================
@@ -461,6 +479,27 @@ class OpLowerer {
});
}
+ [[nodiscard]] bool lowerSplitDouble(Function &F) {
+ IRBuilder<> &IRB = OpBuilder.getIRB();
+ return replaceFunction(F, [&](CallInst *CI) -> Error {
+ IRB.SetInsertPoint(CI);
+
+ Value *Arg0 = CI->getArgOperand(0);
+
+ Type *NewRetTy = OpBuilder.getResSplitDoubleType(M.getContext());
+
+ std::array<Value *, 1> Args{Arg0};
+ Expected<CallInst *> OpCall = OpBuilder.tryCreateOp(
----------------
farzonl wrote:
so what im wondering is it possible to just something that looks like:
```
case Intrinsic::dx_splitdouble:
replaceSplitDoubleCallUsages(...);
replaceFunctionWithOp(F, OpCode);
```
instead of writing our own intrinsic to op code lowering as a one off.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
