https://github.com/KanRobert deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -346,6 +346,9 @@ def FeatureNF : SubtargetFeature<"nf", "HasNF", "true",
"Support status flags update suppression">;
def FeatureCF : SubtargetFeature<"cf", "HasCF", "true",
"Support conditional faulting">;
+de
@@ -5418,6 +5418,8 @@ X86:
operand will get allocated only to RAX -- if two 32-bit operands are needed,
you're better off splitting it yourself, before passing it to the asm
statement.
+- ``jR``: An 8, 16, 32, or 64-bit integer EGPR when EGPR feature is on.
+ Otherwise,
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 2287f8d2353dadcbe210e07776c927c9fabca57c
0fa00f0a6064dd0ab42dfd0863ebdcf90daa1742 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: None (PeterChou1)
Changes
relevant issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/93273
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93276.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-doc/HTMLG
https://github.com/PeterChou1 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93276
relevant issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/93273
>From 1afdd4f6ef0c6e5caad06425cfa83036880ac08b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 02:32:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH
@@ -3833,6 +3833,11 @@ def note_cannot_use_trivial_abi_reason : Note<
"it is polymorphic|"
"it has a base of a non-trivial class type|it has a virtual base|"
"it has a __weak field|it has a field of a non-trivial class type}1">;
+def warn_ppc_musttail_maybe_ignored: Warni
@@ -5418,6 +5418,8 @@ X86:
operand will get allocated only to RAX -- if two 32-bit operands are needed,
you're better off splitting it yourself, before passing it to the asm
statement.
+- ``jR``: An 8, 16, 32, or 64-bit integer EGPR when EGPR feature is on.
--
https://github.com/KanRobert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
FreddyLeaf wrote:
ping @KanRobert
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
>From 41fbc18c7a4a26b11bc4b772bbe2e384ad9d9dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Freddy Ye
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 16:29:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [X86] Support EGPR for inline assembly.
"jR": explictly enabl
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -triple i386-linux -Wno-unknown-pragmas %s -o -
| FileCheck %s
spavloff wrote:
Parsing pragma FENV_ROUND has been moved to the preprocessor.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92699
https://github.com/spavloff updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92699
>From f8cd2539fb7f0388d7f3955f58b61b09da03bf0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Pavlov
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 18:43:08 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Macro for constant rounding mode
MIME-Version: 1.0
Co
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93216
>From 556c622275c630b74c0f9000c5c599ff665595e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 18:45:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] allow `` `@$ `` in raw string delimiters in C++26
@@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
; CHECK-NEXT: AArch64 Stack Tagging
; CHECK-NEXT: SME ABI Pass
; CHECK-NEXT: Exception handling preparation
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
+; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
+; CHECK-NEXT: F
nikic wrote:
Reverted due to major compile-time regressions for unoptimized builds, see
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=910292c3ac2ebe43cdbc90223c6c9702128316db&to=8cc8e5d6c6ac9bfc888f3449f7e424678deae8c2&stat=instructions:u.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/9233
Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2024-05-24T08:14:26+02:00
New Revision: 1579e9ca9ce17364963861517fecf13b00fe4d8a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1579e9ca9ce17364963861517fecf13b00fe4d8a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1579e9ca9ce17364963861517fecf13b00fe4d8a.diff
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
>From 32010ae7e0a47cd4a70a9401980b32ed1d3e10f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:33:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] [C++20] [Modules] Introduce initial support for
C++20 M
jcsxky wrote:
> A test is needed to make the change acceptable but I could not find an easy
> case to provoke the situation. The problem looks to be related to his code:
>
> ```c++
> using size_t = int;
> template class tuple;
>
> template
> struct integral_constant
> {
> static constexpr
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92837
>From 9c2ae2b2b14d27270589f3775df95a7547e74c83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 16:12:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [webkit.RefCntblBaseVirtualDtor] Allow CRTP classes
without a vi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 72200fcc346bee1830d9e640e42d717a55acd74c
69103682e29b58b09da7773e205875b9c75f830e --
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92837
>From 9c2ae2b2b14d27270589f3775df95a7547e74c83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 16:12:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [webkit.RefCntblBaseVirtualDtor] Allow CRTP classes
without a vi
@@ -11,16 +11,134 @@
#include "PtrTypesSemantics.h"
#include "clang/AST/CXXInheritance.h"
#include "clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h"
+#include "clang/AST/StmtVisitor.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/B
@@ -11,16 +11,134 @@
#include "PtrTypesSemantics.h"
#include "clang/AST/CXXInheritance.h"
#include "clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h"
+#include "clang/AST/StmtVisitor.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/B
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@huangqinjin Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a bu
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: huangqinjin
Date: 2024-05-23T22:39:17-07:00
New Revision: 06b5a7c205cbf33d1c40efc77e0820ddd4e060fa
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/06b5a7c205cbf33d1c40efc77e0820ddd4e060fa
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/06b5a7c205cbf33d1c40efc77e0820ddd4e060fa.diff
L
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86265
>From 6e7b38b3e3f781e11db2fa5d552fdfb6123609df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:34:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [Sema] Preserve ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack in
TransformL
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876
>From e40017a2750ee39bfd1a87b5ddea620076bc4419 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 20:18:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial.
---
.../Che
@@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ class RefCounted {
void method();
void someFunction();
int otherFunction();
+ unsigned recursiveTrivialFunction(int n) { return !n ? 1 :
recursiveTrivialFunction(n - 1); }
+ unsigned recursiveComplexFunction(int n) { return !n ? otherFunction() :
chapuni wrote:
@whentojump AFAIK, both of them missed boarding 18.1.6. I'll wait for
opportunities.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92639
>From 5ae3b193a6ec3617c99297da5b8d276b0e5bbc01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 02:17:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [alpha.webkit.UncountedLocalVarsChecker] Detect
assignments to u
@@ -8697,9 +8708,10 @@ static bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(
InvalidTypeKind = CountedByInvalidPointeeTypeKind::FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER;
}
- if (InvalidTypeKind != CountedByInvalidPointeeTypeKind::VALID) {
+ if (InvalidTypeKind != CountedByInvalidPointeeTypeKind::VALID
@@ -425,6 +425,12 @@ Attribute Changes in Clang
size_t count;
};
+- The attributes ``sized_by``, ``counted_by_or_null`` and ``sized_by_or_null```
+ have been added as variants on ``counted_by``, each with slightly different
semantics.
+ ``sized_by`` takes a byte
@@ -8641,22 +8641,33 @@ enum class CountedByInvalidPointeeTypeKind {
VALID,
};
-static bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(
-Sema &S, FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &Decls) {
+static bool
+CheckCountedByAttrOnField(Sema &S, FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E,
+
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8641,22 +8641,33 @@ enum class CountedByInvalidPointeeTypeKind {
VALID,
};
-static bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(
-Sema &S, FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &Decls) {
+static bool
+CheckCountedByAttrOnField(Sema &S, FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E,
+
@@ -8641,22 +8641,33 @@ enum class CountedByInvalidPointeeTypeKind {
VALID,
};
-static bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(
-Sema &S, FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &Decls) {
+static bool
+CheckCountedByAttrOnField(Sema &S, FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E,
+
https://github.com/delcypher requested changes to this pull request.
Looks pretty good. I have some minor comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
rniwa wrote:
> (It might be a good idea to add comments to those parts of the code to make
> sure the reader knows that it was intentional.)
Ok, I was gonna say I'd add tests and then realized that the error message says
"local variable" to both static local as well as global variables. That's
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-webassembly
Author: Brendan Dahl (brendandahl)
Changes
Specified at:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/half-precision/blob/29a9b9462c9285d4ccc1a5dc39214ddfd1892658/proposals/half-precision/Overview.md
Note: the current sp
https://github.com/brendandahl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93272
Specified at:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/half-precision/blob/29a9b9462c9285d4ccc1a5dc39214ddfd1892658/proposals/half-precision/Overview.md
Note: the current spec has f16x8.extract_lane as opcode 0x124, bu
https://github.com/SixWeining approved this pull request.
LGTM from the LoongArch side. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93179
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
@@ -3833,6 +3833,11 @@ def note_cannot_use_trivial_abi_reason : Note<
"it is polymorphic|"
"it has a base of a non-trivial class type|it has a virtual base|"
"it has a __weak field|it has a field of a non-trivial class type}1">;
+def warn_ppc_musttail_maybe_ignored: Warni
https://github.com/mizvekov requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
whentojump wrote:
Thanks everyone!
I notice that #87000 has been tagged with release milestone. I can handle the
backport there. Maybe in a few days? Or sooner if that's needed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89869
___
cfe-commits mailing
@@ -7518,6 +7523,154 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+std::optional
+Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, StringRef AttributeName) {
+ auto BadExpr = [&]() {
+Diag(CondExpr->get
@@ -7518,6 +7523,154 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+std::optional
+Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, StringRef AttributeName) {
+ auto BadExpr = [&]() {
+Diag(CondExpr->get
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7518,6 +7523,154 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+std::optional
+Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, StringRef AttributeName) {
+ auto BadExpr = [&]() {
+Diag(CondExpr->get
@@ -4640,6 +4647,306 @@ class FunctionNoProtoType : public FunctionType, public
llvm::FoldingSetNode {
}
};
+//
--
+
+/// Represents an abstract function effect, using just an enumeration
describi
@@ -7518,6 +7523,154 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+std::optional
+Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, StringRef AttributeName) {
+ auto BadExpr = [&]() {
+Diag(CondExpr->get
@@ -7518,6 +7523,154 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+std::optional
+Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, StringRef AttributeName) {
+ auto BadExpr = [&]() {
+Diag(CondExpr->get
@@ -7518,6 +7523,154 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+std::optional
+Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, StringRef AttributeName) {
+ auto BadExpr = [&]() {
+Diag(CondExpr->get
@@ -4780,42 +4781,38 @@ struct FunctionEffectWithCondition {
/// Return a textual description of the effect, and its condition, if any.
std::string description() const;
-
- friend bool operator<(const FunctionEffectWithCondition &LHS,
-const Functi
@@ -1870,6 +1870,28 @@ bool Sema::IsFunctionConversion(QualType FromType,
QualType ToType,
FromFn = QT->getAs();
Changed = true;
}
+
+// For C, when called from checkPointerTypesForAssignment,
+// we need not to alter FromFn, or else even an innocuous c
@@ -4640,6 +4647,306 @@ class FunctionNoProtoType : public FunctionType, public
llvm::FoldingSetNode {
}
};
+//
--
+
+/// Represents an abstract function effect, using just an enumeration
describi
@@ -4640,6 +4647,306 @@ class FunctionNoProtoType : public FunctionType, public
llvm::FoldingSetNode {
}
};
+//
--
+
+/// Represents an abstract function effect, using just an enumeration
describi
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4640,6 +4647,306 @@ class FunctionNoProtoType : public FunctionType, public
llvm::FoldingSetNode {
}
};
+//
--
+
+/// Represents an abstract function effect, using just an enumeration
describi
https://github.com/Sirraide requested changes to this pull request.
A few more minor things, but I think this should mostly be done after this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http
@@ -1488,12 +1488,91 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
RequiresDoesNotChangeParsingOfTheRest) {
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsAsm) {
auto Tokens = annotate("__asm{\n"
- "a:\n"
- "};");
- ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << To
@@ -1488,12 +1488,91 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
RequiresDoesNotChangeParsingOfTheRest) {
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsAsm) {
auto Tokens = annotate("__asm{\n"
- "a:\n"
- "};");
- ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << To
@@ -1488,12 +1488,91 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
RequiresDoesNotChangeParsingOfTheRest) {
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsAsm) {
auto Tokens = annotate("__asm{\n"
- "a:\n"
- "};");
- ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << To
@@ -1426,12 +1428,9 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
// the colon are passed as macro arguments.
Tok->setType(TT_ObjCMethodExpr);
} else if (Contexts.back().ContextKind == tok::l_paren &&
- !Line.InPragmaDirective) {
-if (Style.isTableGe
@@ -1488,12 +1488,91 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
RequiresDoesNotChangeParsingOfTheRest) {
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsAsm) {
auto Tokens = annotate("__asm{\n"
- "a:\n"
- "};");
- ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << To
mizvekov wrote:
This missed adding support to StructuralValue template arguments to the
template differ.
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93265
Te support is still missing, we are just avoiding the crash for now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041
___
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-coroutines
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Previously we allow `[[clang::coro_wrapper]]` to be marked with function to
allow it to not be checked by `[[clang::coro_return_type]]`.
But in our internal practice, there are classes can be return ty
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93268
Previously we allow `[[clang::coro_wrapper]]` to be marked with function to
allow it to not be checked by `[[clang::coro_return_type]]`.
But in our internal practice, there are classes can be return type of
aheejin wrote:
I guess you've likely already found it but anyway it's here:
https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access
It's basically "Email Chris".
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
c
https://github.com/chapuni closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Wentao Zhang
Date: 2024-05-24T12:06:43+09:00
New Revision: f9e9e599c0138b2403bc89934ddace0c2a8d84d6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f9e9e599c0138b2403bc89934ddace0c2a8d84d6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f9e9e599c0138b2403bc89934ddace0c2a8d84d6.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Chen Zheng (chenzheng1030)
Changes
musttail does not often possible to be generated on PPC targets as when calling
to a function defined in another module, PPC needs to restore the TOC pointer.
To restore the TOC pointer, compiler
https://github.com/aheejin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Brendan Dahl
Date: 2024-05-23T20:05:22-07:00
New Revision: 09c5525610579d71f45502c304146db1d7b38107
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09c5525610579d71f45502c304146db1d7b38107
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09c5525610579d71f45502c304146db1d7b38107.diff
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93267
musttail does not often possible to be generated on PPC targets as when calling
to a function defined in another module, PPC needs to restore the TOC pointer.
To restore the TOC pointer, compiler needs to
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This was not implemented in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041
when StructuralValue TemplateArguments were originally added.
This patch does not implement this functionality, it just falls b
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93265
This was not implemented in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041
when StructuralValue TemplateArguments were originally added.
This patch does not implement this functionality, it just falls back to
@@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ def warn_cxx98_compat_raw_string_literal : Warning<
"raw string literals are incompatible with C++98">,
InGroup, DefaultIgnore;
+def warn_cxx26_compat_raw_string_literal_character_set : Warning<
+ "'%0'in a raw string literal delimiter is incompatible
@@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ def warn_cxx98_compat_raw_string_literal : Warning<
"raw string literals are incompatible with C++98">,
InGroup, DefaultIgnore;
+def warn_cxx26_compat_raw_string_literal_character_set : Warning<
+ "'%0'in a raw string literal delimiter is incompatible
@@ -11,16 +11,134 @@
#include "PtrTypesSemantics.h"
#include "clang/AST/CXXInheritance.h"
#include "clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h"
+#include "clang/AST/StmtVisitor.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/B
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
I think we can land this given it is approved and the CI is green
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aaupov closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91906
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
huangqinjin wrote:
> @huangqinjin Try rebasing you changes on top of latest main. Looks like
> Windows CI is passing there including flang commits which are the source
> files that are causing msvc to run out of heap space.
Thanks for the advice. CI green now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro
FreddyLeaf wrote:
> Not sure - CI checks aren't running either
Woops, I was thinking that is CI checks. I was just wondering for CI checks.
Now it's recovered. Thanks anyway!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93136
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+//===--- UseInternalLinkageCheck.cpp -
clang-tidy--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
aaupov wrote:
> Could you elaborate a bit better on why do we need a deleted block to be
> present in the table? My memory fails me, aren't we using the translation
> table just to map samples collected on the bolted binary? Where do the
> deleted blocks become a problem?
>
> Other than the m
@@ -48,10 +48,13 @@ uint8x16x4_t test_vld4q_u8(const uint8_t *addr)
// CHECK-LABEL: @test_vst2q_u32(
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
-// CHECK-NEXT:[[VALUE_COERCE_FCA_0_0_EXTRACT:%.*]] = extractvalue
[[STRUCT_UINT32X4X2_T:%.*]] [[VALUE_COERCE:%.*]], 0, 0
-// CHECK-NEXT:[[VALUE
@@ -44,20 +44,20 @@ struct S1 f1(struct S1 s1) { return s1; }
// CHECK-SOFT: define{{.*}} void @_Z2f22S2(ptr dead_on_unwind noalias
nocapture writable writeonly sret(%struct.S2) align 8 %agg.result, [4 x i32]
%s2.coerce)
// CHECK-HARD: define{{.*}} arm_aapcs_vfpcc [2 x <2 x
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ int mane() {
char1 f1{1};
char1 f2{1};
-// CHECK: [[TMP:%.+]] = alloca i16
efriedma-quic wrote:
The revised version of casting integers is a bit more aggressive; it's hard to
make it precisely match the old code while still preservi
@@ -177,7 +179,12 @@ kernel void KernelTwoMember(struct StructTwoMember u) {
// AMDGCN-LABEL: define{{.*}} amdgpu_kernel void @KernelLargeTwoMember
// AMDGCN-SAME: (%struct.LargeStructTwoMember %[[u_coerce:.*]])
// AMDGCN: %[[u:.*]] = alloca %struct.LargeStructTwoMember, alig
@@ -11,16 +11,134 @@
#include "PtrTypesSemantics.h"
#include "clang/AST/CXXInheritance.h"
#include "clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h"
+#include "clang/AST/StmtVisitor.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/B
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 0012b1ea84e671a9e0c9f7f2d1564315ed9cbcca
19f3b677d92ed88b825b455d738055da05f91e0d --
@@ -11,16 +11,134 @@
#include "PtrTypesSemantics.h"
#include "clang/AST/CXXInheritance.h"
#include "clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h"
+#include "clang/AST/StmtVisitor.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/B
@@ -11,16 +11,134 @@
#include "PtrTypesSemantics.h"
#include "clang/AST/CXXInheritance.h"
#include "clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h"
+#include "clang/AST/StmtVisitor.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/B
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93115
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 543 matches
Mail list logo
