================
@@ -1488,12 +1488,91 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
RequiresDoesNotChangeParsingOfTheRest) {
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsAsm) {
auto Tokens = annotate("__asm{\n"
- "a:\n"
- "};");
- ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << Tokens;
+ "\"a\":\n"
+ ": x\n"
+ ":};");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 10u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[0], tok::kw_asm, TT_Unknown);
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[1], tok::l_brace, TT_InlineASMBrace);
- EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::r_brace, TT_InlineASMBrace);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[6], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::r_brace, TT_InlineASMBrace);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("__asm__ volatile (\n"
+ "\"a\":\n"
+ ": x\n"
+ ":);");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 11u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[0], tok::kw_asm, TT_Unknown);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("asm volatile (\n"
+ "\"a\":\n"
+ ": x\n"
+ ":);");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 11u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[0], tok::kw_asm, TT_Unknown);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::colon, TT_InlineASMColon);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("__asm__ volatile (\n"
----------------
owenca wrote:
Remove `volatile` to have a little more coverage.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92617
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
