On 21.07.2017 13:37, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users wrote:
To access the new machine, "ssh my_user_lo...@gcc202.fsffrance.org"
should
work for all farm accounts.
Hi Baptiste,
It doesn't.
gcc110 -- good:
$ ssh gcc110.fsffrance.org
Last login: Sat Jul 1 14:18:27 2017 from 70.79.163.252
On 27.07.2017 13:34, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:03:18PM -0700, Kaz Kylheku via cfarm-users
wrote:
On 21.07.2017 13:37, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users wrote:
>To access the new machine, "ssh my_user_lo...@gcc202.fsffrance.org"
>should
>work for all
On 2019-09-09 14:16, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote:
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
When testing on gcc110.fsffrance.org I got confused as there were no
function descriptors, and the float abi to call varargs functions did
not match.
Indeed, function descriptors are a difference b
On 2021-03-20 14:51, CFarm Annoucements via cfarm-announces wrote:
We are happy to announce the availability of a new MiniMac M1 (with
Apple-Silicon arm64 cpu architecture).
Hi!
Thanks for making this machine available.
On Mac OS, there are, by default, bizarre restrictions on IP datagram
si
On 2021-03-24 13:45, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Kaz,
On Mac OS, there are, by default, bizarre restrictions on IP datagram
sizes
in the protocol stack.
...
I have a test case involving UDP that works on numerous platforms, the
oddball being MacOS
So, the test machine was useful to you: it has tol
Hi,
The one Alpine Linux machine has a run-time .so file for libffi, but
pkg-config knows nothing about it, and the header is nowhere
to be found.
Would it be possible to install the libffi-dev package?
Thanks.
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-use
On 2022-09-18 07:14, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote:
> On the gcc119 (AIX 7.2) machine, there are two problems:
Should I be porting anythnig to AIX? Does anyone use it any more?
Simple code like this doesn't compile:
#include
// ...
void foo(struct in6_addr *addr)
{
return bar
On 2022-09-20 14:29, Bruno Haible wrote:
> This is on gcc119.fsffrance.org (AIX 7.2). About which AIX and GCC versions
> were you complaining?
I neglected to mention: there are two areas in the header file
which define that same structure, with different member names and different
definitions of
On 2022-09-21 01:32, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> gcc -E - -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500
>
> Defining _XOPEN_SOURCE — or worse, _POSIX_SOURCE — on arbitrary platforms
> is a recipe for producing compilation errors.
>
> On HP-UX/hppa, -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 is useful.
> On HP-UX/ia64, -D_XOPEN_S
On 2022-09-21 02:49, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Well this is just user error. Unless I'm mistaken, _XOPEN_SOURCE=500
> selects a standard that doesn't even define struct in6_addr.
That is almost certainly correct; but the issue reproduces with 700,
which I tried first. Then I found the smallest val
10 matches
Mail list logo
