On 2019-09-09 14:16, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote:
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
When testing on gcc110.fsffrance.org I got confused as there were no
function descriptors, and the float abi to call varargs functions did
not match.
Indeed, function descriptors are a difference between the ABIs as well:
Interesting. All this explains the proliferation of code in libffi:
https://github.com/libffi/libffi/tree/master/src/powerpc
Good to know.
What I'm now wondering is whether my context saving/restoring assembly
code for PPC has any ABI "gotcha" in it. I've only tested in on the
above
gcc110 machine.
http://www.kylheku.com/cgit/txr/tree/jmp.S#n238
_______________________________________________
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
