On 18/01/2018, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users
wrote:
> I can't speak for others, but I would not mind being subject to a
> script that removes temporary object files that are over N days old.
> In fact I would welcome it because I am forgetful at times.
Traditionally, such a script is called "fil
find /home \( \
\( -name '*.o' -a \! -atime +7 \) \
On 19/01/2018, Martin Guy wrote:
> On 18/01/2018, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users
> wrote:
>> I can't speak for others, but I would not mind being subject to a
>> script that removes temporary object files that are over N days old.
>> I
On 19/01/2018, Martin Guy wrote:
> find /home \( \
> \( -name '*.o' -a \! -atime +7 \) \
Sorry, finger trouble.
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Martin Guy via cfarm-users
wrote:
> On 18/01/2018, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users
> wrote:
>> I can't speak for others, but I would not mind being subject to a
>> script that removes temporary object files that are over N days old.
>> In fact I would welcome it be
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:05:48PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote:
> find /home \( \
> \( -name '*.o' -a \! -atime +7 \) \
I veto this 400%. People have valuable .o files, and this is not very
effective anyway (other files take up more space).
Segher
___
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:05:48PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote:
>> find /home \( \
>> \( -name '*.o' -a \! -atime +7 \) \
>
> I veto this 400%. People have valuable .o files, and this is not very
> e
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:15 AM, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:05:48PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote:
>>> find /home \( \
>>> \( -name '*.o' -a \! -atime +7 \)
Maybe we could combine an automated cleaner with a user defined ignore file.
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
On 19/01/2018, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:05:48PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users
>> wrote:
>>> find /home \( \
>>> \( -name '*.o' -a \! -atime +7 \) \
>> I veto thi
However, automativally cleaning /tmp /var/tmp /usr/tmp is always good,
say after 24h of non-use. Someone said that there is bulk accumulating
in /tmp on some machines that would be cleaned at reboot but, of
course, the GCC Compile Farm machines run for years uninterruptedly...
m
___
Excuse the prolixity. The big stuff is the source. What i usually do
is, while downloading, unpacking, configuring and compiling stuff, is
to keep a window open in which I record the runes to do all this,
modifying it as I find solutions that work. In practice i usually have
to run such a script by
For experimental modifications to the source tree, instead, patch files.
Not only does this reduce disk usag by 99.%, but it documents
the build process in a way that is testable (if it doesn't run, it
isn't right)
cheers
M
___
cfarm-users ma
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:29:23PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote:
> On 19/01/2018, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:05:48PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users
> >> w
I agree with Segher on this. the only way for us to all share the
machines gracefully without constricting system limits and automatic
deletions is for each user to heuristically address their own usage
needs and delete what they don't need accordingly. For me, that
happens to be nearly everything,
Hi,
Could anyone install this fix on gcc119?
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IV98603
I hit the same linker error while building Ruby, and this fix might solve
it.
Thanks,
Rei Odaira
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.teta
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:22 PM, 大平怜 via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could anyone install this fix on gcc119?
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IV98603
>
> I hit the same linker error while building Ruby, and this fix might solve
> it.
I am planning to update gcc119 to the late
16 matches
Mail list logo
