Re: [cfarm-users] Is there any computer with armhf architecture on cfarm?

On Sun, Jul 06, 2025 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote: > > On 06/07/25 09:54, Jaroslav Fojtik via cfarm-users wrote: > > Is there any accessible computer with armhf architecture on cfarm? > > armhf isn'r a hardware type, it's the Debian name for their repo > > compiled for t

Re: [cfarm-users] cfarm427 and cfarm430 crashing

Hi! On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 12:01:59AM +0900, Luke Yasuda via cfarm-users wrote: > On 2025-06-20 14:19, Pierre Muller via cfarm-users wrote: > > Is it a problem that these interrupted tests generate a dmesg entry? > > Oh, that's what it was. It's not a problem to me, but if a test takes > too lo

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage---low priority batch jobs

On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 10:25:11PM +, mirabilos via cfarm-users wrote: > In general I’d ask people who run longer-term jobs to nice(1) > them, and people who do builds that aren’t over in a handful > of minutes to limit parallelisation, so that those of us who > do quick-shot interactive testin

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage---low priority batch jobs

On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 08:46:27PM -0500, Luke Dashjr via cfarm-users wrote: > Bitcoin is in fact good for the environment, despite whatever FUD you > dig up on Wikipedia (which is where credibility is truly lacking). No, bitcoin is terrible for the environment. Pretending that is not true is at

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage---low priority batch jobs

On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 07:19:24PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote: > Which is why I am looking for solutions that also give us conventions > for "politely" running other jobs like CI or fuzzing, so we get > /something/ even if the end result is that the cfarm proves > uninteresting

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage---low priority batch jobs

On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 12:20:52PM +, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jan 2025, 01:40 Jacob Bachmeyer, wrote: > [...], and discriminating against some cryptocurrency project > is fine because being a crypto-bro is not a legally protected > characteristic. Them's fighting wo

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage

On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 12:25:02AM +0100, Gregor Riepl via cfarm-users wrote: > >We want nothing at all to do with any of it (well, I don't, at least), > >even if not all of it is directly against the rules, does not violate > >acceptable use directly: it is just distasteful. > > > >The cfarm is su

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage

On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 04:34:13PM -0500, Luke Dashjr via cfarm-users wrote: > On 1/1/25 4:25 PM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > >"Crypto" has absolutely nothing to do with cryptography. A lot more > >with capitalism or with casinos, it depends on your exac

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:51:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > Forgive my ignorance... when you say "crypto-related," do you mean > just "cryptocurrency" or "mining" operations? Or does that include > cryptographic libraries like Botan, Crypto++ and OpenSSL. "Crypto" has absolut

Re: [cfarm-users] POSIX shells

On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 03:29:58AM +, Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users wrote: > Thorsten Glaser via cfarm-users writes: > > >So, please keep it that way ;-) > > +1. Having access to a very diverse range of compilers and build > environments, even if some are broken-by-design from the vendor, i

Re: [cfarm-users] Install Ada compiler on cfarm185

Hi! On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 11:07:35AM -0400, Simon Marchi via cfarm-users wrote: > I would like to run some Ada tests from the GDB testsuite on an AArch64 > machine. Would it be possible to install the Ada compiler on cfarm185? > I believe the package is named gcc-gnat on Red Hat-like distros.

Re: [cfarm-users] Is there a stanrdard set of installed stuff on cfarm machines?

Hi! On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:10:44AM +0200, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote: > I was wondering if there is, or could be, a standard set of utilities > and libraries installed on cfarm machines. For example I'm trying to > compile and link against libboost_thread, but find it is installed on

Re: [cfarm-users] Install podman on gcc120.fsffrance.org

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 04:05:59PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 15:59, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 04:04:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > Would be pos

Re: [cfarm-users] Install podman on gcc120.fsffrance.org

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 04:04:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer via cfarm-users wrote: > Would be possible to install podman on gcc120.fsffrance.org Wow, that brings in all kinds of container and selinux stuff. But, installed :-) > I expect it to be useful out of the box in rootless mode, and no new >

Re: [cfarm-users] Does cfarm421 need more RAM?

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 07:51:17PM -0700, Daniel B. Widdis via cfarm-users wrote: > HP built a system with 160 TB back in 2017 [1]. That's really not too far > off! Such a machine will be welcome in the cfarm ;-) Segher ___ cfarm-users mailing list c

Re: [cfarm-users] Does cfarm421 need more RAM?

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:50:38PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote: > Pierre's current solution will work until someone actually has a machine > with about 4 PB of RAM. $ free -h totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 2.0Ti

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC repository clones (was: gcc110 /home is now 98% full)

On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 01:38:42AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre via cfarm-users wrote: > On 2024-03-07 18:25:15 -0600, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > > The full GCC repo is smaller than a single trunk checkout, fwiw. > > So, what would be needed is deduplication at the fi

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC repository clones (was: gcc110 /home is now 98% full)

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:55:51PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > >But many, many of those are weeks out of date so almost certainly > >completely useless. > > > > I seem to remember that Git can use another local reposito

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 /home is now 98% full

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:28:35PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Although I know that we are digressing since gcc110 does not use a > log-structured filesystem, isn't the conclusion from that paper that > disk utilization should be kept below 80% for log-structured > filesystems independent of th

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 /home is now 98% full

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:28:13AM -0800, Bart Van Assche via cfarm-users wrote: > > On 3/7/24 01:30, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote: > >which usually begins to degrade above 80% and seriously above 90% if > >I remember correctly. > I think that there is a significant difference between log-stru

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 /home is now 98% full

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:25:45PM +, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 15:20, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:32 +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > Il 06/03/24 20:31, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users ha scritto:

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 /home is now 98% full

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 10:30:13AM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote: > >426Gsegher > > > >and a handful of folks with multi-dozen GB homes. > > What a good thing gcc110 has such an enormous disc if people can need so > much space to achieve certain effects The disk of gcc110 is too sm

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 /home is now 98% full

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:31:57PM -0600, Zach van Rijn wrote: > On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 13:27 -0500, Sean McGovern via cfarm-users > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [seanmcg@gcc1-power7 Projects]$ df -h | grep /home > > /dev/md41.6T 1.5T 44G 98% /home > > > > For such a large disk, this is ver

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 /home is now 98% full

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:27:11PM -0500, Sean McGovern via cfarm-users wrote: > [seanmcg@gcc1-power7 Projects]$ df -h | grep /home > /dev/md41.6T 1.5T 44G 98% /home > > For such a large disk, this is very full. > I know I am not an administrator, but can I ask that users clean their >

Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-admins] authorized_keys file Synced on 29/35 machines

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 08:43:53AM +0800, Lipeng Zhu wrote: > >You don't say what machine(s) you tried to connect to, so we cannot help > >you much. "ssh -v" will tell > >you more about what is wrong, too. > > Thanks for your quick response. > The machines I connected is ssh lip...@cfarm120.cfar

Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-admins] authorized_keys file Synced on 29/35 machines

Hi! On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:15:48PM +0800, Lipeng Zhu via cfarm-admins wrote: > I added some new ssh keys to my account(lipzhu), but the page > https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/sshkey/list/ said "authorized_keys file > Synced on 29/35 machines" and hung there for some time. I can't ssh to > mac

Re: [cfarm-users] account email address

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:00:38PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > One little complication is that OpenSSH 8.5 (2021-03-03) renamed > PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes to PubkeyAcceptedAlgorithms, though the old name > still works as an alias. I never even noticed :-) The new name is better, more in line with

Re: [cfarm-users] Is RSA really insecure?

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:22:28AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva via cfarm-users wrote: > On Dec 13, 2023, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > > This is a pet peeve of mine: unless you have a citation for an actual > > viable attack on RSA as used in SSH, or perhaps on the protocol SSH > > uses for RSA-based authe

Re: [cfarm-users] account email address

Hi! On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 02:57:27AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva via cfarm-users wrote: > I had some trouble accessing gcc210 and gcc211, because openssh on my > end wouldn't allow ssh-rsa host and authorized keys any more. I've > (insecurely) sorted that out with: > > PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes +ssh

Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-announces] Transition to the new cfarm.net domain name

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 09:01:53PM +0200, CFarm Annoucements via cfarm-announces wrote: > The transition to our new cfarm.net domain is complete. All machines are > now referred to as cfarmXX, or cfarmXX.cfarm.net. The old naming > convention and domain (gccXX and gccXX.fsffrance.org) are obsolete

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 04:36:49PM +, mirabilos via cfarm-users wrote: > Noah Misch via cfarm-users dixit: > > >/opt/IBM/openxlC/17.1.1/bin/ibm-clang_r is the new system's XLC. > > Huh, so it’s also “just another LLVM+Clang”, not the old xlC? No, it is openxlc. It is not just standard LLVM.

Re: [cfarm-users] Syncing ssh keys

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 08:05:47PM -0500, Austin English wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 7:18 AM Segher Boessenkool < > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 01:49:10AM -0500, Austin English via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > I recently added some new ssh keys to my accou

Re: [cfarm-users] Syncing ssh keys

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 01:49:10AM -0500, Austin English via cfarm-users wrote: > I recently added some new ssh keys to my account. It's been a few days (3 > days, 9 hours according to https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/sshkey/list/), but > they haven't synced. > > Do I need to do something on my end t

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc102 (sparc64) down again for maintenance/repairs

Hi Zach, On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 09:12:06AM -0600, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote: > On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 15:42 +0100, Pierre Muller via cfarm-users > wrote: > > ... > > > > It still seems that there are CPU lockup :-( *Soft* lockups. Tasks that were unresponsive for more than 20s. Thi

Re: [cfarm-users] Unable to git pull on gcc112

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 09:24:20PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote: > Security is always a trade-off and is never entirely without costs. I > stand by my original position that GitHub removing choice from the user > here is bad and wrong. Rightly, it is up to you to balance risk vs

Re: [cfarm-users] Unable to git pull on gcc112

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:01:26PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote: > Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > >fatal: remote error: > > The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported. > > While this does not help you, the root of this latter problem seems to > b

Re: [cfarm-users] Does gcc304 sync certificates?

On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 02:14:53PM -0800, Daniel Widdis wrote: > Given one needs to actually be on the machine to edit that file, I understood > the advice to use the web form (which helpfully shows the authorized_keys > file contents on it). > > So, given that rsa key is supposed to work, this

Re: [cfarm-users] Does gcc304 sync certificates?

On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 02:28:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 2:24 PM Daniel Widdis via cfarm-users > wrote: > > ... > > I’ve never been able to log into the macOS M1 machine, gcc304. It asks for > > a password (which implies the certificate isn’t sync

Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-announces] New Loongson 3A5000 machines: gcc400 and gcc401

Hi! On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 07:54:33PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Jan 08 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > For example, that en_US.UTF-8 (as it is on Mac OS) will not work on most > > Linux systems, which use en_US.utf8 instead. > > en_US.UTF-8 works perfectly well on glibc. In fact,

Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-announces] New Loongson 3A5000 machines: gcc400 and gcc401

On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:51:54AM +0100, Andreas Schwab via cfarm-users wrote: > On Jan 07 2022, Christian Jullien via cfarm-users wrote: > > Also, the following variables are set > > > > LANG=zh_CN > > LC_ALL=zh_CN > > LC_CTYPE=zh_CN > > LC_NUMERIC=zh_CN > > LC_TYPE=zh_CN > > > > I set them in my

Re: [cfarm-users] Best practices for not hogging resources (nice, ionice, ramdisk etc.)

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 05:14:34PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Per Segher's recent-ish mail about gcc185: > > You can connect to the machine at gcc185.fsffrance.org, default SSH > port. Please be aware and mindful of others (do not hog all CPU, all > memory, all disk space

[cfarm-users] Retiring gcc113..gcc116

We plan to retire the aarch64 machines gcc113, gcc114, gcc115, and gcc116 in a few weeks. These machines are old and have hardware as well as software problems now (gcc116 already took itself down). There still will be gcc80, gcc117, gcc118, as well as the brand spanking new gcc185 for all your a

[cfarm-users] New aarch64 machine gcc185

We have a new aarch64 machine, gcc185. It is a 32-core 3.3GHz Lenovo HR350A running CentOS 8. Thanks to OSUOSL for the machine and the hosting! You can connect to the machine at gcc185.fsffrance.org, default SSH port. Please be aware and mindful of others (do not hog all CPU, all memory, all di

Re: [cfarm-users] Max UDP dgram size on M1 machine (gcc304)

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:30:03PM -0700, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > On 2021-03-24 16:45, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 08:39:10AM -0700, Kaz Kylheku via cfarm-users > >wrote: > >The default is not a restriction, but meant for good performance: > >it is 9216, which is the maximum

Re: [cfarm-users] Max UDP dgram size on M1 machine (gcc304)

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 08:39:10AM -0700, Kaz Kylheku via cfarm-users wrote: > On Mac OS, there are, by default, bizarre restrictions on IP datagram > sizes > in the protocol stack. > > Would it be possible to put this configuration into effect: > >sysctl -w net.inet.udp.maxdgram=65535 The

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220: packages autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.16.2 missing

Hi! On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:42:00PM +0100, Francois-Xavier Le Bail via cfarm-users wrote: > Could someone add packages autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.16.2 on gcc220? Installed. Enjoy, Segher (p.s. It's better not to use cfarm-users@ for this kind of thing; please use cfarm-admins@, instead.

Re: [cfarm-users] Temporarily disabling SMT

Hi Alexander, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 05:24:20PM +0200, Alexander Kruppa via cfarm-users wrote: > would it be possible to allow users to disable SMT (a.k.a. hyperthreading) > temporarily on one cpu core? This would be useful for doing timing runs > that are not affected by other processes running

Re: [cfarm-users] maintenance of gcc202 and gcc203

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:11:01PM +0300, Anatoly Pugachev via cfarm-users wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 1:17 PM Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > There's unexpected maintenance (reachability) of gcc202 and gcc203 due > > to the router failure... > > JFYI, both servers should wor

Re: [cfarm-users] How to request OS updates for OSUOSL-owned machines?

Hi! On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:17:56AM -0300, Luis Machado via cfarm-users wrote: > It seems we have 4 AArch64 machines running Ubuntu 14.04. That is pretty > old and likely not that useful anymore. > > I looked around on the GCC farm site, but couldn't find any owner > contact information. >

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 runaway processes

Hi! On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 05:41:55PM +0200, Jonas Maebe via cfarm-users wrote: > On gcc110, there are two seemingly runaway processes that have been > running since November last year, and that are both listed as using 64% > of CPU in top(as): > > ptc 8126816 1.3 0.0 8704 9812 pts/0 A

Re: [cfarm-users] Fixing CPU/core/threads count

Hi! On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 08:28:49PM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users wrote: > Following up on a thread from 2018 [1], we still have issue with counting > the number of CPU, cores and threads on "exotic" machines. > > I gave a try at hwloc on all farm machines, below is the result where

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC 112 Disk Full

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 02:10:11PM -0500, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users wrote: > GCC 112 disk is full. Please clean up voluntarily or the system will > be cleaned up involuntarily. The system does not have enough > diskspace for each user to checkout the GCC Git tree. Five people use 50GB or mo

Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-admins] gcc303 is out of space on /

[cc: cfarm-users@] On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 04:01:47PM -0600, Christian Biesinger via cfarm-admins wrote: > I noticed that gcc303 (FreeBSD) is out of space on the root partition, > which includes /tmp. This makes it hard to use: > > $ df -h > Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounte

Re: [cfarm-users] What is the name of the compiler on GCC118

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 03:04:42PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > What is the name of the compiler on GCC118? "gcc", of course :-) > $ find / -name 'g++' 2>/dev/null > /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/g++ > $ I installed a C++ compiler for you (and all other languages GCC s

Re: [cfarm-users] Please check your memory usage on GCC117

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:42:14AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > I'm catching a OOM exception while trying to compile a source file on GCC117: > > $ make > g++ -DNDEBUG -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe -c xts.cpp > virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory > GNUmakefile:1625: r

Re: [cfarm-users] PowerPC 32 bit abi on gcc110.fsffrance.org

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Boessenkool wrote: > > > not on powerpc64-elfv2-linux!). > > > > I think you mean powerpc64le-linux? > > Yes, this is the same thing. The ABI indicator for this ABI is the > preprocessor define _CALL_ELF=2; it is used on the distros

Re: [cfarm-users] PowerPC 32 bit abi on gcc110.fsffrance.org

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:16:44PM +0200, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote: > Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > > When testing on gcc110.fsffrance.org I got confused as there were no > > function descriptors, and the float abi to call varargs functions did > > not match. > > Indeed, func

Re: [cfarm-users] PowerPC 32 bit abi on gcc110.fsffrance.org

On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 04:10:52PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > That is the powerpc64-linux ABI, also knows as ELFv1. This is close to > the (much newer) ELFv2 ABI, but there are some important differences: it > has a smaller size minimum stack frame, it doe

Re: [cfarm-users] PowerPC 32 bit abi on gcc110.fsffrance.org

Hi! On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 05:47:45PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade via cfarm-users wrote: > Just testing for hopefully soon new release of GNU Lightning, I noticed > now when building with -m32 it appears to have a different abi that I > could not find any description searching on goo

Re: [cfarm-users] CPU speeds of GCC135?

On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:08:58PM -0400, Chuck Atkins via cfarm-users wrote: > It could be also that you're hitting thread migration across cores, thus > missing out on the clock ramp up. I saw quite a few issues with that on > the p8 running benchmarks a while back. If that's the case then you

Re: [cfarm-users] SSH key fingerprints for gcc farm machine

On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:53:52PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote: > But even a list on an https protected web page seems better than just > having to trust on first use. Yes, and that will be pretty easy to provide, I think. Segher ___ cfarm-users mailing li

Re: [cfarm-users] SSH key fingerprints for gcc farm machine

Hi Lzu, On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 11:50:14PM +0700, Lzu Tao via cfarm-users wrote: > Do we have SSH key fingerprints of each gcc farm machine > in the website? I need it when connecting to each machine > for security purposes. Do you want just the a list of the fingerprints, not signed or anything?

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 nearly out of disk space in /tmp/ (94% full, 115MB free)

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:15:38AM +, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 10:04, Tomas Härdin via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > ons 2019-03-27 klockan 09:01 +0100 skrev Martin Guy via cfarm-users: > > > They probably didn't even know that their work had filled /tmp s

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 nearly out of disk space in /tmp/ (94% full, 115MB free)

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:55:01AM +, Peter Maydell via cfarm-users wrote: > Hi; the gcc110 compile farm machine has a separately mounted /tmp/ > filesystem, which is currently 94% full (and which causes some test > cases I have to fail because they can't create files in /tmp/). > Could people

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 crash

Hi Adhemerval, On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:43:57AM -0200, zatrazz via cfarm-users wrote: > I think I hit a nasty kernel bug testing rt_sigreturn syscall while trying > to understand why it was failing on powerpc64. Thanks for letting use know. > If anyone is curious I > changed the way swapcontex

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC112 disk space

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:40:07AM -0800, Noah Misch via cfarm-users wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 05:46:12PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote: > > On 21/01/2019, Aymeric via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > here is the list of top 10 user, if you're in > > > you should consider making some

Re: [cfarm-users] Correct number of CPU/cores/threads (Was: Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm)

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:13:03PM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > On 20-12-18, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:49:59PM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > So, I just added pretty usage bars [1] to the list of machine :) > > > > Thanks. But maybe it

Re: [cfarm-users] Correct number of CPU/cores/threads (Was: Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm)

Hi! On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:49:59PM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users wrote: > So, I just added pretty usage bars [1] to the list of machine :) Thanks. But maybe it should be presented differently? The page now is much too wide to fit on a screen, and those little bars are all jumbled

Re: [cfarm-users] Looking for the latest GCC for PowerPC

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:02:14PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:02 PM Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > > Does anyone know where to find the latest GCC? > > > > You can just do > > > > $ $HOME/src/gcc/configure --prefix=$HOME/$WHEREVER --enable-languages=a

Re: [cfarm-users] Looking for the latest GCC for PowerPC

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:35:44AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm looking for the latest GCC for PowerPC. I think I need something > from this week or last week. > > GCC135 has "gcc version 8.2.1 20180813" but I am looking for something > newer. The other Powe

Re: [cfarm-users] Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:38:18AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 27/11/2018 à 02:05, Segher Boessenkool a écrit : > > Cool stuff :-) > > gcc110 (a power7, 2 packages, 16 cores, 64 threads): > > $ hwloc-ls -s --no-io > > depth 0:1 Machine (type #1) > > depth 1: 2 NUMANode (type #2) > > de

Re: [cfarm-users] Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:10:27AM +0100, Brice Goglin via cfarm-users wrote: > Instead of hardwiring Linux-specific things, many projects now just use > hwloc [1] to get such kind of topology information in a portable way > (that's what I use cfarm for). On the command-line, you'd just do > "hwloc

Re: [cfarm-users] Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:46:39PM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > On 25-11-18, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 01:14:31PM +0100, Stefan Ring via cfarm-users wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:25 AM Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-

Re: [cfarm-users] Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:57:09PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25 2018, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:23:41AM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > >> On 24-11-18, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > >>

Re: [cfarm-users] Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 01:14:31PM +0100, Stefan Ring via cfarm-users wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:25 AM Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > According to ansible [https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/] gcc112 > > has 160 cores, and gcc135 has 128 cores. Is ansible gett

Re: [cfarm-users] Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:23:41AM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > On 24-11-18, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:28:58PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason via > > cfarm-users wrote: > > > I've tried to be conservative about res

Re: [cfarm-users] Setting up GitLab CI for git.git on the farm

Hi! On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:28:58PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason via cfarm-users wrote: > I got access to the farm a while ago to test free software projects I > work on, mainly git.git. I wanted to send a headsup about what I've been > up to. > > I'm setting up something where the integrat

Re: [cfarm-users] CPU speeds of GCC135?

On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 04:29:49PM +0200, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote: > Those are the idle cores; their clock speed in increased when they are > active. > > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep clock | sort -u > clock : 2166.00MHz > clock : 2200.00MHz > clock : 3400.

Re: [cfarm-users] having a bit of trouble with getting into the new netbsd and freebsd virtual machines

On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 09:25:25PM +0100, Olly Betts via cfarm-users wrote: > Not related to the ssh config, but I've noticed on the NetBSD VM that > if you call getaddrinfo() with ai_family is set to AF_INET and pass an > IPv6 address, you always seem to get an IPv4 address of a different > machin

Re: [cfarm-users] having a bit of trouble with getting into the new netbsd and freebsd virtual machines

On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 03:29:31PM -0500, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote: > By the way, I am using gmail and am having trouble responding properly > on mailing lists in general -- did I use the correct reply options? If > not, I apologize, and what should I do differently? It looks fine. This lis

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc67/68 back online, please test

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 10:19:53PM +0200, Pierre Muller via cfarm-users wrote: > Is there anyway to force rewriting of .ssh/authorized_keys for a particular > machine/user? > Or could someone with root access check if there is an explanation in > /var/log/auth.log > to why login to my account fail

Re: [cfarm-users] Changing shell with chsh without being prompted for password

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:49:19PM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users wrote: > On 17-07-18, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:44:09PM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > As an experiment, we have just added PAM configuration to gcc13 and gcc14 > >

Re: [cfarm-users] Changing shell with chsh without being prompted for password

Hi! On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:44:09PM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users wrote: > As an experiment, we have just added PAM configuration to gcc13 and gcc14 > so that chsh does not ask for a password. Cool. Thanks for doing this. > If you know about any security issues that could arise fr

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112: disk errors

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:05:09AM -0700, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users wrote: > I have reported the problem to OSU. > > Don't know if it's limited to a filesystem corruption bug or symptom > of a hardware disk failure. I kicked off all users and tried an xfs_repair. xfs_repair -n finds a lot o

Re: [cfarm-users] peko, please 'nice' your jobs

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: > Peter's jobs rarely use a huge number of cores (and gcc112 has a lot > of them) so my request was as much that he doesn't just run constant > jobs in a permanent loop, which the machines are not meant to be for. It

Re: [cfarm-users] Bug tracking system for requests?

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:22:05PM +0300, vle--- via cfarm-users wrote: > Hi. Is there any bug tracking system for servers in compile farm? > I'd like to ask some one to install flex-dev package to gcc112, > but I don't where to ask this. On the cfarm website there

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112/ppc64-le, and undefined reference to __cxa_thread_atexit_impl

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:42AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely > wrote: > Now I am even more confused. > > The admins install stiff in /opt/cfarm. I used to look in /usr/local > for the upgrades, but I was told to look in /opt/c

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112/ppc64-le, and undefined reference to __cxa_thread_atexit_impl

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:54:34AM +, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: > On 19 February 2018 at 22:15, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > >>> I used a GNUmakefile: > >>> > >>> CXX=/opt/cfarm/gcc7rc2/bin/g++ make -j 20 > >>> > >>> Nothing special, as far as I know. Just using the

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112/ppc64-le, and undefined reference to __cxa_thread_atexit_impl

Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 02:49:47PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > /opt/cfarm/gcc7rc2/bin/g++ -o cryptest.exe -DNDEBUG -g2 -O3 -fPIC > -pthread -pipe adhoc.o test.o bench1.o bench2.o validat0.o validat1.o > validat2.o validat3.o validat4.o datatest.o regtest1.o regtest2.o > regt

Re: [cfarm-users] Please cleanup your /home on farm machines

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:29:23PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote: > On 19/01/2018, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users > > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:05:48PM +0100,

Re: [cfarm-users] Please cleanup your /home on farm machines

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:05:48PM +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote: > find /home \( \ > \( -name '*.o' -a \! -atime +7 \) \ I veto this 400%. People have valuable .o files, and this is not very effective anyway (other files take up more space). Segher ___

Re: [cfarm-users] OT: Spectre and Meltdown cpu bugs

On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:21:23PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > It looks like PoCs are starting to be released for the CPU bugs. Or > there's a PoC in the wild for ARM processors. The farm may want to > accelerate deployment of the fixes if it has not done so. We'll just do the d

Re: [cfarm-users] Please install tig on gcc116

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:31:31PM -0600, Austin English via cfarm-users wrote: > Ideally, it would be installed wherever git is (it is an ncurses git > browser), if that's a valid request.. Done. Enjoy! Segher ___ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users

Re: [cfarm-users] Missing /opt/cfarm directory

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 04:43:49PM +0100, Julien ÉLIE via cfarm-users wrote: > Could you please create /opt/cfarm (writable to all) on gcc13, gcc14, > gcc22, gcc76, gcc117 and gcc202? Done on all those. What do you want to install there, if I may ask? Cheers, Segher __

Re: [cfarm-users] Install sendmail on gcc13

Hi! On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 02:56:14PM +0100, Julien ÉLIE via cfarm-users wrote: > Would it be possible to install sendmail on gcc13 please (as it is > already the case for other servers of the farm)? > It used to be available at /usr/sbin/sendmail but apparently no longer is. I installed mailut

Re: [cfarm-users] Package installation request for gcc113

Hi, On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 11:50:40AM -0700, Joseph Benden via cfarm-users wrote: > Please install the packages listed below on gcc113. [ fwiw, it helps to say why you want this ] > libnl-3-dev > libnl-genl-3-dev > libpcap-dev > libpcre3-dev > libsqlite3-dev libpcre3-dev already was installed.

Re: [cfarm-users] Please install gcc-gnat on gcc112

Hi Sebastian, On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 07:08:52AM +0100, Sebastian Huber via cfarm-users wrote: > would someone mind installing gcc-gnat on gcc112 (CentOS 7). There is no gnat package for CentOS 7 unfortunately. You can use the compiler in /opt/cfarm/gcc7rc2 , it has gnat. Segher __

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 (gcc1-power7) scheduled upgrade August 10

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:19:39AM -0600, 大平怜 via cfarm-users wrote: > Could you install libstdc++-static.ppc and libstdc++-static.ppc64 on gcc110? > I need them to build snappy-java. Appreciate your help. Done, enjoy! Segher ___ cfarm-users mailing l

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc22, gcc23, gcc24 ssh login problem

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 01:21:44AM +0100, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote: > Has there been a recent change to the ssh configuration on the machines > gcc22, gcc23, gcc24 ? > > Up until recently I could ssh into these machines. Now it asks for the > password, which indicates a problem with the

Re: [cfarm-users] Please install perf on gcc117/gcc118

Hi Paul, On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:42:35PM +0800, Paul Hua via cfarm-users wrote: > Please install perf on gcc117/gcc118. gcc117 is down. gcc118 does not know about a package named "perf". It probably needs some repository added, but I do not know which. Segher ___

  1   2   >