Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> $ sh config.sub powerpc64-elfv2-linux
> powerpc64-elfv2-linux-gnu
>
> No, that is not the same thing. It is BE, and it uses ELFv1!
>
>
> $ :|powerpc64-elfv2-linux-gcc -dM -E -|grep BYTE_ORDER
> #define __BYTE_ORDER__ __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
>
> $ :|powerpc64-elfv2-linu
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Boessenkool wrote:
> > > not on powerpc64-elfv2-linux!).
> >
> > I think you mean powerpc64le-linux?
>
> Yes, this is the same thing. The ABI indicator for this ABI is the
> preprocessor define _CALL_ELF=2; it is used on the distros
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 6:22 PM Bruno Haible via cfarm-users
wrote:
>
> Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> > What I'm now wondering is whether my context saving/restoring assembly
> > code for PPC has any ABI "gotcha" in it. I've only tested in on the
> > above gcc110 machine.
>
> The compilefarm covers all vari
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> What I'm now wondering is whether my context saving/restoring assembly
> code for PPC has any ABI "gotcha" in it. I've only tested in on the
> above gcc110 machine.
The compilefarm covers all variations of PowerPC ABIs (except for
Mac OS X <= 10.5, which no one uses any more)
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > not on powerpc64-elfv2-linux!).
>
> I think you mean powerpc64le-linux?
Yes, this is the same thing. The ABI indicator for this ABI is the
preprocessor define _CALL_ELF=2; it is used on the distros named
powerpc64le-linux.
Bruno
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:16:44PM +0200, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote:
> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> > When testing on gcc110.fsffrance.org I got confused as there were no
> > function descriptors, and the float abi to call varargs functions did
> > not match.
>
> Indeed, func
On 2019-09-09 14:16, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote:
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
When testing on gcc110.fsffrance.org I got confused as there were no
function descriptors, and the float abi to call varargs functions did
not match.
Indeed, function descriptors are a difference b
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> When testing on gcc110.fsffrance.org I got confused as there were no
> function descriptors, and the float abi to call varargs functions did
> not match.
Indeed, function descriptors are a difference between the ABIs as well:
On powerpc-aix and powerpc64-
Em sáb, 7 de set de 2019 às 21:39, Bruno Haible escreveu:
Hi Bruno and thanks to all that replied.
> > Just testing for hopefully soon new release of GNU Lightning, I noticed
> > now when building with -m32 it appears to have a different abi that I
> > could not find any description searchi
