[Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [Babel-users] OT: Centralised WebRTC server available for testing

2020-05-01 Thread Dave Taht
I kind of have an ulterior motive for tracking this work, as A) the codebase is new, small and not crufty and B) juliusz sometimes bothers to answer my emails, and C) I don't really have a grip on the state of webrtc congestion control. I used to really enjoy dinking with videoconferencing tools.

[Cerowrt-devel] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-01 Thread Dave Taht
https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/gbd6g0/dsl_reports_speed_test_no_longer_free/ They ran out of bandwidth. Message to users here: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest -- Make Music, Not War Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729 ___

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-01 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Dave, well, it was a free service and it lasted a long time. I want to raise a toast to Justin and convey my sincere thanks for years of investing into the "good" of the internet. Now, the question is which test is going to be the rightful successor? Short of running netperf/irtt/iper2/ip

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Cake] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-01 Thread Sergey Fedorov via Cerowrt-devel
--- Begin Message --- Great review, Sebastian! > NETFLIX: fast.com. > Pros: allows selection of upload testing, supposedly decent > back-end, duration configurable > allows unloaded, loaded download and loaded upload RTT > measurements (but reports sinlge numbers for loade

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Cake] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-01 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Sergey, > On May 1, 2020, at 22:09, Sergey Fedorov wrote: > > Great review, Sebastian! > > NETFLIX: fast.com. > Pros: allows selection of upload testing, supposedly decent back-end, > duration configurable > allows unloaded, loaded download and loaded upload RTT

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Cake] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-01 Thread Sergey Fedorov via Cerowrt-devel
--- Begin Message --- Thanks for the kind words, Sebastian! +1; for normal users that is already bliss. For de-bloating a link however > a bit more time resolution generally makes things a bit easier to reason > about ;) Apologies, I misunderstood your original statement. I interpreted it as a v

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Cake] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-01 Thread Michael Richardson
{Do I need all the lists?} Sergey Fedorov via Bloat wrote: > Just a note that I have a plan to separate the loaded latency into > upload/download. It's not great UX now they way it's implemented. > The timeline view is a bit more nuanced, in the spirit of the simplistic > UX, but

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Cake] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-01 Thread Sergey Fedorov via Cerowrt-devel
--- Begin Message --- Hi Michael, This blog post describes how the test steers to the server(s). Noted on the other thread, I hope to add the url param option reasonably soon. SERGEY FEDOROV Director of Engineering sfedo...@netflix.co

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Cake] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-01 Thread Michael Richardson
Given QUIC uses UDP and does congestion control essentially within the browser, it seems that maybe one could built latency under load measuring into the QUIC infrastructure in the browser. Maybe we don't have to create JS tools like fast.com to get good and regular measurements of bufferbloat.