On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:29 PM, wrote:
> While I applaud "making wifi fast", I'd like to see some substantial effort
> in moving away from (beyond) Wifi's inherent limits to dense scaling.
I agree. So much of what's wrong with wifi comes down to that.
> That's what I'm working on in my persona
While I applaud "making wifi fast", I'd like to see some substantial effort in
moving away from (beyond) Wifi's inherent limits to dense scaling.
That's what I'm working on in my personal wireless lab, with my own funds,
since it's actually a problem that does not get solved by either IEEE 802
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
> Couldn't find a mention of *codel, but it would be sad to see vendors
> just sprinkle some traffic shaping on top of codel and brand it.
I'm perfectly happy qualcomm found a way to combine the packet
classification technology acquired fro
Couldn't find a mention of *codel, but it would be sad to see vendors
just sprinkle some traffic shaping on top of codel and brand it.
It cheers me up that *codel is about to be picked up by the vendors,
but not when customers are tricked to pay extra for SuperBoostNow [tm]
or DoMeQuick [tm]...
-
It would be interesting to see what streamboost gains on top of just
fq_codel. Since it appears that they are doing so fairly heavy-handed
traffic shaping.
-Aaron
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> An interesting new chipset:
>
>
> http://www.anandtech.com/show/7526/qualcomm
An interesting new chipset:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7526/qualcomm-atheros-announces-new-internet-processor-lineup-ipq8064-and-ipq8062
And streamboost (of which fq_codel is a component) is getting good reviews:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-features/32297-does-qualcomms-strea
