Couldn't find a mention of *codel, but it would be sad to see vendors just sprinkle some traffic shaping on top of codel and brand it.
It cheers me up that *codel is about to be picked up by the vendors, but not when customers are tricked to pay extra for SuperBoostNow [tm] or DoMeQuick [tm]... -- Maciej On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Aaron Wood <wood...@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be interesting to see what streamboost gains on top of just > fq_codel. Since it appears that they are doing so fairly heavy-handed > traffic shaping. > > -Aaron > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> An interesting new chipset: >> >> >> http://www.anandtech.com/show/7526/qualcomm-atheros-announces-new-internet-processor-lineup-ipq8064-and-ipq8062 >> >> And streamboost (of which fq_codel is a component) is getting good >> reviews: >> >> >> http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-features/32297-does-qualcomms-streamboost-really-work?start=1 >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: >> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
