On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Georg Höllrigl
wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Using the radosgw works fine, as long as the amount of data doesn't get too
> big.
>
> I have created one bucket that holds many small files, separated into
> different "directories". But whenever I try to acess the bucket, I
That looks like a bug; generally the permission checks there are
broken. I opened issue #8428, and pushed a fix on top of the firefly
branch to wip-8428.
Thanks!
Yehuda
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:49 PM, James Page wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Folks
>
> I'm see
rver 1
> or server 2.
>
> I've noticed that if I go directly (Internet <--> Radosgw_Server_1) I do not
> have any issues with special characters.
>
> Any idea what I am missing? Perhaps something needs changing on the proxy
> server?
>
> Cheers
>
> Andrei
>
>
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Sylvain Munaut
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> During a multi part upload you can't upload parts smaller than 5M, and
>> radosgw also slices object in slices of 4M. Having those two being
>> different is a bit unfort
Right. It only matters for newly created objects.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> I don't believe that should cause any issues; the chunk sizes are in
> the metadata.
> -Greg
> Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:2
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
> On 11/28/13, 4:18 AM, Dan Van Der Ster wrote:
>> Dear users/experts,
>> Does anyone know how to use radosgw-admin log show? It seems to not properly
>> read the --bucket parameter.
>>
>> # radosgw-admin log show --bucket=asdf --date=2013-11-2
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:00 PM, David Curtiss
wrote:
> Over the last two days, I set up ceph on a set of ubuntu 12.04 VMs (my first
> time working with ceph), and it seems to be working fine (I have HEALTH_OK,
> and can create a test document via the rados commandline tool), but I can't
> authent
pp...@ni.com
> radosgw-admin subuser create --uid=hive_cache --subuser=hive_cache:swift
> --access=full
> radosgw-admin key create --subuser=hive_cache:swift --key-type=swift
> --secret=QFAMEDSJP5DEKJO0DDXY
>
> - David
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wr
rd KB wrwr KB
> ...
> .users.swift- 110
>0 00011
>
> For comparison, the 'df' line for the .users pool lists 2 objects, which
> a
The second response is a response to an expected follow up request on
the same connection (using keep alive). If you're seeing it as part of
the response on the first request then it's either an issue with the
client not handling keep alive connections correctly, or an issue with
the content length
The gateway itself supports these kind of characters. Usually we see
this issue when there's something in front of the web server (like a
load balancer) that modifies the requests. Another possibility is the
web server configuration that might be rewriting the requests. In this
case it seems that y
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Justice London
wrote:
> Hello, I am having issues getting FG working between east/west data-center
> test configurations. I have the sync default.conf configured like this:
>
> source: "http://10.20.2.39:80";
> src_zone: "us-west-1"
> src_access_key:
> src_secret_
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Patrycja Szabłowska
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've noticed a strange thing about the ceph's bucket index today. I'm
> using ceph 0.80 from github.
> I've uploaded successfully a file using multipart upload (script based
> on the one included here:
> http://lists.ceph.com/
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> [ correct the URL ]
>
>
> On 2014年08月02日 00:42, Osier Yang wrote:
>>
>> Hi, list,
>>
>> I managed to setup radosgw in testing environment to see if it's
>> stable/mature enough
>> for production use these several days. In the meanwhile, I tried t
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Marco Garcês wrote:
>
> UPDATE:
>
> I have installed Tengine (nginx fork) and configured both HTTP and HTTPS to
> use radosgw socket.
Looking back at this thread, and considering this solution it seems to
me that you were running the wrong apache fastcgi module.
There's the usage log that can be turned on and is in the granularity
of 1 hour. It basically records amount of data transferred, bucket
name, number of operations, and types of operations.
Yehuda
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Craig Lewis wrote:
> Not directly, no.
>
> There is data recorded
Not sure I understand what you ask. Multiple zones within the same
region configuration is described here:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/federated-config/#multi-site-data-replication
Yehuda
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:32 PM, M Ranga Swami Reddy
wrote:
> Hi Yahuda,
> I need more info on Ceph
I agree with Greg. When dealing with the latencies that we deal with due to
different IO operations (networking, storage), it's mostly not worth the
trouble. I think the main reason we didn't actually put it to use is that
we forgot we've had this macro defined, and it really wasn't worth the
troub
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Lyn Mitchell wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a way to either reconcile or remove possible orphaned
> “shadow” files in a federated gateway configuration? The issue we’re seeing
> is the number of chunks/shadow files on the slave has many more “shadow”
> files than the
> De: ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com
> [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph..com] En nombre de Alvaro Izquierdo
> Jimeno
> Enviado el: viernes, 05 de julio de 2013 11:58
> Para: Yehuda Sadeh
> CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] (keystone + radosgw ) users
&
ion: close
> < Transfer-Encoding: chunked
> < Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> <
> Object1
> * Closing connection #0
>
> But, where is the X-Container-Read header? it should appear? Maybe the
> problem is saving the metadata header
>
> Thanks a lo
l: martes, 09 de julio de 2013 8:55
> Para: Yehuda Sadeh
> CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] (keystone + radosgw ) users
>
> The same result.
>
> Attached the log from creating bucket with the header 'HTTP-X-Container-Read'
>
> Response of
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Bright wrote:
> Hello Guys:
>
> I am working with ceph nowadys and i want to setup a system which
>
> includes a web page to create the ceph object storage user.
>
> So, i tried to use Admin Ops API to fulfill my needs. However, if i use
>
> GET
x27;t fail, but doesn't update the user.
Right. There's the radosgw-admin caps add / rm command to do that for you.
>
> Many thanks and best regards,
> Álvaro.
>
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com
> [mailto:ceph-users-boun
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
> I have been running a development radosgw instance for awhile and now
> looking to start a larger production one. I am trying to track down
> some issues with PUT on larger files I am having from certain S3
> clients. I am running on the 0.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Alvaro Izquierdo Jimeno
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Reading the URL http://ceph.com/docs/next/radosgw/adminops/#create-user ,
> I’m trying to create a new user with:
>
>
>
> curl -v -X PUT -d '{"uid": "alvaro", "display-name": "alvaro"}
> http://myradosgw/admin/user?for
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> Hi,
> Rgw bucket index is in one file (one osd performance issues).
> Is there on roudmap sharding or other change to increase performance?
>
>
Excellent question. Note that the upcoming Dupling release will have
the ability to separate
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Jeppesen, Nelson
wrote:
> Sage et al,
>
> This is an exciting release but I must say I'm a bit confused about some of
> the new rgw details.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) I'd like to understand how regions work. I assume that's how you get
> multi-site, multi-datacenter
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Øystein Lønning Nerhus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This seems like a bug.
>
> # ceph df
> NAME ID USED %USED OBJECTS
> .rgw.root 26 778 0 3
> .rgw 27 1118 0 8
> .r
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT)
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I succesfully setup a ceph cluster with 0.67.1, now I try to get the radosgw
> on a separate node running
>
> Os=ubuntu 12.04 lts
> Install seemed succesfull, but if I try to access the api I see the
> following in the l
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Jeppesen, Nelson
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having issues with setting cors on dumpling. I seems like it's not doing
> anything.
>
> I have the following CORS rule on test1 bucket:
>
>
>
>
> GETPOST
> http://a.a.a
>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> Hi,
> I think about sharding s3 buckets in CEPH cluster, create
> bucket-per-XX (256 buckets) or even bucket-per-XXX (4096 buckets)
> where XXX is sign from object md5 url.
> Could this be the problem? (performance, or some limits)
>
The
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Pawel Stefanski wrote:
> hello!
>
> Today our radosgw crashed while running multiple deletions via s3 api.
>
> Is this known bug ?
>
> POST
> WSTtobXBlBrm2r78B67LtQ==
>
> Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:38:34 GMT
> /inna-a/?delete
>-11> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650499 7f36347d8
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT)
wrote:
> My apache conf is as follows
>
> cat /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
> ServerName radosgw01.swisstxt.ch
>
> cat /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000_radosgw
>
>
> ServerName *.radosgw01.swisstxt.ch
> # ServerAdmin {email.addre
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Tobias Brunner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My RadosGW (0.67.2) setup keeps complaining about the following error:
>
> 2013-08-23 10:20:32.920808 7f9e298fb7c0 0 WARNING: cannot read region map
>
> # radosgw-admin region-map get
> failed to read region map: (2) No such file or
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Tobias Brunner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use radosgw with s3cmd:
>
> # s3cmd ls
>
> # s3cmd mb s3://bucket-1
> ERROR: S3 error: 405 (MethodNotAllowed):
>
> So there seems to be something missing according to buckets. How can I
> create buckets? What do I have
I'm not aware of any multipart upload issues. Just tested it with the
latest, and it seemed to work. Can you provide more details about your
environment and about the failing operations?
Thanks,
Yehuda
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Juan FRANÇOIS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any known issues for
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Juan FRANÇOIS wrote:
> I created a server on a virtual machine for testing using Ubuntu server
> (Precise 64-bit), following the 5 minute guide that used to be at
> http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/quick-start/ and the radosgw one in
> http://ceph.com/docs/master
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Juan FRANÇOIS wrote:
>> I created a server on a virtual machine for testing using Ubuntu server
>> (Precise 64-bit), following the 5 minute guide that used to be at
>> http://ceph.com/do
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Art M. wrote:
> Hi guys!
> Maube someone knows…
> Does radosgw have file limit?
> I tried to upload 7GB of data using swift with no hope.
>
Is it possible somehow to increase this limit?
>
>
> For objects > 5GB you need to use the large object upload api. Swift ha
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Mihály Árva-Tóth
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an user with 3 subuser:
>
> { "user_id": "johndoe",
> "display_name": "John Doe",
> "email": "",
> "suspended": 0,
> "max_buckets": 1000,
> "auid": 0,
> "subusers": [
> { "id": "johndoe:readonly",
>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So what am I doing wrong? As I read the docs
> (http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/adminops/) i need users=read which
> I applied with the command,
>
> radosgw-admin caps add --uid=derek --caps="users=read"
>
> But when I try to a
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> (echo -n 'GET
> /dysk/files/test.test%40op.pl/DOMIWENT%202013/Damian%20DW/dw/Specyfikacja%20istotnych%20warunk%F3w%20zam%F3wienia.doc
> HTTP/1.0'; printf "\r\n\r\n") | nc localhost 88
> HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 1
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Mark Kirkwood
wrote:
> I have a test setup for Radosgw on a single box. The Swift side of things
> works fine, but trying S3 (via boto) I am encountering the error:
>
> error reading user info, uid=('X5E5BXJHCZGGII3HAWBB',) can't authenticate
>
> Now the access key
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Pawel Stefanski wrote:
> hello!
>
> I've tried with wip-6078 and git dumpling builds and got the same error
> during OPTIONS request.
>
> curl -v -X OPTIONS -H 'Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT' -H "Origin:
> http://X.pl"; http://static3.X.pl/
>
>> OPTIONS
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT)
wrote:
> We are testing radosgw with cyberduck, so far we see the following issues
>
> 1. In apache error log for each file put we see:
>
> [Tue Sep 03 17:35:24 2013] [warn] FastCGI: 193.218.104.138 PUT
> https://193.218.100.131/test/tesfi
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So say a usera has full control (and is the owner) of a bucket in s3 and
> gives userb 'FULL_CONTROL' on the bucket. Userb writes a file and it
> seems that by default the ACL for that key is going to be 'FULL_CONTROL'
> for userb. W
is bucket
> 2013-09-04 08:07:46.083105 7ff4bf7ee700 2 req 10:0.000640:s3:OPTIONS
> /:options_cors:http status=403
> 2013-09-04 08:07:46.083548 7ff4bf7ee700 1 == req done req=0xbcd910
> http_status=403 ==
>
> best regards!
> --
> pawel
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Bill Omer wrote:
>> Thats correct. We created 65k buckets, using two hex characters as the
>> naming convention, then stored the files in each container based on their
>> first two characters in the file name. The end result
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Georg Höllrigl
wrote:
> Just in case someone stumbles across the same problem:
>
> The option name in ceph.conf is rgw_dns_name - not as described "rgw dns
> name" at http://ceph.com/docs/next/radosgw/config-ref/ !?
Both should work.
>
> And the hostname needs to
ated on 0.56 afair, I've tested the same operation
> with fresh bucket created now on dumpling, and the problem still occurs.
>
> regards!
> --
> pawel
>
>
> On 04.09.2013 20:15, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>
>> Is static3 a bucket that you created before the upgrade? Ca
ool_size 200
The path to the admin socket may be different, and in any case can be
set through the 'admin socket' variable in ceph.conf.
Yehuda
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Yehuda Sadeh
>>
>> Try modifing the 'rgw thread pool size' param in your ceph.conf. By
1:/tmp# radosgw-admin -v
> ceph version 0.61.8 (a6fdcca3bddbc9f177e4e2bf0d9cdd85006b028b)
>
>
> Appreciate ~
>
>
> +Hugo Kuo+
> (+886) 935004793
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Yehuda Sadeh
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Kuo Hugo wrote:
>> >
>>
OSD config information includes rgw_thread_pool_size , is
> this what you mentioned ?
> Why that the value is on OSD?
> Where is the value of rgw_thread_pool_size that OSDs referenced from ?
>
The ceph global config holds that variable, the osd just gets all the
defaults but it has n
nchmark run for high concurrency connections
> before?
>
> Cheers
>
>
> +Hugo Kuo+
> (+886) 935004793
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Yehuda Sadeh
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Kuo Hugo wrote:
>> > Hmm Interesting now.
>> >
>> > I ha
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Kuo Hugo wrote:
> Yes. I restart it by /etc/init.d/radosgw for times before. :D
>
> btw, I check several things here to prevent any permission issue.
>
> root@p01:/var/run# /etc/init.d/radosgw start
> Starting client.radosgw.gateway...
> root@p01:/var/run# ps aux
ests to these osds that thrash. You could
try to use also the radosgw admin socket (if you manage to set it up).
Yehuda
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Yehuda Sadeh [mailto:yeh...@inktank.com]
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 06:38
>> To: Kuo Hugo
>>
ar/log/ceph/radosgw.log
> rgw_thread_pool_size = 200
> rgw_cache_enabled = false
>
>
> +Hugo Kuo+
> (+886) 935004793
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Yehuda Sadeh
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT)
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Yehuda
>>
huda
> --
> pawel
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>
>> Can you provide a log that includes the bucket creation, CORS settings
>> and the OPTIONS call? It'd be best if you could do it with also 'debug
>> ms = 1'.
>&
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Pawel Stefanski wrote:
> ceph version 0.67.3 (408cd61584c72c0d97b774b3d8f95c6b1b06341a)
That one doesn't have the required fix, which will be in 0.67.4.
Yehuda
>
> 16 wrz 2013 18:40, "Yehuda Sadeh" napisał(a):
>
>> On Mo
Hi,
currently different users share the same namespace. This follows the
S3 semantics, and allows accessing buckets directly via a virtual host
name. We do have multiple namespaces in mind though, and I also
prototyped it not too long ago:
http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Emperor/rg
with Ceph -v.
> static33 bucket was made on 0.67.
>
> best regards!
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Pawel Stefanski
>> wrote:
>> > hello all!
>> >
>> > Once again sorry
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:21 PM, 鹏 wrote:
>
>
> hi
> So what am I doing wrong? when i run commond:
> radosgw-admin bucket list --uid=johdone the return is []
> and the commond
> radosgw-admin bucket list --uid=wkp4666 the return is []
> and the commond
> radosgw-admin bucket listthe retu
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Alexis GÜNST HORN
wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> I've a big issue with Ceph RadosGW.
> I did a PoC some days ago with radosgw. It worked well.
>
> Ceph version 0.67.3 under CentOS 6.4
>
> Now, I'm installing a new cluster but, I can't succeed. I do not understand
> wh
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Gerd Jakobovitsch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am testing a ceph environment installed in debian wheezy, and, when
> testing file upload of more than 1 GB, I am getting errors. For files larger
> than 5 GB, I get a "400 Bad Request EntityTooLarge" response; looking at
bovitsch wrote:
>
> Hello Yehuda, thank you for your help.
>
>
> On 09/17/2013 08:35 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Gerd Jakobovitsch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am testing a ceph environ
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Matt Thompson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We're trying to test swift API performance of swift itself (1.9.0) and
> ceph's radosgw (0.67.3) using the following hardware configuration:
>
> Shared servers:
>
> * 1 server running keystone for authentication
> * 1 server runni
missing something).
That looks like a ceph generic directory that can be used to put your
specific user's keyring file (but I might be wrong).
>
> Thanks again for the help!
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>
>> On Thu
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Rick Stokkingreef
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to connect radosgw to keystone, it seems it is all working but it
> won't create the bucket:
>
>
> Error Swift Client:
> DEBUG:root:HTTP PERF: 0.05760 seconds to PUT 10.10.10.51:80 /swift/v1/test)
> DEBUG:swiftclient
"? If so, we
> don't have that set in our ceph.conf so should in theory be using it already.
I actually meant to say ceph authentication, not ceph cache.
Yehuda
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:51
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 7:08 PM, 鹏 wrote:
> hi:
> I follow the docment
> http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/adminops/#trim-usage send
>
> DELETE /{admin}/usage?format=json HTTP/1.1
> but the rwsquest is 400 {"Code":"InvalidArgument"}
>
> the log is
>
>
> compare=0
> DELETE /admin/usage:t
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:18 AM, yy-nm wrote:
> hay, folks:
> i use ceph source code to install a ceph cluster. ceph version 0.61.8
> (a6fdcca3bddbc9f177e4e2bf0d9cdd85006b028b)
> After finish install, i can't find radosgw command?
> i use below paramter in ceph's installation:
>
> install pack
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Guang wrote:
> Hi ceph-users,
> I deployed a Ceph cluster (including RadosGW) with use of ceph-deploy on
> RHEL6.4, during the deployment, I have a couple of questions which need your
> help.
>
> 1. I followed the steps http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/rpm/ to
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Mike O'Toole wrote:
> After upgrading from Cuddlefish to Dumpling I am no longer able to obtain
> user information from the rados gateway.
>
> radosgw-admin user info
> could not fetch user info: no user info saved
>
>
> radosgw-admin user create --uid=bob --displa
Are you sure you ran the same radosgw-admin command? the log shows a
different error message. Can you re-run it with also (besides the
--debug-ms=1 and --debug-rgw=20) also with --debug-objecter=20?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Mike O'Toole wrote:
> radosgw-admin zone get
> { "domain_root": "
The osd returns some unexpected error:
2013-09-26 13:25:17.651552 7ff13cd0b700 1 -- 10.10.2.55:0/1005496 <==
osd.2 10.10.2.200:6800/4790 5 osd_op_reply(25 bob
[call,getxattrs,stat] ack = -5 (Input/output error)) v4 186+0+0
(4137529543 0 0) 0x7ff120002490 con 0xa6a380
Is there a matchin
You specify the relative performance, but what the actual numbers that
you're seeing? How many GETs per second, and how many PUTs per second
do you see?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Somnath Roy wrote:
> Mark,
> One more thing, all my test is with rgw cache enabled , disabling the cache
> the
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Gruher, Joseph R
wrote:
> Hi all-
>
>
>
> I am following the object storage quick start guide. I have a cluster with
> two OSDs and have followed the steps on both. Both are failing to start
> radosgw but each in a different manner. All the previous steps in the
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:10 AM, lixuehui wrote:
> Hi all
> Does gateway instances mean multi-process of a gateway user for a ceph
> cluster. Though they were configured independently during the configure
> file,can they configured with zones among different region?
Not sure I follow your questi
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jefferson Alcantara
wrote:
> hi ,
>
>
> I need help for show all users created on radosgw-admin all users using
> buckets or not ,I dont find any attribute for show this , I tried
> radosgw-admin user info -iud=* but this options does not accept query ,
> anyb
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:21 AM, wrote:
> Ok,
>
>
>
> Think I spotted the issue. I think the guide has the subuser credentials
> which map to the swift tenant:user in the wrong order.
>
>
>
> Guide states:
>
> sudo radosgw-admin subuser create --uid=johndoe --subuser=johndoe:swift
> --access=full
The region map has not been initialized. Try running:
$ radosgw-admin region-map update
Yehuda
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Jefferson Alcantara
wrote:
> hi ,
>
>
> I need help , when I try run radosgw-admin metadata list I `m receive the
> mensage 0 WARNING: cannot read region mapanyb
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jefferson Alcantara
wrote:
> I need help for my radosgw machine , when I try start the service radosgw I
> receive equal bellow :
>
> /etc/init.d/radosgw start
> Starting client.radosgw.napsao-nix-qa-ceph-s301...
> 2013-10-10 20:34:14.047159 7f5dfc20b780 -1 WARNI
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Valery Tschopp
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since we upgraded ceph to 0.67.4, the radosgw-admin doesn't list all the
> users anymore:
>
> root@ineri:~# radosgw-admin user info
> could not fetch user info: no user info saved
>
>
> But it still work for single user:
>
> root@ine
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> Hi,
> How works radosgw-admin object unlink?
>
> After:
> radosgw-admin object unlink --bucket=testbucket 'test_file_1001.txt'
Try:
$ radosgw-admin object unlink --bucket=testbucket --object='test_file_1001.txt'
Yehuda
>
> File stil
(not mark it as removed)?
>
> --
> Regards
> Domink
>
> 2013/10/13 Yehuda Sadeh :
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> How works radosgw-admin object unlink?
>>>
>>> After:
>>> radosgw-admin ob
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:04 AM, david zhang wrote:
> Hi ceph-users,
>
> I uploaded an object successfully to radosgw with 3 replicas. And I located
> all the physical paths of 3 replicas on different OSDs.
>
> i.e, one of the 3 physical paths is
> /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-2/current/3.5_head/DIR_D/d
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Carlos Gimeno Yañez wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've deployed Ceph using Ceph-deploy and following the official
> documentation. I've created a user to use with Swift and everything is
> working fine, my users can create buckets and upload files if they use
> Horizon Dashboard
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
> So I have tried to enable usage logging on a new production Ceph RadosGW
> cluster but nothing seems to show up.
>
> I have added to the [client.radosgw.] section the following
>
> rgw enable usage log = true
> rgw usage log tick interval = 3
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Snider, Tim wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me what I'm missing. I have a radosgw user created.
>
> I get the following complaint when I try to create a pool with or without the
> --uid parameter:
>
>
> #radosgw-admin pool add --pool=radosPool --uid=rados
>
> failed t
t in bucket without rgw index)?
>
> --
> Regards
> Dominik
>
> 2013/10/13 Dominik Mostowiec :
>> hmm, 'tail' - do you mean file/object content?
>> I thought that this command might be workaround for 'blind bucket'.
>> Am I wrong?
>>
>> -
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing with some multipart uploads to RGW and I'm hitting a problem
> when trying to upload files larger then 1159MB.
>
> The tool I'm using is s3cmd 1.5.1
>
> Ceph version: 0.67.4
>
> It's very specific, this is what I trie
Sounds like an issue with your apache config. How did you install your
apache? What distribution are you running on? Are you using it as
mpm-worker? Do you have non-default radosgw settings?
Yehuda
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:58 AM, hadi golestani
wrote:
> My test is so simple,
> On a cluster wit
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Mark Kirkwood
wrote:
> I have a radosgw instance (ceph 0.71-299-g5cba838 src build), running on
> Ubuntu 13.10. I've been experimenting with multipart uploads (which are
> working fine). However while *most* objects (from radosgw perspective) have
> their storage s
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Corin Langosch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> using ceph 0.67.4 I followed http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/. I can
> connect using s3cmd (test configuration succeeds), so the user credentials
> and everything else seems to be running as it should. But when doing a
> "s3cmd mb
Not sure why you're able to run the 'rados' and 'ceph' command, and
not 'radosgw', just note that the former two don't connect to the
osds, whereas the latter does, so it might fail on a different level.
You're using the default client.admin as the user for radosgw, but
your ceph.conf file doesn't
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Gruher, Joseph R
wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Yehuda Sadeh [mailto:yeh...@inktank.com]
>>Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 12:40 PM
>>To: Gruher, Joseph R
>>Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>Subject: Re: [ceph-users]
error 95 is "Not supported", might mean that there are some issues with the
osd, e.g., incompatibility (running older version than the gateway's), or
likely objclass issues. What does the osd log say?
Yehuda
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:50 PM, 鹏 wrote:
>
> hi all!
> I configuration a ceph obje
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:28 PM, lixuehui wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I failed to create bucket with s3 API. the error is 403 'Access Denied'.In
> fact ,I've give the user write permission.
> { "user_id": "lxh",
> "display_name": "=lxh",
> "email": "",
> "suspended": 0,
> "max_buckets": 1000,
>
You can do it through the metadata api. Try doing something like:
GET /admin/metadata/user
Yehuda
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Nelson Jeppesen
wrote:
> I've looked around but could not find it. Can I open a ticket for this
> issue?
>
> Not being able to enumerate users via API is a road blo
1 - 100 of 533 matches
Mail list logo
