I created a user/keyring to be able to access RBDs, but I'm trying to find
a way to set the config file on the client machine such that I don't need
to use -n client.rbd in my commands when I'm on that host. Currently I'm
testing rbd-fuse vs rbd-nbd for our use case, but I'm having a hard time
wit
Hello,
I am using the Ceph cluster with HDDs and SSDs. Created separate pool for each.
Now, when I ran the "ceph osd bench", HDD's OSDs show around 500 MB/s
and SSD's OSD show around 280MB/s.
Ideally, what I expected was - SSD's OSDs should be at-least 40% high
as compared with HDD's OSD bench.
D
I think you just specify "name = client.rbd" as a config in the global
section of the machine's ceph.conf and it will use that automatically.
-Greg
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:34 AM, David Turner wrote:
> I created a user/keyring to be able to access RBDs, but I'm trying to find a
> way to set the
Hi,
I want install ceph in 3 machines. CEPH, CEPH-OSD-1 CEPH-OSD-2, each
machines have 2 disk in RAID 0 with total 930GiB
CEPH is mon and osd too..
CEPH-OSD-1 osd
CEPH-OSD-2 osd
I install and reinstall ceph many times. All installation the CEPH don't
get full partion space. Take only 1GB. How I
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:14 AM Andreas Calminder <
andreas.calmin...@klarna.com> wrote:
> Thanks,
> I've modified the timeout successfully, unfortunately it wasn't enough
> for the deep-scrub to finish, so I increased the
> osd_op_thread_suicide_timeout even higher (1200s), the deep-scrub
> comm
I already tested putting name, user, and id in the global section with
client.rbd and rbd as the value (one at a time, testing in between). None
of them had any affect. This is on a 10.2.7 cluster.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017, 2:06 PM Gregory Farnum wrote:
> I think you just specify "name = client.rbd"
Am 16.08.2017 um 13:40 schrieb Hauke Homburg:
> Hello,
>
>
> How can i delete a pg completly from a ceph server? I think i have all
> Data manually from the Server deleted. But i a ceph pg query
> shows the pg already? A ceph pg force_create_pg doesn't create the pg.
>
> The ceph says he has creat
You should be able to set a CEPH_ARGS='--id rbd' environment variable.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:25 PM, David Turner wrote:
> I already tested putting name, user, and id in the global section with
> client.rbd and rbd as the value (one at a time, testing in between). None of
> them had any affect
Hi,
Sorry guys, during theese days I'm asking a lot about how to distribute my
data.
I have two kinds of VM:
1.- Management VMs (linux) --> Full SSD dedicated disks
2.- Windows VM --> SSD + HHD (with tiering).
I'm working on installing two clusters on the same host but I'm
encountering lots of
... or at least since yesterday!
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
If I'm understanding you correctly, you want to have 2 different roots that
pools can be made using. The first being entirely SSD storage. The second
being HDD Storage with an SSD cache tier on top of it.
https://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/08/25/ceph-mix-sata-and-ssd-within-the-same-box/
Th
I'm not sure what's going on w/ the master branch docs today, but in
the meantime you can use the luminous docs [1] until this is sorted
out since they should be nearly identical.
[1] http://docs.ceph.com/docs/luminous/
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:52 PM, wrote:
> ... or at least since yesterday!
If you are on a different version of ceph than that, replace that in the
url. jewel, hammer, etc.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:37 PM Jason Dillaman wrote:
> I'm not sure what's going on w/ the master branch docs today, but in
> the meantime you can use the luminous docs [1] until this is sorted
>
I've been using docs.ceph.com all day and just double checked that it's
up. Make sure that your DNS, router, firewall, etc isn't blocking it.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:28 PM wrote:
> ... or at least since yesterday!
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> c
Hi!
Thanks for getting back to me!
Clients access the cluster through rgw (s3), we had some big buckets
containing a lot of small files. Prior to this happening I removed a
semi-stale bucket with a rather large index, 2.5 million objects, all but
30 objects didn't actually exist which left the nor
It's up for me as well -- but for me the master branch docs are
missing the table of contents on the nav pane on the left.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:32 PM, David Turner wrote:
> I've been using docs.ceph.com all day and just double checked that it's up.
> Make sure that your DNS, router, firewall
Hello,
I'm trying to modify the metadata of a RGW user in a multi-tenant
setup. For a regular user with the default implicit tenant it works
fine using the following to get metadata:
# radosgw-admin metadata get user:
I however can't figure out how to do the same for a user with an
explicit tena
The rules in the CRUSH map will always be followed. It is not possible for
Ceph to go against that and put data into a root that shouldn't have it.
The problem with a cache tier is that Ceph is going to need to promote and
evict stuff all the time (not free). A lot of people that want to use SSD
Hey Mark :)
Am 16. August 2017 21:43:34 MESZ schrieb Mark Nelson :
>Hi Mehmet!
>
>On 08/16/2017 11:12 AM, Mehmet wrote:
>> :( no suggestions or recommendations on this?
>>
>> Am 14. August 2017 16:50:15 MESZ schrieb Mehmet :
>>
>> Hi friends,
>>
>> my actual hardware setup per OSD-node i
Yeah, Alfredo said he would look into it. Presumably something
happened when he was fixing other broken pieces of things in the doc
links.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> It's up for me as well -- but for me the master branch docs are
> missing the table of contents on t
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Calminder
wrote:
> Hi!
> Thanks for getting back to me!
>
> Clients access the cluster through rgw (s3), we had some big buckets
> containing a lot of small files. Prior to this happening I removed a
> semi-stale bucket with a rather large index, 2.5 millio
Which ssds are used? Are they in production? If so how is your PG Count?
Am 17. August 2017 20:04:25 MESZ schrieb M Ranga Swami Reddy
:
>Hello,
>I am using the Ceph cluster with HDDs and SSDs. Created separate pool
>for each.
>Now, when I ran the "ceph osd bench", HDD's OSDs show around 500 MB/s
*resend... this Time to the list...*
Hey David Thank you for the response!
My use case is actually only rbd for kvm Images where mostly Running Lamp
systems on Ubuntu or centos.
All Images (rbds) are created with "proxmox" where the ceph defaults are used
(actually Jewel in the near Future lumin
On 18/08/17 06:10, Maiko de Andrade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want install ceph in 3 machines. CEPH, CEPH-OSD-1 CEPH-OSD-2, each
> machines have 2 disk in RAID 0 with total 930GiB
>
> CEPH is mon and osd too..
> CEPH-OSD-1 osd
> CEPH-OSD-2 osd
>
> I install and reinstall ceph many times. All installa
Thanks a lot David,
for me is a little bit difficult to make some tests because I have to buy a
hardware... and the price is different with cache ssd tier o without it.
If anybody have experience with VDI/login storms... will be really welcome!
Note: I have removed the ceph-user list because I g
Hello,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:09 +0200 Mehmet wrote:
> Which ssds are used? Are they in production? If so how is your PG Count?
>
What he wrote.
W/o knowing which apples you're comparing to what oranges, this is
pointless.
Also testing osd bench is the LEAST relevant test you can do, as it o
Hello,
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:56:49 +0200 Oscar Segarra wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks a lot again for your quick answer...
>
> *The rules in the CRUSH map will always be followed. It is not possible
> for Ceph to go against that and put data into a root that shouldn't have
> it.*
> --> I will
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:09:48 +0200 Mehmet wrote:
> *resend... this Time to the list...*
> Hey David Thank you for the response!
>
> My use case is actually only rbd for kvm Images where mostly Running Lamp
> systems on Ubuntu or centos.
> All Images (rbds) are created with "proxmox" where the ce
Hello,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:31:56 +0200 Oscar Segarra wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks a lot for helping...
>
> Have you read:
> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-openstack/
>
> So just from the perspective of qcow2, you seem to be doomed.
> --> Sorry, I've talking about RAW + QCOW2
Do you mean a lot of snapshots or creating a lot of clones from a snapshot?
I can agree to the pain of crating a lot of snapshots of rbds in ceph. I'm
assuming that you mean to say that you will have a template rbd with a
version snapshot that you clone each time you need to let someone log in.
Is
Am 17.08.2017 um 22:35 schrieb Hauke Homburg:
> Am 16.08.2017 um 13:40 schrieb Hauke Homburg:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> How can i delete a pg completly from a ceph server? I think i have all
>> Data manually from the Server deleted. But i a ceph pg query
>> shows the pg already? A ceph pg force_create_pg
Am 15.08.2017 um 16:34 schrieb ZHOU Yuan:
> Hi Hauke,
>
> It's possibly the XFS issue as discussed in the previous thread. I
> also saw this issue in some JBOD setup, running with RHEL 7.3
>
>
> Sincerely, Yuan
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Hauke Homburg
> mailto:hhomb...@w3-creative.de>> wr
Hi, Cephers!
I'm currently testing the situation of double failure for ceph cluster.
But, I faced that pgs are in stale state forever.
reproduce steps)
0. ceph version : jewel 10.2.3 (ecc23778eb545d8dd55e2e4735b53cc93f92e65b)
1. Pool create : exp-volumes (size = 2, min_size = 1)
2. rbd create : t
33 matches
Mail list logo
