Same physical interfaces (say, LACP) with 2 vlan is my best configuration
That way, you can over-use your hardware, and still get per-usage graphs
On 04/06/2016 23:41, George Mihaiescu wrote:
> One benefit of separate networks is that you can graph the client vs
> replication traffic.
>
>> On J
One benefit of separate networks is that you can graph the client vs
replication traffic.
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Nick Fisk wrote:
>
> Yes, this is fine. I currently use 2 bonded 10G nics which have the untagged
> vlan as the public network and a tagged vlan as the cluster network.
>
>
On 06/04/2016 06:12 PM, Nick Fisk wrote:
Yes, this is fine. I currently use 2 bonded 10G nics which have the
untagged vlan as the public network and a tagged vlan as the cluster
network.
Thanks for info!
However, when I build my next cluster I will probably forgo the
separate cluster network a
Yes, this is fine. I currently use 2 bonded 10G nics which have the untagged
vlan as the public network and a tagged vlan as the cluster network.
However, when I build my next cluster I will probably forgo the separate
cluster network and just run them over the same IP, as after running the
clu
