One benefit of separate networks is that you can graph the client vs replication traffic.
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> wrote: > > Yes, this is fine. I currently use 2 bonded 10G nics which have the untagged > vlan as the public network and a tagged vlan as the cluster network. > > However, when I build my next cluster I will probably forgo the separate > cluster network and just run them over the same IP, as after running the > cluster, I don't see any benefit from separate networks when taking into > account the extra complexity. Something to consider. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of >> Adrian Sevcenco >> Sent: 04 June 2016 16:11 >> To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> Subject: [ceph-users] 2 networks vs 2 NICs >> >> Hi! I seen in discussion and in documentation that "networks" is used >> interchangeable with "NIC" (which also is a different thing than interface) >> .. >> So, my question is :for an OSD server with 24 OSDs with a single 40 GB NIC >> would be ok to have a public network on the main interface and a vlan >> (virtual) interface for the cluster network? >> >> Thank you! >> Adrian > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
