Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations Issue

2019-03-01 Thread Matthew H
lf of David Turner Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:34 PM To: Krishna Venkata Cc: ceph-users Subject: Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations Issue Those numbers look right for a pool only containing 10% of your data. Now continue to calculate the pg counts for the remaining 90% of your data. O

Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations Issue

2019-02-28 Thread David Turner
Those numbers look right for a pool only containing 10% of your data. Now continue to calculate the pg counts for the remaining 90% of your data. On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 12:17 PM Krishna Venkata wrote: > Greetings, > > > I am having issues in the way PGs are calculated in > https://ceph.com/pgcalc

[ceph-users] PG Calculations Issue

2019-02-27 Thread Krishna Venkata
Greetings, I am having issues in the way PGs are calculated in https://ceph.com/pgcalc/ [Ceph PGs per Pool Calculator ] and the formulae mentioned in the site. Below are my findings The formula to calculate PGs as mentioned in the https://ceph.com/pgcalc/ : 1. Need to pick the highest val

Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations

2014-03-14 Thread Peter Matulis
On 03/14/2014 12:37 PM, Brian Andrus wrote: > To add on to Mark's thoughtful reply - The formula was intended to be > used on a *per-pool* basis for clusters that have a small number of > pools. However in small or large clusters, you may consider scaling up > or down per Mark's suggestion, or usin

Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations

2014-03-14 Thread Brian Andrus
;> >> Date: Friday, March 14, 2014 at 10:55 AM >> To: "bradley.mcnam...@seattle.gov <mailto:bradley.mcnam...@seattle.gov>" >> mailto:bradley.mcnam...@seattle.gov>> >> Cc: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>" >>

Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations

2014-03-14 Thread Mark Nelson
@cern.ch>> Date: Friday, March 14, 2014 at 10:55 AM To: "bradley.mcnam...@seattle.gov <mailto:bradley.mcnam...@seattle.gov>" mailto:bradley.mcnam...@seattle.gov>> Cc: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>" mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations

2014-03-14 Thread Karol Kozubal
<mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>" mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations Hi, Since you didn't get an immediate reply from a developer, I'm going to be bold and repeat my interpretation that the documentation implies, perhaps not clearl

Re: [ceph-users] PG Calculations

2014-03-14 Thread Dan Van Der Ster
Original Message From: "McNamara, Bradley" Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 08:03 PM To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: [ceph-users] PG Calculations There was a very recent thread discussing PG calculations, and it made me doubt my cluster setup. So, Inktank, plea

[ceph-users] PG Calculations

2014-03-13 Thread McNamara, Bradley
There was a very recent thread discussing PG calculations, and it made me doubt my cluster setup. So, Inktank, please provide some clarification. I followed the documentation, and interpreted that documentation to mean that PG and PGP calculation was based upon a per-pool calculation. The rece