On 30/04/2014 00:42, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Marc wrote:
>> Thank you for the help so far! I went for option 1 and that did solve
>> that problem. However quorum has not been restored. Here's the
>> information I can get:
>>
>> mon a+b are in state Electing and hav
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Marc wrote:
> Thank you for the help so far! I went for option 1 and that did solve
> that problem. However quorum has not been restored. Here's the
> information I can get:
>
> mon a+b are in state Electing and have been for more than 2 hours now.
> mon c does rep
Thank you for the help so far! I went for option 1 and that did solve
that problem. However quorum has not been restored. Here's the
information I can get:
mon a+b are in state Electing and have been for more than 2 hours now.
mon c does reply to "help" by using the socket, but it does not respond
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Marc wrote:
> 'ls' on the respective stores in /var/lib/ceph/mon/ceph.X/store.db
> returns a list of files (i.e. still present), fsck seems fine. I did
> notice that one of the nodes has different contents in the
> /var/lib/ceph/mon/ceph-b/keyring i.e. its key is d
'ls' on the respective stores in /var/lib/ceph/mon/ceph.X/store.db
returns a list of files (i.e. still present), fsck seems fine. I did
notice that one of the nodes has different contents in the
/var/lib/ceph/mon/ceph-b/keyring i.e. its key is different from the
other 2 nodes'. That shouldn't be th
Monitor keys don't change; I think something else must be going on. Did you
remove any of their stores? Are the local filesystems actually correct
(fsck)?
The ceph-create-keys is a red herring and will stop as soon as. The
monitors do get into a quorum.
-Greg
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Marc wro
Hi,
still working on a troubled ceph cluster running .61.2-1raring
consisting of (currently) 4 monitors a,b,c,g with g being a newly added
monitor that failed/fails to sync up, so consider that one down. Now mon
a and b died because for some (currently unknown) reason linux created a
core dump on