Re: [ceph-users] Mimic 13.2.3?

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 12:23 PM Gregory Farnum wrote: > I imagine we will discuss all this in more detail after the release, > but everybody's patience is appreciated as we work through these > challenges. We have some people on the list asking for more frequent releases, and some people on the l

Re: [ceph-users] Should ceph build against libcurl4 for Ubuntu 18.04 and later?

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:47 AM Matthew Vernon wrote: > > On 22/11/2018 13:40, Paul Emmerich wrote: > > We've encountered the same problem on Debian Buster > > It looks to me like this could be fixed simply by building the Bionic > packages in a Bionic chroot (ditto Buster); maybe that could be d

Re: [ceph-users] Packaging bug breaks Jewel -> Luminous upgrade

Hi Matthew, What's the full apt-get command you're running? On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:31 AM Matthew Vernon wrote: > > Hi, > > in Jewel, /etc/bash_completion.d/radosgw-admin is in the radosgw package > In Luminous, /etc/bash_completion.d/radosgw-admin is in the ceph-common > package > > ...so if yo

Re: [ceph-users] ceph 12.2.9 release

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:57 AM Kevin Olbrich wrote: > We solve this problem by hosting two repos. One for staging and QA and one > for production. > Every release gets to staging (for example directly after building a scm tag). > > If QA passed, the stage repo is turned into the prod one. > Using

Re: [ceph-users] can we drop support of centos/rhel 7.4?

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:48 PM kefu chai wrote: > my question is: is it okay to drop the support of centos/rhel 7.4? so > we will solely build and test the supported Ceph releases (luminous, > mimic) on 7.5 ? CentOS itself does not support old point releases, and I don't think we should imply th

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-ansible

Hi Alfredo, I've packaged the latest version in Fedora, but I didn't update EPEL. I've submitted the update for EPEL now at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7f8d3be3e2 . solarflow99, you can test this package and report "+1" in Bodhi there. It's also in the CentOS Storage

Re: [ceph-users] packages names for ubuntu/debian

Yes, this is a bummer. http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2017-November/022687.html Unfortunately we chose to add the the Ubuntu distro codename suffixes like "xenial" to the ceph.com packages long ago, because who knew that the release names would ever wrap around :) If we were

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Snapshots in Mimic

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Kenneth Waegeman wrote: > Thanks David and John, > > That sounds logical now. When I did read "To make a snapshot on directory > “/1/2/3/”, the client invokes “mkdir” on “/1/2/3/.snap” directory > (http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/cephfs-snapshots/)" it didn't

Re: [ceph-users] [Ceph-maintainers] download.ceph.com repository changes

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:28 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:38:43AM -0400, Alfredo Deza wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After the 12.2.6 release went out, we've been thinking on better ways >> to remove a version from our repositories to prevent users from >> upgrading/installi

Re: [ceph-users] download.ceph.com repository changes

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:38 PM Alfredo Deza wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> After the 12.2.6 release went out, we've been thinking on better ways >> to remove a version from our repositories to prevent users from >> upgrading/installing a kno

Re: [ceph-users] Luminous 12.2.6 release date?

Sage, does http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24597 cover the full problem you're describing? - Ken On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > Please hold off on upgrading. We discovered a regression (in 12.2.5 > actually) but the triggering event is OSD restarts or other peering > combine

Re: [ceph-users] Does anyone use rcceph script in CentOS/SUSE?

Please drop it, it has been untested for a long time. - Ken On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Nathan Cutler wrote: > To all who are running Ceph on CentOS or SUSE: do you use the "rcceph" > script? The ceph RPMs ship it in /usr/sbin/rcceph > > (Why I ask: more-or-less the same functionality is pr

Re: [ceph-users] Any way to get around selinux-policy-base dependency

Hi Bryan, Why not upgrade to RHEL 7.4? We don't really build Ceph to run on older RHEL releases. - Ken On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Bryan Banister wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I would like to upgrade to the latest Luminous release but found that it > requires the absolute latest selinux-policy-

Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu upgrade Zesty => Aardvark, Implications for Ceph?

As a tangent, it's a problem for download.ceph.com packages that "xenial" happens to sort alphabetically after "bionic", because do-release-upgrade will consider (for example) "ceph_12.2.1-1xenial" to be newer than "ceph_12.2.1-1bionic". I think we need to switch to using "ubuntu16.04", "ubuntu18.0

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph mirrors

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Stefan Kooman wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for empty mail, that shouldn't have happened. I would like to > address the following. Currently the repository list for debian- > packages contain _only_ the latest package version. In case of a > (urgent) need to downgrade you

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph release cadence

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > * Keep even/odd pattern, but force a 'train' model with a more regular > cadence > > + predictable schedule > - some features will miss the target and be delayed a year This one (#2, regular release cadence) is the one I will value the most.

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs file size limit 0f 1.1TB?

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:36 PM, John Spray wrote: > > CephFS has a configurable maximum file size, it's 1TB by default. > > Change it with: > ceph fs set max_file_size How does this command relate to "ceph mds set max_file_size" ? Is it different? I've put some of the information in this t

Re: [ceph-users] RGW: removal of support for fastcgi

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > > TL;DR: Does anyone care if we remove support for fastcgi in rgw? Please remove it as soon as possible. The old libfcgi project's code is a security liability. When upstream died, there was a severe lack of coordination around distri

Re: [ceph-users] A Jewel in the rough? (cache tier bugs and documentation omissions)

At a general level, is there any way we could update the documentation automatically whenever src/common/config_opts.h changes? - Ken On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Nick Fisk wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of >> Joh

Re: [ceph-users] [Tendrl-devel] Calamari-server for CentOS

I think the most up-to-date source of Calamari CentOS packages would be https://shaman.ceph.com/repos/calamari/1.5/ On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Martin Kudlej wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to ask again about calamari-server package for CentOS 7. Is > there any plan to have calamari-ser

Re: [ceph-users] Kernel 4 repository to use?

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Marc Roos wrote: > We are going to setup a test cluster with kraken using CentOS7. And > obviously like to stay as close as possible to using their repositories. Ilya has backported the latest kernel code to CentOS 7.3's kernel, so I'd recommend the version in the

Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu Xenial - Ceph repo uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1)

Apologies for the thread necromancy :) We've (finally) configured our signing system to use sha256 for GPG digests, so this issue should no longer appear on Debian/Ubuntu. - Ken On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Saverio Proto wrote: > I started to use Xenial... does everyone have this error ? :

Re: [ceph-users] Unwanted automatic restart of daemons during an upgrade since 10.2.5 (on Trusty)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Francois Lafont > wrote: >> So, now with 10.2.5 version, in my process, OSD daemons are stopped, >> then automatically restarted by the upgrade and then stopped again >> by the reboot

Re: [ceph-users] Unwanted automatic restart of daemons during an upgrade since 10.2.5 (on Trusty)

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Francois Lafont wrote: > So, now with 10.2.5 version, in my process, OSD daemons are stopped, > then automatically restarted by the upgrade and then stopped again > by the reboot. This is not an optimal process of course. ;) We do not intend for anything in the pa

Re: [ceph-users] Server crashes on high mount volume

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Diego Castro wrote: > Thank you for the tip. > Just found out the repo is empty, am i doing something wrong? > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cr/x86_64/Packages/ > Sorry for the confusion. CentOS 7.3 shipped a few hours ago. - Ken ___

Re: [ceph-users] Server crashes on high mount volume

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Diego Castro wrote: > Hello, my case is very specific but i think other may have this issue. > > I have a ceph cluster up and running hosting block storage for my openshift > (kubernetes) cluster. > Things goes bad when i "evacuate" a node, which is move all contain

Re: [ceph-users] nfs-ganesha and rados gateway, Cannot find supported RGW runtime. Disabling RGW fsal build

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, 于 姜 wrote: > ceph version 10.2.3 > ubuntu 14.04 server > nfs-ganesha 2.4.1 > ntirpc 1.4.3 > > cmake -DUSE_FSAL_RGW=ON ../src/ > > -- Found rgw libraries: /usr/lib > -- Could NOT find RGW: Found unsuitable version ".", but required is at > least "1.1" (found /usr) >

Re: [ceph-users] Memory leak in radosgw

Hi Trey, If you run the upstream curl releases, please note that curl has a poor security record and it's important to stay on top of updates. https://curl.haxx.se/docs/security.html indicates that 7.44 has security problems, and in fact there are eleven more security announcements coming soon (ht

Re: [ceph-users] ceph website problems?

I think this may be related: http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2016/10/11/dreamcompute-us-east-1-cluster-service-disruption/ On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Sean Redmond wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like the ceph website and related sub domains are giving errors for > the last few hours. > > I noticed th

Re: [ceph-users] CEPHFS file or directories disappear when ls (metadata problem)

kernel-3.10.0-327.*.el7 comes from RHEL 7.2. (although I don't know what "ug" means in your version, there?) kernel-3.10.0-493.el7 ships in the RHEL 7.3 Beta. You need a RHEL subscription to access the RHEL betas (CentOS doesn't build them). - Ken On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Kenneth Waegem

Re: [ceph-users] High CPU load with radosgw instances

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > Hi Casey, > > That warning message tells users to upgrade to a new version of > libcurl. Telling users to upgrade to a newer version of a base system > package like that sets the user on a trajectory to have to maintain &

Re: [ceph-users] High CPU load with radosgw instances

backport to jewel) at > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16695. > > Casey > > > > On 09/16/2016 01:38 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> >> Hi Lewis, >> >> This sounds a lot like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1347904 , currently >> slated for the upcoming RHEL 7.3 (and

Re: [ceph-users] High CPU load with radosgw instances

Hi Lewis, This sounds a lot like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1347904 , currently slated for the upcoming RHEL 7.3 (and CentOS 7.3). There's an SRPM in that BZ that you can rebuild and test out. This method won't require you to keep chasing upstream curl versions forever (curl has a lot of CVEs).

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-dbg package for Xenial (ubuntu-16.04.x) broken

For some reason, during the v10.2.2 release, ceph-dbg_10.0.2-1xenial_amd64.deb did not get transferred to http://download.ceph.com/debian-jewel/pool/main/c/ceph/ - Ken On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:27 PM, J. Ryan Earl wrote: > Hello, > > New to the list. I'm working on performance tuning and testin

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Samba VFS RHEL packages

The Samba packages in Fedora 22+ do enable the Samba VFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1174412 >From what Ira said downthread, this is pretty experimental, so you could run your tests on a Fedora system and see how it goes :) - Ken On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > Hi al

Re: [ceph-users] ERROR: unable to open OSD superblock on /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-1: (13) Permission denied

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:31 AM, RJ Nowling wrote: > Sam, George, thanks for your help! > > The problem is that the data directory is symlinked to /home and the systemd > unit file had `ProtectHome=true` Good to know that feature works! :D - Ken ___ cep

Re: [ceph-users] CEPH/CEPHFS upgrade questions (9.2.0 ---> 10.2.1)

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Goncalo Borges > wrote: >> Thank you Greg... >> >> There is one further thing which is not explained in the release notes and >> that may be worthwhile to say. >> >> The rpm structure (for redhat compatible

Re: [ceph-users] jewel 10.2.1 lttng & rbdmap.service

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:00 AM, kefu chai wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Max Vernimmen > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I upgraded to 10.2.1 and noticed that lttng is a dependency for the RHEL >> packages in that version. Since I have no intention of doing traces on ceph >> I find myself wonder

Re: [ceph-users] v10.2.1 Jewel released

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Karsten Heymann wrote: > the updated debian packages are *still* missing ceph-{mon,osd}.target. > Was it intentional to release the point release without the fix? It was not intentional. Teuthology does not test systemd, so these sort of things tend to fall off

Re: [ceph-users] yum install ceph on RHEL 7.2

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > If you register subscription properly, you should be able to install > the Ceph without the EPEL. The opposite is true (when installing upstream / ceph.com). We rely on EPEL for several things, like leveldb and xmlstarlet. - Ken ___

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Hammer LTS to Infernalis or wait for Jewel LTS?

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Luis Periquito wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Mihai Gheorghe wrote: > From previous history the last 2 LTS versions are supported (currently > Firefly and Hammer). Note that Firefly reached end-of-life in January, and we're no longer issuing releases for

Re: [ceph-users] systemd & sysvinit scripts mix ?

In theory the RPM should contain either the init script, or the systemd .service files, but not both. If that's not the case, you can file a bug @ http://tracker.ceph.com/ . Patches are even better! - Ken On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Florent B wrote: > By the way, why /etc/init.d/ceph script

[ceph-users] babeltrace and lttng-ust headed to EPEL 7

lttng is destined for EPEL 7, so we will finally have lttng tracepoints in librbd for our EL7 Ceph builds, as we've done with the EL6 builds. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-200bd827c6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8c74b0b27f If you are running

Re: [ceph-users] systemd & sysvinit scripts mix ?

I recommend we simply drop the init scripts from the master branch. All our supported platforms (CentOS 7 or newer, and Ubuntu Trusty or newer) use upstart or systemd. - Ken On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Florent B wrote: > Hi everyone, > > On a few servers, updated from Hammer to Infernalis,

Re: [ceph-users] State of Ceph documention

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Andy Allan wrote: > including a nice big obvious version switcher banner on every > page. We used to have something like this, but we didn't set it back up when we migrated the web servers to new infrastructure a while back. It was using https://github.com/alfredo

[ceph-users] "ceph-installer" in GitHub

Hi folks, A few of us at RH are working on a project called "ceph-installer", which is a Pecan web app that exposes endpoints for running ceph-ansible under the hood. The idea is that other applications will be able to consume this REST API in order to orchestrate Ceph installations. Another tea

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph extras package support for centos kvm-qemu

When we re-arranged the download structure for packages and moved everything from ceph.com to download.ceph.com, we did not carry ceph-extras over. The reason is that the packages there were unmaintained. The EL6 QEMU binaries were vulnerable to VENOM (CVE-2015-3456) and maybe other CVEs, and no u

Re: [ceph-users] http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/

Yes, we've had to move all of our hardware out of the datacenter in Irvine, California to a new home in Raleigh, North Carolina. The backend server for gitbuilder.ceph.com had a *lot* of data and we were not able to sync all of it to an interim server in Raleigh before we had to unplug the old one.

Re: [ceph-users] [Ceph-maintainers] ceph packages link is gone

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Dan Mick wrote: > This was sent to the ceph-maintainers list; answering here: > > On 11/25/2015 02:54 AM, Alaâ Chatti wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I used to install qemu-ceph on centos 6 machine from >> http://ceph.com/packages/, but the link has been removed, and there i

Re: [ceph-users] Problem with infernalis el7 package

locally will not help. > > stijn > > On 11/11/2015 01:06 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Bob R wrote: >>> We've got two problems trying to update our cluster to infernalis- >> >> >> This was our bad. As indicated in http:

Re: [ceph-users] can't stop ceph

The version of the documentation you were browsing was for "argonaut", which is very old, and predates Upstart integration. Here's the version of the docs for firefly (0.80.z), the version that you're using on Ubuntu: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/firefly/rados/operations/operating/ This version has

Re: [ceph-users] Unable to install ceph

Looks like ceph-deploy 1.5.20 thinks your Ubuntu 15.10 wily system is an Upstart-based system, and it's systemd instead. - Ken On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Robert Shore wrote: > OS: Linux b260-space-pc62 4.2.0-18-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 6 18:25:50 > UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/L

Re: [ceph-users] No Presto metadata available for Ceph-noarch ceph-release-1-1.el7.noarch.rp FAILED

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Andrey Shevel wrote: > ceph-release-1-1.el7.noarch.rp FAILED > http://download.ceph.com/rpm-giant/el7/noarch/ceph-release-1-1.el7.noarch.rpm: > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found > ] 0.0 B/s |0 B --:--:-- ETA > Trying other mirror. > > > Error down

Re: [ceph-users] SHA1 wrt hammer release and tag v0.94.3

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Artie Ziff wrote: > I'm looking forward to learning... > Why the different SHA1 values in two places that reference v0.94.3? 95cefea9fd9ab740263bf8bb4796fd864d9afe2b is the commit where we bump the version number in the debian packaging. b2503b0e15c0b13f480f083506

Re: [ceph-users] Issues with CentOS RDO Liberty (OpenStack) and Ceph Repo (dependency resolution failed)

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:05 PM, c...@dolphin-it.de wrote: > Error: Package: 1:cups-client-1.6.3-17.el7.x86_64 (core-0) >Requires: cups-libs(x86-64) = 1:1.6.3-17.el7 >Installed: 1:cups-libs-1.6.3-17.el7_1.1.x86_64 (@updates) >cups-libs(x86-64) = 1:1.6.3-17.el

Re: [ceph-users] Problem with infernalis el7 package

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Bob R wrote: > We've got two problems trying to update our cluster to infernalis- This was our bad. As indicated in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13746 , Alfredo rebuilt CentOS 7 infernalis packages, re-signed them, and re-uploaded them to the same location on do

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Hammer to Infernalis with ceph-deploy fails on Centos7

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Jason Altorf wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> It is not a known problem. Mind filing a ticket @ >> http://tracker.ceph.com/ so we can track the fix for this? >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:35 PM, c.

Re: [ceph-users] Problem with infernalis el7 package

Yeah, this was our bad. As indicated in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13746 , Alfredo rebuilt CentOS 7 infernalis packages so that they don't have this dependency, re-signed them, and re-uploaded them to the same location. Please clear your yum cache (`yum makecache`) and try again. On Tue, Nov 1

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Hammer to Infernalis with ceph-deploy fails on Centos7

It is not a known problem. Mind filing a ticket @ http://tracker.ceph.com/ so we can track the fix for this? On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:35 PM, c...@dolphin-it.de wrote: > > > Dear Ceph-users, > > I am trying to upgrade from Hammer to Infernalis but "ceph-deploy install > --release infernalis host1

Re: [ceph-users] rsync mirror download.ceph.com - broken file on rsync server

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Matt Taylor wrote: > I still see rsync errors due to permissions on the remote side: > Thanks for the heads' up; I bet another upload rsync process got interrupted there. I've run the following to remove all the oddly-named RPM files: for f in $(locate *.rpm.*

Re: [ceph-users] rsync mirror download.ceph.com - broken file on rsync server

Thanks, I've deleted it from the download.ceph.com web server. - Ken On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Alfredo Deza wrote: > Yes that file can (should) be deleted > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Björn Lässig

Re: [ceph-users] fedora core 22

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Andrew Hume wrote: > a while back, i had installed ceph (firefly i believe) on my fedora core > system and all went smoothly. > i went to repeat this yesterday with hammer, but i am stymied by lack of > packages. there doesn’t > appear anything for fc21 or fc22.

Re: [ceph-users] rsync mirror download.ceph.com - broken file on rsync server

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Björn Lässig wrote: > indeed there is: > > [09:40:49] ~ > rsync -4 -L > download.ceph.com::ceph/debian-hammer/pool/main/c/ceph/.ceph-dbg_0.94.5-1trusty_amd64.deb.3xQnIQ > -rw--- 91,488,256 2015/10/26 19:36:46 > .ceph-dbg_0.94.5-1trusty_amd64.deb.3xQnIQ > >

Re: [ceph-users] Can we place the release key on download.ceph.com?

Good suggestion! Done: http://download.ceph.com/keys/release.asc The gitbuilder key is now there also: http://download.ceph.com/keys/autobuild.asc - Ken On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the public keys for signing the packages can be found on > git.

Re: [ceph-users] download.ceph.com unreachable IPv6 [was: v9.1.0 Infernalis release candidate released]

I wonder if there are routing issues with IPv6 in the DreamHost cloud? http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php prints the right IP, but then "web server is unreachable : Connection timed out" - Ken On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Björn Lässig wrote: > On 10/14/2015 09:19 PM, Wido den Hollander wrot

Re: [ceph-users] Annoying libust warning on ceph reload

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote: > - Each time logrotate is executed, we received a daily notice with the > message > > ibust[8241/8241]: Warning: HOME environment variable not set. Disabling > LTTng-UST per-user tracing. (in setup_local_apps() at lttng-ust-comm.c:305) Thank

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph-deploy error

This issue with the conflicts between Firefly and EPEL is tracked at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104 On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:11 PM, pavana bhat wrote: > In case someone else runs into the same issue in future: > > I came out of this issue by installing epel-release before installing > ceph

Re: [ceph-users] Potential OSD deadlock?

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > Oh.. I bet you didn't upgrade the osds to 0.94.4 (or latest hammer build) > first. They won't be allowed to boot until that happens... all upgrades > must stop at 0.94.4 first. This sounds pretty crucial. is there Redmine ticket(s)? - Ken _

Re: [ceph-users] Can not download from http://ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras/rpm/centos6.3/

When we re-arranged the download structure for packages and moved everything to download.ceph.com, we did not carry ceph-extras over. The reason is that the packages there were unmaintained. The EL6 QEMU binaries were vulnerable to VENOM (CVE-2015-3456) and maybe other CVEs, and no users should re

Re: [ceph-users] rbd/rados packages in python virtual environment

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:32 PM, shiva rkreddy wrote: > Hi, > Any one has tried installing python-rbd and python-rados packages in python > virtual environment? > We are planning to have openstack services(cinder/glance) run in the virtual > environment. There are no pip install packages available

Re: [ceph-users] Important security noticed regarding release signing key

/ceph-extras" is in used now, such as > qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph, qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph > etc. > Any new releases will be provided ? > > > On 15/9/22 下午10:24, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang wrot

Re: [ceph-users] Important security noticed regarding release signing key

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang wrote: > Hi, all, > Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras” can be > opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now? > > Thanks and Regards, > WangSongbo > The packages in "ceph-extras" were old and subje

Re: [ceph-users] debian repositories path change?

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > I'm getting: > > W: GPG error: http://download.ceph.com wheezy Release: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: > NO_PUBKEY E84AC2C0460F3994 > > > Trying to update from there Hi Lindsay,

Re: [ceph-users] debian repositories path change?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Alfredo Deza wrote: >> The new locations are in: >> >> >> http://packages.ceph.com/ >> >> For debian this would be: >> >> http://packages.ceph.com/debian-{release} > > Make that download.ceph.com .. the packages url was tempo

Re: [ceph-users] Ruby bindings for Librados

- Original Message - > From: "Ken Dreyer" > To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 9:06:01 PM > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ruby bindings for Librados > > On 07/13/2015 02:11 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > On 07/13/2015 09:43

Re: [ceph-users] SSL for tracker.ceph.com

On 07/14/2015 04:14 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > Curently tracker.ceph.com doesn't have SSL enabled. > > Every time I log in I'm sending my password over plain text which I'd > rather not. > > Can we get SSL enabled on tracker.ceph.com? > > And while we are at it, can we enable IPv6

Re: [ceph-users] Ruby bindings for Librados

On 07/13/2015 02:11 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 07/13/2015 09:43 PM, Corin Langosch wrote: >> Hi Wido, >> >> I'm the dev of https://github.com/netskin/ceph-ruby and still use it in >> production on some systems. It has everything I >> need so I didn't develop any further. If you find any bu

Re: [ceph-users] Redhat Storage Ceph Storage 1.3 released

On 07/02/2015 12:16 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Hi, > Am 01.07.2015 um 23:35 schrieb Loic Dachary: >> Hi, >> >> The details of the differences between the Hammer point releases and the >> RedHat Ceph Storage 1.3 can be listed as described at >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-de

Re: [ceph-users] Redhat Storage Ceph Storage 1.3 released

On 07/01/2015 03:02 PM, Vickey Singh wrote: > - What's the exact version number of OpenSource Ceph is provided with > this Product It is Hammer, specifically 0.94.1 with several critical bugfixes on top as the product went through QE. All of the bugfixes have been proposed or merged to Hammer ups

Re: [ceph-users] Unexpected period of iowait, no obvious activity?

On 06/23/2015 09:09 AM, Scottix wrote: > Ya Ubuntu has a process called mlocate which run updatedb > > We basically turn it off shown > here http://askubuntu.com/questions/268130/can-i-disable-updatedb-mlocate > > If you still want it you could edit the settings /etc/updatedb.conf and > add a prune

Re: [ceph-users] CEPH on RHEL 7.1

- Original Message - > From: "Varada Kari" > To: "ceph-devel" > Cc: "ceph-users" > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:33:08 AM > Subject: [ceph-users] CEPH on RHEL 7.1 > > Hi, > > We are trying to build CEPH on RHEL7.1. But facing some issues with the build > with "Giant" branch. > Enabl

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph on RHEL7.0

For the sake of providing more clarity regarding the Ceph kernel module situation on RHEL 7.0, I've removed all the files at https://github.com/ceph/ceph-kmod-rpm and updated the README there. The summary is that if you want to use Ceph's RBD kernel module on RHEL 7, you should use RHEL 7.1 or lat

Re: [ceph-users] ceph_argparse packaging error in Hammer/debian?

On 05/07/2015 12:53 PM, Andy Allan wrote: > Hi Loic, > > Sorry for the noise! I'd looked when I first ran into it and didn't > find any reports or PRs, I should have checked again today. > > Thanks, > Andy That's totally fine. If you want, you can review that PR and give a thumbs up or down comm

[ceph-users] systemd unit files and multiple daemons

I could really use some eyes on the systemd change proposed here: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11344 Specifically, on bullet #4 there, should we have a single "ceph-mon.service" (implying that users should only run one monitor daemon per server) or if we should support multiple "ceph-mon@" servi

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy : systemd unit files not deployed to a centos7 nodes

As you've seen, a set of systemd unit files has been committed to git, but the packages do not yet use them. There is an open ticket for this task, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11344 . Feel free to add yourself as a watcher on that if you are interested in the progress. - Ken On 04/17/2015 06:

Re: [ceph-users] Purpose of the s3gw.fcgi script?

On 04/13/2015 07:35 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Francois Lafont" >> To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:17:47 PM >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Purpose of the s3gw.fcgi script? >> >> Hi, >> >> Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote

Re: [ceph-users] CentOS 7.1: Upgrading (downgrading) from 0.80.9 to bundled rpms

Hi Dan, Arne, KB, I got a chance to look into this this afternoon. In a CentOS 7.1 VM (that's not using EPEL), I found that ceph.com's 0.80.9 fails to install due to an Epoch issue. I've opened a ticket for that: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11371 I think you're asking about the reverse, though

Re: [ceph-users] Firefly - Giant : CentOS 7 : install failed ceph-deploy

On 04/08/2015 03:00 PM, Travis Rhoden wrote: > Hi Vickey, > > The easiest way I know of to get around this right now is to add the > following line in section for epel in /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo > > exclude=python-rados python-rbd > > So this is what my epel.repo file looks like: http://fpast

Re: [ceph-users] Firefly - Giant : CentOS 7 : install failed ceph-deploy

Hi Vickey, Sorry about the issues you've been seeing. This looks very similar to http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104 . Here are two options you can try in order to work around this: - If you must run Firefly (0.80.x) or Giant (0.87.x), please try enabling the "epel-testing" repository on your s

Re: [ceph-users] Install problems GIANT on RHEL7

On 04/04/2015 02:49 PM, Don Doerner wrote: > Key problem resolved by actually installing (as opposed to simply > configuring) the EPEL repo. And with that, the cluster became viable. > Thanks all. Hi Don, I'm not sure I understand what you did to fix this. Can you share more information about t

Re: [ceph-users] Where is the systemd files?

The systemd service unit files were imported into the tree, but they have not been added into any upstream packaging yet. See the discussion at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769593 or "git log -- systemd". I don't think there are any upstream tickets in Redmine for this yet. Si

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.8 and librbd performance

On 03/03/2015 04:19 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > Hi, > > This is just a heads up that we've identified a performance regression in > v0.80.8 from previous firefly releases. A v0.80.9 is working it's way > through QA and should be out in a few days. If you haven't upgraded yet > you may want to wait

Re: [ceph-users] CentOS7 librbd1-devel problem.

On 02/17/2015 01:07 AM, Leszek Master wrote: > Hello all. I have to install qemu on one of my ceph nodes to test > somethings. I added there a ceph-giant repository and connceted it to > ceph cluster. The problem is that i need to build from sourcess qemu > with rbd support and there is no librbd1-

Re: [ceph-users] Installation failure

On 02/16/2015 08:44 AM, HEWLETT, Paul (Paul)** CTR ** wrote: > Thanks for that Travis. Much appreciated. > > Paul Hewlett > Senior Systems Engineer > Velocix, Cambridge > Alcatel-Lucent > t: +44 1223 435893 m: +44 7985327353 > > > > > From: Travis Rhode

Re: [ceph-users] Compilation problem

On 02/09/2015 08:17 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > I think there's ongoing work to backport (portions of?) Ceph to RHEL5, > but it definitely doesn't build out of the box. Even beyond the > library dependencies you've noticed you'll find more issues with e.g. > the boost and gcc versions. :/ As far a

Re: [ceph-users] RBD deprecated?

On 02/05/2015 08:55 AM, Don Doerner wrote: > I have been using Ceph to provide block devices for various, nefarious > purposes (mostly testing ;-). But as I have worked with various Linux > distributions (RHEL7, CentOS6, CentOS7) and various Ceph releases > (firefly, giant), I notice that the only

Re: [ceph-users] got "XmlParseFailure" when libs3 client accessing radosgw object gateway

On 01/06/2015 02:21 AM, Liu, Xuezhao wrote: > But when I using libs3 (clone from http://github.com/wido/libs3.git ), > the s3 commander does not work as expected: Hi Xuezhao, Wido's fork of libs3 is pretty old and not up to date [1]. It's best to use Bryan's repository instead: https://github.com

Re: [ceph-users] Building Ceph

On 01/05/2015 11:26 AM, Garg, Pankaj wrote: > I’m trying to build Ceph on my RHEL (Scientific Linux 7 – Nitrogen), > with 3.10.0. > > I am using the configure script and I am now stuck on “libkeyutils not > found”. > > I can’t seem to find the right library for this. What Is the right yum > updat

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy Errors - Fedora 21

On 01/02/2015 12:38 PM, Travis Rhoden wrote: > Hello, > > I believe this is a problem specific to Fedora packaging. The Fedora > package for ceph-deploy is a bit different than the ones hosted at > ceph.com . Can you please tell me the output of "rpm > -q python-remoto"? > > I

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy Errors - Fedora 21

On 12/29/2014 08:24 PM, deeepdish wrote: > Hello. > > I’m having an issue with ceph-deploy on Fedora 21. > > - Installed ceph-deploy via ‘yum install ceph-deploy' > - created non-root user > - assigned sudo privs as per documentation > - http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/deployment/preflight-c

  1   2   >