Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu 19.04

2019-07-08 Thread James Page
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 10:30 PM Kai Stian Olstad wrote: > On 06.07.2019 16:43, Ashley Merrick wrote: > > Looking at the possibility of upgrading my personal storage cluster from > > Ubuntu 18.04 -> 19.04 to benefit from a newer version of the Kernel e.t.c > > For a newer kernel install HWE[1], at

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph version upgrade with Juju

2018-10-08 Thread James Page
Hi Fabio On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 23:02 Fabio Abreu wrote: > Hi Cephers, > > I have a little doubt about the migration of Jewel version in the MAAS / > JUJU implementation scenario . > > Could someone has the same experience in production environment? > > I am asking this because we mapping all

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread James Page
w when the patched version is up. >> >> Thanks for your help, much appreciated. >> >> On 13 April 2016 at 11:19, James Page wrote: >> >>> n Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 10:09 hp cre wrote: >>> >>>> I am using version .31 from either the ceph repo or the

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread James Page
n Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 10:09 hp cre wrote: > I am using version .31 from either the ceph repo or the one you updated in > the ubuntu repo. > It seems that these commits were not "commited" in version .31 ? > Yes - they post-date the .31 release; a patched version of .31 should be in Xenial shortl

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread James Page
spect and follow the code for ceph-deploy, though i'm no >> python developer. >> It seems that in hosts/debian/__init__.py, line number 20, that if >> distro.lower == ubuntu then it will return upstart. >> >> maybe thats the problem ? >> >> On 13

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread James Page
Hello On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 22:08 hp cre wrote: > Hey James, > Did you check my steps? What did you do differently and worked for your? > Your steps look OK to me; I did pretty much the same, but with three nodes instead on a single node - but I'm scratching my head as to why I don't see the s

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread James Page
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 21:35 hp cre wrote: > I wanted to try the latest ceph-deploy. Thats why i downloaded this > version (31). Latest ubuntu version is (20). > > I tried today at the end of the failed attempt to uninstall this version > and install the one that came with xenial, but whatever i

Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread James Page
10:18 James Page wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 10:02 hp cre wrote: > >> Hello James, >> >> It's a default install of xenial server beta 2 release. Created a user >> then followed the ceph installation quick start exactly as it is. >> >> Ceph-deploy ver

Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread James Page
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 10:02 hp cre wrote: > Hello James, > > It's a default install of xenial server beta 2 release. Created a user > then followed the ceph installation quick start exactly as it is. > > Ceph-deploy version 1.5.31 was used as follows > > 1- ceph-deploy new node1 > 2- ceph-deploy

Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread James Page
Hi On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 at 16:39 hp cre wrote: > Hello all, > > I was just installing jewel 10.1.0 on ubuntu xenial beta 2. > I got an error when trying to create a mon about failure to find command > 'initctl' which is in upstart. > Tried to install upstart, then got an error 'com.ubuntu...' not

Re: [ceph-users] ceph for ubuntu 16.04

2016-03-23 Thread James Page
Hi On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 at 08:04 Robertz C. wrote: > Hi members, > > Ubuntu 16.04 will get released soon. > I want to make sure that, will ceph integrated with the new ubuntu > system work fine in production environment? > Do you have any suggestion on this? The ceph packages in Ubuntu 16.04 it

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW not working after upgrade to Hammer

2015-09-11 Thread James Page
; the Gateway was working fine for a bit, but then started throwing this error. Turned out the back-end mon and osd daemons had not been restarted so where still running firefly code - if you're running on Ubuntu, the packaging won't restart daemons automatically - it has to be done manual

Re: [ceph-users] Packages for Debian jessie, Ubuntu vivid etc

2015-04-22 Thread James Page
e on firefly at this time). trusty and utopic are firefly (0.80.9). vivid is hammer (0.94.1) - this is also available for trusty via the Kilo Cloud Archive - see [0]. [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@

Re: [ceph-users] Heads up: libvirt produces unusable images from RBD pool on Ubuntu trusty

2015-04-22 Thread James Page
ning ;)'. Nice spot - and this is not the first time I've seen a bug due to incorrect specification of the stripe size for rbd images. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCA

Re: [ceph-users] who is using radosgw with civetweb?

2015-02-26 Thread James Page
u in our 15.01 charm release - mod-fastcgi was causing so many headaches! So far in our internal QA cloud its been very reliable running with civetweb - we run three units of the ceph-radosgw charm frontend by haproxy + VIP. I'd +1 switching focus to this approach. Cheers James - -- James

Re: [ceph-users] v0.67.9 Dumpling released

2014-06-03 Thread James Page
_ ceph-users mailing > list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: U

Re: [ceph-users] Unable to update Swift ACL's on existing containers

2014-05-23 Thread James Page
nd tested - LGTM. Thanks for the quick fix. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTf06vAAoJEL/srsu

[ceph-users] Unable to update Swift ACL's on existing containers

2014-05-22 Thread James Page
10.98.191.31/swift/v1/61853c5a-e1d4-11e3-b125-2c768a4f56ac 401 Unauthorized AccessDenied Any ideas? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.e

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph 0.80 and Ubuntu 14.04

2014-04-30 Thread James Page
04.30 07:08, Kenneth wrote: >> >> Latest Ceph release is Firefly v0.80 right? Or is it still in >> beta? And Ubuntu is on 14.04. >> >> Will I be able to install ceph 0.80 on Ubuntu 14.04 for >> production? If not, what is the time frame on when can I install >>

Re: [ceph-users] Cannot create keys for new 0.78 deployment - protocol mismatch

2014-03-25 Thread James Page
t should be followed by 0.79 prior to release with firefly being dropped in as an SRU shortly afterwards. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunder

Re: [ceph-users] How to Configure Cinder to access multiple pools

2014-02-27 Thread James Page
ce root volumes. The path to cinder volumes is passed in full when attaching volumes to instances. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigm

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph under Ubuntu 14.04, what's still on the TODO?

2013-12-13 Thread James Page
es. >> > > Great! Before 14.04 comes out I think there will be a minor release > of Emperor. If everything line up OK we will ship with firefly :-) Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph under Ubuntu 14.04, what's still on the TODO?

2013-12-11 Thread James Page
> Let me know if you want anything else added/tracked. > The rbdmap init script should be upstartified. +1 - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunder

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph under Ubuntu 14.04, what's still on the TODO?

2013-12-11 Thread James Page
ly a matter of installing the > CloudStack KVM agent and people can start with Ceph. Same goes for > OpenStack I guess. I'm tracking 14.04 Ceph related stuff on this blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-1311-ceph Let me know if you want anything el

Re: [ceph-users] centos6.4 + libvirt + qemu + rbd/ceph

2013-12-09 Thread James Page
well so it gets exercised *alot* *DISTRO PITCH OVER* Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

Re: [ceph-users] saucy salamander support?

2013-10-23 Thread James Page
le with those from ceph.com (I try to keep things in sync as much as possible) so should work OK with ceph-deploy. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with

Re: [ceph-users] 1 particular ceph-mon never jobs on 0.67.2

2013-08-27 Thread James Page
example are all network interfaces configured using /etc/network/interfaces? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://ww

Re: [ceph-users] Backporting the kernel client

2013-04-29 Thread James Page
-enablement-stack-means-for-sysadmins/ This allows you to use a more recent, distro provided kernel than 3.2 which should have the required fixes/features you need. That said if you are having problems with the 3.2 kernel please do report bugs back to Ubuntu. Cheers James -- James Page Techni