Re: [ceph-users] Using same name for rgw / beast web front end

n civetweb. > > In nautilus though, the beast frontend still has this > thread-per-connection limitation, and its performance is comparable to > civetweb's. I expect we'll make more noise about it once we're further > along with the async refactoring and start to show the re

Re: [ceph-users] Using same name for rgw / beast web front end

Replying to my own question: 2. Beast is not a web front end, so it would be an apple-to-orange comparison. I just couldn't find any blogs / docs about it at first (found it here: https://github.com/ceph/Beast) Still unsure about the first question.. On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM Eric

[ceph-users] Using same name for rgw / beast web front end

able as an option to us. I couldn't find any blogs / docs on comparing these 2 frontends. Is there any recommended reading or could someone give me an overview? Much appreciated! -- Eric Choi Senior Software Engineer 2 | Core Platform ___ cep

[ceph-users] Upgrading from Luminous to Nautilus: PG State Unknown

y chance? Thank you, -- Eric Choi Senior Software Engineer 2 | Core Platform ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] osd_op_tp timeouts

I realized I sent this under wrong thread: here I am sending it again: --- Hello all, I work in the same team as Tyler here, and I can provide more info here.. The cluster is indeed an RGW cluster, with many small (100 KB) objects similar to your use case Bryan. But we have the blind bucket se

Re: [ceph-users] Living with huge bucket sizes

Hello all, I work in the same team as Tyler here, and I can provide more info here.. The cluster is indeed an RGW cluster, with many small (100 KB) objects similar to your use case Bryan. But we have the blind bucket set up with "index_type": 1 for this particular bucket, as we wanted to avoid

[ceph-users] RGW: Auth error with hostname instead of IP

When I send the a RGW request with hostname (with port that is not 80), I am seeing "SignatureDoesNotMatch" error. GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: cephrgw0002s2mdw1.sendgrid.net:50680 User-Agent: Minio (linux; amd64) minio-go/2.0.4 mc/2017-04-03T18:35:01Z Authorization: AWS **REDACTED**:**REDACTED** Si

[ceph-users] RadosGW Performance on Copy

Performance related data I found so far on RadosGW don't contain anything on Copy operation. Can anyone comment on the Copy operation? Is it basically just a GET + INSERT? Thanks, Eric ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.