Replying to my own question: 2. Beast is not a web front end, so it would be an apple-to-orange comparison. I just couldn't find any blogs / docs about it at first (found it here: https://github.com/ceph/Beast)
Still unsure about the first question.. On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM Eric Choi <ec...@twilio.com> wrote: > Hi there, we have been using ceph for a few years now, it's only now that > I've noticed we have been using the same name for all RGW hosts, resulting > when you run ceph -s: > > rgw: 1 daemon active (..) > > despite having more than 10 RGW hosts. > > * What are the side effects of doing this? Is this a no-no? I can see the > metrics can (ceph daemon ... perf dump) be wrong, are the metrics kept > track independently (per host)? > > * My second question (maybe this should be a separate email!) is that > comparison between Beast vs Civetweb. We only recently upgraded to > Nautilus, so Beast became available as an option to us. I couldn't find > any blogs / docs on comparing these 2 frontends. Is there any recommended > reading or could someone give me an overview? > > Much appreciated! > > > > -- > > Eric Choi > Senior Software Engineer 2 | Core Platform > > > -- Eric Choi Senior Software Engineer 2 | Core Platform
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
