On 30/04/14 18:05, Mike Hanby wrote:
Congrats, any possible conflict with RedHat's earlier acquisition of GlusterFS?
They are similar projects but with slightly different targets. I guess
with Ceph+Openstack and Gluster+[RHEV|Ovirt] as natural partners. That
said I'd love to see Ceph+[RHEV|
Hi.
I've read in many places that you should never use writeback on any kind
of shared storage. Caching is better dealt with on the storage side
anyway as you have hopefully provided resilience there. In fact if your
SAN/NAS is good enough it's supposed to be best to use "none" as the
caching
Hi,
Many thanks for this.
Cheers
Alex
Original Message
*Subject:* Re: [ceph-users] CephFS posix ACLs
*Date:* Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:47:37 +0800
*From:* Yan, Zheng
*To:* Alex Crow
*CC:* ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
that code is already in test branch of ceph-client, I think it will go
Hi list,
I've noticed that a patch was submitted in October last year to enable
POSIX ACLs in cephfs, but things have gone very quiet on that front
recently.
We're looking to use cephfs in our organisation for resilient storage of
documents, but without ACLs we would have some issues. Are th
