Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performance calculator

2016-07-26 Thread
how did you deploy ceph jewel on debian7? 2016-07-26 1:08 GMT+08:00 Mark Nelson : > Several years ago Mark Kampe proposed doing something like this. I was > never totally convinced we could make something accurate enough quickly > enough for it to be useful. > > If I were to attempt it, I would

Re: [ceph-users] Lessons learned upgrading Hammer -> Jewel

2016-07-14 Thread
good job, thank you for sharing, Wido~ it's very useful~ 2016-07-14 14:33 GMT+08:00 Wido den Hollander : > To add, the RGWs upgraded just fine as well. > > No regions in use here (yet!), so that upgraded as it should. > > Wido > > > Op 13 juli 2016 om 16:56 schreef Wido den Hollander : > > > > >

Re: [ceph-users] Can't configure ceph with dpdk

2016-07-06 Thread
very appreciate~ 2016-07-07 14:18 GMT+08:00 Haomai Wang : > Previously dpdk plugin only support cmake. > > Currently I'm working on split that PR into multi clean PR to let > merge. So previous PR isn't on my work list. plz move on the following > changes > > On T

Re: [ceph-users] Can't configure ceph with dpdk

2016-07-06 Thread
645: recipe for target 'libcommon_crc.la' failed make[3]: *** [libcommon_crc.la] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs 2016-07-07 9:04 GMT+08:00 席智勇 : > Hi haomai: > > I noticed your PR about support DPDK by Ceph: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9230

[ceph-users] Can't configure ceph with dpdk

2016-07-06 Thread
Hi haomai: I noticed your PR about support DPDK by Ceph: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9230 It's great job for Ceph. I want to do some test base on the PR, but can not use it still.First I can not find the package for dpdk on debian/ubuntu, So I download the source code of dpdk and compile

Re: [ceph-users] about 'ceph df' value on Jewel+Bluestore

2016-06-02 Thread
version info == cepher@10-165-160-18:~/xzy$ ceph -v ceph version 10.2.1 (3a66dd4f30852819c1bdaa8ec23c795d4ad77269) cepher@10-165-160-18:~/xzy$ cat /etc/debian_version 8.4 2016-06-02 17:54 GMT+08:00 席智勇 : > hi cepher: > >I upgrade my ceph cluster to Jewel, and use bluestore a

[ceph-users] about 'ceph df' value on Jewel+Bluestore

2016-06-02 Thread
hi cepher: I upgrade my ceph cluster to Jewel, and use bluestore as beckend store, when I create image using rbd command line tool, it works ok, like: cepher@10-165-160-18:~/xzy$ sudo rbd create xzy_vol -p switch01_ssd_volumes --size 10240 cepher@10-165-160-18:~/xzy$ rbd ls -p switch01_

Re: [ceph-users] about slides on VAULT of 2016

2016-04-28 Thread
got~ thank you~ regards~ 2016-04-28 20:59 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil : > Hi, > > Here are the slides: > > > http://www.slideshare.net/sageweil1/bluestore-a-new-faster-storage-backend-for-ceph > > sage > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, 席智勇 wrote: > > > hi sage: > >

[ceph-users] about slides on VAULT of 2016

2016-04-27 Thread
hi sage: I find the slides of VAULT of 2016 on this page( http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/vault/program/slides), it seems not the whole accoding to the schedule info, and I didn't find yours. Can you share your slides or any things usefull on VAULT about BlueStore. regards~ zhiyo

[ceph-users] Fwd: google perftools on ceph-osd

2016-04-27 Thread
Anyone can give me some advice? -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: 2016-04-26 18:50 GMT+08:00 Subject: google perftools on ceph-osd To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG hi Stefan: When We are using ceph, I found osd process use much more CPU, especially when small rand write

Re: [ceph-users] krbd map on Jewel, sysfs write failed when rbd map

2016-04-21 Thread
And this setting will enable "exclusive-lock, object-map, fast-diff, > deep-flatten" features. > > > > > Best wishes, > Mika > > > 2016-04-21 16:56 GMT+08:00 席智勇 : > >> That's true for me too. >> You can disable them via set in the conf fil

Re: [ceph-users] krbd map on Jewel, sysfs write failed when rbd map

2016-04-21 Thread
That's true for me too. You can disable them via set in the conf file. #ceph.conf rbd_default_features = 3 #meens only enable layering and striping 2016-04-21 16:00 GMT+08:00 Mika c : > Hi cephers, > Had the same issue too. But the command "rbd feature disable" not > working to me. > Any com

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Day Sunnyvale Presentations

2016-04-21 Thread
2016-04-07 0:18 GMT+08:00 Patrick McGarry : > Hey cephers, > > I have all but one of the presentations from Ceph Day Sunnyvale, so > rather than wait for a full hand I went ahead and posted the link to > the slides on the event page: > > http://ceph.com/cephdays/ceph-day-sunnyvale/ thanks for sh

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Day Sunnyvale Presentations

2016-04-19 Thread
I have read the SK‘s performance tuning work too, it's a good job especially the analysis of write/read latancy on OSD. I want to ask a question about the optimize on 'Long logging time', what's the meaning about 'split logging into another thread and do it later', AFAIK, ceph does logging async by

Re: [ceph-users] Some monitors have still not reached quorum

2016-04-19 Thread
some tips: 1.if you enabled auth_cluster_required, you may shoud have a check the keyring 2.can you reach the monitors from your admin node by ssh without passwd 2016-04-16 18:16 GMT+08:00 AJ NOURI : > Followed the preflight and quick start > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/start/quick-ceph-depl

Re: [ceph-users] krbd map on Jewel, sysfs write failed when rbd map

2016-04-18 Thread
Hi, can you post the 'modinfo rbd' and your cluster state 'ceph -s'. > > 2016-04-18 16:35 GMT+08:00 席智勇 : > > hi cephers: > > > > I create a rbd volume(image) on Jewel release, when exec rbd map, I got > the > > error message as follows.i can not

[ceph-users] krbd map on Jewel, sysfs write failed when rbd map

2016-04-18 Thread
hi cephers: I create a rbd volume(image) on Jewel release, when exec rbd map, I got the error message as follows.i can not find any message usage in syslog/kern.log/messages. anyone can share some tips? --my ceph version root@hzbxs-

[ceph-users] Reply:Re: what's the benefit if I deploy more ceph-mon node?

2015-11-19 Thread
hi Jan: got it. thanks for the reply. At 2015-11-19 17:14:19, "Jan Schermer" wrote: >There's no added benefit - it just adds resiliency. >On the other hand - more monitors means more likelihood that one of them will >break, when that happens there will be a brief interruption to so

[ceph-users] what's the benefit if I deploy more ceph-mon node?

2015-11-19 Thread
hi all:        As the title, if I deploy more than three ceph-mon node, I can tolerate more monitor node failture, what I wana know is, is there any other benefit, for example, better for IOPS or latency? On the other hand, what the disadvantage if it has? best regards~