hi Jan:
got it.
thanks for the reply.
At 2015-11-19 17:14:19, "Jan Schermer" <j...@schermer.cz> wrote:
>There's no added benefit - it just adds resiliency.
>On the other hand - more monitors means more likelihood that one of them will
>break, when that happens there will be a brief interruption to some (not only
>management) operations.
>If you decide to reduce the number of MONs then that is a PITA as it means
>recreating for example libvirt domains (mon addresses are pretty much
>hardcoded in there).
>Just keep at at 3 unless you have more than 3 datacenters.
>
>Jan
>
>> On 19 Nov 2015, at 09:35, <xizhiyon...@163.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> hi all:
>>
>> As the title, if I deploy more than three ceph-mon node, I can
>> tolerate more monitor node failture, what I wana know is, is there any
>> other benefit， for example, better for IOPS or latency? On the other hand,
>> what the disadvantage if it has？
>>
>> best regards~
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
