Hello,
I found that documentation on the Internet on the question whether I
can safely have two instances of cephfs in my cluster is inconsistent.
For the record, I don't use snapshots.
FOSDEM 19 presentation by Sage Weil:
https://archive.fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/ceph_project_status_update/
Hi Ceph users,
librados (C interface) disappered ? All google provided links are broken:
\ SORRY /
\ /
\ This page does /
] not exist yet. [ ,'|
] [ / |
]__
Hello experts,
I have accidentally created a situation where the only monitor in a cluster has
been moved to a new node without it’s /var/lib/ceph contents. Not realizing
what I had done, I decommissioned the original node, but still have the
contents of it’s /var/lib/ceph.
Can I shut down th
* Monitors now have a config option ``mon_osd_warn_num_repaired``, 10 by
default.
If any OSD has repaired more than this many I/O errors in stored data a
``OSD_TOO_MANY_REPAIRS`` health warning is generated.
Look at `dmesg` and the underlying drive’s SMART counters. You almost
certainly hav
On 2020-10-09 19:12, anantha.ad...@intel.com wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is an invite to all interested to join a working group being formed
> for 2020 Ceph User Survey planning.
I'm interested.
How and when will this working group come together?
Gr. Stefan
Hello!
Today, I started the morning with a WARNING STATUS on our Ceph cluster.
# ceph health detail
HEALTH_WARN Too many repaired reads on 1 OSDs
[WRN] OSD_TOO_MANY_REPAIRS: Too many repaired reads on 1 OSDs
osd.67 had 399911 reads repaired
I made "ceph osd out 67" and PGs where migrat
Hi Frank,
That was a good tip. I was able to move the broken files out of the way
and restore them for users. However, after 2 weeks I'm still left with
unfound objects. Even more annoying, I now have 82k objects degraded
(up from 74), which hasn't changed in over a week.
I'm ready to cla
Hello all,
This is an invite to all interested to join a working group being formed for
2020 Ceph User Survey planning. The focus is to augment the questionnaire
coverage, explore survey delivery formats and to expand the survey reach to
audience across the world. The popularity and adoptio
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:12 PM Marc Roos wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >1. The pg log contains 3000 entries by default (on nautilus). These
> >3000 entries can legitimately consume gigabytes of ram for some
> >use-cases. (I haven't determined exactly which ops triggered this
> >today).
>
> How can I chec
Hi Matt,
Thanks for replying and for the clarification on the load-sharing mechanism.
Do you know which version is targeted to include that feature ?
Thanks again !
Nicolas
De : Matt Benjamin
Envoyé : vendredi 9 octobre 2020 14:27
À : Nicolas Moal
Cc : Paul Me
>1. The pg log contains 3000 entries by default (on nautilus). These
>3000 entries can legitimately consume gigabytes of ram for some
>use-cases. (I haven't determined exactly which ops triggered this
>today).
How can I check how much ram my pg_logs are using?
-Original Message
What I've found is the following method:
radosgw-admin reshard add --bucket dsfdsfsf--num-shards 200
radosgw-admin reshard process
Could this cause any issue in a 10 millions object bucket if I increase it to
200 maybe?
From: Szabo, Istvan (Agoda)
Sent:
Hi,
Most of it is described here: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22928
Buckets created under Jewel don't always have the *placement_rule* set
in their bucket metadata and this causes Nautilus RGWs to not serve
requests for them.
Snippet from the metadata:
{
"key": "bucket.instance:pbx:
On 09.10.20 13:55, Dan van der Ster wrote:
[...]
I also noticed a possible relationship with scrubbing -- One week ago
we increased to osd_max_scrubs=5 to clear out a scrubbing backlog; I
wonder if the increased read/write ratio somehow led to an exploding
buffer_anon. Do things stabilize on your
Hello,
I have a bucket which is close to 10 millions objects (9.1 millions), we have:
rgw_dynamic_resharding = false
rgw_override_bucket_index_max_shards = 100
rgw_max_objs_per_shard = 10
Do I need to increase the numbers soon or it is not possible so they need to
start to use new bucket?
Hi Nicolas,
This is expected behavior currently, but a sync fairness mechanism
that will permit load-sharing across gateways during replication is
being worked on.
regards,
Matt
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 6:30 AM Nicolas Moal wrote:
>
> Hello Paul,
>
> Thank you very much for pointing us at BBR !
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:42 PM Harald Staub wrote:
>
> On 07.10.20 21:00, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 07/10/2020 16:00, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:29 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 07/10/2020 14:08, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> Hi
On 07.10.20 21:00, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 07/10/2020 16:00, Dan van der Ster wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:29 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 07/10/2020 14:08, Dan van der Ster wrote:
Hi all,
This morning some osds in our S3 cluster started going OOM, after
restarting them I not
Hello Paul,
Thank you very much for pointing us at BBR ! We will definitely run some tests
before and with the change applied to see if it's increasing a bit our transfer
speed.
One additional question if you don't mind. As of today, our zonegroup
configuration consist of two zones, a master z
Hi,
I think by "copy function" would be the "bluefs-bdev-migrate" command
from ceph-bluestore-tool, this is an excerpt from the man paage:
---snip---
bluefs-bdev-migrate --dev-target new-device --devs-source device1
[--devs-source device2]
Moves BlueFS data from source device
20 matches
Mail list logo
