What I've found is the following method:

radosgw-admin reshard add --bucket dsfdsfsf--num-shards 200
radosgw-admin reshard process

Could this cause any issue in a 10 millions object bucket if I increase it to 
200 maybe?
________________________________________
From: Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) <istvan.sz...@agoda.com>
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 3:44 PM
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Bucket sharding

Email received from outside the company. If in doubt don't click links nor open 
attachments!
________________________________

Hello,

I have a bucket which is close to 10 millions objects (9.1 millions), we have:

rgw_dynamic_resharding = false
rgw_override_bucket_index_max_shards = 100
rgw_max_objs_per_shard = 100000

Do I need to increase the numbers soon or it is not possible so they need to 
start to use new bucket?

The version is luminous 12.2.8.

I don't want outage so want to be prepared.

Thank you

________________________________
This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s). It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by copyright or 
other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by 
reply email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to copy this 
message or disclose its content to anyone. Any confidentiality or privilege is 
not waived or lost by any mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the 
message. All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to ensure 
compliance with company policies, to protect the company's interests and to 
remove potential malware. Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost 
or deleted, or contain viruses.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

Reply via email to