[CentOS] Samba issue

for some reason I cannot to my samba server on centos 4.5 with any other linux distro. I have tried pclinuxos, kubuntu, fc7. I have entered the correct credentials in the correct case to no avail. What's funny is my winders machines can connect just fine. Any ideas? -- My "Foundation" ver

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail server setup for small ISP

ah but if you give them a quality product(even outsourced) and it works for them while you won't see the extra fees up front it will pay off in terms of they will call on you later for more help AND you will get referrals from others. Ugo Bellavance wrote: Gary Richardson wrote: It's been awh

[CentOS] install isues

I have a new dell t105(opty 1210's with 4 gigs of ram..sata hdd's and sata dvd-rom). I can bot to the Cent 5 64 bit dvd fine but once it asks where the install image is i tell it cd-rom..then it rejects the dvd spits it out and tells me it's not there. the same happens on 32 bit. I have downl

Re: [CentOS] install issues

cd set torrent now but if i can find a solution in the next 6 hours(burning and downloading time) i'd be highly appreciative. Wiliam William Warren wrote: I have a new dell t105(opty 1210's with 4 gigs of ram..sata hdd's and sata dvd-rom). I can bot to the Cent 5 64 bit d

Re: [CentOS] Re: install issues

.. Scott Silva wrote: on 1/24/2008 2:17 PM William Warren spake the following: well it boots onto my athlon64 system. what's weird is no centos dvd will install..they all die at that point. The centos 32 bit CD's also work fine. I guess something in this machine does not like centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: install issues

5. Oh the possibilities. Scott Silva wrote: on 1/24/2008 3:02 PM William Warren spake the following: will the network install iso on the mirrors do the same thing? If so yes i have another server(the one who's hard drives are going to wind up in this one..sounds like. It's going to

Re: [CentOS] install isues

OTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Warren Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:37 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] install isues I have a new dell t105(opty 1210's with 4 gigs of ram..sata hdd's and sata dvd-rom). I can bot to the Cent 5 64 bit dvd fine but onc

Re: [CentOS] Re: install issues

I just realized the old server had a cd rom not dvd..:( I wonder if i can install directly from one of the mirrors over http? Scott Silva wrote: on 1/24/2008 2:17 PM William Warren spake the following: well it boots onto my athlon64 system. what's weird is no centos dvd will install.

Re: [CentOS] Re: install issues

I found a better workaround. i forgot i had a usb 2.0 external cdrom drive. I booted to that and it's installing from the 64 bit cd set for centos 5. I have files a bug report about not being able to use the internal dvd drive for installations of 64 bit. William Warren wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Re: install issues

s or dvd's.) the https install has died 4 times now saying it's timing out..unfortunately the other 5 machines here are not having any issues. I need a machine working pretty quick..if this is not solved soon i'll send this back and build one myself. sincerely, William Warren Damie

Re: [CentOS] Re: install issues

about 7mb) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Warren Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:15 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: install issues I just realized the old server had a cd rom not dvd..:( I wonder if i can ins

[CentOS] vmware question

I am running Centos 5 64 bit. For somer reason i cannot get the windows client to connect to the server. The port is set to 904 as per the install but when i try to connect to the server i get the error the machine is actively refusing it. I do not have a firewall on and the apache server an

Re: [CentOS] vmware question

when i loaded vmware up it went to 904 on it's own. netstat -an | grep LISTEN | grep 904 tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:904 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# netstat -an | grep LISTEN | grep 902 I gave xinetd a start command as well. nate wrote: William Warren

Re: [CentOS] vmware question

I'm at a loss.. Tronn Wærdahl wrote: On Jan 27, 2008 7:53 AM, William Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: when i loaded vmware up it went to 904 on it's own. netstat -an | grep LISTEN | grep 904 tcp0

Re: [CentOS] vmware question

that's what i missed. I misunderstood the directions. Now i know in the hostname to put : in there. Let me reinstall vmware and try it again. Jonathan Berry wrote: On Jan 26, 2008 10:46 PM, William Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am running Centos 5 64 bit. For somer reas

Re: [CentOS] swapping on centos 5.1

you can also flush the swap with a swapoff -a wait till it flushes then swapon -a Johnny Hughes wrote: Jerry Geis wrote: Hi all, I used to use centos 4.5 on an AMD 4800+ with 2GIG ram. Now I use centos 5.1 on AMD 6400+ with 4GIG RAM. The system responsiveness is different between the two. I

Re: [CentOS] cpu type

no you won't really gain anything for regular mundane tasks like that. Jimmy Bradley wrote: On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 12:12 +, Steve Searle wrote: Around 12:06pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley scrawled: and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of th

Re: [CentOS] Way to not page swap programs

you can set vm.swappiness=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf that will do just about that. if your programs get a leak though you really do want the system to be able to swap or OOM might nuke them anyway. If you are really concerned about this make sure you have plenty of ram in the machine and set swappi

[CentOS] Virtualization question

I want to use Centos5 as my host os and virtualize a windows server on it. My question is..do i have to be at the machine to setup the windows server inside the virtual server since windows 2k3 is gui based or can i do this remotely somehow? -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that

Re: [CentOS] upgrade my open ssl

unless there is a certain feature you have to have the version number is nothing to worry about. RHEL(Centos) has all of the security and bugfix patches form the latest vanilla version backported to the one you're seeing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All, I have centos 4.5 final and when i

Re: [CentOS] IHC7 RAID-1 or Kernel Software RAID-1?

use only the linux software raid. It's perfectly stable even under high loads here. Tony Mountifield wrote: I'm just setting up a SuperMicro system which has twin SATA disks on an Intel IHC7 RAID-capable controller. The system came with Fedora 5 pre-installed, which I will be removing and rep

Re: [CentOS] Getting info on hardware RAID

if they are dells go to support.dell.com and input your system serial numbers. You'll get the information you need there. Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote: On 8/27/07, Mezei Zoltán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote: I'm doing an audit of all

Re: [CentOS] What is eating my memory?

easier waylog in as root and type the word free to get a much slimmer version of that information. If the numbers look odd(after posting them here) then the more expansive option below is needed. Alfred von Campe wrote: I install centos 5 on a HD while it is in a Compaq with 256Mb memory.

Re: [CentOS] What is eating my memory?

Moskowitz wrote: Below is both results... William Warren wrote: easier waylog in as root and type the word free to get a much slimmer version of that information. If the numbers look odd(after posting them here) then the more expansive option below is needed. Alfred von Campe wrote: I install

Re: [CentOS] Virtual Hosting

you can also go with webmin to configure this stuff.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All, Im sorry for posting this query here but was helpless.. as i am not able to subscribe to sendmail mailing list i have jus installed CentOS 5 and the following software sendmail 8.13 bind 9.3 this machine

Re: [CentOS] Virtual Hosting

I run selinux in permissive. Once i figure out how to write policy i'll put it back on active.. Lanny Marcus wrote: On 01 September 2007, William Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Message: 3 you can also go with webmin to configure this stuff.. If you use Webmin, at this

Re: [CentOS] Disk De-Fraging in Linux

IME defragging is highly needed in busy servers that use a lot of disk. Every single one of my clients have seen server performance tank when fragmentation goes over 15% or so..including the workstations. In vista it's still necessary. John R Pierce wrote: you're in luck cause you don't d

Re: [CentOS] Re: Central file server advice please

actually it'll perform WORSE in many cases than Linux software raid. Scott Silva wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following on 9/21/2007 2:43 AM: Exactly how much throughput are you realistically anticipating? What connection are you going to use? 802.11 or 10/100 or gige? And yes, the ch

Re: [CentOS] Re: Central file server advice please

I mistyped..hardware raid is the way to go. FRIAD will perform worse than Linux software raid most times..:) Feizhou wrote: William Warren wrote: actually it'll perform WORSE in many cases than Linux software raid. Used to (bar buggy firmware, incompatibilities). Most hardware raid

Re: [CentOS] hosting panel

virtualmin pro Michael Kress wrote: Hi there, what's your favorite (OS) hosting panel for centos5 ? What's most interesting for me is the usability by others i.e. users who don't know the tool very much, so it has to be very simple. Second is of course security. Greetings & TIA Michael --

Re: [CentOS] Re: Asterisk

have you tried trixbox which is an asterisk version based off of Centos? Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Friday, October 05, 2007 9:11 PM + Tony Mountifield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That very much depends on who you ask. Many people (myself included) prefer the original version which is acti

Re: [CentOS] where to find Single Server CD edition?

actually just yum update Rogelio Bastardo wrote: probably nto built yet for 4.5, you can find them for 4.4... http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum /pub/centos/4.4/isos/i386/ Very cool, thank you. For whatever reason, none of the mirrors I was using had th

Re: [CentOS] how to convert 7 cd iso images into one dvd image?

On 1/14/2011 9:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 01/14/11 5:29 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: >> Home ISP blocking bittorrent; company now blocks bittorrent. >> >> I want/need an old release (CentOS 5.2) to install as a VirtualBox guest. >> >> I suppose I could install from the cd iso images, but it is

Re: [CentOS] Let's talk about compression rates

On 1/22/2011 5:45 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> I am sure there is a more relevant list you could take something of this >> nature to. > Hi Karanbir > > can you name me a list for general Open Source discussions? > thanks > > cheers Sven > _

Re: [CentOS] Package updates for 5.4?

On 1/26/2011 8:35 PM, Mitch Patenaude wrote: We're running a large cluster, and are leery of upgrading them all to 5.5, but would like to find the latest security patches. Is there a repo for this? I can't seem to find a 5.4 specific update repo with anything since last March. Is 5.4 EOL'd?

Re: [CentOS] server specifications

On 2/14/2011 12:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampen > wrote: >> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC >>> demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in >>> the ssytem components on

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On 2/21/2011 12:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ? Dag, The pac

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On 2/21/2011 1:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> This is the last post I am making to this thread ... and maybe to this >> list in general. During the build processes, here are the files that we >> have had to add (at various times) to g

Re: [CentOS] Alternative to cPanel

On 2/23/2011 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote: Hello all, I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom built httpd/mysql/etc

Re: [CentOS] Samba quota for AD users

AFAIK Samba doesn't directly support quotas..you CAN however setup quotas using the linux Filesystem quota manager. I'm a wimp and use webmin most times for that..:) of course i do NOT have that exposed externally(that's what vpn's are for.. On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 02

[CentOS] KVM Question

t the basics of KVM..:) Thanks, William Warren ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 does not recognise SAS drives with LSI 1068E Controller

On 3/9/2011 12:10 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Some controllers want to map arrays to volumes and present the volumes >> to the OS instead of drives, so you have to go through the motions of >> assigning the resources to volumes and ini

Re: [CentOS] php53-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1

On 3/19/2011 8:42 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > Curious I do not see the php53 in the yum centos 5 repositories. > > Has this package been excluded? > > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/php53-5.3. > 3-1.el5_6.1.src.rpm > > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/ente

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: >> . >>> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with >>> RH >>> for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable >>> binaries for free. >> Yes, but patches (suppo

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 6:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote: > >> On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: >>>> . >>>>> I hope the situation may change now with

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 7:00 PM, compdoc wrote: >> It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on. > > Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried opensuse for > the first time and I really like it. > > I understand the need for stability, but for what I do, having the newest > (stable) kern

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 7:11 PM, compdoc wrote: >> to which news are you referring about ubuntu-wise? > I meant recent redhat news about the change in how it will deliver code to > the community. They mentioned opensuse as being a competitor, I believe. > > > > > __

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 7:29 PM, compdoc wrote: >> their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and > Somehow a story led me to try opensuse. Sorry, don't know which it was that > I read. > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 10:44 PM, Marko A. Jennings wrote: > On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote: >> their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and >> mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges. >> That's basicall

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 arecausing EPEL incompatibilities [OT]

On 3/21/2011 6:19 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > Now I have read this thread twice. > > :( > > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > - - > - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - >

Re: [CentOS] Duplicate Mails

On 3/21/2011 7:53 PM, Max Hetrick wrote: > On 03/21/2011 05:57 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >> Apologies if this caused any inconveniences. > No apology necessary from you. Much appreciated for fixing it quickly, > Ralph. > > If anyone is using Thunderbird, there's a handy add-on called Remove > Du

[CentOS] check memory configuration

What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the case? Just a general pointer is fine..:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/m

Re: [CentOS] check memory configuration

On 3/28/2011 5:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > William Warren wrote: >> What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show >> me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the >> case? Just a general pointer is fine..:) > ls

Re: [CentOS] Download the repo DAG of CentOS 5.5

On 4/3/2011 2:33 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote: > Yes, I know that, but I want to download for make a local repository > > On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 14:25 -0400, Winter wrote: >> On 4/3/2011 2:12 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote: >>> hello >>> somebody might help to create a script to download the r

Re: [CentOS] question on software raid

On 4/1/2011 11:32 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors my .02 i would replace the drive. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] status of 5.6 updates

There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6. I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] status of 5.6 updates

On 4/13/2011 5:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > William Warren wrote: >> There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6. >> I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:) >> ___ >&g

Re: [CentOS] Yum and upgrading PHP

On 11/25/2009 4:22 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: ML wrote: Hi Mark, I tried a yum upgrade php so that I could get to either 5.2 or 5.3 (currently 5.1.2) and It says nothing marked for upgrade. How does one upgrade individual packages versus doing a plain system upgrade (like just yum upgrade) I'm a l

Re: [CentOS] GGI or Server Based Proxy Recommendations

On 11/26/2009 9:24 AM, Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:43 PM, James Bensley wrote: > >> I didn't think you could access squid via a web front end like proxify.co.uk? >> >> -- >> Regards, >> James ;) >> >> Mike Ditka - "If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On 12/16/2009 12:10 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > On 12/15/09 2:48 PM, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > >> I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS >> box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single >> LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On 12/16/2009 9:34 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > Steve Thompson wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: >> >> >>> Steve Thompson wrote: >>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I have a client with a handfu

Re: [CentOS] storage servers crashing, hair being pulled out!

I'm looking at the controller myself. Have you tried updating either the firmware on the card the drivers or both? On 12/19/2009 10:55 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote: > The other variable is the two machines running drbd have promise raid > cards in them. I also have the same raid card in my persona

Re: [CentOS] storage servers crashing, hair being pulled out!

Do you have a BBU on this card? Various sites report the controller has poor performance on writes without the bbu. On 12/19/2009 10:55 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote: > I'm really at a loss on what to do next... Any suggestions? > ___ CentOS mailing l

[CentOS] upgrade adivce

appreciated..:) Sincerely, William Warren ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

On 12/30/2009 8:23 PM, Corey Chandler wrote: > William Warren wrote: > >> I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system. Can i upgrade >> that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should >> i just back it up and do it from scratch? Als

Re: [CentOS] [OT] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

On 1/7/2010 9:30 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> On 01/06/2010 09:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set >>> up some storage servers to run und

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

On 1/11/2010 1:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 1/11/2010 11:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> >>> It seems X4500 (not available anymore) had Marvell SATA controllers, that >>> are not supported with RHEL5. >>> >>> >> And those marvell controllers caused ma

Re: [CentOS] OT: free DNS service?

On 1/17/2010 7:22 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > I have been using a free DNS service for the past seven (7) years. > This morning, at 4 A.M., , I changed the "A" record for one of my web > sites, to point to an IP address on a different server, so I could > test. After watching the TTL count down fro

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization - what do You recommend?

On 2/2/2010 6:20 AM, Rafa? Radecki wrote: Hi All. I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use one of the following options: - KVM; - VMWare Esxi; - VMWare Workstation. I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something like LVM snapshots for backu

Re: [CentOS] what causes CUPS to dis-enable a printer?

On 2/10/2010 9:15 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:37:28 -0600 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > >> In our computer lab, there are 6 Centos 5.4 workstations. There is an >> HP printer with jet direct card. It often works. >> >> But sometimes users come and get me saying the pri

Re: [CentOS] OT: Top Posting

Beyond casutic...who's slaging here karanbir? He expressed his opinion and last time i checked there wasn't a rule against that. While your reply was inflamatory you also have the right to fire back..however saying it's not ok to do something that wasn't against any of the rules of this forum

Re: [CentOS] Re: RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

I'm not a fan of RAID 5 at all since it can only tolerate one failure at all. Go with raid 10 or something like that which is able to handle more than one failure. Intermittent, uncorrectable sector failures during rebuilds are becoming an increasing problem with today's drives. Rudi Ahlers

Re: [CentOS] Hardened ver of CentOS?

John Thomas wrote: Rogelio wrote: Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro? Perhaps you can find a Viagra RPM ROFL -- Registered Microsoft Partner My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.c

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot from DVD on an Intel Svr to install CentOS 5.2

checkout the bugtracker..this is a long running issue. The issue stems from newer servers/computers using sata optical drives. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm new to CentOS and I want to install CentOS 5.2 on an intel computer to use it as a server. I downloaded the CentOS 5.2 DVD iso i386 a

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot from DVD on an Intel Svr to install CentOS 5.2

however booting from the cd's of 5.x works fine. William Warren wrote: checkout the bugtracker..this is a long running issue. The issue stems from newer servers/computers using sata optical drives. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm new to CentOS and I want to install CentOS 5.2 o

Re: [CentOS] Load Average ~0.40 when idle

post it on the centos bug tracker to start..:) listmail wrote: On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing a

Re: [CentOS] Load Average ~0.40 when idle

the issue occurs even on a live cd so the machine's software load isn't suspect. It's the nics. Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote: William Warren escribió: post it on the centos bug tracker to start..:) listmail wrote: On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrot

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 CR mdadm-3.2.2 breaks Intel BIOS RAID

On 10/8/2011 3:14 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Steve Brookswrote: > >> On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Trey Dockendorf wrote: >> >>> I just upgraded my home KVM server to CentOS 6.0 CR to make use of the >>> latest libvirt and now my RAID array with my VM storage is missing. It

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 9:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 06:25 AM, Steve Walsh wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 10:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto pis(e: >>> As far as I am aware, how I understood official explanation, packages >>> that are introduced in C

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 10:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >> >> Giles Coochey wrote: >>> So Centos 6.0 is EOL? >> not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you? >> Read this: >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ >>

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 12:54 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >> wrote: >> Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/30/2011 8:33 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Sunday, October 30, 2011 08:38 PM, William Warren wrote: > >> Or move to another distro that has timely security updates and long term >> support like Centos. > What...Ubuntu "LTS"? > __

Re: [CentOS] Disable autoneg on r8169?

On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: >> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex. >> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot: >> >> Any other ideas? > udev rules? > mii-tool? > ___ > CentOS ma

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

On 1/11/2012 6:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Rilindo Foster wrote: > >>> So I looked up avahi on the web, but as far as I could see >>> it is not doing anything essential; >>> so I was wondering if stopping avahi-daemon would have any bad effect? >> Avahi is a mdns daemon. You can safely disable i

Re: [CentOS] SSD Drives

On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote: > Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on > SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would > solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out > quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each m

Re: [CentOS] SSD Drives

On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote: > On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote: >> >>> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote: >>>> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on >>>> SSD drives?

Re: [CentOS] SSD Drives

On 2/2/2012 5:19 PM, Peter A wrote: > On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote: >> On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote: >>> If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive) >>> SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID1 with CentOS-6.2

first off..if you are using the on bios raid turn it off. Secondly black drives form WD intentionally put themselves into deep cycle diags every so often. This makes them impossible to use in hardware and FRAID setups. I have 4 of them in raid 10 under mdraid and i had to disable bios raid f

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID1 with CentOS-6.2

What's funny is WD is just being idiotic. Seagate does NOT have that extended error checking. I have two barracuda green drives in an sbs 2k8 server on a sas 6 ir and they work perfectly. On 2/29/2012 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Miguel Medalha wrote: >> A few months ago I had an enormous

[CentOS] md raid 10

why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] md raid 10

is machine will come back to centos6..:) Centos 6 is great but it's not right for this particluar machine..:( On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, William Warren > wrote: > > why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition

Re: [CentOS] md raid 10

, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren > > wrote: > >> well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they > >> are doing that allows that to boot. > > > > That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck > > debugging it whe

Re: [CentOS] Intel Atom systems?

Tosh wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> Hi Bill, >> >> On 05/23/2009 08:37 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: >> > Any comments on CentOS 5 on Intel Atom CPUs? > >> Something I totally left out in my last email - atleast 2 people have >> reported success using C5 on Atom. I've loo

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:23:16PM -0700, Linux Advocate wrote: > >> Hell, has my centos 5.3 box been hacked??? Help !! >> > > Yes. Reinstall; fully update components; restore *data* > from backups (you have backups, right?) and review what >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:23:16PM -0700, Linux Advocate wrote: > >> Hell, has my centos 5.3 box been hacked??? Help !! >> > > Yes. Reinstall; fully update components; restore *data* > from backups (you have backups, right?) and review what >

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > >> On 21/06/09 13:28, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> That page does indeed reflect the current state of play - there is *no* centos approved or recommended commercial support entity - but it *is* something t

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Spiro Harvey wrote: > > >> Karanbir, >> >> what about putting up something along the lines of: >> >> "Commercial support is currently unavailable, although this is being >> investigated by the community. The difficulty is that CentOS is a >> volunte

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Spiro Harvey wrote: > > >>> from a promotional standpoint, i would avoid getting into that >>> centos is a volunteer effort, and i would *seriously* avoid using >>> the word "difficulty." all i was suggesting earlier is that there >>> are a >>>

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

Geoff Galitz wrote: > >> The aim was to create platform, not >> strictly focused on enterprise. We wanted create something mixed. >> Something with enterprise, testing, backport levels and efforts. The >> project has been started but never really haven't happened. >> > > I'll go on the reco

[CentOS] no more single cd installs?

for some reason cent 5 now wants cd 3 as well as 1. I make sure to uncheck everything and instlal only the base system. Bad iso or new default? Sincerely, William Warren ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman

  1   2   >