Re: [CentOS] build rpm from source code

2008-01-17 Thread Warren Young
Centos wrote: any thing specific for centos ? If you build and test the package on CentOS and it works, then you've built a package for CentOS. There's no need to make it any more difficult than that. All that changes when you move an RPM from one system to another is how packages are nam

Re: [CentOS] MySQL and charsets: latin1 vs. utf8

2008-01-21 Thread Warren Young
Niki Kovacs wrote: when doing a backup database dump, the resulting dumpfile will be iso-8859-1. This is controlled by the setup for the tables themselves. MySQL does have a default character set, but it will let you create each individual table in any character set you like, and even mix

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-31 Thread Warren Young
James B. Byrne wrote: I am not a fan of security through obscurity. You're diluting a useful phrase. It originally referred to practices where obscurity was the _only_ source of security. As soon as you saw through the obscurity, there was no security. Of course, this means that there w

Re: [CentOS] adaptec 2100S drivers

2008-01-31 Thread Warren Young
Mark Weaver wrote: I've got a server that I'm rebuilding and I've been given an Adaptec 2100S single channel scsi card to use. Problem is I can't find drivers for CentOS 4 anywhere. The driver is included in the kernel now, though apparently not built by default upstream. You'll need to rebu

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs?

2008-02-01 Thread Warren Young
Kenneth Wolcott wrote: RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs? Why not? Because Linux is a perfectly good operating system already without layering Emacs on top of it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-04 Thread Warren Young
Jimmy Bradley wrote: would I really gain anything right now by going to a 64bit machine? Not unless you put at least 4 GB of RAM in it, and from your description of what you do, you have no good reason to do that. If you don't have enough RAM to need 64-bit addressing, you're just slowing t

Re: [CentOS] 5.0 -> 5.1

2008-03-05 Thread Warren Young
Les Mikesell wrote: when has anyone seen a Centos system die from an update? Just a few months ago, one of the Samba updates caused it to drop all our Windows systems' mapped drives every 10 minutes or so. You'd be in the middle of a big copy, and boom, there goes your share, and you have t

Re: [CentOS] what is this address meaning?

2008-03-19 Thread Warren Young
ann kok wrote: inet addr:0.0.0.6 Bcast:255.255.255.255 What is this address meaning? It means something's misconfigured. Can you post the contents of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://li

Re: [CentOS] what is this address meaning?

2008-03-19 Thread Warren Young
ann kok wrote: DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:1B:21:07:A5:94 ONBOOT=yes # BOOTPROTO=dhcp TYPE=Ethernet # BOOTPROTO=dhcp Nowhere in here do you give the device a way to get an IP address. You've turned off DHCP, but don't give a static address, so I guess it's just picking a random value from somewhere

Re: [CentOS] moving from RH8 to CentOS5.1

2008-03-24 Thread Warren Young
Ray Leventhal wrote: Is there a way to 'automatically' recreate users/permissions when moving from RH8 (yes, I know...way old) to CentOS5.1 or is it just simpler to recreate the users manually? Merge your RH8 copies of /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow into the CentOS ones, preferring the new ver

Re: [CentOS] "Site down for maintenance" - How is this accomplished?

2007-08-24 Thread Warren Young
Brian Mathis wrote: Messing with DNS is really the wrong way to go on this. You'd be forcing all of the DNS servers involved to start messing with their caches, update more frequently, etc.., pushing the problem out onto "everyone else", and you have no control over any of it really. Cache tim

Re: [CentOS] grep

2007-08-28 Thread Warren Young
Scott McClanahan wrote: grep out the next 5 lines after the first and only instance The scope of grep's view of the world is a single line. At any one time, it knows nothing more. If you need to deal with multiple lines, I suggest perl. Untested code: #!/usr/bin/perl while (<>) {

Re: [CentOS] grep

2007-08-28 Thread Warren Young
Scott McClanahan wrote: I'd like to skip those lines. I'd like to skip the line with "bar" and the following five lines. In that case, the perl code would be: #!/usr/bin/perl $eat = 0; while (<>) { if (m/bar/) { $eat = 6; } if ($eat) { --$eat; } else {

Re: [CentOS] Cronjob script with date stamp?

2007-10-25 Thread Warren Young
Scott Ehrlich wrote: - Have the script dump the results of the job to a text file. I tried this with /path/to/dump my switches -v >> /home/me/dump.log But that just produced an empty file. Try appending "2>&1" (without the quotes) to that command. - Have the dump file be date-stamped with

Re: [CentOS] Re: is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread Warren Young
Feizhou wrote: If you understand 'automated deployment' to mean just merely clobbering an installation with another Linux distro then I cannot help you. You're right, we are not using the same terms. I understand "automated deployment" to include things like yum. one does not leave out s

Re: [CentOS] emulate ARM ?

2023-11-15 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 14, 2023, at 13:44, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > > How do you emulate AMR arch With QEMU: $ uname -r 5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_2.x86_64 $ sudo dnf install qemu-user-static-aarch64 $ docker pull --platform=linux/arm64 tangentsoft/iperf3 $ docker export $(docker create --name iperf3 tangentsoft/

Re: [CentOS] emulate ARM ?

2023-11-15 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 15, 2023, at 20:11, Warren Young wrote: > > Docker also uses QEMU in this fashion: I forgot to point out that “docker” is actually an alias for Podman on the test system, which fully satisfies your wish for using only things that come with the platform, no third-party programs,

Re: [CentOS] first boot after install - WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB - fails ?

2024-01-19 Thread Warren Young
NVMe requires EFI booting. In some UEFI implementations, if you say "BIOS + UEFI" or however it puts it, CentOS will put a `/biosboot` partition on the disk, not `/boot/efi`, giving exactly the symptom you report. Put it into pure UEFI mode, ensure the partitioning step creates `/boot/efi`, and I

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

2011-03-28 Thread Warren Young
On 3/27/2011 3:07 PM, Jure Pečar wrote: > > It's interesting that nobody so far mentioned openVZ I wouldn't use it since being bitten by its lack of swap support. I run a couple of web sites on a fairly "heavy" web stack which loads up a bunch of dependencies that don't actually end up being use

Re: [CentOS] ZFS @ centOS

2011-04-04 Thread Warren Young
On 4/2/2011 2:54 PM, Dawid Horacio Golebiewski wrote: > I do want to > use ZFS and I thus far I have only found information about the ZFS-Fuse > implementation and unclear hints that there is another way. Here are some benchmark numbers I came up with just a week or two ago. (View with fixed-widt

Re: [CentOS] ZFS @ centOS

2011-04-04 Thread Warren Young
On 4/4/2011 9:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > try iozone Maybe on the next server. This one can't be reformatted yet again. > bonnie++ That's what I used. I just reformatted its results for readability. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:

Re: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster (was:Re: ZFS @ centOS)

2011-04-06 Thread Warren Young
On 4/5/2011 11:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: >> Dropping to 16.37 TB on the RAID configuration by switching to >> RAID-6 let us put almost the entire array under a single 16 TB XFS >> filesystem. > > You really, really, really don't want to do this. Actually, it seems that you can't do it any more. I

Re: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster

2011-04-06 Thread Warren Young
On 4/5/2011 11:24 AM, Brandon Ooi wrote: > > Afaik 32-bit binaries do run on the 64-bit build and compat libraries > exist for most everything. You should evaluate if you really *really* > need 32-bit. Yes, thanks for assuming I don't know what I was talking about when I wrote that we had a hard

Re: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster

2011-04-06 Thread Warren Young
On 4/6/2011 11:40 AM, Finnur Örn Guðmundsson wrote: > > Just a shot in the darkbut can't you have a x86_64 NFS server export > a fs larger then 16TB and mount that on your x86 machine for use with > your application? I already ran the two-server idea past the decision makers. It was rejected

Re: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster (was:Re: ZFS @ centOS)

2011-04-06 Thread Warren Young
On 4/6/2011 1:16 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > There are other issues with XFS and 32-bit; see: > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3364 > and > http://www.mail-archive.com/scientific-linux-users@listserv.fnal.gov/msg05347.html > and google for 'XFS 32-bit 4K stacks' for more of the gory details. Tha

Re: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potentialdisaster

2011-04-06 Thread Warren Young
On 4/6/2011 12:25 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > > Don't scream: I'm using RedHat 7.3 for related reasons. Yep, we've still got a bunch of those running in the field, too, and many older besides. We still build new boxes using CentOS 3, also for legacy compatibility reasons. > can a 64-bit sys

Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project. [FLUFF]

2011-04-13 Thread Warren Young
On 4/13/2011 7:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: So when is DEntOS 6.0 going to be released? >>> >>> What's that? The latest electronic flossing toothbrush? >> >> The "fresh maker"! > > With the great new "hot silicon" flavor! Hot silicon? I thought that smell was smoldering Nomex underwear, fr

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed (was: RHEL 6.1 beta)

2011-05-02 Thread Warren Young
On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> >> Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems pointlessto me > > The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops Fast boots also matter for embedded systems. We integrate a series of Linux-based boxes made by another company into ou

Re: [CentOS] how does autofs deal with stuck NFS mounts and suspending to RAM?

2020-05-18 Thread Warren Young
On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw wrote: > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over > unreliable > connections? I don’t have a good answer for you, because if you’d asked me without all this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad connections, I’d hav

Re: [CentOS] fdisk boot partition

2020-07-01 Thread Warren Young
On Jun 30, 2020, at 1:25 PM, John Pierce wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:12 PM Jerry Geis wrote: > >> I am trying to use CentOS 8 host to boot an image (OS X) that I created >> using dd. >> >> First I tried fdisk -l image_file.img ... > > > fdisk has been deprecated for quite a long t

Re: [CentOS] Question regarding cent OS 7.8.2003 compatibility with large SAS disks

2020-09-25 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 24, 2020, at 10:25 PM, Amey Abhyankar wrote: > > I referred = https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product > But slightly confused with the 'maximum file size' row for ext4 FS. CentOS 8 defaults to XFS, not to ext4, so that row has no bearing on your use case. Although I wouldn’t recommend ove

Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq centos 7

2020-10-31 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 31, 2020, at 1:22 PM, Strahil Nikolov via CentOS wrote: > > Are you sure you have opened 53/udp ? Good call, but you left out the “how”: $ sudo firewall-cmd --add-service dns $ sudo firewall-cmd --add-service dns --permanent Without the second command, it affects the runtime fi

Re: [CentOS] ssacli start rebuild?

2020-11-11 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw wrote: > > I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. When was the last time you tried it? Why would you expect that a modern 8-core Intel CPU would impede I/O in any measureable way as compared to the outdated single-core 32-bit RISC CPU

Re: [CentOS] ssacli start rebuild?

2020-11-11 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 11, 2020, at 6:37 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > how do you map failed software RAID drive to physical port of, say, > SAS-attached enclosure. With ZFS, you set a partition label on the whole-drive partition pool member, then mount the pool with something like “zpool mount -d /dev/disk/

Re: [CentOS] ssacli start rebuild?

2020-11-11 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 11, 2020, at 7:04 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > zpool mount -d /dev/disk/by-partlabel Oops, I’m mixing the zpool and zfs commands. It’d be “zpool import”. And you do this just once: afterward, the automatic on-boot import brings the drives back in using the names they had befo

Re: [CentOS] ssacli start rebuild?

2020-11-14 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 14, 2020, at 5:56 AM, hw wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 16:38 -0700, Warren Young wrote: >> On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw wrote: >>> I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. >> >> When was the last time you tried it

Re: [CentOS] Replacing SW RAID-1 with SSD RAID-1

2020-11-24 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 24, 2020, at 10:43 AM, cen...@niob.at wrote: > > On 24/11/2020 18:32, John Pierce wrote: >> zpool create newpool mirror sdb sdc mirror sdd sde mirror sdf sdg mirror >> sdh sdi spare sdj sdk >> zfs create -o mountpoint=/var/lib/pgsql-11 newpool/postgres11 > > This *might* be a valid answer

Re: [CentOS] Replacing SW RAID-1 with SSD RAID-1

2020-11-24 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 24, 2020, at 10:05 AM, Simon Matter wrote: > > Why is a layered approach > worse than a fully included solution like ZFS? Just one reason is that you lose visibility of lower-level elements from the top level. You gave the example of a bad block in a RAID. What current RHEL type system

Re: [CentOS] Trying to find gcc 5

2020-12-04 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 3, 2020, at 5:26 PM, mark wrote: > > 4's ancient, move to another distro" Do you mean GCC 4.8.5 from CentOS 7, or GCC 4.47 from CentOS 6, or GCC 4.2.1 from CentOS 5? If we’re talking about CentOS 6, then even Red Hat agrees with the Calibre folks: it’s now officially past time to get o

Re: [CentOS] rare but repeating system crash in C7

2021-01-02 Thread Warren Young
On Jan 2, 2021, at 7:44 AM, Fred wrote: > > I'm further guessing that "xhci_hcd" has something to do with USB Yup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Host_Controller_Interface#Virtualization_support > If so I don't know what it would be... My guess: you have USB-attached storage that’s

Re: [CentOS] rare but repeating system crash in C7

2021-01-02 Thread Warren Young
On Jan 2, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Fred wrote: > > Plantronics USB headset/microphone? > Yottamaster RAID-1 storage (USB3)? > Behringer USB audio interface? > Logitech wireless mouse? > Leopold USB keyboard? HID devices won’t go to sleep when the computer does, else they couldn’t wake it back up. (Ke

Re: [CentOS] rare but repeating system crash in C7

2021-01-02 Thread Warren Young
On Jan 2, 2021, at 11:17 AM, Fred wrote: > > I assume that the yottamaster device runs Linux, just like 99% of other > such devices. 99% of NAS boxes, maybe, but not dumb RAID boxes like the one I believe you’re referring to. (And I doubt even that, with the likes of FreeNAS extending down fro

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

2021-02-04 Thread Warren Young
On Feb 3, 2021, at 5:28 PM, Lists wrote: > > I had the impression that MacOS' Rosetta II might do what I need That’s rather difficult when the x86 code in question is on the other side of a virtualized CPU. It’s a double translation, you see: real x86 code run on a virtual x86 CPU under your

Re: [CentOS] Transition test report going from CentOS8 to Debian 10.

2021-02-04 Thread Warren Young
On Feb 4, 2021, at 8:39 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > I posted a pretty complete rundown on the scientific linux users mailing > list, so I won't recap it all here. Link? > the transition was not any more difficult, really, than moving from CentOS 7 > to CentOS 8. That’s not my experience. I ke

Re: [CentOS] Transition test report going from CentOS8 to Debian 10.

2021-02-05 Thread Warren Young
On Feb 5, 2021, at 9:03 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > >> 1. The package names are often different, and not always differing by an >> obvious translation rule. ... > > I consider this to be very minor in comparison to other items. If you’re making a wholesale transition, sure, but when you’re mainta

Re: [CentOS] proper recipe for local mirror

2021-03-04 Thread Warren Young
On Mar 4, 2021, at 7:04 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > > What is the proper solution for a local mirror for centos 7 (or oven 8) > repositories? https://www.osradar.com/how-to-create-centos-8-local-repository-mirrors-with-rsync-nginx/ ___ CentOS mailin

[CentOS] Can't upgrade sssd-*

2021-03-26 Thread Warren Young
Is anyone else getting this on dnf upgrade? [MIRROR] sssd-proxy-2.3.0-9.el8.x86_64.rpm: Interrupted by header callback: Server reports Content-Length: 9937 but expected size is: 143980 [MIRROR] sssd-proxy-2.3.0-9.el8.x86_64.rpm: Interrupted by header callback: Server reports Content-Length: 993

Re: [CentOS] Can't upgrade sssd-*

2021-04-01 Thread Warren Young
On Mar 26, 2021, at 7:08 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > Is anyone else getting this on dnf upgrade? > > [MIRROR] sssd-proxy-2.3.0-9.el8.x86_64.rpm: Interrupted by header callback: > Server reports Content-Length: 9937 but expected size is: 143980 The short reply size made me

Re: [CentOS] Can't upgrade sssd-*

2021-04-02 Thread Warren Young
On Apr 2, 2021, at 8:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > We just can't risk putting private keys for centos.org on > machines that are donated. I guess I don’t understand how the mirror system works, then, because I thought DNF/YUM contacted a central server (presumably under centos.org) which then

Re: [CentOS] Can't upgrade sssd-*

2021-04-05 Thread Warren Young
On Apr 5, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > wrt private keys .. we don't want any to live on machines we > don't physically own. Yeah, I get that. What I don’t get is why, if DNF goes to http://foo.centos.org to pull metadata, and it tells DNF to go to https://bar.qux.example.edu to d

Re: [CentOS] Can't upgrade sssd-*

2021-04-09 Thread Warren Young
On Apr 9, 2021, at 9:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > donated machines that are part of the > mirror.centos.org dns name. My key incorrect assumption was that this is just a front end, and all of the actual file pulls came from other second-level domains. I didn’t realize you were allowing oth

Re: [CentOS] Help with default shell

2021-06-23 Thread Warren Young
On Jun 23, 2021, at 7:12 AM, Hooton, Gerard wrote: > > The users are authenticated using OpenLDAP. > On LDAP the default shell is csh. > When ssh to login it works, i.e. $SHELL = /bin/csh > Also, when using xrdp it works. > However, a login from the keyboard and screen attached computer we get

Re: [CentOS] Minimising a CentOS installation

2021-08-20 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 20, 2021, at 8:24 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > What other things do folk usually remove to make their installation smaller? Our post-install removal command here is: dnf -y remove cockpit* pcp* But we’re old-school Unix geeks, so there you go. :) __

Re: [CentOS] Simple way to banish IP addresses ?

2009-10-09 Thread Warren Young
Toby Bluhm wrote: > > Try fail2ban from rpmforge. The main problem with fail2ban is that it's based on Python, so it takes a fair bit of memory. This isn't a big problem on a dedicated server or on a system with swap, but a lot of these attacks are made against shared servers or those running

Re: [CentOS] Rendering farm?

2009-10-12 Thread Warren Young
Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I received at least one email suggesting a Windows-based rendering > farm - likely to consist of a few rack systems all running 64-bit > Windows. I read an article on Tomshardware which gave some decent > insight. What can list participants offer on this concept? Well, si

Re: [CentOS] Rendering farm?

2009-10-12 Thread Warren Young
mark wrote: > > It's not anything I had ever looked into, or needed, but thanks for the > view into the heavy duty rendering field. I'm glad you were able to extract some value from my incoherent babbling. (No false modestyon re-reading the post it's clear the caffeine isn't working y

Re: [CentOS] scp with tty

2009-10-13 Thread Warren Young
Les Mikesell wrote: > > I'm still missing why you'd need to sudo inside the remote shell instead > of ssh'ing as the right user in the first place. Perhaps he doesn't know the user@ syntax. Tony, try this: [localu...@host1 ~]$ ssh r...@host2 remotecmd This requires that the public k

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request

2009-12-17 Thread Warren Young
On 12/17/2009 3:59 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:37:52PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> what I meant was, without working video, how does he know what the error is? > > POST beep codes I would think. Yes, he confirmed that in a later message. ___

Re: [CentOS] mkdir this "." directory

2009-12-29 Thread Warren Young
On 12/29/2009 11:49 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: >> Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> >>> You mean new to the concept of files and directories? This is not >>> Linux-only. >>> The . and .. existed even in MS-DOS back in the 80's. >> >> having an actual . and .. file in a directory is a

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-07 Thread Warren Young
On 1/6/2010 2:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > > we are trying to set > up some storage servers to run under Linux You should also consider FreeBSD 8.0, which has the newest version of ZFS up and running stably on it. I use Linux for most server tasks, but for big storage, Linux just doesn't have

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-07 Thread Warren Young
On 1/7/2010 6:01 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > >> I'm not recommending OpenSolaris on purpose. > > Serious system administrators are not Linux fans I don't think. I think I must have been sent back in time, say to 1997 or so, because I can't possibly be reading this in 2010. I base this on the f

Re: [CentOS] APC Smart-ups "status codes" (slightly OT)

2010-01-29 Thread Warren Young
On 1/29/2010 2:53 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Idiot "change battery" led stays on. By chance, I just did an RBC 23 change the other day. The docs I got with it said to let it charge for 8 hours, then do the self-test. On my UPS, that means holding the On button for a few seconds. (A single

Re: [CentOS] Mount USB disk at startup?

2010-02-04 Thread Warren Young
On 2/4/2010 7:10 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 02/04/2010 02:41 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > ... >> how about mounting that drive on rc.local ? > > That's too late; I need it before /etc/init.d/mythbackend > starts. # ls /etc/rc`runlevel | cut -c3`.d/*myth* Then write a script in /etc/init.d to wai

Re: [CentOS] Show IP Traffic on a port

2008-05-20 Thread Warren Young
Joseph L. Casale wrote: I am trying to determine the root of an issue I am having. How can I watch traffic destined to a specific port on my CentOS 5.1 box to see if its even hitting it? It would be udp traffic. # yum install wireshark # tshark udp port 1234 __

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Warren Young
John R Pierce wrote: raid50 requires 2 or more raid 5 volumes. with 4 disks, thats just not an option. for file storage (including backup files from a database), raid5 is probably fine... for primary database tablespace storage, I'd only use raid1 or raid10. RAID-10 has only one perfect appli

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Warren Young
Rudi Ahlers wrote: So, how does it perform with 6 discs for example? Say I have 3 HDD's in RAID-0, and another 3 in RAID-0, then RAID-1 the 2 RAID-0 stripes. There's actually two kinds of RAID-10. Some like to say RAID-01 or RAID-1+0 or things like that to distinguish them. It's a matter

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet poor performance

2008-07-02 Thread Warren Young
Robert Moskowitz wrote: I get pings around 60ms. Pings within the same LAN? If so, that's slow even for 100BaseT. It should be under 10 ms. When I switch the cards around, the addon card attached to my network, I get pings that alternate with one being ~1488ms and the next 488ms! This i

Re: [CentOS] Printer recommendations

2008-07-22 Thread Warren Young
Ron Loftin wrote: I'm considering a color laser printer instead of the inkjets that I've been using, and I'm dithering back and forth over the question of direct-connect or networked printer. In that case, I'd get something with Postscript support. The "native" printer language driver will u

Re: [CentOS] ASP running on a Linux Machine

2012-01-04 Thread Warren Young
On 1/4/2012 12:30 AM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote: > > this wasn't possible without a program like ChiliASP, ...which is now dead, apparently. > noow I heard > rumor that apache might have a plugin to allow it to read ASP. Rumor, really? I don't think open source works like that. We're not talking

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

2012-01-11 Thread Warren Young
On 1/11/2012 6:10 PM, Florin Andrei wrote: > On 01/11/2012 06:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> It is for devices with IP, but to find names that aren't officially >> registered in a DNS server. For example if you have a Playstation 3, >> or a newer blu-ray player that supports network streaming it

Re: [CentOS] CPU Usage when idle

2012-01-11 Thread Warren Young
On 1/11/2012 6:42 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > > They did a great job with RHEL6 and I'm > curious what was changed in order to accomplish this. It's probably the PowerTop work, primarily done to get better battery life on laptops by throttling the CPU down when it's idle: http://www.less

Re: [CentOS] Ways To Practice Breaking My System?

2012-02-21 Thread Warren Young
On 2/21/2012 5:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Things like boot process rarely break. I can't remember the last time I caused a system to outright fail to boot, but I *do* get unclean boots regularly. Examples: - Build and install some needed driver from source, yum upgrade repeatedly, implicitl

Re: [CentOS] Ways To Practice Breaking My System?

2012-02-21 Thread Warren Young
On 2/21/2012 1:45 AM, Alex Walker wrote: > > I've been looking into some ways to break a CentOS system so I can > perform some simulated disaster recovery Bring up a fresh CentOS 6.0 system. Disable automatic updates. Add a bunch of third-party software. Install at least one bit of hardware so

Re: [CentOS] XFS on Centos 6.2 ?

2012-02-27 Thread Warren Young
On 2/27/2012 9:31 AM, admin lewis wrote: > I need of to mount an XFS partition on Centos 6.2 .. but I cant find > the kernel module.. # rpm -ivh http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-5.noarch.rpm # yum install kmod-xfs xfsprogs _

Re: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS

2012-03-07 Thread Warren Young
On 3/7/2012 11:16 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 03/07/12 6:47 AM, Ross Walker wrote: >> These days XFS should always be inode64 enabled, given the size of disks, >> and NFS should have been fixed a long, long time ago. > > yes. problem is, we have clients that are running all sorts of OS's, > inc

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-06-30 Thread Warren Young
Justin Bull wrote: > > I don't know if you can disable su - Sure: usermod -L root. Before you do that, you need to have a user in /etc/sudoers that has root equivalence. Ubuntu does this by default. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://li

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-06-30 Thread Warren Young
Robert Heller wrote: > (eg 'sudo su -' which is kind if redundant). A shortcut that I just recently learned: "sudo -s" gives you a root shell, like "su". Not like "su -", because it's not a login shell, so you don't get root's .bashrc and such, but you can then "su -" from within the root shel

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-07-01 Thread Warren Young
Michael A. Peters wrote: > I still don't understand how using sudo instead of su makes it more secure. Let's start with the simple case where only one person needs superuser type privileges on a given machine. What, then, is the difference between sudo and su -? There has to be one all-powerfu

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-07-01 Thread Warren Young
Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:05:58 -0700 > Gary Greene wrote: > >> . With sudo, >> you get a record of what command was executed with superuser rights by whom >> at whenever given hour. > > sudo bash If that's a problem for you, don't let people run bash via sudo. There's an entire

Re: [CentOS] slugishness

2009-07-15 Thread Warren Young
Scott Silva wrote: > USB I believe is not a DMA based port, so the processor has to do a lot of > work, especially at higher speeds. Rsync can also be a resource hog, as it > keeps most of the hash tables in memory it uses to compare files with. True enough, though I wouldn't say USB is the whole

Re: [CentOS] ASP Pages?

2009-08-10 Thread Warren Young
ML wrote: > > Is there any way I can host his site on my Linux Server? Without re- > writing it for him There used to be a project called ChiliSoft ASP that did this, but it appears that Sun bought them and then killed the product. As John R. Pierce noted, if his site is actually using ASP

Re: [CentOS] Apache and ASP or asp.net?

2009-08-26 Thread Warren Young
Dave wrote: > Has anyone got this combination working? This was asked and answered on this very list just two weeks ago: http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/348850-asp-pages.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cento

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Warren Young
On 8/5/2010 11:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> When someone says, "I'm writing a shell script, and hereabouts I need >> $TOOL to do such and such," a good answer is usually forthcoming. >> >> When someone says, "Tell me how to script this $PROJECT," the >> commmunity usually points the OP off to Goog

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2010 5:07 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > [r...@devserver21 ~]# cat /etc/ntp.conf | grep -v ^# | grep -v ^$ > restrict default nomodify notrap noquery > restrict 127.0.0.1 > server 192.168.1.67 > server 192.168.1.66 > server 192.168.1.65 Some HOWTOs tell you that more time servers is better, o

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2010 3:43 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > Okay, I only have one timeserver, I meant that your on-site time server should be relying on only one other outside time server, one stratum up. > but the ntp clients cowardly refuse to use > less than 3. Only one server on a given LAN should be run

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2010 4:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >On 08/12/10 2:51 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> Only one server on a given LAN should be running ntpd. It's overkill >> for every machine to keep themselves synced with such a complex and >> fussy server. All the ot

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-13 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2010 9:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > ntpd always tries to move the clock fractional seconds at a time msntp does that, too, if you give the -a flag. (You have to give either -a or -r for it to change the system time at all.) ntpdate also does this, as long as the delta is less than half

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

2010-09-24 Thread Warren Young
On 9/24/2010 10:54 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's > universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain "not installed - > ever" on many people's systems, including mine. It is completely > unacceptable that it is happy to install, but

Re: [CentOS] [Slightly OT] "Open Source Development + Tools" - Book/Resource?

2010-09-27 Thread Warren Young
On 9/27/2010 2:10 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: > > Another is ``GNU Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool'' by Vaughan, > Elliston, Tromey, and Taylor. Vaughan is still active on the autotools lists, and he occasionally pops in on threads mentioning his book, telling people they should be careful in apply

Re: [CentOS] OT: linux desktop market share more than 1%

2010-10-08 Thread Warren Young
On 10/8/2010 6:14 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> is on Linux servers, but OS X Just Works(tm), and I don't have to be >> constantly fiddling to get tools working. > > I here that occasionally; since you switched to OS X "shortly after it > came out", which is like 5 years ago now OS X came out

Re: [CentOS] OT: linux desktop market share more than 1%

2010-10-08 Thread Warren Young
On 10/8/2010 4:09 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > But OS X can legally only run on Apple (tm$$$) systems, where Linux can > run on *anything* and anybody's inexpensive hardware. Apple hardware is fairly priced when compared on quality. Yes, there are cheap POS PCs that compare favorably on feature

Re: [CentOS] OT: linux desktop market share more than 1%

2010-10-08 Thread Warren Young
On 10/8/2010 4:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 10/8/2010 5:25 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> But a fair comparison would be the Adobe Creative Suite, since Adobe >> presumably wants their software used everywhere. You can't blame Adobe >> for not porting it. They&

Re: [CentOS] OT: linux desktop market share more than 1%

2010-10-08 Thread Warren Young
On 10/8/2010 4:29 PM, Jerry Franz wrote: > On 10/08/2010 03:25 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> There's more to a PC than [a] spec list. > > Apple runs commodity hardware that is essentially identical to everyone > else's - just priced 3X more. ...says the guy comparing mac

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Warren Young
On 11/3/2010 8:32 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: > > So to prepare the disk for returning under warranty, I used > another HDD utility to clean the disk again ... > So I ran an Advanced r/w scan again with Hitachi DFT, and > the result was OK. A complete disk wipe brings bad sectors to the drive's att

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Warren Young
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Yeah, but I have problems with smartmon: More likely, problems with SMART. S.M.A.R.T. is D.U.M.B. :) It's better than nothing, but sometimes not by a whole lot. > one server that's got two bad sectors, which SMART reports. I've followed > the ins

Re: [CentOS] was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"

2010-11-03 Thread Warren Young
On 11/3/2010 12:22 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Maybe try fsck -cc for a non-destructive read-write test. Good call. That's resilvering. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Warren Young
On 11/3/2010 4:18 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: > I might shell out some dosh for a copy if it can > non-destructably repair bad sectors. Try fsck -cc first. (Or badblocks -n) These do part of what SR does already, so if they work, that's all you need. Step up only when you need something that tri

Re: [CentOS] was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"

2010-11-04 Thread Warren Young
On 11/4/2010 1:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > I said yes, fix them, and rebooted, and I don't see complaints. Good to hear it. Minor nit: I called "fsck -cc" resilvering, but that's not in spirit of the term. The name comes from the practice of taking an old mirror, stripping off the o

Re: [CentOS] memory upgrade cost (was: RHEL 6 Officially Released)

2010-11-11 Thread Warren Young
On 11/11/2010 7:53 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > It does not pay to replace the memory on these test systems. I > can pick up 1Gb used SFF systems for about the same price as 512Mb > memory for these old boxes. How much time (money) do you spend waiting on installers to run, when you force the

Re: [CentOS] XFS or EXT3 ?

2010-12-03 Thread Warren Young
On 12/3/2010 6:20 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote: >> What about the XFS admin tools - do these get installed when >> you format a partition as XFS from anaconda, or are they a >> seperate rpm package, installed later? > > They are in a separate rpm (xfsprogs, repository: extras). On that topic, there

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >