Hi
I have a process that creates 'some data' and outputs this to standard
out and i want to shift this data over ssh to a remote box without
ever writing anything locally. I have been experimenting with tar to
create the archive as the i dont know what the contents of 'some data'
might be so i jus
> Why not just do
>
> `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd
> of=somethin
>
>
> eg
>
> find . | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=find.out
>
> You don't need tar for anything.
alas the thing that generates the output creates 5 or 6 seperate
streams in sequence that gene
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On Monday, 16 August 2010 00:31:14 -0300,
> JohnS wrote:
>
>>> This is my first message to the list. Some time ago I'm user of
>>> Debian GNU/Linux and recently I also started to use CentOS GNU/Linux.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how to enable t
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Matt wrote:
>>>
>>> With the default settings in my Supermicro motherboard CentOS calls my
>>> SATA drive /dev/hda. If in bi
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:47 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> Sorry. following way does NOT work.
> user1 (ALL)=user2 /bin/bash
> Leave off su entirely and
> sudo -H user2 -i
> as user1
Because you have to run
sudo -i -u user2
as user1
___
CentOS mailing list
C
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> The problems can sometimes be caused by not having reverse-DNS records for
> your hosts. Can you resolve to names (any name) from an IP address?
> e.g. nslookup 10.2.9.2?
If this is a reverse-lookup problem and you can't have a
reverse-loo
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 3:45 PM, drew einhorn wrote:
>
> I want to rename some volume groups and logical volumes.
> I was not surprised when it would not let me rename active volumes.
> So I booted up the system using the CentOS 5.5 LiveCD,
> but the LiveCD makes the logical volumes browsable usin
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:12:46 +0100 CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Is there a document with instructions for this?
>> > I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in m
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:19:16 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>>
>> What about doing all with dd ... If you have the second disk installed in
>> the same machine you can do "dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb" ort you can use
>> clonezilla is a l
rtant tweaks.
if you're not already so sick of bacula that the mere name makes you break
out in hives, might i ask what problems you've been having? on- or
off-list is fine, as you prefer.
--
Tom Yates - http://www.teaparty.net
it and wanted the
> thursday tape. Why thursday I don't know, mon tue and wed should all
> have been available.
yes, i completely agree; the stacker changes everything. sorry to have
jumped in, and i hope you find something that work
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
03:16:59PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
> > Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential
> release
> > date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
>
> "When it is ready and not a second before."
>
>I woul
+1 for bastille...
On 9/18/10, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>>
>> i Just finished setting up an apache service on a centos 5.2 VM machine.
>>
>> i need to secure this machine as i'm soon to be setting a public IP over
>> it where i'd be opening up the following services:
>>
>> 1
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Matthew Topper wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:42:59 +0200 Timo Schoeler
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/18/2010 05:13 PM, Matthew Topper wrote:
>> > I'm playing with software RAID and LVM in some virtual machines and
>> > I've run into an issue that I can't find a good answ
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Matthew Topper wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> I need to find some good reference on GRUB, which seems difficult
>>> because most things I can find are about GRUB2, and CentOS has 0.97
>>
>>
+1 Just Awesome.ROFL.too funny :)
Thanks for the link
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Timo Schoeler
wrote:
> May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
>
> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS mach
I have been reading lots of stuff but trying to find out if a raid10 2drive
setup is any better/worse than a normal raid 1 setupI have to 1Tb drives
for my data and a seperate system drive, I am only interested in doing raid
on my data...
So i setup my initial test like this
mdadm -v --c
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>> Jacob Bresciani wrote:
>>> RAID10 requires at least 4 drives does it not?
>>>
>>> Since it's a strip set of mirrored disks, the smallest configuration I
>>> can see is 4 disks, 2 mirr
the n2 optionthis is on 2 1TB hdd
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Tom H wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ross Walker
> wrote:
> >> On Sep 25, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Christopher Chan <
> christoph
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>>> On Sep 25, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Christopher Chan
>>> wrote:
>>>> Jacob Bresciani wrote:
>>>
limit...
# sysctl dev.raid.speed_limit_min
# sysctl dev.raid.speed_limit_max
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> > On Sep 25, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ross Walker
>
So I'm in the process of building and testing a raid setup and it appeared
to take along time to build I came across some settings for setting the min
amount of time and that helped but it appears that one of the disks is
struggling (100 utilization) vs the other one...I was wondering if anyone
el
0
225 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032 100 100 000Old_age
Always - 5
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > On 9/27/2010 12:19 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> >> On 09/27/2010 08:15 AM, To
27, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> Thanks ROss, I poured through my dmesg logs and all looks well, things
> appear fine but i don't think the samsung should be running at
> 100%...something is not right but it hasn't bit me yether are my dmesg
> logs...
>
>
they changed
something...
So should I break it and change the partitions and if so do I do it on both
of the disks so they are the same??? Thanks in advance...going to do some
more reading...
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:16 PM, Tom Bishop
28, 2010, at 12:40 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> > On 09/27/10 7:49 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> >> How do I figure out if it's a 4k sector drive, I've read about that
> >> but never looked into it...is there any way to tell, and when you mean
> >> start my
So I have been playing with a RAID 10 f2 ( 2 disks far layout)
setup...thanks for all of the advice..Now I am playing with the format and
want to make sure I have it setup the best that I can, my raid was built
using the raid 10 option with 2 disks with the layout=far, chunk size
512now I read
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but
>>
>> Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it.
>>
>> When I did S
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Iain Morris wrote:
> No one seems to like AD. I actually find it to be fairly manageable compared
> to stock LDAP/Kerberos. The management tools blow OpenLDAP out of the
> water. I laugh at myself saying it, but if you want simple management of a
> big installation,
Is anyone using or played with wowza???looks interesting...
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Tom G. Christensen
wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> > Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
> >
> http://www.wowzamedia.com/i
el
and your budget. From a FREE Wowza Server Developer edition
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Tom G. Christensen
> wrote:
> > Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> >> Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
> >>
>
ct 6, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> > Wowza development editiion is free for personal use and appears to have
> all
> > of the beels and whisltes but is limited to 10 concurrent connections
> >
> > Editions and Pricing
> > Wowza gives you the choice
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:20 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> Two servers, each have normal user umask values of 0077 and root umask
> values on 0022.
>
> On the first server (CentOS 5.4 i386) running sudo 1.6.9pl7-5 (from
> base), here are the results of touching a file as a user, as root and as
> a u
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:48 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> On 10/7/2010 9:25 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:20 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
>>> Two servers, each have normal user umask values of 0077 and root umask
>>> values on 0022.
>>>
>
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:35 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> On 10/7/2010 9:59 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:48 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
>>> On 10/7/2010 9:25 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:20 PM, David Goldsmith
>>>>
I use freenx and install it very frequently, I don't modify the sshd config
but go here to get a copy of the .ssh key...
/var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh/client.id_dsa.key
and copy that to your client machine
in fact if you want to generate a new key the comman is nxkeygen
see if that makes an
+1 can't wait
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Timo Schoeler
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> There's progress...
>
>
> http://press.redhat.com/2010/10/18/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-release-candidate-available-to-partners/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Timo
> -BEGIN PGP SIGN
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM, fred smith
wrote:
>
> back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one
> of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array.
>
> something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago,
> upon rebooting after
Well it depends on what you want in your new board, workstation vs
serverI just built 2 machines based on this boardMSI 785G-E53 AM3
785G...with amd quad coresone is acting as a server and centos 5.5
loaded up just fine with no issues, running KVM with a couple of VM'sI
would look a
Yah...can't wait
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:02 PM, John Kennedy wrote:
> When will CentOS 6 be released???
>
> (Just kidding...Just wanted to let you all know that RHEL6 has been
> released...And yes, I know that most of you all know...)
> John
>
> --
> John Kennedy
>
>
> ___
Thanks Karanbir , I actually want to pony up and start helping so I am
looking forward to hearing more about that and how I can help...Sounds Great
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> hi Guys,
>
> On 11/10/2010 07:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> > Last time there was only one bui
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> centos 5 had modprobe.conf entries for eth0 and if present eth1.
> something like:
> alias eth0 forcedeth
> alias eth1 e1000e
>
> For the new centos 6 (I have the rhel 6 client installed on my laptop)
> the modprobe.conf file is gone. Which is
So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see
this:
mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 0.90
Creation Time : Mon Sep 27 22:47:44 2010
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size :
NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
> servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see
> this:
>
> mdadm --
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:36 AM, David McGuffey
wrote:
>
> I'm doing some testing in a lab which is isolated from the rest of my
> network (DMZ). I'm doing both inbound and outbound filtering at the
> firewall (CentOS +iptables).
>
> What protocols, ports and destination IP addresses does yum use
It depends on what hardware you have available and what all you would
like to play with...I run both tomato and pfsense and both are great
products but both serve a particular setting...I use tomato for AP's
primarily but also use it for a soho router much better than
linksys...but if you want more
Hi
I am having real trouble with a new batch of Intel NIC's - We were
using another type of 10gig card and they were fine but got EOL'd from
Intel and are now using something subtly different.
I dont have all the details yet on the issue but basically there is a
major delay in when the link comes
>
> The only time I have seen such a delay in the past was because of OSPF on
> the Cisco switch it was connected to.
these are Arista DCS-7148SX's so i'll have to chat to the network
guys. On the kernel line can you state delay=x so that it waits for a
link ??
thanks
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, John Kennedy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:59, Matt wrote:
>> Have a CentOS 4.x 32 bit server running on a single 500M SATA drive.
>> What is easiest way to convert too RAID 1 on it? Anyone have a link?
>> Would be open to hardware or software just do no
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote:
> On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>> (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm),
>
> Haven't switched yet, I have IPv6 at home using sixxs.
>
> I can't even figure out what address ranges are reserved
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:27 AM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote:
>>> On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>>>
>>>> (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv
Well I'm sure there are a lot of folks eagerly waiting..this is the latest I
have seen which sums it up the best http://planet.centos.org/
e.g. it will be here when it is ready, I for one am hoping for an early
christmas present;)
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell wrote:
> Ryan Wagoner wrote:
>>
>> IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
>> until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4
>> address, which complicates a number of protocols like FTP and SIP. The
>> on
15:29, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote:
>>>>>>&g
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> > b) Do I get charged by my ISP on a per-device basis?
>>
> This is no science fiction.
> Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
> can connect to internet. You have to register the MAC address of your
> si
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
> Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4
addres
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
wrote:
>
> Trim your quotes.
LOL
I was in a hurry... I think that this applies to all in this thread so
I hope that you've email everyone else...
Also, please keep your commands on-list; I only caught your email
because it was at the top of my
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:32:32 am Tom H wrote:
>> Is 172.16.10.72 a private address of yours or of your ISP?
>
> More to the point; do you have a route to his address?
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming th
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
wrote:
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Tom H
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:34 AM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly de
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:16 +, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>>>
>>> I guess the reason it jars us here is because most people post properly.
>>
>> Except the gmail lusers who haven't figured out how to turn off multipart
>
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/8/2010 4:04 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> iptables is a de-facto standard on all Linux distributions nowadays. It
>> is not ratified by ISO, IETF or similar ... but how does that make the
>> real life scenario any different? That's
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>
> I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have
> sudo.i386 1.7.2p1-9.el5_5
> installed
>
> I am using the same sudoers file, but the one on box A keeps trying to do
> DNS lookups while the on
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 10:40 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have
>>> sudo.i386
LOL...great analogy..I think the details will be lost on many non firearm
types...but I found it to be a great analogy...:)
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, December 13, 2010 03:15:48 pm Nick wrote:
> > This is a bit like saying "I have 12 years experience of hunti
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Philix T A wrote:
> 2) Dont create RAID for swap and / root partition (Not Advisable)
Any rationale for this bad advice?
> 3) Swap Size size should be 2X the size of the Physical memory
For a desktop, maybe.
> 6) My experience had always shown if your apps
So I need some opinions on which way to go, for my home network I am running
almost all linux, and I am starting to want to manage all of the users
accounts, uid/gids for all of the devices some of which are laptops...so
what is the best path going forward, on the server end I am running
Centos5.5
I'm going to chime in here, First off I want to thank Simon for pitching in
and trying to help out.The problem I have is that while I would love to
run RHEV, at the moment having to have a windows server to install it on is
a bit much for mein fact it kind of runs opposite of what I am tryi
Or you could boot up with knoppix or some other livecd so the filesystem is
not in use and mount both drives and do a:
mkdir /mnt/org
mount /dev/hdx /mnt/org
mkdir /mnt/bckup
mount /dev/hdx /mnt/bckup
cp -af /mnt/org/* /mnt/bckup/.
umount both drives
then copy mbr
dd if=/dev/hdx of=/dev/hdx bs
ompat_check: guest type xen-3.0-x86_32"
in google you might just get the info you need. Do not forget to include the
quotes in your google search.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spamtrap address [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
___
hat points to the gateway.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spamtrap address [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
PG check.
This seems to be isolated to yum, as downloading the RPM directly via
FTP with wget or lftpget provides an RPM that *does* pass the GPG check.
I have upgraded key packages to the latest version (eg. yum upgrade
'yum*') and tried again to no avail.
Anyone seen this
r as I know,
there should be no issue with this... or am I missing something?
Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 25/08/2008, at 10:54 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a la
orrupt. Whoops, who looks silly now. :)
Thanks all,
Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 27/08/2008, at 6:57 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
on 8-26-2008 2:08 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
If your P
a-gtk-3235 in
java.library.path).I have a gre.conf, have set MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME,
and LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but continue to get that error.
If you have any ideas, I'd be very grateful.
Thanks
-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cen
Hi
I am trying to forward port 80 to 8080 locally using iptables with the
following
/sbin/iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT
--to-port 8080
However this does not get put into the iptables configuration even after
running iptables-save
Have i missed something alon
iptables-save will only output the rules in a way that
iptables-restore will be able to rebuild the rules from.
If what you want is for these rules to be up when you boot the
machine, what you want is probably "service iptables save", which will
use iptables-save to record these rules to /etc/s
AFAIK, "service iptables restart" does not cut off current
connections. The stateful connections are kept by the conntrack
module, which I believe will not be cleared on a restart of iptables,
and "service iptables restart" also uses iptables-restore, which does
the changes atomically instead of
Hi
I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i
can enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does
anyone know if there is a way for me to see the current status of the
user? ie locked or unlocked?
thanks
_
this should get you a list of all the users which have been disabled
by means of `usermod -L`:
perl -e 'open($SHADOW, "<", "/etc/shadow") or die( "$!\n" ); while (
<$SHADOW> ) { chomp; print "$1\n" if (/^([^:]*):!{1}[^!:]*:.*$/) }
close( $SHADOW );'
you'll need to run it as root. no do
Hi
I am migrating a mailserver from CentOS 4 to 5 and i am migrating the
db's over
from mysql-max-4.1.13 to mysql-server-5.0.45-7.el5
during the mysql import it fails with this...
ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 129: Duplicate entry '3-r��?�' for key 1
anyone got any clues to this one as so far
you are inserting multiple duplicate values somewhere where its not
allowed. without looking at your schema it would be hard to work out
what the issue is.
its a bayes db for spamassassin
in other news, you dont need to dump + reload when you move from
mysql-4 to mysql-5, just service m
Hi
I am trying to package a bunch of files so that i can deploy them with
rpm - Its prtty much just a case of dumping some files on the filesystem.
I achieve this with rpm without issue however when i remove the rpm from
the system it also removes the dir that contains the files, even though
The characters look binary, so this might be a problem of conversion
latin1 -> utf8 or vice versa.
Try dumping with:
mysqldump --default-character-set=binary ... >/path/to/dumpfile
And loading the dump with:
mysql --default-character-set=binary ... >/path/to/dumpfile
Let us know if that wor
don't list the dir in the files section, use /* instead to point out
the files in the dir
If you list the dir itself, it will be owned by the rpm and removed
together with it.
perfect thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
What does
# ldd /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
write?
I get:
libldap-2.2.so.7 => /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7 (0x009ab000)
liblber-2.2.so.7 => /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7 (0x00b42000)
libdb-4.2.so => /lib/tls/i686/libdb-4.2.so (0x00111000)
libexpat.so.0 => /usr/lib/lib
# ldd /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x00ca1000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00324000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00b77000)
That was a short list!
i know! - i was a bit surprised there
Is /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 a s
Do you also have the /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4 file?
What does
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.6
write?
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.6
file /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.6 is not owned by any package
although thats a symlink created today - i presume by the http in
That is strange; is /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.6 a real file
or a symlink?
# ll /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.6
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 306917 Dec 11 2007 /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.6
Do you also have the /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4 file?
yeap -
# ll /usr/lib/libaprutil-0
Hi
I am trying to get httpd onto a freshly updated, although long time ago
installed CentOS 4 box. Its fully updated to 4.7 however when trying to
install httpd this is the error i get, well i should say install is fine
but httpd cant start.
# yum install httpd
-- snip --
Dependencies Reso
# ll /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.6
If you move the 0.9.6 file to a safe place,
change the symlink to the 0.9.4 file and
run ldconfig, does httpd work?
# rm -f /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
# ln -s /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4 /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
# ldconfig
# /etc/init.d/httpd
A google search suggests relabeling, if SElinux is enabled:
touch /.autorelabel
reboot
no selinux here
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I've had a similar problem, and it was a software that had a custom
version of gdbm library and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in profile to make
sure that version would be used.
Do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set? What does this command say:
# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
If you do, try unsetting it before start
After this, what does
# ls -l /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
link to?
it seems to be getting changed back!!
# rm -f /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
# ln -s /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4 /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
# ls -l /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
/usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 -> /usr/lib/libaprutil
Can anyone suggest a good CPU, and memory if possible, benchmarking tool
as we have some new kit that needs benchmarks running against it.
thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
measure your application performance. anything else is BS.
well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we
want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps
are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is not possible.
___
mobo with Intel Core 2 Duo.
I appreciate any help,
-Tom
Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Tom Browder Wrote:
>
>>>I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under
>>>Linux, not to speak of Centos. I need a specific model and brand that
>>>a user
401 - 500 of 860 matches
Mail list logo
