[CentOS] ipsec with ipv4 and ipv6 not working

Hello, How do I find out what is happening to my packets thru my ipsec tunnel. They just seem to disappear on the remote side. I have successfully got the pings thru when everything has an ipv6 address, but am not successful when trying to connect two ipv4 lans across an ipv6 ipsec tunnel. All fw

Re: [CentOS] ipsec with ipv4 and ipv6 not working

On 02/08/2011 05:54 PM, Drew wrote: I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I have spent 2 days googling with no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru an ipv6 ipsec tunnel? AFAIK, No. IPv4& IPv6 are different pr

Re: [CentOS] ipsec with ipv4 and ipv6 not working

On 02/09/2011 07:14 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:54 -0800, Drew wrote: I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I have spent 2 days googling with no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru an

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On 02/18/2011 11:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and omitted SRPMs from the manifest, but I certainly believe they did according to reports. At some point d

Re: [CentOS] what wrong about my ipv6 address

On 03/08/2011 10:42 AM, ann kok wrote: Hi Thank you for your help I type the ifconfig -a there is ipv6 address inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1/64 scope link tentative i also add one inet6 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 scope global tentative but both are not pingable by ping6 Here are commands

Re: [CentOS] Door not hitting me on my way out

d regret that I was unable to assist further. My tweaks and bundles will now be going over to Fedora and Scientific Linux, rather than here or in the developer's list. Big issue I saw with Scientific Linux was a lack of commitment to long term support matching what RedHat and Centos provide.

Re: [CentOS] Door not hitting me on my way out

On 04/04/2011 06:47 AM, Markus Falb wrote: On 3.4.2011 23:57, Steve Clark wrote: Big issue I saw with Scientific Linux was a lack of commitment to long term support matching what RedHat and Centos provide. This seems to be true. https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ https

[CentOS] why are warning be treated as errors?

Hello, I am trying to compile RHEL-6 kernel srpm on Fedora 14 and run into the following problem. From what I read -Werror flag causes warnings to be treated as errors - but I don't see that flag on in the following. Any ideas? gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/.wakemain.o.d -nostdi

Re: [CentOS] why are warning be treated as errors?

On 04/07/2011 09:13 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Steve Clark wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile RHEL-6 kernel srpm on Fedora 14 and run into the following problem. From what I read -Werror flag causes warnings to be treated as errors - but I don't see that fl

Re: [CentOS] why are warning be treated as errors?

On 04/07/2011 10:01 AM, Neil Viglieno wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile RHEL-6 kernel srpm on Fedora 14 and run into the following problem. From what I read -Werror flag causes warnings to be treated as errors - but I don't see that

Re: [CentOS] why are warning be treated as errors?

On 04/07/2011 10:25 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile RHEL-6 kernel srpm on Fedora 14 and run into the following problem. From what I read -Werror flag causes warnings to be treated as errors - but I don't see that flag on in the followi

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Changing the subject line for good ... On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote: AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. Starting 6.0 RH releases patched so

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586 Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any feedback / suggestions for the proposed method I

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an adjustment. Akemi I just

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/08/2011 11:35 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing. Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. I got a kernel built with the patches using

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011 11:36 files let me try the kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :) Akemi HOORAY - it works. I got an ipv6 address: $ ip6 a s eth2 4: eth2: mtu 1500

[CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

Hello, Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the VIA Eden Processor? cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 13 model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz I am testing, (using ayplus kernel) and get the followi

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: Hello, Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the VIA Eden Processor? Possibly ... Does that processor have PAE? The non-PAE kernel was dropped, the current 'normal' kernel requires a PAE-capable

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 04/26/2011 09:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 04/26/2011 07:48 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: Hello, Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the VIA Eden Processor? Possibly ... Does that processor

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell servers ATM. But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

On 05/02/2011 11:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/2/2011 9:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe. It's about time. EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to have to worry is this rl0, vr0, em0, fxp0, bg

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

On 05/03/2011 09:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/3/11 8:17 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems pointlessto me The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops Fast

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

On 05/02/2011 10:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain

Re: [CentOS] USB->Parallel cable compatibility

On 05/05/2011 07:18 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: I have an installation where we're replacing a rather old Linux box with a new one that has no parallel ports. The old box has two parallel ports going to Okidata printers. The IOGEAR GUC1284B USB to Parallel Adapter cable looks like it might be a si

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/20/2011 01:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Jerry Geis wrote: >>Hi gang - Love CentOS - you guys to a fabulous job. >> >> It has been a while since I saw any update... >> I went to twitter.com/centos nothing there, >> twitter.com/centos6 nothing there, >> went to the qa calendar stuff not

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

On 11/10/2011 07:05 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > James A. Peltier wrote: > >> Fedora 16 moved to GRUB 2 as well. It will be in RHEL/CentOS in the next >> release. Get used to it. ;) > Grub2 really seems extraordinarily verbose. > One can't help wondering if the simplicity of the old grub > offende

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS

On 11/15/2011 09:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 15.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Timothy Murphy: >> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use? > this is what some braindead developers seems to think > but it is not true nor will it never get true! > > why in the world should i use a laptop

[CentOS] net-snmp-5.5-27.el6.i686

Hello, Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string "public" even if I don't have it defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't timeout. See example below. ... rocommunity nobody 127.0.0.1 ... [root@L703108 pgsql]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c

Re: [CentOS] net-snmp-5.5-27.el6.i686

On 11/28/2011 07:41 PM, Corey Henderson wrote: > On 11/28/2011 2:13 PM, Steve Clark wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community >> string "public" even if I don't have it >> defined in my snmpd.

[CentOS] rsyslog-5.8.7

Hi, Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6? Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lis

Re: [CentOS] rsyslog-5.8.7

On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote: >> Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6? >> > I do not see any 3rd party repo offering it. > > Me neither. I am trying to build a syslog server and this version has the capab

Re: [CentOS] rsyslog-5.8.7

On 01/24/2012 11:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote: >>> Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6? >>> >> I do not see any 3rd party repo offering it. >> >> >

Re: [CentOS] rsyslog-5.8.7

On 01/24/2012 12:02 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 01/24/2012 05:40 PM, Steve Clark wrote: >> On 01/24/2012 11:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >>> On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>>> On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote: >>>&g

[CentOS] fsck

Hello, We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units returned that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that the default preen doesn't fix but running fsck -y does. I want to eliminate the -p (preen option) and always do the -y option

Re: [CentOS] fsck

On 01/27/2012 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units >> returned >> that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsi

Re: [CentOS] fsck

On 01/27/2012 12:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units >>> r

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

On 02/01/2012 02:03 PM, Nick wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route > via > a second network interface. > > Given: > > - eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1 > - eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/2

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

On 02/01/2012 04:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Steve Clark wrote: >>> I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default >>> route via >>> a second network interface. >>> >>> Given: >>

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

On 02/02/2012 05:41 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 02/02/2012 11:28 AM, Nick wrote: >> And if it isn't, is there anything I should bear in mind when hacking a >> script >> to do this sort of thing, in order to avoid breaking my system or generally >> fighting against the system's assumptions?

Re: [CentOS] configure network bridge listing bridged intefaces

On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > Hi all, > > Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge > named br0. > > Searching the web I only found about creating a file > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to > explicitely list wh

Re: [CentOS] configure network bridge listing bridged intefaces

On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote: > On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written: > >> On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge >> > named br0. >> > >

Re: [CentOS] configure network bridge listing bridged intefaces

On 02/05/2012 10:17 AM, Robert Spangler wrote: > On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written: > >> On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote: >> > On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written: >> >>On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0124 CentOS 6 kernel Update

On 02/14/2012 06:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0124 > > Upstream details at :https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0124.html > > The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently > syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) > > > i386: > 7

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0124 CentOS 6 kernel Update

On 02/15/2012 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/14/2012 09:14 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >> On 02/14/2012 06:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0124 >>> >>> Upstream details at :https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-012

[CentOS] kernel.org kernel in CentOS respin.

Hello List, I found these wonderful instruction by Alan Bartlett (thanks Alan) for building a kernel.org kernel that would install on CentOS 5.5. Doing this and moving the resulting .rpm to the target system and doing a rpm -ivh ... works great. Now I am trying to use the same rpm as part of a

Re: [CentOS] kernel.org kernel in CentOS respin.

On 10/05/2010 05:30 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: Steve Clark > >> I found these wonderful instruction by Alan Bartlett (thanks Alan) for >> building >> > >> a kernel.org kernel >> that would install on CentOS 5.5. Doing this and moving the res

Re: [CentOS] kernel.org kernel in CentOS respin.

On 10/06/2010 06:05 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Steve Clark I realize that uname is missing as well as /sbin/new-kernel-pkg. That is why I was asking if someone has a "recipe" for building a kernel from "kernel.org" that will install correctly from a respin. Y

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving mail

On 10/18/2010 04:18 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 22:06, Alexander Dalloz wrote: The daemon is bound to localhost only. Yes, that would be a problem! What could I be missing? The logs are clean. postconf -e 'inet_interfaces = all' service postfix res

Re: [CentOS] Getting Wake on lan to work

On 10/20/2010 01:53 PM, Peter Crighton wrote: On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:25:26 -0700, you wrote: on 10-6-2010 2:27 PM Robert Heller spake the following: At Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:33:25 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: My system is: Intel CC820 motherboard (which supports PME# wa

Re: [CentOS] Getting Wake on lan to work

On 10/20/2010 02:13 PM, cen...@crighton.me.uk wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:04:51 -0400, you wrote: To get mine to work under fedora I had to run ethtool and turn on the wol option. Also it seemed to get reset after used wol to start it up so in my rc.local I put /sbin/ethtool -s eth1 wol

[CentOS] conntrack-tools

Hi, I have been looking for a conntrack-tools rpm for Centos 5.5. Does anyone know of one? Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

On 11/27/2010 09:21 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:23:34PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: The "working system" in that analogy is software, not necessarily nor even likely to be the kernel itself. But yes, it can trash a production critical web or software applicatio

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 12/07/2010 06:56 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mathieu Baudier said the following on 07/12/10 12:23: Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that can connect to internet. FastWeb does this in Italy. They configure the

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 12/07/2010 05:13 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 07/12/10 02:26, Les Mikesell wrote: On 12/6/10 6:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: You are enjoying a side-effect of NAT by thinking it is a firewall. The other nice side-effect of NAT is that you get an effectively infinite number

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 12/07/2010 04:31 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:51:16AM -0500, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: LOL twice, I'll top-post! (I hate M$ Office, but I'm stuck with it) Really? In blatant disregard for the published guidelines for use on this and other

Re: [CentOS] Optimal VPN

On 12/09/2010 10:30 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 25/11/10 14:12, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: [...snip...] Will you be confronted with IPv6 in the (not so) near future? Forget OpenVPN, it is still beta there, while it has been implemented in strongswan for ages, and part of there standard t

[CentOS] sudo doing DNS lookup

Hi, I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have sudo.i3861.7.2p1-9.el5_5 installed I am using the same sudoers file, but the one on box A keeps trying to do DNS lookups while the one on box B does not. How do I disable this

Re: [CentOS] sudo doing DNS lookup

On 12/10/2010 08:46 AM, Baird, Josh wrote: Maybe I am missing something here.. but what does 'sudo' have to do with DNS resolution? *From:* centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] *On Behalf Of *Steve Clark *Sent:* Friday, December 10, 2010 7:44 AM *To:* Cent

Re: [CentOS] sudo doing DNS lookup

On 12/10/2010 09:04 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Steve Clark I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have sudo.i3861.7.2p1-9.el5_5 installed I am using the same sudoers file, but the one on box A keeps trying to do DNS lookups

Re: [CentOS] sudo doing DNS lookup

On 12/10/2010 10:40 AM, Tom H wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Steve Clark wrote: I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have sudo.i3861.7.2p1-9.el5_5 installed I am using the same sudoers file, but the one on box A keeps

Re: [CentOS] appliance to embed Centos

On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote: On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: 2010/12/29 John R Pierce: On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote: - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb to 100mb THAT is a tough requirement. I was go

Re: [CentOS] appliance to embed Centos

On 12/30/2010 07:34 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: 2010/12/30 Steve Clark: On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote: On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: 2010/12/29 John R Pierce: On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote: - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from

Re: [CentOS] appliance to embed Centos

On 12/30/2010 07:34 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: 2010/12/30 Steve Clark: On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote: On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: 2010/12/29 John R Pierce: On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote: - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hello, Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the VIA Eden Processor? cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 13 model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz I am

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

Yes, We are using one to HE and one to SIXXS. We don't rely on any of the standard redhat config stuff - we do it all thru our own configs. Been working great. On 05/10/2011 11:17 AM, David Mehler wrote: Hello, Is anyone using an ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel? I've got one through Hurricane Electric

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1 ... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the weekend and it's gone. Up till the reboot, th

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

On 05/10/2011 02:28 PM, Steve Clark wrote: On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1 ... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hello, Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the VIA Eden Processor? cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hello, Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the VIA Eden Processor? cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Hello, does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel check

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 05/11/2011 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hello Steve, On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0. Just checking now and still

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 05/12/2011 09:49 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote: > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > And given that C5.6 took 3 mont

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

On 05/24/2011 02:01 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 05/24/11 10:32 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 05/24/2011 09:57 AM, John R Pierce wrote: also you want SSD that has a supercap on its internal cache so pending writes aren't lost in a power failure scenario. You know, I've asked people about tha

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

On 05/27/2011 05:29 AM, John Doe wrote: From: "aurfal...@gmail.com" In Windows and OSX its easy to get TRIM working, does any know of TRIM for linux? You apparently need a 2.6.33+ kernel (I read somewhere RH backported what was needed to their 2.6.32) and an fs like ext4 or brtfs. Read some p

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

On 05/27/2011 08:28 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Steve Clark On 05/27/2011 05:29 AM, John Doe wrote: Test = https://sites.google.com/site/lightrush/random-1/checkiftrimonext4isenabledandworking Tested on Fedora (15) and it worked. Hmmm How do you determine whether TRIM worked or not

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

On 05/27/2011 10:04 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Steve Clark Unfortunately when I try it on SL 6.0 hdparm gets a segment violation on the --read-sector command. The fedora one is 9.36 And the one we used on CentOS 5.6 was 9.37 (compiled it). Maybe try a more recent version... Hmmm

Re: [CentOS] How to format a USB drive?

On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 6/2/2011 3:04 PM, Robert Heller wrote: I know. But you need to setup sudo for users, I never bothered so far. It is one of the *first* things I do when I freshly install Linux (*ANY* distro, both on my machines and anyone else's I set up). And the

Re: [CentOS] How to format a USB drive?

On 06/03/2011 06:56 AM, Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:52:30AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote: On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: And the first thing I do when I need to change something on a system set up like that is 'sudo su -'... Too lazy to type it more

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

On 06/16/2011 12:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun OS - I can remember putting things into 3, because X would wh

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

On 06/16/2011 12:58 PM, Steve Clark wrote: On 06/16/2011 12:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun OS - I can

Re: [CentOS] Installing from CD

On 07/12/2011 09:59 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: this machine can boot only from a ... HardDrive. USB is not an option. What I did: Move said hard drive to a system that has a DVD, and install there. I had to "tweak a few things" because of how the install pr

Re: [CentOS] Installing from CD

On 07/13/2011 12:46 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 07/12/11 11:53 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Steve Clarkwrote: With an HP DL140 we open the cover and temporarily plug in a standard atapi 5.25 DVD drive

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

On 07/15/2011 02:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Jake Shipton wrote: On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I've installed CentOS-6 on my server (in parallel to CentOS-5.6) and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd. I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd under CentOS-6, but I'm get

Re: [CentOS] cent0s-6 and virtualbox

On 07/17/2011 09:32 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote: I want to get a look at Cents-6 The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42 The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the same r

Re: [CentOS] SPAM on the List

On 07/18/2011 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 7/18/2011 11:25 AM, ?? ?? wrote: So do you typically provide helpful answers to forum questions sooner after they are posted when you have to forum-hop than you would if they land in your inbox or later? Obviously some level of activity must be mai

Re: [CentOS] SPAM on the List

On 07/18/2011 02:37 PM, Steve Clark wrote: On 07/18/2011 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 7/18/2011 11:25 AM, ?? ?? wrote: So do you typically provide helpful answers to forum questions sooner after they are posted when you have to forum-hop than you would if they land in your inbox or later

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

On 07/19/2011 10:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I finally switched workstations, and am running into a lot of truly annoying details with CentOS 6, and the software with it. For one, I'm doing this by webmail, and this version of Firefox *insists* on putting what I'm typing in gray, rather than b

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/29/2011 07:48 AM, Thomas Harold wrote: On 7/28/2011 5:01 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote: the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to headers, whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt will use the subject line as well to thread messages. Apple Mail does that to

Re: [CentOS] Iptables - flooding console

On 08/01/2011 03:23 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:44 AM -0500 cbul...@gmail.com wrote: We are trying to track some specific rules using LOG as target. Everything is working well but the problem is that iptables is flooding the console with LOG messages. In additio

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and IPv6 neighbor proxy

On 08/18/2011 11:10 AM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote: To route a subnet in ipv6 there are two possibilities: -add route commands for the subnet in each computer -or use neighbor proxy in the router server I prefer neighbor proxy. So I have to activate neighbor proxy in the router: sysctl -w net.i

Re: [CentOS] Off topic list for centos please?

On 08/25/2011 09:18 AM, ken wrote: On 08/25/2011 08:47 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: I don't think that is necessary; this newsgroup does not seem to me to be over-loaded with OT material, or indeed with material of any kind. Splitting it would just be a nuisance, in my case at least. Surely it is e

Re: [CentOS] Off topic list for centos please?

On 08/25/2011 11:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Ross Walker wrote: On Aug 25, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: On 08/25/2011 11:00 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: Could we have a centos-offtopic list please, so anything that would be considered OT can be posted there? How about specific on

Re: [CentOS] fdisk on centos 6

On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the same thing? Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result. jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.o

Re: [CentOS] fdisk on centos 6

On 09/16/2011 08:10 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: On 09/16/2011 06:59 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the same thing? Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result. jerry

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

On 11/17/2014 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 11/17/2014 10:05 AM, Darr247 wrote: On 17 November 2014 @15:19 zulu, Johnny Hughes wrote: I (we, the CentOS Project) can not distribute flash Is it because Adobe said no, or that you never actually asked? Because I was OK'd to distribute FlashPla

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Centos and logs

On 11/18/2014 10:25 AM, zep wrote: On 11/18/2014 10:03 AM, Alan Holt wrote: Hello, may be anyone familiar with some tool for viewing logs. I mean web-interface based, simple solution. you say 'servers': plural, which leads me to think you're doing load balancing or otherwise have multiple serv

  1   2   3   4   >