On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark<scl...@netwolves.com> wrote:
On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be
applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an
adjustment.
Akemi
I just finished building a kernel based on
kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.src.rpm. I hand applied the patches. Like you said
one applied clean the other applied with a fuzz offset of -36 (IIRC). I am
installing now to test.
My rebuild was simply cp the /boot/config-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.i686 to
.config;make oldconfig;make rpm
That is why I was asking about the proper way.
I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing.
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel.
I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in 0004586
(thanks). I am pleased to report
that they appear to work as advertised. With:
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 2
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 2
Router solicitations were issued and router advertisements were accepted and I
could still forward packets.
I didn't make new patches, I simply did
%define with_fuzzy_patches 1
Also what should the normal rpmbuild line be?
I ended up doing
rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` kernel.spec --with firmware --without debug
--without debuginfo
The first time I didn't have --with firmware and the kernel wouldn't install.
Regards,
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Sr. Software Engineer III
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
