[CentOS] How do I blank or overwrite DVD-RW disks in CentOS 5?

2008-01-06 Thread Robert Nichols
I'm trying to use DVD-RW ("minus RW") disks in my LG GSA-4040B drive. I can write a new disk just fine, but can't find any way to blank or re-use a disk. When I run xcdroast and click on the "Blank CD/DVD+-RW" button, I get "Error while blanking." Here is last part of the dialog: Using gen

[CentOS] Re: How do I blank or overwrite DVD-RW disks in CentOS 5?

2008-01-06 Thread Robert Nichols
Barry Brimer wrote: I'm trying to use DVD-RW ("minus RW") disks in my LG GSA-4040B drive. I can write a new disk just fine, but can't find any way to blank or re-use a disk. When I run xcdroast and click on the "Blank CD/DVD+-RW" button, I get "Error while blanking." Here is last part of the d

[CentOS] Re: question on "cp -f" on centos 5.1

2008-01-28 Thread Robert Nichols
Alex White wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:25:27 -0500 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ alias foo=bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ foo bash: bar: command not found [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ "foo" bash: foo: command not found [EMAIL PROTECTE

[CentOS] Re: Monitor power save question

2008-02-01 Thread Robert Nichols
nate wrote: David G. Miller wrote: I don't see anything incriminating in dmesg, /var/log/messages or /var/log/Xorg.0.log. I'll switch the system to boot to runlevel 3 so I can see if X is spewing something to the first alternate console that isn't getting written to the log file. Anyone have

[CentOS] Re: Monitor power save question

2008-02-02 Thread Robert Nichols
MHR wrote: On Feb 1, 2008 6:54 PM, Robert Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And, see what "xset q" has to say about whether DPMS is currently enabled or not. I've noticed that mplayer disables DPMS on entry, but neglects to re-enable it on termination. Interesting

[CentOS] Re: bash - safely pass untrusted strings?

2008-02-26 Thread Robert Nichols
Benjamin Smith wrote: It's obviously getting slipped on on the "-b". Tried again: $ cat script3.sh #! /bin/bash for file in $* do ls -l -- "$file"; done $ /bin/bash ./script3.sh * -rw-r--r-- 1 bens nobody 5 2008-02-26 12:14 -b ls: cannot access Disney: No such file or d

[CentOS] Odd AVC from tcpdump

2008-03-02 Thread Robert Nichols
Whenever tcpdump fills a savefile to capacity (-C option) and tries to open a new one, I get the following AVC denial: kernel: audit(1204485464.409:106): avc: denied { search } for pid=2702 comm="tcpdump" name="/" dev=hdb1 ino=2 scontext=system_u:system_r:netutils_t:s0 t context=system_u:objec

[CentOS] Re: C5 krb5 updates do not get applied

2008-03-23 Thread Robert Nichols
Karanbir Singh wrote: Bernd Bartmann wrote: Hi, the latest Centos 5 krb5 1.6.1-17.el5_1.1 do not get applied to any of my servers. I can see the updates being available on the mirror servers, but "yum update" shows nothing. The krb5 updates for Centos 4 were installed on all of my Centos 4 serv

[CentOS] Re: A few questions regarding CentOS (5.0)

2008-03-27 Thread Robert Nichols
Morten Nilsen wrote: - Why does the screen flicker on and off several times during boot and when logging in? In the kernel distributed with RHEL5 / CentOS 5.0, a driver was accidentally omitted (CONFIG_FB_VESA). This makes the text mode display wonky on some common hardware. IIRC, this was

[CentOS] Re: A few questions regarding CentOS (5.0)

2008-03-27 Thread Robert Nichols
Morten Nilsen wrote: Robert Nichols wrote: If you installed 5.0, you're missing a LOT of updates. The normal update mechanism should bring your machine up to 5.1 unless you've taken action to lock it to the 5.0 release. When I installed this box, 5.1 wasn't out yet.. And, no

[CentOS] Re: new CentOS 5 install, 'Network is unreachable'

2007-08-03 Thread Robert Nichols
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've a new CentOS 5 minimalist install; this will be the name server from my prior thread. I have configured eth0 during setup with the static IP the unit will have when in production. During this setup phase, selinux is set to permissive. Setting up on a different

[CentOS] Re: Opposite of cp -u

2007-08-06 Thread Robert Nichols
Robert Moskowitz wrote: I had at one point copied a large number of files between drives and did not use the -p and thus the timestamps were all set to the date of the copy. I did not catch this, and deleted the source. So I 'lived' with it and have since changed many files. Well, yesterda

[CentOS] Re: Opposite of cp -u

2007-08-06 Thread Robert Nichols
Stephen Harris wrote: On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:27:20PM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: for F in * do cmp "$F" "/new/directory/$F" && touch -r "$F" "/new/directory/$F" done That will compare all the files and adjust the timestamp on t

[CentOS] Re: too many links error when creating directories

2007-09-27 Thread Robert Nichols
chitgoks wrote: hi , our centos os has an ext3 file system. and i cant create any more directories, it gives me a too many links error, even when doing a manual mkdir. is there any workaround for this? without changing it to a different file system like reiserFS? we dont have a reiserfs module i

[CentOS] Re: FW: Logwatch for XXXXXXX.kd4efm.org (Linux)

2007-10-26 Thread Robert Nichols
Ugo Bellavance wrote: Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 wrote: WARNING: Kernel Errors Present end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector ...: 2 Time(s) You tried to read or write to a floppy and it kind of failed... I see that error being logged every time a new kernel is inst

[CentOS] Re: installed centos date & time

2007-06-15 Thread Robert Nichols
Hiep Nguyen wrote: hi list, is there a command to find out the date & time that centos installed? thanks T. Hiep $ rpm -qi centos-release Name : centos-release Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 5 Vendor: CentOS Release : 0.0.el5.

[CentOS] Re: installed centos date & time

2007-06-15 Thread Robert Nichols
Scott Ehrlich wrote: On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Jim Perrin wrote: rpm -qi centos-release showed dates well beyond when I knew I installed the system. Probably because you "installed" Centos 4.4 as an upgrade. The install timestamp for centos-release would be the time of the upgrade, not the time o

Re: [CentOS] Basic Permissions Questions

2011-01-26 Thread Robert Nichols
On 01/26/2011 04:31 AM, James Bensley wrote: > On 26 January 2011 10:17, Rafa Griman wrote: >> Directories should have +x permissions. Do a: >> >> chmod0750/directory >> >> And see what happens. >> > > Hi Rafa, like a fool I sent that email and then worked this out > shortly after :) > > S

Re: [CentOS] SSH Automatic Log-on Failure - Centos 5.5

2011-01-27 Thread Robert Nichols
On 01/27/2011 01:39 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Also, there's a stack of reasons that DSA is preferred to RSA for SSH > keys these days. When you generate your private keys, use "ssh-keygen > -t dsa", not rsa. Care to elaborate on that? Searching, I find mostly a "stack of reasons" for prefer

Re: [CentOS] How to relocate $HOME directory

2011-01-31 Thread Robert Nichols
On 01/31/2011 01:32 PM, Cameron Kerr wrote: > On 1/02/2011, at 7:19 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > > Lots of good advice snipped > >> 12. Tell your users emphatically that they should use $HOME anywhere >> they're tempted to hardwire their home directory path into a >> script. :-) > > Althou

Re: [CentOS] /etc/hosts - hostname alias for 127.0.0.1

2011-03-07 Thread Robert Nichols
On 03/07/2011 08:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > That said, it can be problematic when you "ping $HOSTNAME" and get a > valid 127.0.0.1 response, and haven't actually tested your external > port. It also requires thought for configuring SSH and SNMP and NFS to > allow localhost access. When yo

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

2011-04-06 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/05/2011 08:47 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote: > > "What the hell is so special about CentOS 6?" For me, that would be kernel version 2.6.32. I have hardware and software that needs a kernel a lot newer than the 2.6.18 kernel in CentOS 5.6. I would dearly love to get off the Fedora roller coaster

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

2011-04-11 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/11/2011 05:53 AM, Tom Brown wrote: >>> I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that >>> have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others >>> have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg >>> >>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/

Re: [CentOS] ext4 not on a bootable partition

2011-04-11 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/11/2011 11:04 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the "/" >> partitition. I got the error that cannot boot ext4 partition. >> bummer I know this is just a boot issue and make the ext3 but I >> was disapp

Re: [CentOS] Attaching LinkSys WRT54GL to CentOS machine

2011-04-24 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/24/2011 01:15 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I don't actually think my motives are relevant. > In case I didn't described the situation clearly, > my CentOS server is connected to an ADSL modem by ethernet (eth0). > The modem's IP address is 192.168.1.254 . > > I have a second NIC on my server (

Re: [CentOS] iptables

2011-04-26 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/26/2011 10:19 AM, mattias wrote: > Can anyone see any errors in this scripts > Iptables says > Invalid target > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o virbr0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED > -j ACCEPT > iptables -A FORWARD -i virbr0 -o eth0

Re: [CentOS] Curious fdisk report on large disk

2011-04-26 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/26/2011 06:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > James Pearson wrote: > Could it be that the partition table has become corrupt (e.g. overwritten)? >>> >>> But everything seems to be working perfectly; >>> is that possible if the partition table is corrupt? >> >> Yes - the partition table

Re: [CentOS] Curious fdisk report on large disk

2011-04-27 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/27/2011 07:26 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > James Pearson wrote: > >>> Is there a safe way of recovering the partition table? >>> I have a vague idea that copies are kept at various places on the disk? >> >> AFAIK, there is only one copy at the start of the disk - however what >> does /proc/par

Re: [CentOS] INN removed from CentOS 6

2011-04-27 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/27/2011 08:56 AM, Reynolds McClatchey wrote: > I use inn to make internal company announcements and > discussions available to remote offices. > I note inn is removed form RHEL 6. What replaces inn? > > http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Technical_Notes/apc.

Re: [CentOS] Curious fdisk report on large disk

2011-04-27 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/27/2011 01:15 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:18:28AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: >> It would make life so much easier if fdisk would simply accept those same >> numbers as Kilobytes, but alas it keeps trying to round up to the next >> "

Re: [CentOS] Curious fdisk report on large disk

2011-04-27 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/27/2011 07:08 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Robert Nichols wrote: > >>> sfdisk has "dump" mode, and it can also import old dump to new disk. >> >> That dump mode doesn't help if the partition table is currently munged, >> and sfdisk is extra

Re: [CentOS] Curious fdisk report on large disk

2011-04-28 Thread Robert Nichols
On 04/28/2011 04:06 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Robert Nichols wrote: > >> Actually, if it were my drive I would just re-create the 4 primary >> partitions using whatever tool was handy, but giving that extended >> partition a "normal" type instead. Once I had

Re: [CentOS] Recover from an fsck failure

2020-05-28 Thread Robert Nichols
On 5/28/20 1:33 PM, James B. Byrne via CentOS wrote: /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_log The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock is cor

Re: [CentOS] Using CentOS 7 to attempt recovery of failed disk

2020-09-26 Thread Robert Nichols
On 9/26/20 12:40 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: Hello I did try the "dd conv=noerror …" The ddrescue - doesnt stop - it just doesnt "continue" past a certain point. Somewhere around the 117G mark - it just doesnt go past that . (same with dd, gets to 117G and just doesnt continue. I have let the dd run a

[CentOS] No sound after latest Firefox update (firefox-78.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64)

2020-09-29 Thread Robert Nichols
With Firefox updated to firefox-78.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64, I cannot get sound from Firefox. I've tried restarting pulseaudio, also logging out and logging back in. No help. Other A/V apps work just fine. Downgrading to firefox-68.12.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64 makes sound work again. For now, I've

Re: [CentOS] No sound after latest Firefox update (firefox-78.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64)

2020-10-01 Thread Robert Nichols
On 9/30/20 8:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 9/29/20 9:16 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: With Firefox updated to firefox-78.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64, I cannot get sound from Firefox. I've tried restarting pulseaudio, also logging out and logging back in. No help. Other A/V apps work just

Re: [CentOS] No sound after latest Firefox update (firefox-78.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64)

2020-10-02 Thread Robert Nichols
On 10/1/20 3:24 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 04:01:29PM -0400, mailist wrote: The Ubuntu-derived distros are much better suited to desktop. I run several of them, as well as CentOS 7 and 8. Ubuntu, Kubuntu (Ubuntu with KDE), Lubuntu, Debian, PopOS, and Zorin. They all

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

2020-10-17 Thread Robert Nichols
On 10/17/20 3:38 PM, Robert Heller wrote: I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, and FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? As a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is otherwise up-to-date. I'm seei

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

2020-10-20 Thread Robert Nichols
On 10/20/20 2:45 PM, Robert Heller wrote: At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: Jonathan Billings wrote: I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6 systems when the platform is only going to live for another month. Frankly, I'm glad to se

[CentOS] Gnote equivalent in CentOS 8

2020-12-24 Thread Robert Nichols
In CentOS 8, is there an equivalent for the gnote application? -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Gnote equivalent in CentOS 8

2020-12-24 Thread Robert Nichols
On 12/24/20 12:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 11:04:26 -0600 Robert Nichols wrote: In CentOS 8, is there an equivalent for the gnote application? I personally use vimwiki. Have you tried compiling the Fedora srpm on your Centos box? A lot of stuff that you might want to

Re: [CentOS] Gnote equivalent in CentOS 8

2020-12-26 Thread Robert Nichols
On 12/25/20 12:42 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: As I can see, Cherytree can be used only on Fedora 32 and above due to dependencies. I personally use Tomboy for years. I install it from Fedora 28 repository I have set up on my CentOS 8 laptop. In general, Fedora 28 packages can be directly inst

Re: [CentOS] Automatic clean /tmp folder

2021-04-07 Thread Robert Nichols
On 4/7/21 7:27 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Wednesday, April 07, 2021 9:00 AM + Gestió Servidors wrote: With these files I supposed that a file with more than 10 days in /tmp would be automatically deleted, but today I have found some files/folders with more than 10 days. What I have d

[CentOS] Is my ssh private key already unlocked?

2022-01-07 Thread Robert Nichols
When I first ssh to a system, I am asked for the password to unlock the private key file. Thereafter, that key file remains unlocked, and subsequent ssh sessions will not prompt for a password. I can always re-lock the key file by running "ssh-add -D". In a script I have that runs sshfs to moun

Re: [CentOS] Is my ssh private key already unlocked?

2022-01-09 Thread Robert Nichols
t; is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. On 1/9/22 12:54 PM, cen...@niob.at wrote: Look at ssh-add -T . This will test if the private key for the given public key is available through the agent. Am 07.01.22 um 23:35 schrieb Robert Nichols: When I first ssh to a sy

Re: [CentOS] Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)

2022-01-20 Thread Robert Nichols
On 1/20/22 10:32 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 19/01/2022 15:32, Toralf Lund wrote: Following some update or the other (I think) on my CentOS Stream 8 system, I'm no longer able to use ping as a regular user; I get $ ping www.centos.org ping: socket: Operation not permitted Does anyone else se

[CentOS] Need fstab-decode for CentOS 8

2022-02-26 Thread Robert Nichols
Does anything for CentOS 8 provide the function of the fstab-decode utility? Entries in /proc/mounts and /etc/fstab can have escape sequences for certain special characters, and I need to decode that. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete i

Re: [CentOS] Need fstab-decode for CentOS 8

2022-02-27 Thread Robert Nichols
On 2/27/22 12:26 PM, cen...@niob.at wrote: Am 27.02.22 um 04:33 schrieb Robert Nichols: Does anything for CentOS 8 provide the function of the fstab-decode utility? Entries in /proc/mounts and /etc/fstab can have escape sequences for certain special characters, and I need to decode that

Re: [CentOS] Need fstab-decode for CentOS 8

2022-02-28 Thread Robert Nichols
On 2/28/22 1:22 AM, cen...@niob.at wrote: Am 28.02.22 um 05:45 schrieb Robert Nichols: On 2/27/22 12:26 PM, cen...@niob.at wrote: Am 27.02.22 um 04:33 schrieb Robert Nichols: Does anything for CentOS 8 provide the function of the fstab-decode utility? Entries in /proc/mounts and /etc/fstab

Re: [CentOS] Need fstab-decode for CentOS 8

2022-03-01 Thread Robert Nichols
On 2/28/22 8:46 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: On 2/28/22 1:22 AM, cen...@niob.at wrote: Am 28.02.22 um 05:45 schrieb Robert Nichols: On 2/27/22 12:26 PM, cen...@niob.at wrote: Am 27.02.22 um 04:33 schrieb Robert Nichols: Does anything for CentOS 8 provide the function of the fstab-decode utility

Re: [CentOS] Need fstab-decode for CentOS 8

2022-03-01 Thread Robert Nichols
On 3/1/22 3:46 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 3/1/22 10:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: Chris Schanzle mentioned off-list that a tab character had been replaced with spaces (I *knew* that should have been an attached file, shame on me).  He also suggested an improvement that removes the tab character,

Re: [CentOS] Need fstab-decode for CentOS 8

2022-03-02 Thread Robert Nichols
On 3/1/22 7:07 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 3/1/22 15:36, Robert Nichols wrote: "${cmdline[@]}" The problem there is that the last line is going to get interpreted by a shell before anything is executed, so you now have to escape characters that are special to the shell withi

Re: [CentOS] Question about virt-manager Version 9.1

2023-02-11 Thread Robert Nichols
On 2/10/23 11:07, Joshua Kramer wrote: This may provide the answer you are looking for: it's being deprecated in favor of Cockpit. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030592 Deprecated, yes, rut only in Red Hat. Still fully supported upstream. https://blog.wikichoon.com/2020/06/virt-m

Re: [CentOS] du vs df size difference

2009-09-30 Thread Robert Nichols
Ryan Pugatch wrote: > Hi all, > > Curious issue.. looking in to how much disk space is being used on a > machine (CentOS 5.3). When I compare the output of du vs df, I am > seeing a 12GB difference with du saying 8G used and df saying 20G used. > > # du -hcx / > 8.0Gtotal > > # df -h / >

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] CentOS-5.4 Update?

2009-10-23 Thread Robert Nichols
Timothy Murphy wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > >> but out of curiosity, did you just do a >> simple yum update or did you follow the procedure in the release notes >> document? > > Where is this document? > > Incidentally, I did a simple yum update and it seemed to work fine. On the centos.org h

Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-24 Thread Robert Nichols
David Suhendrik wrote: > Still waiting for DVD 5.4 64 bit > Have you been looking, or just expecting a DVD to show up in your mailbox?? Go to the CentOS homepage, http://www.centos.org/ . At the top of the page you'll see CentOS Download Information. Click on "CentOS-5 ISOs", then on "x86_64".

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Robert Nichols
Rod Rook wrote: > Having used Fedora 8 and 10 for a long time and Fedora 11 for a few > months and never experienced this in these distros, I can say this bug > occurs only in old versions of Red Had distros like CentOS. Now that I > know this is a bug, I will move on hoping that others will so

Re: [CentOS] don't understand this command

2009-12-18 Thread Robert Nichols
adrian kok wrote: > Hi > > I mistype this shell#/rm a.tar.gz > > it works but it won't confirm and the file is remove > > why? And now you mistyped your mistyping. That would be a backslash (\) not a forward slash (/). Escaping the command name with a backslash bypasses the "alias rm='rm -i'"

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

2009-12-22 Thread Robert Nichols
Carlos Santana wrote: > Hi, > > Does mount point specification while partitioning (order in which I > specify /, /boot, swap etc..) affect performance? I am not sure about > the syntax, but I guess one can also specify address/block range while > partitioning. Does it affect IO performance? Probab

Re: [CentOS] IPTABLEs and port scanning

2010-01-05 Thread Robert Nichols
James B. Byrne wrote: > I see many entries in /var/log/secure similar to these: > > . . . > /var/log/secure.1:Dec 31 08:00:55 gway01 sshd[7220]: Received > disconnect from 93.89.144.31: 11: Bye Bye > /var/log/secure.1:Dec 31 08:00:58 gway01 sshd[7221]: Failed password > for root from 93.89.144.31

Re: [CentOS] Backup server

2010-01-13 Thread Robert Nichols
Jussi Hirvi wrote: > I think nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. I have very good > experiences with it. Easy to setup and control (only remember first to > install the required packages, and I think rsync-devel was not mentioned > but is required). What did you run into that requires rsync-

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

2010-01-23 Thread Robert Nichols
Robert Heller wrote: > At Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:43:40 + CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> Just curious. What is the difference between the command above and "find >> -exec rm -f {} \;" ? > > The command "find -exec rm -f {} \;" collects ALL of the names > "find " as a single command line,

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge]

2010-01-25 Thread Robert Nichols
James B. Byrne wrote: > On Sat, January 23, 2010 20:21, Robert Nichols wrote: >> Robert Heller wrote: > >> Gosh, then I guess the manpage for 'find' must be totally wrong >> where it >> says: >> >> -exec command ; >>

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

2010-01-26 Thread Robert Nichols
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 1/26/2010 11:42 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Mon, January 25, 2010 13:40, Les Mikesell wrote: >> . >>> I'd say it is more likely that the command that resulted in an error >>> wasn't exactly what was posted or there is a filesystem problem. >>> >> I do not consider a fil

Re: [CentOS] Find and excluding directory

2010-02-02 Thread Robert Nichols
Tom Brown wrote: > Hi > > I have to use find to change the perms of a directory and files within > that directory recursively but i need to exclude a directory within the > top level directory, as its a netapp and so contains a read only > .snapshot dir. > > I have tried... > > # find /var/da

Re: [CentOS] Mount USB disk at startup?

2010-02-04 Thread Robert Nichols
Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 02/04/2010 02:15 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > ... >> How do I mount /dev/sdb1 automatically at boot? > > It turns out to be some sort of race condition: > > If I modify /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit: > > ... > STRING=$"Checking filesystems" > echo $STRING >

Re: [CentOS] Mount USB disk at startup?

2010-02-05 Thread Robert Nichols
John Doe wrote: > From: Ian Forde >> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:19 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: >>> --On Thursday, February 04, 2010 8:36 AM -0600 Robert Nichols >>>> Looks like that's about all you can do. USB devices aren't available >>>> un

[CentOS] Re: fdisk partition table plus sign

2008-04-21 Thread Robert Nichols
Kai Schaetzl wrote: What does the plus sign after the blocks value exactly mean in the fdisk output? Some research reveals that it indicates that not all the blocks are included in the fdisk value. But what does this exactly mean? Those blocks are 1024 bytes each, so you'll see that "+" when t

[CentOS] Re: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box

2008-05-07 Thread Robert Nichols
Michael Simpson wrote: do you have any mention of the new kernel in /etc/grub.conf? you might find that the default kernel is still the original one in which case there would be a line like default=1 in grub.conf changing this to default=0 might bring up the new kernel on reboot i have an old d

[CentOS] Re: Today's log - yum entries

2008-05-11 Thread Robert Nichols
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday, 10th May). I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update yesterday, and no packages were install

[CentOS] Re: symbolic linking

2008-05-19 Thread Robert Nichols
MHR wrote: Yes, using fqpn's is best in situations like this, but if I read the above correctly, you want: ln -s /mnt/jack/files /opt/files because you said you mounted jack's /opt on jill's /mnt/jack, not jack's / (root). Still, why you would get /opt/files/files is a mystery to me, too. Yo

[CentOS] Finding module name for SCSI host adapter for a given SCSI target

2008-06-03 Thread Robert Nichols
Given a path to a SCSI device, e.g. "DEV=/dev/st1", I need to find the name of the kernel module for the SCSI host adapter that controls that target. The objective is to be able to unload and reload the kernel module when the drive gets into a state that requires a SCSI bus reset for recovery. T

[CentOS] Re: Mounting Floppies

2008-06-20 Thread Robert Nichols
Nigel Kendrick wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:01 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mounting Floppies Nigel Kendrick wrote: So is it me, CentOS 5 or something else? (Idea

[CentOS] Total lockup caused by Shift-{print screen}

2008-07-08 Thread Robert Nichols
I just had the misfortune to press Shift-{print screen} accidentally while in a Gnome desktop, and the result was a completely unresponsive system where the only recovery was a power switch initiated shutdown. Further investigation shows the runaway creation of gnome-screenshot processes. System

[CentOS] Re: Total lockup caused by Shift-{print screen}

2008-07-09 Thread Robert Nichols
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Robert Nichols wrote: System is CentOS 5.2 fully updated on an Intel i686. Suggestions about what component should receive the bugzilla report are welcome. Are you able to recreate it? It happened to me once, I've never seen the issue again after that. Ralph

[CentOS] Re: Total lockup caused by Shift-{print screen}

2008-07-09 Thread Robert Nichols
Robert Nichols wrote: I just had the misfortune to press Shift-{print screen} accidentally while in a Gnome desktop, and the result was a completely unresponsive system where the only recovery was a power switch initiated shutdown. Further investigation shows the runaway creation of gnome

[CentOS] Re: Iptables not blocking UDP port 53

2008-07-10 Thread Robert Nichols
Sean Carolan wrote: I'm attempting to block access to port 53 from internet hosts for an internal server. This device is behind a gateway router so all traffic appears to come from source ip 10.100.1.1. Here are my (non-working) iptables rules: -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -s 10.100.1.1 -m tcp -p tc

[CentOS] Re: Iptables not blocking UDP port 53

2008-07-10 Thread Robert Nichols
Sean Carolan wrote: Does the count field from "iptables -vnL RH-Firewall-1-INPUT" show your REJECT rules being hit? Yes, the rule gets hit and it returns an answer to the DNS query anyway. I saw it increment from 10 to 11 when I ran the query: 11 692 REJECT udp -- * * 10.10

[CentOS] Re: Documentation file for ifcfg options

2008-07-15 Thread Robert Nichols
Robert Moskowitz wrote: Sometime in the past two weeks, Some kind person pointed me to a GREAT document file that explained all those commands you find in the ifcfg-* files and the network file (and others, I believe). It was a great help to me, and now I need it again, and I did not write do

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Robert Nichols
On 12/04/2011 01:08 PM, fred smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 10:24:00PM +0800, Ho Chaw Ming wrote: >> Check your bios, and make sure that you did not have IDE mode enabled and >> AHCI is selected . > > Also, is this one of the "Green" series of WD disks? Those have > a 4KB sector size, not t

Re: [CentOS] regex help

2009-05-12 Thread Robert Nichols
Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I need a little help, trying to search for a line that begins with /dev > and ends with a single digit that I will choose, like 5. I can search for > ^/dev and 5$ but I am having trouble forming the combined search pattern > using egrep. If you mean any single digit not p

Re: [CentOS] can non-owner change file group setup?

2009-05-12 Thread Robert Nichols
nate wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: > >> But if you only have read access to the original file, can you overwrite it? > > If you have write access to the directory yes you should be able > to, if you only have read access to the directory I would expect > not. Technically, that's not overwriting.

Re: [CentOS] fsck file system is mounted

2009-05-16 Thread Robert Nichols
cen...@911networks.com wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is > drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on. > > I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode. > > All suggestions are welcomed. You can run fsck wit

Re: [CentOS] OT: SMART warning on hard drive, same warning for 2 1 /2 years

2009-05-24 Thread Robert Nichols
Lanny Marcus wrote: > My wife's box has a very intermittent problem, when booting from the > Maxtor IDE hard drive. This has been going on for about 2 1/2 > years The box is a Compaq EVO D300v for the Enterprise. When it > boots, there is a SMART advisory from the BIOS that says failure is > i

Re: [CentOS] Trouble (?) reformatting flash drive to include former U3 partition

2009-06-14 Thread Robert Nichols
MHR wrote: > Semi-OT? > > I just got a new SanDisk 8GB flash drive, and, as usual, it came with > the U3 software (for Windoze) on a "CD" partition and considerably > less than 8GB on the disk partition. I put it into my WinXP portable > and told U3 to delete itself, but I still can't get at the

Re: [CentOS] Trouble (?) reformatting flash drive to include former U3 partition

2009-06-14 Thread Robert Nichols
MHR wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Robert > Nichols wrote: >> If you go into fdisk's "expert" mode and set the geometry to >> 31 heads, 31 sectors/track, 16319 cylinders you can utilize >> the full 8029470208 bytes. >> > > I was able

Re: [CentOS] Trouble (?) reformatting flash drive to include former U3 partition

2009-06-14 Thread Robert Nichols
Robert Nichols wrote: > MHR wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Robert >> Nichols wrote: >>> If you go into fdisk's "expert" mode and set the geometry to >>> 31 heads, 31 sectors/track, 16319 cylinders you can utilize >>> the full 802

Re: [CentOS] Trouble (?) reformatting flash drive to include former U3 partition

2009-06-15 Thread Robert Nichols
Robert wrote: Robert Nichols wrote: The first thing I do with every USB flash drive I buy is figure out a geometry that uses all of the sectors reported by fdisk (I have a shell script that does that in a pretty much brute force way.) and then repartition and re-format the drive using that

Re: [CentOS] Trouble (?) reformatting flash drive to include former U3 partition

2009-06-16 Thread Robert Nichols
Robert wrote: > > Robert Nichols wrote: >> Robert wrote: >>> Robert Nichols wrote: >>>> The first thing I do with every USB flash drive I buy is figure >>>> out a geometry that uses all of the sectors reported by fdisk >>>> (I have a

Re: [CentOS] Trouble (?) reformatting flash drive to include former U3 partition

2009-06-16 Thread Robert Nichols
MHR wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Robert > Nichols wrote: >> Sure. I'll try it as a small attachment here. It that doesn't >> work, and I suspect it won't, I'll have to find some spot where >> I can upload it. I don't have anything l

Re: [CentOS] Flash Drive problem?

2009-07-02 Thread Robert Nichols
Ron Blizzard wrote: 1 > Jul 1 03:54:26 localhost hald[2450]: forcibly attempting to lazy > unmount /dev/sda1 as enclosing drive was disc That indicates that you unplugged the drive without first unmounting it, which is very likely to cause exactly the problem you are seeing. -- Bob Nichols

Re: [CentOS] Flash Drive problem?

2009-07-07 Thread Robert Nichols
Ron Blizzard wrote: > One thing that is odd -- sometimes when I unmount the flash drive, I > get a notice on the bottom of the screen that says 1) Wait until the > files are written to the flash and 2) It is now safe to remove the > flash drive. But I only get these notices some of the time -- mayb

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.5 Issues

2009-07-12 Thread Robert Nichols
John R Pierce wrote: > Ron Blizzard wrote: >> I downloaded Firefox 3.5 from the M. Harris site and, for the most >> part, have had good luck with it. But I have also had hard crashes >> that take down CentOS, not just Firefox. >> >> It happened to me twice on eBay (on the same page) -- and now I ca

Re: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery

2009-08-14 Thread Robert Nichols
Ross Walker wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang > Christopher wrote: > > Question now is, was the first sector of partition 1 damaged (was it > 63 or 64 sectors dd'd)? > > If so it will require a more tricky procedure to fix. No, the ext2 file system does not use the first 1

Re: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery

2009-08-14 Thread Robert Nichols
Ross Walker wrote: > On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Robert Nichols > wrote: > >> Ross Walker wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang >>> Christopher wrote: >>> >>> Question now is, was the first sector of partition 1 damage

Re: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery

2009-08-14 Thread Robert Nichols
Ross Walker wrote: > > Since you don't know if LVM has a recovery path how can you imply it > doesn't? I've seen plenty of evidence that tools for LVM recovery are lacking. I see postings from people asking about recovery of damaged LVM volumes and not getting any reasonable answers about how t

Re: [CentOS] replacing permissions on uploaded windows files

2009-08-19 Thread Robert Nichols
Dave wrote: > Hello, > I've got a CentOS box and users are putting Windows long files on > it, files with " " and " - " in their filenames. I'm trying to adjust the > permissions as well as user and group membership and i'd like the changes to > be sticky. On the tld i've set permissions of 2

[CentOS] Need Java plugin for Firefox in CentOS 5.3

2009-08-23 Thread Robert Nichols
Somewhere during the course of recent updates I've lost the Java plugin for Firefox. Not sure when it happened, but I know Java was working in Firefox earlier this year. Firefox comes up empty when searching for a suitable plugin. I'm running a fully updated CentOS 5.3 with the following package

Re: [CentOS] Need Java plugin for Firefox in CentOS 5.3

2009-08-23 Thread Robert Nichols
In a highly frustrated moment I wrote: > Somewhere during the course of recent updates I've lost the Java plugin > for Firefox. Not sure when it happened, but I know Java was working in > Firefox earlier this year. Firefox comes up empty when searching for a > suitable plugin. I'm running a full

Re: [CentOS] ls -l output

2009-09-03 Thread Robert Nichols
Jacob Bresciani wrote: > OK, this should be an easy fix but I can't find it, and it's strictly > a cosmetic's issue. > > on our older Gentoo systems if you do an ls -a it orders the results > with all the . files ordered alphabetically then all the non-hidden > files alphabetically. it also

  1   2   3   4   >