Starting back in RHEL/Cent 5 I found that the only way to make sure your
interface enumeration was consistent after install with what you had
during install was to create a udev rules file using the mac addresses as
the key. It is easy to run a short script in postinstall to create it
base
x27;s/dhcp/none/'
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-${NETDEV}-tmp
mv -f /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-${NETDEV}-tmp \
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-${NETDEV}
done
###
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:53:40 -0600, Ashley M. Kir
b 2015 16:28:31 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner
wrote:
Ok, when I run that, it creates a now "custom" 70-persistent-net.rules,
but
the interfaces are still out of order, with the added one listed first,
and
the built-ins 2nd and 3rd.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Jason Warr wrote
lly get ON the machine. Right now I'm just looking at its
console
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jason Warr wrote:
Define out of order in this case just so I know for sure what you mean.
What my solution does, or at least does reliably in my case, is make
sure the interfaces a
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:11:02 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner
wrote:
Add "rdblacklist=MODULE_NAME" to your append line in pxelinux.conf file.
Trying that next. It'll have to wait till tomorrow as we're under a
serious
blizzard/snow event right now and I'd like to get home before all of hell
f
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:30:30 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner
wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015 4:19 PM, "Jason Warr" wrote:
It will if you try to configure the now non-existent interface.
That's what I figured, so I can remove it from the kickstart file, no
problem. The question t
g to "do something" on the system
after it reboots. :)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Jason Warr wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:30:30 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner <
ash...@pcraft.com> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015 4:19 PM, "Jason Warr" wrote:
> It will if you try to co
doesn't add it to the kernel boot parameters. That was the
first thing I checked.
As for the bootproto ... DUH. I didn't check that. :) That being solved,
yeah it's not bringing up the add-in card now when it boots up.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jason Warr wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
I know how to use 'ip' to set up a static route, e.g.:
ip route add 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 dev eth0
But if you reboot or restart network, you loose this. Thus you have to
make it persistant. I found:
http://www.cyber
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:25:52 -0500, Warren Young wrote:
ADDRESS0=192.168.128.0
NETMASK0=255.255.128.0
GATEWAY0=40.53.24.3
This is the scheme used in prior versions of RHEL.
Are you saying this should not work in RHEL/Cent 7? It works fine for me
in 5/6/7.
___
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:02:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
All that matters for CentOS is:
1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS because of Red Hat's lawyers' interpretation
of GPL+CDDL
2: Arguing about it here will not change #1
3: CentOS ships a clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and so won't have
t
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:06:20 -0500, Jonathan Billings
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:55:55AM -0500, Jason Warr wrote:
I think that you need to simplify #1 to:
1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS
As that is really all that matters and so that people can't argue that
you
are making a
On 6/23/2015 10:33 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Inside / (which is mostly always ext4), 100% of the time. :-)
That said, I prefer virtual machines over multiboot environments, and I
absolutely despise LVM --- that cursed thing is never getting on my
drives. Never again, that is...
I'm curious
On 6/23/2015 3:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:23:52 -0400
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Marko Vojinovic
wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:15:30 -0500
Jason Warr wrote:
I'm curious what has made some people hate L
On 6/24/2015 2:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, m.r...@5-cent.us said:
Here's a question: all of the arguments you're giving have to do with VMs.
Do you have some for straight-on-the-server, non-VM cases?
I've used LVM on servers with hot-swap drives to migrate to new storage
with
On 6/24/2015 3:11 PM, Chuck Campbell wrote:
Is there an easy to follow "howto" for normal LVM administration
tasks. I get tired of googling every-time I have to do something I
don't remember how to do regarding LVM, so I usually just don't bother
with it at all. I believe it has some benefit
On 6/26/2015 12:38 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:58:07 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:27:47PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
It's bad design. First, it's a nested mount: file system A on /, and
file system B on /boot, and file system C on /boot/ef
On 6/26/2015 12:34 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
At the moment, LVM RAID is only supported with conventional/thick
provisioning. So if you want to do software RAID and also use LVM thin
provisioning, you still need to use mdadm (or hardware RAID).
You can do thin pools as RAID[1,5,N], just not in
On 7/10/2015 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jason Warr wrote:
On July 10, 2015 11:47:09 AM CDT, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi. Anyone working with these things? I've got a drive in "predictive
failure" on in a RAID5. Now here's the thing: there was an issue
yesterday
On 7/21/2015 4:02 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Hello all--
I am trying to determine what I have isntalled from a given repository.
I have seen several references to "yum repo-pkgs" which I think is what
would work for me, but "repo-pkgs" does not seem to be a part of
yum 3.2.29. Is this a yum add o
Have you tried starting up an rsync daemon and running it without the ssh
overhead?
I occasionally do rsync over 10g lan and if I don't use a daemon or NFS then
arc-four is enough to provide adequate speed.
On August 11, 2015 11:34:48 AM CDT, "Götz Reinicke"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I tried differen
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:31 +0100, Michael H wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
> > Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel
> > parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning?
> >
> > I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not
> > survive a
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 12:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
> > Could you provide more context information?
> > Appliance setup, Dekstop setup, server setup?
> > There exist a lot scenarios where something
> > happen automagically?
>
> It's a Chimera De
On 8/15/2015 1:17 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 08/14/2015 07:19 AM, Michael H wrote:
I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does
not survive a reboot.
It's already been pointed out that you'll need to modify the init
script, but just to make clear why that is the cas
On 8/30/2015 4:59 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
On 08/30/2015 12:02 PM, Mike Mohr wrote:
In my experience the mass market HBAs and RAID cards typically do support
only 8 or 16 drives. For the internal variety in a standard rack-mount
server you'll usually see either 2 or 4 iPass cables (each of
It's a Zero Config IP address. Most likely a host with zero config
enabled, pretty much all Windows by default, was unable to get an IP
from DHCP.
On 10/28/2015 9:04 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Why does "arp -a" show IP address 169.254.192.123
on my 192.168.2.0 home network?
I recall seeing thi
26 matches
Mail list logo
