- Mail original -
> De: "Gordon Messmer"
> À: "centos"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Décembre 2015 07:25:00
> Objet: Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is up since
> migrating to 7.2
> On 12/23/2015 08:38 AM, Sylvain CANOINE wrote:
>> Then I'm wondering :
>> 2/ why "After=foo" doe
- Mail original -
> De: "Ofer Hasson"
> À: "centos"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Décembre 2015 11:36:00
> Objet: Re: [CentOS] systemd-sysctl not running on boot
> [root@web-devel-local-1 ~]# ll -Z /etc/ | grep sysctl
> drwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0 sysctl.d
>
> [root
I think I worked out one part: the SELinux issues probably didn't pop up
initially because the nVidia PMDA was probably started within the context of me
running 'sudo ./Install', whereas after a reboot it was started within the
context of systemd starting up pmcd. I just hit a similar issue wit
I still do not understand something.
The thread started with:
i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices.
I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device
Could i realize this with firewal
Hi all,
I've been googling for this for a day now and I can't seem to find a coherent
structured way to build a fiber channel storage box where CentOS 6.7 is used
both at the fiber channel target and initiator ends.
My Brocade HBA:s are installed and the driver loads just fine in both boxes.
You might want to try installing the version of DBI you want using
local::lib, which can be done with something like (this is using cpan
minus):
cpanm --local-lib=/path/to/custom/location DBI@1.52
then in your Perl script:
use local::lib '/path/to/custom/location';
If you need to do a ful
I ran into this exact issue last night -
http://www.iotti.biz/?p=433
When a computer is connected via IPv4 but the IPv4 a repo host connects
to is not available, yum then tries the IPv6 address and will fail with
a confusing message telling you it failed to connect to the IPv6 address.
I don
On 12/28/2015 01:19 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
Are you sure? You assume the destination of the incoming traffic is > the
gateway. What if it isn't?
Can you explain what you mean? Not only am I not assuming that, I can
hardly conceive of any situation in which a host will receive traffic
On 12/28/2015 04:50 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Which means he has 1 server with two gateway devices which each has
it's own broadcast space\network.
It's not clear to me if there are two gateways in the same
broadcast\network or not.
I think it's safe to assume that the two addresses and, nec
I am familiar with using commands like:
firewall-cmd --permanent --add-service=http
To enable firewalld services. I am also aware that this is through xml
'scripts' in:
/usr/lib/firewalld/services/
But what I find interesting is what services are there and which are
not. I went a'lookin w
I dont see any reason this will have anything to do with the issue.
In any case, i re-installed the package, had the symlink, moved my
definitions to sysctl.conf. still the same
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Sylvain CANOINE <
sylvain.cano...@tv5monde.org> wrote:
>
> - Mail original ---
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
>
> I ran into this exact issue last night -
>
> http://www.iotti.biz/?p=433
>
> When a computer is connected via IPv4 but the IPv4 a repo host connects to is
> not available, yum then tries the IPv6 address and will fail with a confusing
> me
On 12/28/2015 02:10 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
I ran into this exact issue last night -
http://www.iotti.biz/?p=433
When a computer is connected via IPv4 but the IPv4 a repo host connects to is
not available, yum then tries the IPv6
On 12/28/15 17:16, Alice Wonder wrote:
>
>
> On 12/28/2015 02:10 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alice Wonder
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I ran into this exact issue last night -
>>>
>>> http://www.iotti.biz/?p=433
>>>
>>> When a computer is connected via IPv4 but the IPv
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> I am familiar with using commands like:
>
> firewall-cmd --permanent --add-service=http
>
> To enable firewalld services. I am also aware that this is through xml
> 'scripts' in:
>
> /usr/lib/firewalld/services/
>
> But what I find inter
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 19:23 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> The place to complain about this is the Fedora list since what CentOS
> has comes from them by way of RHEL. They, Fedora, are not apt to pay
> you any mind because they have already abandoned yum and are going
> with a new package manager
16 matches
Mail list logo
