I think I worked out one part: the SELinux issues probably didn't pop up 
initially because the nVidia PMDA was probably started within the context of me 
running 'sudo ./Install', whereas after a reboot it was started within the 
context of systemd starting up pmcd.  I just hit a similar issue with a PMDA 
that I wrote myself, where it worked fine after I ran the Install script but 
hit SELinux problems after 'sudo systemctl restart pmcd'.

Regards,
David

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: CentOS 7 pcp-pmda-nvidia-gpu SELinux problems
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:47:01 +1000




Hi all,

I installed Performance Co-Pilot 3 days ago, and installed the nVidia PMDA 
according to the instructions at 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Performance_Tuning_Guide/ch03s03s02.html
 and was able to view metrics about my video card using pmchart.  I then played 
around a little with the lmsensors PMDA (but it doesn't look too useful to me - 
it doesn't support my sensors, and I think it's for a 2.x kernel).

After not looking at PCP at all for a few days, today I tried using pmchart to 
look at the nVidia metrics again but they were unavailable, and after checking 
/var/log/messages I found SELinux complaints.  After a few iterations of the 
suggested 'grep pmdanvidia /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M [...]', 
'semodule -i [...].pp', restarting the PCP service, getting new SELinux errors, 
going back to step 1, I ended up with this content in the .te file:

"""
module doshea-selinux-pcp-pmda-nvidia-gpu 1.0;

require {
    type xserver_misc_device_t;
    type pcp_pmcd_t;
    class capability sys_admin;
    class chr_file { read write ioctl open };
}

#============= pcp_pmcd_t ==============
allow pcp_pmcd_t self:capability sys_admin;

#!!!! This avc is allowed in the current policy
allow pcp_pmcd_t xserver_misc_device_t:chr_file { read write ioctl open };
"""

I don't get why this worked 3 days ago and not today.  I haven't installed many 
packages in the meantime.

Should I file a bug somewhere about this?

I don't know much about SELinux - I have a slight ability to edit those .te 
files and I think I remember what to do with them afterwards - but it seems 
like the sys_admin capability is pretty significant to be granting.  Is there 
any way to work out why that's needed?

Thanks in advance,
David
                                                                                
  
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to