On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 08:08:49PM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> >What about this:
> >
> >hostnamectl set-hostname whateveryouwant
>
> # which hostnamectl
> /usr/bin/which: no hostnamectl in
> (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin)
> # yu
Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security
vulnerability is "Nessus".
I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost) is fixed
in this version and I want to apply patch for the vulnerbailities
CVE-2015-1472 & CVE-2015-1473. Can you please help me in f
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> I'm reasonably certain that a script with no shebang will run with
> /bin/sh. I interpret your statement to mean that if a user is using ksh
> and enters the path to such a script, it would also run in ksh. That
> would only be true if you "sourced" the script from yo
John R Pierce wrote:
> oh fun, just did some tests (using c6.latest). if you're in bash,
> ./script (sans shebang) runs it in bash. if you're in dash or csh,
> ./script runs it in sh.if you're in ksh, it runs it in ksh.
See my other mail.
The scripts (unless marked) are run by the curr
Am 26.04.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Tim :
> Hi all,
>
> I got a message at boot:
> dracut-pre-udev: libkmod: kmod_config_parse:
> /etc/modprobe.d/thinkpad_battery.conf line 2: ignoring bad line starting
> with 'options'
>
> I have had this file to load modules for my thinkpad (acpi_call &
> tp_smapi)
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> readlink /proc/$$/file
>
>
> ( note that that "file" is because I'm using FreeBSD /proc, for Linux you
> may need to replace the line with something like:
>
> readlink /proc/$$/exe
And on a platform that implements a correct procfs-2, y
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:38:25AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Fascinating. As I'd been in Sun OS, and started doing admin work when it
> > became Solaris, I'd missed that bit. A question: did the license agreement
> > include payment, or was it just restrictive on
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:47:24AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 04/24/2015 03:57 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
> > >if you leave it out the script will run in whatever environment it
> > >currently is in.
> >
> > I'm reasonably certain that a script with no shebang wi
wrote:
> Ah. I don't remember if I was using csh, or ksh, and didn't realize about
> bash. I *think* I vaguely remember that sh seemed to be more capable than
> I remembered.
If you like to check what the Bourne Shell did support in the late 1980s, I
recommend you to fetch recent Schily tools f
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:04 PM, wrote:
> > >
> > My first RH was 5, late nineties. First time I looked at linux and
> > installed, it was '95, and slack. (We'll ignore the Coherent that I
> > installed on my beloved 286 in the late 80's).
> >
>
> You mean you missed all
On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
> This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has been
> added with Svr4:
Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell?
http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh.html
I see that you already wr
Warren Young wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> >
> > This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has
> > been
> > added with Svr4:
>
> Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell?
>
> http://heirloom.sourcef
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> >
> I would be interested to understand why Heirloom seems to so well known and my
> portability attempts seem to be widely unknown.
>
Not sure why it matters with a standalone application like sh, but I
think a lot of people have been pu
On 04/27/2015 06:43 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I started with UNOS in 1982 as my first UNIX like. UNOS in fact was
the first UNIX clone and it was a real time OS. In February 1985, I
switched to a Sunthe first Sun that made it to Europe. Jörg
Charles River UNOS was actually Tandy's first
On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
> Heirloom added support for uname -S and for some linux ulimit extensions but
> then stopped working on the code after a few months
Ah. I had no idea it was in a state of disrepair.
>> I see that you already wrote up the differences betw
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > >
> > I would be interested to understand why Heirloom seems to so well known and
> > my
> > portability attempts seem to be widely unknown.
> >
>
> Not sure why it matters with a standalone application like sh
I posted this to the comp.lang.tcl newsgroup, but it might relate to a
possible bug in the Mingw32 cross-build environment under CentOS 6 (or EPEL).
Forwarded Message:
From: Robert Heller
Subject: Cross Building Tcl using Mingw32-gcc (4.9.2)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl
Message-ID:
Date: Mon, 27 A
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> >
> And the problem is the GPL. I recommend you to work on making all GPL code
> freely combinable with other OSS.
Of course the problem it the GPL. Glad you recognize that. It's
whole point is the restriction against linking with anyth
Warren Young wrote:
> > The schily tools act as a container to publish the current code state.
> > There is
> > no such maintained web page.
>
> I was referring to the summary on the SourceForge page, where you just list
> the contents of the package without explaining why one would want to do
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > >
> > And the problem is the GPL. I recommend you to work on making all GPL code
> > freely combinable with other OSS.
>
> Of course the problem it the GPL. Glad you recognize that. It's
> whole point is the r
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> >
> You should read the GPL and get help to understand it. The GPL does not forbid
> this linking. In contrary, the GPOL allows any GPLd program to be linked
> against any library under and license. If this was not thecase, you could not
>
On Apr 27, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
> Warren Young wrote:
>
>> I was referring to the summary on the SourceForge page, where you just list
>> the contents of the package without explaining why one would want to
>> download it.
>
> I thought I don't need to make advertizin
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> >
>>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people.
>>
>> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS
>> enemies.
>
> The following irritates me, I am a “people,” and I am not an OSS enemy:
>
> http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > >
> > You should read the GPL and get help to understand it. The GPL does not
> > forbid
> > this linking. In contrary, the GPOL allows any GPLd program to be linked
> > against any library under and license. I
Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
instead of the initial anaconda install?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:39:30PM +0530, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security
> vulnerability is "Nessus".
>
> I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost) is fixed
> in this version and I want to apply patch
Warren Young wrote:
> Yes, I realize that osh is closer to the original Bourne shell. My point is
> that you can?t expect people to just know, without having been told, why they
> want bsh, or osh, bosh, or smake, or?
>
> Most of these tools compete with tools that are already in CentOS. If y
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> > >
> >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people.
> >>
> >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS
> >> enemies.
> >
> > The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am not an OSS enemy:
On 04/27/2015 02:09 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
Can you please help me in finding the right
version that has fixes for these?
Start by accessing Red Hat's CVE database:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/
If errata have been published for a CVE entry, they will be listed along
with
On Mon, April 27, 2015 12:01 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:39:30PM +0530, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
>> Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security
>> vulnerability is "Nessus".
>>
>> I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-02
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> >>
>> You can't distribute GPLd programs unless 'the work as a whole' is
>> covered by the GPL. There can't be a distinction between binary and
>> source since one is derived from the other.
>
> Now you just need to understand what "as a
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> >
> If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the
> GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of
> course.
Which countries' copyright laws would permit that explicitly eve
Thanks for providing a lot of information. My first guess is that the
remote hosts you're trying to reach don't have the routes that they
require to use the IPSec tunnel. You demonstrated that server 2 has the
route it needs to reach the remote network, and that server 1 appears to
be routing
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > >
> > If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and
> > the
> > GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS
> > of
> > course.
>
> Which countries'
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > >>
> >> You can't distribute GPLd programs unless 'the work as a whole' is
> >> covered by the GPL. There can't be a distinction between binary and
> >> source since one is derived from the other.
> >
> > Now
Hi,
I just installed CentOS and have been trying to change the desktop panel
background (in gnome classic) to black. How do I do this? Holding the alt
button while right-clicking on the mouse does not seem to do anything.
I do not have anything installed (other than what came with the LiveCD).
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 12:32 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> >
> > Now you just need to understand what "as a whole" means
> Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal
> interpretation is that it covers ev
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> >
> The GPL makes claims that are in conflict with the law because these claims
> are
> not amongst what the list in the law permits and that are thus void.
The GPL is all that gives you permission to distribute. If it is
void then you
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
> installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
> instead of the initial anaconda install?
Yes. "yum grouplist" will tell you the groups that are current
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal
>> interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same
>> process at runtime unless there is an alternate interface-compatible
>> component with the same
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > >
> > The GPL makes claims that are in conflict with the law because these claims
> > are
> > not amongst what the list in the law permits and that are thus void.
>
> The GPL is all that gives you permission to
Can we take the license wanking off the list please? I don't think
either of the people arguing are actually lawyers, so it has no
relevance.
--
Chris Adams
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Can we take the license wanking off the list please? I don't think
> either of the people arguing are actually lawyers, so it has no
> relevance.
Relevance is not dependent on being, or not being, a lawyer. Relevance
for inclusion on the m
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal
> >> interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same
> >> process at runtime unless there is an alternate interface-compa
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective
work" and the GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and
independend
>> > work ZFS of course.
>>
>
wrote:
> First, I was not aware that the US had declared any part of the GPL null
Just ask US lawyers. one of them sits on the other side of the corridor of
my office, another is the well known Lawrence Rosen.
For Europe check the reasoning of the cases from Harald Welte. One of them is
v
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
>> The GPL is all that gives you permission to distribute. If it is
>> void then you have no permission at all to distribute any covered
>> code.
>
> Fortunately judges know better than you
>
> If you read the reasoning from judgement
On 04/27/2015 04:09 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security
> vulnerability is "Nessus".
>
> I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost) is fixed
> in this version and I want to apply patch for the vulnerbail
On 04/27/2015 01:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
>> installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
>> instead of the initial anaconda install?
>
> Yes. "y
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> > >
>> > "as a whole" means generally BUT allowing for exceptions.
>>
>> OK, great. That clears it up then.
>
> Maybe this helps:
>
> The BSD license does not permit to relicense the code, so you cannot put BSD
> code under the GPL
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > > >
> >> > "as a whole" means generally BUT allowing for exceptions.
> >>
> >> OK, great. That clears it up then.
> >
> > Maybe this helps:
> >
> > The BSD license does not permit to relicense the code,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
>> installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
>> instead of the initial anaconda install?
>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> >
> >> The GPL is all that gives you permission to distribute. If it is
> >> void then you have no permission at all to distribute any covered
> >> code.
> >
> > Fortunately judges know better than you
> >
>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>>>
>> Yes, if you mean what is described here as 'the original 4-clause'
>> license, or BSD-old:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
>
> Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
The only thing I'd like
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> >>>
> >> Yes, if you mean what is described here as 'the original 4-clause'
> >> license, or BSD-old:
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
> >
> > Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smo
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> > >
>> > Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
>>
>> The only thing I'd like to discuss is your reason for not adding a
>> dual license to make your code as usable and probably as ubiquitous as
>> perl. And
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:45:16PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> But, I think that is a YUM database and not based on the RPM database,
> so it is possible that you can have all the RPMs for a group installed
> and not actually have it listed as installed.
> At least I sometimes find myself in that
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
> in the anaconda install. For example where the saved anaconda-ks-cfg
> shows @gnome-desktop and @development, 'yum grouplist' only shows
> 'MATE Desktop' which
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > > >
> >> > Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
> >>
> >> The only thing I'd like to discuss is your reason for not adding a
> >> dual license to make your code as usable and prob
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> >>
>> No, you posted some ranting misconceptions about why you don't see a
>> need for it. But if you actually believed any of that yourself, then
>> you would see there was no harm in adding a dual license to make it
>> clear to everyone
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
>> in the anaconda install. For example where the saved anaconda-ks-cfg
>> shows @gnome-desktop and @de
On 04/27/2015 12:28 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Up to now, nobody could explain me how a mixture of GPL and BSD can be legal as
this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under GPL
in order to make the whole be under GPL.
The GPL doesn't require that you relicense any
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> There was no court case, but VERITAS published a modifed version of gtar where
> additional code was added by binary only libraries from VERITAS. The FSF did
> never try to discuss this is public even though everybo
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
>>> in the anaconda install. For example wher
On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
> a GPU, or two, or more, that will work with the Folding At Home project.
>
> I built a killer machine primarily for contributing to the FAH effort
> but the video card, NVIDIA Corpor
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
> > a GPU, or two, or more, that will work with the Folding At Home project.
> >
> > I built a killer machine primari
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > > Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
> > > a GPU, or two, or more, that will work with the Foldi
On 04/27/15 19:24, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>> Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
>>> a GPU, or two, or more, that will work with the Folding At Home project.
>
Hi All,
I had some health issues for a few months and I barely recall dealing
with Heartbleed ... it's all just a blur. Now I'm getting back up to
speed, but I have a pair of CentOS 6.6 x86_64 + Virtualmin 4.13 GPL
servers which no longer seem to be picking up available updates.
'yum check' ran f
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Ian wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am having a weird problem which I cant figure out - so I was hoping
> someone here could give me a hand.
>
> First off the end goal is that a specific server in my network runs an
> IPSEC connection to another company and I want all othe
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:37 AM, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I had some health issues for a few months and I barely recall dealing
> with Heartbleed ... it's all just a blur. Now I'm getting back up to
> speed, but I have a pair of CentOS 6.6 x86_64 + Virtualmin 4.13 GPL
> servers which no longer
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:47:32 +0530
Ashish Yadav wrote:
> have you tried to rebuild the RPM database using below command,
>
> # rpm --rebuilddb
Hi Ashish, and thank you for your reply. I contemplated doing that but
felt I needed to better understand the problem, first. As it happens, I
refined my
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:47:32 +0530
> Ashish Yadav wrote:
>
> > have you tried to rebuild the RPM database using below command,
> >
> > # rpm --rebuilddb
>
> Hi Ashish, and thank you for your reply. I contemplated doing that but
> felt I needed to be
Hey Leon,
that did the trick. Thank you!
Regards
Tim
Am 27. April 2015 11:39:56 MESZ, schrieb Leon Fauster
:
>Am 26.04.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Tim :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I got a message at boot:
>> dracut-pre-udev: libkmod: kmod_config_parse:
>> /etc/modprobe.d/thinkpad_battery.conf line 2: ignoring
74 matches
Mail list logo
