[CentOS] CentOS 7 Cloudstack templates

Hi, Just letting everyone know I've made some CentOS 7 templates for Cloudstack available at: http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/ Any feedback welcome. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro __

Re: [CentOS] Cloud Images

Hi Tim On 07/14/2014 07:27 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > Any chance of a refresh of the cloud image > (http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/) and including cloud-init and > the repos ? > > With this, we can start asking our end users to give CentOS 7 a spin on the > cloud.. Coming in the next

Re: [CentOS] Command Line Commands Aren't Working.....

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:48:26AM -0400, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: > On 07/13/2014 10:07 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > Well it's like I had said before.when the USB boots up, it doesn't > give me any type of real options except to install the OSor "Test" > the media and THEN install the os

Re: [CentOS] centos plus kernel - moving it in and back out again

On 2014-07-12 09:26, Frank Cox wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:19:22 -0600 > Frank Cox wrote: > >> My main computer has a Logitech wireless mouse that's likely affected by the >> bug, though I haven't tried it yet to verify that. > > My Logitech wireless mouse model M510 is NOT affected by this bug

Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS-7 but keeping CentOS-6.5

On 07/13/2014 01:01 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm having trouble installing CentOS-7 on my HP MicroServer. > I've tried with KDE LiveCD and Netinstall (both on USB sticks), > and now I'm going to try with the DVD ISO. > > But I want to be quite sure I can return to CentOS-6.5 > if things go wrong

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 07/12/2014 11:08 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > [I wasn't going to reply; but after thinking about it for quite a while, > there are a few points here that deserve just a bit of level-headed > attention.] > > On 07/11/2014 10:53 AM, David G. Miller wrote: >> Les Mikesell writes: >> >>> Or, if you want

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 > my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to be > everything which makes > it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - umm.. like Windoze! > My $.02 + $ 10.00 :-) --

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > >> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 >> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to be >> everything which makes >> it vulnerable to bugs a

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 07:18 -0500, William Woods wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > > > >> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 > >> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrus

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

William Woods wrote: > On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: >> >>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 >>> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to be >>> everything which makes >>> i

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

Like OpenSSL ? On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > William Woods wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: >>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 my biggest complaint wi

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

William Woods wrote: Please stop top posting. > > On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> William Woods wrote: >>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning >>> wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > Having been working with UNIX like syste

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > William Woods wrote: > > Please stop top posting. >> >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> William Woods wrote: On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, S

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: > On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> William Woods wrote: >> >> Please stop top posting. >>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: William Woods wrote: > On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning >

[CentOS] Cemtos 6 - rc.local does not run

Is there a special step for this? -- Cosme Corrêa On Jul 8, 2014 4:32 PM, wrote: > Always Learning wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 11:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 7/8/2014 10:36 AM, Always Learning wrote: > >> > 75 baud on a TTY (clank, clank, clank, ding, thud as the printer head

[CentOS] Disable auto window maximize

Job #1 for me with CentOS 7 is to disable the automatic window maximization. Some googling found this command: $ gsettings set org.gnome.mutter auto-maximize false No such schema 'org.gnome.mutter' and this: $ gsettings set orh.gnome.shell.overrides edge-tiling false but that had no visible effe

[CentOS] latest freeIPA on CentOS

We're looking to run freeipa on CentOS-6.5. It seems the version available for 6.5 is 3.0, whereas the latest 3.x is 3.3.5 (available in F19 & 20). And now I see 4.0 was just released and will be in F21 (with support for native OTP-based 2FA!). Has anyone attempted rebuilds against the F19/20 3.

Re: [CentOS] latest freeIPA on CentOS

Am Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:47:32 -0400 schrieb Johnny Tan : > We're looking to run freeipa on CentOS-6.5. > > It seems the version available for 6.5 is 3.0, whereas the latest 3.x > is 3.3.5 (available in F19 & 20). And now I see 4.0 was just released > and will be in F21 (with support for native OTP

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> William Woods wrote: >>> >>> Please stop top posting. On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > William Woods wr

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:19 AM, wrote: > William Woods wrote: > > Please stop top posting. > > > > On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> William Woods wrote: > >>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning > >>> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clar

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Jul 14, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:19 AM, wrote: > >> William Woods wrote: >> >> Please stop top posting. >>> >>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: William Woods wrote: > On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning >>>

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

Steve Clark wrote: > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> William Woods wrote: >>> >>> Please stop top posting. On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > William Woods wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 A

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote: > Steve Clark wrote: > > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: > >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> William Woods wrote: > >>> > >>> Please stop top posting. > On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

Andrew Wyatt wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote: > >> Steve Clark wrote: >> > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: >> >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> William Woods wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Please stop top posting. >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 A

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:52 AM, wrote: > Andrew Wyatt wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote: > > > >> Steve Clark wrote: > >> > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: > >> >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> >>> William Woods wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > >> >> Anyway, he also seems determined to see it all as black and white, rather >> than looking at the *much* larger set of bugs and vulnerabilities that >> Windows Server has had than any version of 'Nix. Sure, we have some... but >> a *lot*

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > > >> > >> Anyway, he also seems determined to see it all as black and white, > rather > >> than looking at the *much* larger set of bugs and vulnerabilities that > >> Windows Server ha

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 6 - rc.local does not run

On 07/14/2014 10:39 AM, Cosme Corrêa wrote: > Is there a special step for this? systemctl enable rc-local.service -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com "I grew up before Mark Z

[CentOS] Changing gdm background

Anyone know how to do $SUBJECT? I've tried running both gnome-control- center and dconf as the gdm user, but neither one had any effect. TIA -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com -

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > >> > >> > http://heartbleed.com/ >> > >> > Oh, wait. >> >> Openssl doesn't have much to do with Unix/linux. It is just one of a >> bazillion application level programs that you might run. Are you >> going to include all bugs in all possible

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 6 - rc.local does not run

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:27:47PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 07/14/2014 10:39 AM, Cosme Corrêa wrote: > > Is there a special step for this? > > systemctl enable rc-local.service This shouldn't be required. The rc-local.service should automatically start in the multi-user.target if the file

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 6 - rc.local does not run

On 07/14/2014 12:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 14.07.2014 19:27, schrieb Ian Pilcher: >> On 07/14/2014 10:39 AM, Cosme Corrêa wrote: >>> Is there a special step for this? >> >> systemctl enable rc-local.service > > on *CentOS 6* > let me hear from where you get systemd there > Whoops!

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:19 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > Windows is no more or less secure than anything else out there. Not with so many of Windoze world-wide users getting viruses all the time. Centos is inherently more secure than Windoze. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Centos, Exim,

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:02 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > 5.x is ancient and had its own set of flaws over its lifecycle. 1/3 of my servers use C 5.10, 2/3 use C 6.5. I use C 5.10 as my individual development server and desktop. C 5 works well for me. Centos 5 Fan :-) -- Regards, Pa

Re: [CentOS] latest freeIPA on CentOS

2014-07-14 17:57 GMT+02:00 Rainer Duffner : > CentOS7 has 3.3 > > I don't know if RedHat will backport it to 6.x like they did previously. > > I think we will start with what is in CentOS 7.0 and see how far we get. > We will even buy RHEL-lics for it. > > I certainly don't want to run Fedora in p

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:02 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > > > 5.x is ancient and had its own set of flaws over its lifecycle. > > 1/3 of my servers use C 5.10, 2/3 use C 6.5. I use C 5.10 as my > individual development server and

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:02 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > >> 5.x is ancient and had its own set of flaws over its lifecycle. > > 1/3 of my servers use C 5.10, 2/3 use C 6.5. I use C 5.10 as my > individual development server and

Re: [CentOS] latest freeIPA on CentOS

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jitse Klomp wrote: > > >> I certainly don't want to run Fedora in production - and I don't want >> to do the backport for such a complicated piece of software myself. >> > > RH will *not* do a backport of 3.3 to RHEL 6.x. > > Alexander Bokovoy (from Red Hat) on th

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:05 PM, William Woods wrote: > >> >> 1/3 of my servers use C 5.10, 2/3 use C 6.5. I use C 5.10 as my >> individual development server and desktop. >> >> C 5 works well for me. >> >> Centos 5 Fan :-) > > That is probably the most pointless comment you have made yet. Just be

Re: [CentOS] latest freeIPA on CentOS

2014-07-14 21:33 GMT+02:00 Les Mikesell : > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jitse Klomp wrote: > > > > >> I certainly don't want to run Fedora in production - and I don't want > >> to do the backport for such a complicated piece of software myself. > >> > > > > RH will *not* do a backport of 3.

Re: [CentOS] Changing gdm background

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:32:41PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Anyone know how to do $SUBJECT? I've tried running both gnome-control- > center and dconf as the gdm user, but neither one had any effect. > > TIA depends on which Centos you're talking about. If C7, with Gnome 3, here's one URL a li

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 14:05 -0500, William Woods wrote: > On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > C 5 works well for me. > > > > Centos 5 Fan :-) > That is probably the most pointless comment you have made yet. Just because > you use something, and you are a fan does not mean

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:19 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > >> Windows is no more or less secure than anything else out there. > That is a false statement. > Not with so many of Windoze world-wide users getting viruses all the > time. Centos is inherently more secure than

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:19 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > >> Windows is no more or less secure than anything else out there. > > Not with so many of Windoze world-wide users getting viruses all the > time. Centos is inherently more secure

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 7/14/2014 12:48 PM, Always Learning wrote: > On the contrary it means a discerning user like me, never adverse to > complaining, is satisfied with the quality product C 5 undoubtedly is. > And satisfied sufficiently to use it instead of C6 and C7. perhaps you should change your username from Al

Re: [CentOS] latest freeIPA on CentOS

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Jitse Klomp wrote: > ​RH will *not* do a backport of 3.3 to RHEL 6.x. > > Alexander Bokovoy (from Red Hat) on the freeipa-users list (feb. 17): > "RHEL 6.x lacks many of the dependencies required for IPA 3.3. Newer > MIT Kerberos (with API and ABI change for KDC d

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 14:05 -0500, William Woods wrote: > > > On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > > C 5 works well for me. > > > > > > Centos 5 Fan :-) > > > That is probably the most pointless comment you have m

Re: [CentOS] latest freeIPA on CentOS

Am 14.07.2014 um 21:02 schrieb Jitse Klomp : > 2014-07-14 17:57 GMT+02:00 Rainer Duffner : > >> CentOS7 has 3.3 >> >> I don't know if RedHat will backport it to 6.x like they did previously. >> >> I think we will start with what is in CentOS 7.0 and see how far we get. >> We will even buy RHEL

Re: [CentOS] Changing gdm background

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:32 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Anyone know how to do $SUBJECT? I've tried running both gnome-control- > center and dconf as the gdm user, but neither one had any effect. > > TIA > Hi, Best way to-do this and one that is reversible if needed. - Open terminal. - Do: 'cd

Re: [CentOS] Changing gdm background

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 21:13 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:32 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > Anyone know how to do $SUBJECT? I've tried running both gnome-control- > > center and dconf as the gdm user, but neither one had any effect. > > > > TIA > > > > Hi, > > Best way to-

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/14/2014 12:48 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> On the contrary it means a discerning user like me, never adverse to >> complaining, is satisfied with the quality product C 5 undoubtedly is. >> And satisfied sufficiently to use it instead of C6 and C7. > > perhaps you should

[CentOS] Questoin on iptables

I am getting this error... Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information. iptables v1.4.7: Couldn't load target `Spamhaus':/lib64/xtables/libipt_Spamhaus.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file yum provides says not found also. CentOS 6.5 x86_64 Thoughts? Thanks, Jerry _

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 7/14/2014 1:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > c) We have some production boxes that are 5.10.*YOU* go and tell managers > that we're going to take down their production boxes and upgrade them, > or were*you* personally going to assure that their budgets would be > upped to pro

Re: [CentOS] Questoin on iptables

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 14.07.2014 23:00, schrieb Jerry Geis: > > I am getting this error... > > > > Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information. > > iptables v1.4.7: Couldn't load target > > `Spamhaus':/lib64/xtables/libipt_Spamhaus.so: cann

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/14/2014 1:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> c) We have some production boxes that are 5.10.*YOU* go and tell >> managers that we're going to take down their production boxes >> and upgrade them, or were*you* personally going to assure that >> their budgets

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 07/14/2014 02:03 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/14/2014 1:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> c) We have some production boxes that are 5.10.*YOU* go and tell managers >>that we're going to take down their production boxes and upgrade them, >>or were*you* personally going to as

Re: [CentOS] Questoin on iptables

Am 14.07.2014 23:13, schrieb Jerry Geis: > I did not send the exact command I used but it is "yum > provides /lib64/xtables/libipt_Spamhaus.so" > No matches found. > > I am using this script to block spam: > #!/bin/bash > IPTABLES=/sbin/iptables > FILE="/tmp/drop.txt" > URL="http://www.spamhaus.or

[CentOS] List attitude and content

hi folks, Can we please: 1) keep it civil, be polite - if you have nothing meaningful to contribute to the thread, then dont contribute anything 2) Keep it on context, this isnt the place to talk about old hardware stories and personal fluffery like that. This is the CentOS users list, keep conte

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:59 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/14/2014 12:48 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On the contrary it means a discerning user like me, never adverse to > > complaining, is satisfied with the quality product C 5 undoubtedly is. > > And satisfied sufficiently to use it inst

Re: [CentOS] Changing gdm background

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 21:21 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 21:13 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:32 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > > Anyone know how to do $SUBJECT? I've tried running both gnome-control- > > > center and dconf as the gdm user, but neither one

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 15:10 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > William didn't say that it was ancient, I did. If you think that "5.x is > ancient and had its own set of flaws over its lifecycle" is "derogatory", > it should come as no surprise to us that you've mixed up who you were > talking too. I

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 7/14/2014 2:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Do I? I'm just a sysadmin. Perhaps you should reread the above... or maybe > you're not familiar with working in a organizational environment. I work in a corporation, supporting software development for manufacturing. unsupported hardware/software

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 2014-07-07, Always Learning wrote: > Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of > Microsoft's "put everything into the Windows Registry" (Win 95 onwards). Has anyone here actually interacted with systemd, and if so could you perhaps provide a writeup of your experi

Re: [CentOS] Questoin on iptables

On 07/15/2014 12:45 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > It means that your script is not correct[1] and by error tries to load a > helper module which does not exist. So fix your script. > > [1] "cat | grep | awk" constructs are far from being elegant. > > Alexander I think that these are not too bad.. A

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:52:10PM -0700, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2014-07-07, Always Learning wrote: > > Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of > > Microsoft's "put everything into the Windows Registry" (Win 95 onwards). > > Has anyone here actually interacted wi

[CentOS] Python Twisted Packages In CentOS 7

I'm currently looking for the package python-twisted-names but seem to be falling short. A quick yum search and a bit of digging appears to indicate that there are quite a few less twisted packages for python in 7 then there is in 6. Is this expected or am I searching in the wrong places? Thank yo

Re: [CentOS] List attitude and content

Thank you! On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi folks, > > Can we please: > 1) keep it civil, be polite - if you have nothing meaningful to > contribute to the thread, then dont contribute anything > > 2) Keep it on context, this isnt the place to talk about old hardware

Re: [CentOS] List attitude and content

+1 > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of hemen.me...@gmail.com > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:10 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] List attitude and content > > Thank you! > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at

Re: [CentOS] List attitude and content

On 15/07/14 11:17, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: > +1 And this idea of +n'ing comments is annoying as hell! Please read and move on! Having to open up a thread just to find +1 is a waste of time for us all! Cheers, ak. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@

Re: [CentOS] List attitude and content

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:44:25 +1000 Anthony K wrote: > Having to open up a thread just to find +1 is a waste of time for us > all! +1 // Sorry, couldn't resist... ;-) // Best, :-) Marko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

[CentOS] pptp client automatically disconnected after some time

Hi, I configured pptp client and it connected successfully. but after sometimes it automatically got disconnected. /var/log/messages : Jul 15 15:29:19 ahc151l pppd[4725]: pppd 2.4.5 started by root, uid 0 Jul 15 15:29:19 ahc151l pppd[4725]: Using interface ppp0 Jul 15 15:29:19 ahc151l pppd[4725

[CentOS] centos updates and kernel patches

Dear all, Where can I find the latest kernel patches, is there any repository maintained by centos. Please share me the link of the patch repository and rpm updates. Thanks and regards Dilip Kumar B L&T Technology Services Ltd www.LntTechservices.com

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 2014-07-15, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > I've been using systemd ever since it was introduced in Fedora, and > the RHEL7 beta and CentOS7 final since it came out. I could tell you > about all the positive and negative experiences I've had. I think this could be very useful, especially coming

Re: [CentOS] centos updates and kernel patches

On 2014-07-15, Dilip Basavaraju wrote: > > Where can I find the latest kernel patches, is there any > repository maintained by centos. You should just run "yum update" or "yum update kernel*". The latest released updates are always there. If there's a reason that yum doesn't work f

Re: [CentOS] centos updates and kernel patches

Hi, I am using centos 6.5 minimal version, some of the updates may not be relevant for my OS. So I need to verify and decide the patches and accordingly need to update my OS. Please is there any way for this? Thanks and regards Dilip Kumar B -Original Message- From: cen

Re: [CentOS] centos updates and kernel patches

On 7/14/2014 10:04 PM, Dilip Basavaraju wrote: > I am using centos 6.5 minimal version, some of the updates may not > be relevant for my OS. So I need to verify and decide the patches and > accordingly need to update my OS. > Please is there any way for this? yum update will on

Re: [CentOS] centos updates and kernel patches

On 2014-07-15, Dilip Basavaraju wrote: > I am using centos 6.5 minimal version, some of the updates may not be > relevant for my OS. I believe "yum update" updates only currently-installed packages, so they should all be relevant. > So I need to verify and decide the patches and accordi