On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 07:18 -0500, William Woods wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning <cen...@u62.u22.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > > > >> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 > >> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to be > >> everything which makes > >> it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - umm.. like Windoze! > > > >> My $.02 > > > > + $ 10.00 :-) > > Because UNIX has never had a bug or exploit right ?
There is an old English saying "Never put all your eggs in the same basket." If systemd has a bug or is exploited, because it does so many different things, the resulting "damage" to a working system is potentially significantly greater than if systemd did less functions. As previously stated by JH, its in RH so its in Centos. We have to accept it or go elsewhere. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office. Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
