Hi,
Due to limitations of our Storage we need to set the device queue_depth to 4.
I did this with a script that basically does this: echo 4 >
/sys/block/sdft/device/queue_depth.
But after a few minutes it starts to grow until it reaches 32 again. What
could cause that behavior?
Furthermore th
On 5/19/2014 12:00 AM, axel.we...@cbc.de wrote:
> Centos: CentOS release 6.3 (Final)
> Storage: DDN 9900
> Qlogic: 2560 (using distri firmware)
have you tried 6.5 with latest yum update patches?
If it does the same thing, then its quite likely Red Hat you need to
file the report with, as Centos
> I have not looked at Lustre, as I have heard many negative things about it
> (including Oracle ownership). The only business using Lustre where I know
> the admins has had a lot of trouble with it. No redundancy.
I know some Lustre admins that indeed have the far away stare similar to
people tha
From: Fred Smith
> Looking for suggestions on backup software I can use.
You could also have a look at bacula...
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 19 May 2014 04:50, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 01:30:24PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> > An idea is to build it in a directory, as much independent as it is
>> > possible from the installed libraries on the centos installation. Is
>> > there an automated build system fo
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Ted Miller wrote:
> How recently have you looked at Gluster? It has seen some significant
> progress, though small files are still its weakest area. I believe that
> some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files.
I last looked at Gluster about two mont
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Do you really need filesystem semantics or would ceph's object store work?
Yes, I really need file system semantics; I am storing home directories.
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
On 5/18/2014 8:51 AM, Chris Weisiger wrote:
> > I'm posting from my phone so I can't bottom post
>
That is not a valid excuse. I'm posting from my phone now and I was able
to post properly.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.
On 05/17/14 18:29, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 17.05.2014 23:22, schrieb Always Learning:
>> I blame M$ for introducing TOP POSTING.
>
> It makes no sense to blame a company, it is the people who don't make
> enough effort to help everyone on a mailinglist to follow the
> discussions in an effici
Am 15.05.2014 um 11:22 schrieb Leon Fauster :
> Am 15.05.2014 um 07:23 schrieb Eero Volotinen :
>>
>> 2014-05-12 21:13 GMT+03:00 James Hogarth :
>>
>>> Remember to be especially aware if you have systems that can potentially
>>> have code uploaded and run (ftp to httpd vhost or improper php confi
We were using glusterfs for shared home directories and it was really slow.
We're using an NFS shared and it's working much faster.
Mark
> On May 18, 2014, at 21:35, "Ted Miller" wrote:
>
>> On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and we
Hi list,
I've a problem with my system on CentOS 6.5 x86_64 on a workstation.
During utilizzation, after several hours after boot (6/7 hours) I get an
error:
Disabling IRQ #16
and after this seems be that 3d acceleration is unloaded.
This is a workstation with a dedicated vga (nvidia gt450)
On 19 May 2014 13:06, mark wrote:
> Wrong. It was M$ Lookout, er, Outlook, that introduced top posting by default.
I'm pretty sure that Microsoft email applications were top-posting
long before Outlook arrived :-)
Dave...
--
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
_
Dave Cross wrote:
> On 19 May 2014 13:06, mark wrote:
>
>> Wrong. It was M$ Lookout, er, Outlook, that introduced top posting by
>> default.
>
> I'm pretty sure that Microsoft email applications were top-posting
> long before Outlook arrived :-)
>
I don't think so. They only got email that was wid
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, mark wrote:
> On 05/17/14 18:29, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> Am 17.05.2014 23:22, schrieb Always Learning:
>
>>> I blame M$ for introducing TOP POSTING.
>>
>> It makes no sense to blame a company, it is the people who don't make
>> enough effort to help everyone on
On 19 May 2014 15:47, wrote:
> Dave Cross wrote:
>> On 19 May 2014 13:06, mark wrote:
>>
>>> Wrong. It was M$ Lookout, er, Outlook, that introduced top posting by
>>> default.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that Microsoft email applications were top-posting
>> long before Outlook arrived :-)
>>
> I don't
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Do you really need filesystem semantics or would ceph's object store work?
>
> Yes, I really need file system semantics; I am storing home directories.
In that case, wouldn't it be simpler to ha
On 5/19/2014 9:02 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I'ts not really a bad thing in the context of 1<->1 messages and
> business communications where you are interested enough to not need
> the reply put in context for you but might want the audit-trail of the
> whole previous conversation for reference.
>
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:12:17PM +, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote:
> We're using rsnapshot.
>
> My colleague set it up, but I will be taking over administration soon.
>
> Mark
Having looked more deeply into rsnapshot, I think I'll try it, as it
appears it'll do what I need.
My thanks to ALL O
On 19-05-14 17:10, Dave Cross wrote:
> On 19 May 2014 15:47, wrote:
>> Dave Cross wrote:
>>> On 19 May 2014 13:06, mark wrote:
>>>
Wrong. It was M$ Lookout, er, Outlook, that introduced top posting by
default.
>>> I'm pretty sure that Microsoft email applications were top-posting
>>>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, mark wrote:
>> On 05/17/14 18:29, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> Am 17.05.2014 23:22, schrieb Always Learning:
> I'ts not really a bad thing in the context of 1<->1 messages and
> business communications where you are interested enough to not ne
There are only two things more annoying on a mailing list than top
posting: bottom posting with no trimming of quoted content and all the
endless discussions about top posting.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
There is one more thing more annoying: people sending endless emails about
what's annoying on a mailing list...
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Lamar Owen
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 9:28 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject
and in retaliation for spawning ANOTHER thread about less than 10
seconds after I made my filter to delete the old, I'll top post respond
to it.
thanks.
On 05/19/2014 11:27 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> There are only two things more annoying on a mailing list than top
> posting: bottom posting with
On 5/19/2014 8:17 AM, Dominic Hoogendijk wrote:
> There are 2 lines of M$ mail clients, Mail that became Outlook express
> and then Mail again and Outlook (the exchange enabled client). --
> DeHostingFirma.nl
The original Microsoft Mail wasn't internet mail at all, it used a
completely proprietar
I'm getting a lot of this at boottime:
udev still not settled. Waiting.
udevadm settle - timeout of 0 seconds reached, the event queue contains:
/sys/module/scsi_wait_scan (11707)
udev still not settled. Waiting.
udevadm settle - timeout of 0 seconds reached, the event queue contains:
/sys/mo
Gé Weijers wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of this at boottime:
>
> udev still not settled. Waiting.
> udevadm settle - timeout of 0 seconds reached, the event queue contains:
> /sys/module/scsi_wait_scan (11707)
>
> udev still not settled. Waiting.
> udevadm settle - timeout of 0 seconds reached, the
This is what I added to my grub.conf kernel lines to revert to a console
that looks like it did at 5.X
nouveau.modeset=0
This just disables the driver which worked for what I needed...
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Richard Reina wrote:
> Just installed 6.4 on and old Dell laptop and the fo
Thanks for answering.
a) The workstation has:
- CPU E5-2687W
- 32 GB RAM (ECC)
- AMD FirePro V7900, original graphics card. (This happens with both the
AMD driver installed and not installed.)
- MegaRAID SAS 2008 controller configured for RAID1
I had a quad PCIe serial card in it as well, but I h
BTW: I just saw those 'oopses', or I would have mentioned them right away.
I'm seriously suspecting the RAID controller.
Gé
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Gé Weijers wrote:
> Thanks for answering.
>
> a) The workstation has:
> - CPU E5-2687W
> - 32 GB RAM (ECC)
> - AMD FirePro V7900, origina
Gé Weijers wrote:
> Thanks for answering.
>
> a) The workstation has:
> - CPU E5-2687W
> - 32 GB RAM (ECC)
> - AMD FirePro V7900, original graphics card. (This happens with both the
> AMD driver installed and not installed.)
> - MegaRAID SAS 2008 controller configured for RAID1
>
> I had a quad PCI
I'm running a memory check right now, just to rule things out.
Gé
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:36 PM, wrote:
> Gé Weijers wrote:
> > Thanks for answering.
> >
> > a) The workstation has:
> > - CPU E5-2687W
> > - 32 GB RAM (ECC)
> > - AMD FirePro V7900, original graphics card. (This happens with b
Hello listmates,
I feel a little embarrassed but I can not get through this one and any help
will be much appreciated.
I have a Broadcom WiFi adapter in a 64-bit CentOS 6.5 laptop. Trying to get
it connect automatically - and it just would not - no error messages,
nothing. With the same config Ne
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Derrik Walker v2.0 wrote:
>>
> I've been using BackupPC for years. I currently have it running on a
> small CentOS system that mainly does backups.
>
> I like it because it's agentless ( it uses ssh/rsync ). The Pooling and
> Data-deduping is also nice, and saves
34 matches
Mail list logo
