We were using glusterfs for shared home directories and it was really slow. We're using an NFS shared and it's working much faster.
Mark > On May 18, 2014, at 21:35, "Ted Miller" <tedli...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: >> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the >> case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow. > > How recently have you looked at Gluster? It has seen some significant > progress, though small files are still its weakest area. I believe that > some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files. > > Ted Miller > Elkhart, IN > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
