[CentOS] ruby193 SCL and mod_passenger

2014-04-03 Thread Filip Bartmann
  I'm interested in ruby and I try the ruby193 SCL and I want to run Ruby on Rails with Apache, so I'm searching mod_passenger for this ruby SCL version, but I found, that this package is not in this SCL. Are any other possibilities to run Ruby on Rails with Apache or why is mod_passenger not in

Re: [CentOS] cachefs

2014-04-03 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 03.04.2014 um 04:15 schrieb Grant Street : > On 03/04/14 12:34, Rita wrote: >> How come I don't see any changes in the Centos 6.{3,4,5} release which >> mention updates to cachefs? > > I don't know why they weren't in the release notesmaybe because it's > a preview release? They were issu

Re: [CentOS] ruby193 SCL and mod_passenger

2014-04-03 Thread Adam Wead
Filip, I install and manage my ruby versions with chruby, instead of using packages. You can get more up-to-date versions of ruby that way. There are other ruby managers such as rbenv and rvm. For passenger, you’ll install the passenger gem and then build the Apache module from source: http

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2

2014-04-03 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Removing a file that starts with dashes

2014-04-03 Thread James B. Byrne
On Wed, April 2, 2014 20:56, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:59:26PM -0700, benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:17:02PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> > >> > WTF - there is a reason the "-f" flag exists - RTFM >> > > > Please ignore and do not respon

[CentOS] Difference between ruby193 CentOS SCL and ruby193 softwarecollections.org SCL

2014-04-03 Thread Filip Bartmann
  I've found that in https://softwarecollections.org/repos/rhscl/ruby193/epel-6-x86_64/ is passenger included but in http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/ruby193/ is not. What is the differences between this two repos?   Thanks, Filip Bartmann ___

Re: [CentOS] ruby193 SCL and mod_passenger

2014-04-03 Thread James B. Byrne
On Thu, April 3, 2014 03:38, Filip Bartmann wrote: >   > I'm interested in ruby and I try the ruby193 SCL and I want to run Ruby on > Rails with Apache, so I'm searching mod_passenger for this ruby SCL version, > but I found, that this package is not in this SCL. Are any other possibilities > to

Re: [CentOS] Chromium 31.0.1650.63-2.el6 for CentOS 6

2014-04-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/02/2014 10:49 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 13.03.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Johnny Hughes : >> On 03/13/2014 12:43 PM, teltel wrote: >>> Johnny, >>> Thanks for the Chromium 31 build; it works great. >>> Are you planning on continuing support for Chromium-32 for CentOS and >>> beyond? >>> Stable re

Re: [CentOS] ruby193 SCL and mod_passenger

2014-04-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/03/2014 02:38 AM, Filip Bartmann wrote: > > I'm interested in ruby and I try the ruby193 SCL and I want to run Ruby on > Rails with Apache, so I'm searching mod_passenger for this ruby SCL version, > but I found, that this package is not in this SCL. Are any other > possibilities to run

Re: [CentOS] Difference between ruby193 CentOS SCL and ruby193 softwarecollections.org SCL

2014-04-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/03/2014 09:28 AM, Filip Bartmann wrote: > > I've found that in > https://softwarecollections.org/repos/rhscl/ruby193/epel-6-x86_64/ is > passenger included but in http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/ruby193/ > is not. > What is the differences between this two repos? > The CentO

[CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread m . roth
CentOS 6.5, with the current trac, and trac-agilo-plugin. I seem to have problems, and maybe even a bug in the packaging. I installed and got trac running with authentication. Fine. I installed and enabled the agilo plugin. Supposedly fine. Except it doesn't work. On the trac web pages, in the

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > CentOS 6.5, with the current trac, and trac-agilo-plugin. > > I seem to have problems, and maybe even a bug in the packaging. > > I installed and got trac running with authentication. Fine. I installed > and enabled the agilo plugin. Supposedly fine. > > Except it doesn't

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Still googling, and found something *else* I don't understand: all the docs I find online talk about editing trac.ini, *apparently* in /path/to/proj/conf/trac.ini. But I just found that there's an /etc/trac/trac.ini. So, *now* which should be edited?

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

2014-04-03 Thread Johan Vermeulen
Hello All, I think this is an idea worth a thought. op 02-04-14 19:44, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef: > Always Learning wrote: >> Today, an enthusiastic 10 year old boy asked me about Linux. >> >> I thought of telling me to go to centos.org but then realised there is >> nothing on centos.org for comple

[CentOS] kwallet?

2014-04-03 Thread m . roth
So, the other admin I work with comes by, and we're both using kde, and he asks me to to go the start menu, and fire up kwalletmanager. I do... and nothing happens. ps tells me it's running, but there is no window. What's supposed to happen? This is 6.5 mark "don't use it, anyway, but"

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread m . roth
Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Still googling, and found something *else* I don't understand: all >> the docs I find online talk about editing trac.ini, *apparently* in >> /path/to/proj/conf/trac.ini. But I just found that there's an >> /etc/trac/trac.ini. So,

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On the other hand - any advice? Clues as to why this icon (the information shows it as a round bullet) isn't on the toolbar, or why admin is undefined? All of this is from the quick-start for agilo, where it says to go to admin, and create a team,

Re: [CentOS] Chromium 31.0.1650.63-2.el6 for CentOS 6

2014-04-03 Thread Νικόλαος Γεωργόπουλος
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSWmFiT0REeG1QS28/edit?usp=sharing 2014-04-03 18:43 GMT+03:00 Johnny Hughes : > On 04/02/2014 10:49 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > > Am 13.03.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Johnny Hughes : > >> On 03/13/2014 12:43 PM, teltel wrote: > >>> Johnny, > >>> Thanks for th

Re: [CentOS] Chromium 31.0.1650.63-2.el6 for CentOS 6

2014-04-03 Thread Νικόλαος Γεωργόπουλος
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSQlZ1OUljT3p6U1U/edit?usp=sharing 2014-04-04 1:49 GMT+03:00 Νικόλαος Γεωργόπουλος : > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSWmFiT0REeG1QS28/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > 2014-04-03 18:43 GMT+03:00 Johnny Hughes : > >> On 04/02/2014 10:49 AM, Leon

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

2014-04-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: >> > I would be interested to hear if someone knows of an initiative that > really brings Linux to kids or kids to Linux. > And if in other country's schools do use Linux. There was one... Up through CentOS5 there was an iso respin that just

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

2014-04-03 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 22:16 +0200, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > Hello All, > > I think this is an idea worth a thought. Ja. Dat klopt. > op 02-04-14 19:44, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef: > > Always Learning wrote: > >> Today, an enthusiastic 10 year old boy asked me about Linux. > >> > >> I thought of t

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

2014-04-03 Thread David Beveridge
There is this http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar based on fedora, for younger children. dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

2014-04-03 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 10:09 +1000, David Beveridge wrote: > There is this > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar > > based on fedora, for younger children. Thanks Dave. But, looking at the initial web page, this is NOT what I believe is required. For example, on http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Creati