> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Always Learning
> Sent: den 29 januari 2014 20:36
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Booting Software RAID
>
>
> > My (sometimes unpopular) advice is to set up the partiti
Hi! I recently encountered a situation when a x86_64 package is
dependent on i686 packages..
Does anyone with packaging experience know why this could be necessary?
What arguments (logical and technical) can i bring to the said packager
in order to stop this chain of dependencies?
Thanks!
Adrian
On 1/30/2014 1:17 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! I recently encountered a situation when a x86_64 package is
> dependent on i686 packages..
> Does anyone with packaging experience know why this could be necessary?
> What arguments (logical and technical) can i bring to the said packager
> in orde
When I start yumex as user it displays but stops with an error message
that the backend is not running.
However "yumex --root" starts and runs normally.
It is Centos 6.5 64 bit and using XFCE running in virtualbox if that
matters.
Any suggestion as to what I am missing?
Bob
--
http://www.qr
On 1/30/2014 1:32 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> When I start yumex as user it displays but stops with an error message
> that the backend is not running.
>
> However "yumex --root" starts and runs normally.
>
> It is Centos 6.5 64 bit and using XFCE running in virtualbox if that
>
Hi,
I'm running CentOS 6.5 as NFS server (v3 and v4) and exporting Ext4 and
XFS filesystem.
After many months that all works fine today the server crash:
Jan 30 09:46:13 qb-storage kernel: [ cut here ]
Jan 30 09:46:13 qb-storage kernel: WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:26
_
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 30/01/2014 11:24, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> he error is exactly like this:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/site/solutions/166583
> |
>
> Does anyone know if the problem is solved and how?
> Thanks
That page lists the workaround if you log in, but no "resolution" as
yet. Although there are internal B
Il 30/01/2014 13:32, Daniel Bird ha scritto:
> On 30/01/2014 11:24, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
>> he error is exactly like this:
>>
>> https://access.redhat.com/site/solutions/166583
>> |
>>
>> Does anyone know if the problem is solved and how?
>> Thanks
> That page lists the workaround if you log in, b
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
wrote:
> Hi! I recently encountered a situation when a x86_64 package is
> dependent on i686 packages..
> Does anyone with packaging experience know why this could be necessary?
> What arguments (logical and technical) can i bring to the said packag
> -Original Message-
> From: John R Pierce
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:21
>
> On 1/30/2014 1:17 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> > Hi! I recently encountered a situation when a x86_64 package is
> > dependent on i686 packages..
RPM and Specfile please? Also if it is not a CentOS pac
On Wed, January 29, 2014 12:47, James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> |
>> | Do you have a writeup of what you had to do to get CentOS to
>> | authenticate against AD?
>
> I have to sanitize it. The project started 3 years ago with SSSD and there
> were a lot of workarounds/p
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win workstations
> and CentOS-6 boxes? Does anyone here use it for imap and/or smtp
> authentication?
Yes to all of these, using sssd on CentOS, for about 18 months now. It
works very wel
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:13:18 -0500 (EST)
Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> > Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win
> > workstations
> > and CentOS-6 boxes? Does anyone here use it for imap and/or smtp
> > authentication?
>
> Ye
On Wed, January 29, 2014 11:57, Lists wrote:
> On 01/29/2014 08:15 AM, Matt wrote:
>> If I am putting both 4TB drives in a single RAID1 array for /vz would
>> there be any advantage to using LVM on it?
>
> My (sometimes unpopular) advice is to set up the partitions on servers
> into two categories
i m working in PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY as a engineer trainee and want
to install netcdf file and ncview but it gives some OS error
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Bob Marcan wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:13:18 -0500 (EST)
> Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, James B. Byrn
Am 30.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Alexander Dalloz:
> Am 30.01.2014 15:45, schrieb dip patel:
>> i m working in PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY as a engineer trainee and want
>> to install netcdf file and ncview but it gives some OS error
Sorry, I did sent my previous message too early.
Your problem des
Am 30.01.2014 15:45, schrieb dip patel:
Please do not hijack other threads by replying to other list mails with
a new topic. Thanks.
And please no top-posting and full quotation.
> i m working in PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY as a engineer trainee and want
> to install netcdf file and ncview but
On 01/30/2014 03:28 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John R Pierce
>> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:21
>>
>> On 1/30/2014 1:17 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>>> Hi! I recently encountered a situation when a x86_64 package is
>>> dependent on i686 packages..
>
> RPM
i had used all the resources as below
and when i had all the untar in a directories and then ./configure the
netcdf file so it fives x lib developer is missing and some x11 library is
also missing etc so please help me...
netcdf-4.3.1.tar.gz
hdf5-1.9.148.tar.gz
ncview-2.1.2.tar.gz
On Thu, Jan
I love .conf files.. can you include Shockwave with it, there are some
that may not understand it...
j/h
On 1/30/2014 6:13 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win
>> workstations
>> and CentOS-
or i m also want to run cent os with my window 8 socan u please provide a
direct download link for centos 6.5 or ftp link for download it?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:00 PM, dip patel wrote:
> it can not b possible cause i m working in ISRO - PRL and it had a 348
> node cluster and that all sys
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 30.01.2014 16:20:47:
> Von: dip patel
> An: CentOS mailing list
> Datum: 30.01.2014 16:21
> Betreff: Re: [CentOS] netcdf
> Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
>
> i had used all the resources as below
> and when i had all the untar in a directories and t
um, you could 'yum' your X11 binaries.
make sure to also run your updates...
yum update
very nice to do for your system..
after you take a 'snapshot' if a VM and it SHOULD BE by now...
.. um, also, you need to load development packages as it needs to 'make' and
compile those packages unique to yo
it can not b possible cause i m working in ISRO - PRL and it had a 348
node cluster and that all system is already running on Cent os so it is not
possible to change whole system due to this single problem my head doesnt
allow to me for this
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Andreas Reschke
wrote
Really? Really
j/h
On 1/30/2014 7:32 AM, dip patel wrote:
> or i m also want to run cent os with my window 8 socan u please provide a
> direct download link for centos 6.5 or ftp link for download it?
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:00 PM, dip patel wrote:
>
>> it can not b possible caus
Allesio,
Are these VM's -- did you move the /VM files/ respectively to backup
location named as per VM? e.g.:
/DB
/CORE business Server
/etc
Because it looks like your PowerEdge system chocked and you may have to:
A: get that back online, fire up the systems.. or
B: replace
C: restor/replace
T
Google is your friend (not that you really need in this instance).
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:32, dip patel wrote:
>
> or i m also want to run cent os with my window 8 socan u please provide a
> direct download link for centos 6.5 or ftp link for download it?
>
>
>> On Thu,
ohkkk and what about netcdf
???
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:08 PM, yoursurrogate...@gmail.com <
yoursurrogate...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Google is your friend (not that you really need in this instance).
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:32, dip patel wrote:
> >
> > or i m als
o
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Jeffrey Hass wrote:
> ... release notes and manuals, too --
> always good to hear what the 'prominent Linux vendor in 'North America'
> is thinking --
>
> ah, the pleasure of knowledge.. I'm surprised at the questions here ..
> most can be
> solved with th
... release notes and manuals, too --
always good to hear what the 'prominent Linux vendor in 'North America'
is thinking --
ah, the pleasure of knowledge.. I'm surprised at the questions here ..
most can be
solved with that Google search. don't have to be technical now.. in
fact, most technica
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 30.01.2014 16:32:16:
> Von: dip patel
> An: CentOS mailing list
> Datum: 30.01.2014 16:32
> Betreff: Re: [CentOS] Antwort: Re: netcdf
> Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
>
> or i m also want to run cent os with my window 8 socan u please provide
a
>
https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/netcdf-tutorial.html
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/thredds/current/netcdf-java/tutorial/
http://www.ems.psu.edu/~young/meteo473/lecture_netcdf_matlab.htm
http://werc.engr.uaf.edu/~ken/doc/netcdf-doc/netcdf-tutorial/Documentation.html
http
You seem to imply something magic is going happen to performance with
partitioning. There's not really much magic in these boxes. You
either move the disk head farther more frequently or you don't. So if
your test stays mostly constrained to a small slice of disk that
you've partitioned you migh
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 10:38 -0500, yoursurrogate...@gmail.com wrote:
> Google is your friend (not that you really need in this instance).
>
> Sent from my iPhone
Please stop posting rubbish.
What is the point in your single line comment followed by 124 lines of
previous postings ?
CUT-out all
On 01/30/2014 10:50 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/30/2014 1:32 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>> When I start yumex as user it displays but stops with an error message
>> that the backend is not running.
>>
>> However "yumex --root" starts and runs normally.
>>
>> It is Centos 6.5 6
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Jeffrey Hass wrote:
>
> You could EASILY write a script (anyone do that here?) -- to monitor
> that /OS file system ~ and send
> alerts based on thresholds and triggers (notify the monitoring people
> before they get even notified.. it's
> alot of fun!) -- and put
i definitely had the same experience back then. Anybody had luck with
simply dd a current CentOS iso. I wonder if RedHat supports
ISOHybrid?
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
>>
>
>
>
> > From: Nux!
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Sent: Mon
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 21:09 +0530, dip patel wrote:
> ohkkk and what about netcdf
> ???
Mr Patel,
Please omit (= delete) all unnecessary parts of previous postings.
You included 143 lines of previous postings. It is excessive for your
one line reply.
Thank you.
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
..this is nice, but way overcomplicated than it needs to be.
we're talking just slices /containers/ and data /files/ at the end of
the so-called
day everything is a file in *ix - even printers.. whatever.
... restoring the below would be a challenge for someone not truly
intimate with
this schem
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Bob Marcan wrote:
> Please post sssd.conf.
OK, here it is. Note that we're using service discovery to locate the
DC's, which avoids having to hard-code the DC host names. This particular
sssd.conf was from a machine called nebula, and europa.icse.cornell.edu is
the domain
From: dip patel
> or i m also want to run cent os with my window 8 socan u please provide a
> direct download link for centos 6.5 or ftp link for download it?
On the CentOS website homepage there is a BIG and bright orange button
that says "Get CentOS Linux Now". Maybe try to click on it...
On 30/01/14 10:52, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> When Yumex is started from GNOME, it asks for Authentication to start.
> If Xfce is unable to provide that Auth prompt Yumex may fail (I am
> guessing).
>
> I do not see any actual service, so I am guessing backend is that Auth
> stuff.
>
>
> -- Ljub
Hi,
I'm setting up Samba to authenticate against an LDAP Server. I have the
basic setup running but authentication fails. I'm 95% sure that the LDAP
config is still wrong but the guy I'm setting this up for doesn't really
come up with the proper info.
I have set log level = 5 and get tons of irre
dip patel wrote:
> i had used all the resources as below
> and when i had all the untar in a directories and then ./configure the
> netcdf file so it fives x lib developer is missing and some x11 library is
> also missing etc so please help me...
>
>
> netcdf-4.3.1.tar.gz
>
> hdf5-1.9.148.tar.gz
>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:30 AM, dip patel wrote:
> it can not b possible cause i m working in ISRO - PRL and it had a 348
> node cluster and that all system is already running on Cent os so it is not
> possible to change whole system due to this single problem my head doesnt
> allow to me for th
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:32 AM, dip patel wrote:
> or i m also want to run cent os with my window 8 socan u please provide a
> direct download link for centos 6.5 or ftp link for download it?
>
I'm not sure what you mean by 'with window 8', but VMware player or
Virtualbox will probably let you
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:55:56AM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
> wrote:
> > Hi! I recently encountered a situation when a x86_64 package is
> > dependent on i686 packages..
> > Does anyone with packaging experience know why this could be necessary?
>
On 01/30/2014 05:36 PM, Dirk Olmes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm setting up Samba to authenticate against an LDAP Server. I have the
> basic setup running but authentication fails. I'm 95% sure that the LDAP
> config is still wrong but the guy I'm setting this up for doesn't really
> come up with the proper
On 01/30/2014 07:25 AM, Jeffrey Hass wrote:
> You could EASILY write a script (anyone do that here?) -- to monitor
> that /OS file system ~ and send
> alerts based on thresholds and triggers (notify the monitoring people
> before they get even notified.. it's
> alot of fun!) -- and put it in the cr
On 01/30/2014 12:28 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> My (sometimes unpopular) advice is to set up the partitions on servers
>>> into two categories:
>>>
>>> 1) OS
>>> 2) Data
>> Absolutely. I have been doing this, without problems, for 5 years.
>> Keeping the two distinct is best, in my opinion.
> Exactly
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Lists wrote:
> >
> And for clarity's sake, I'm not suggesting a literal partition /os and
> /data, simply that there are areas of the filesystem used to store
> operating system stuff (EG: /bin, /boot, /usr), and areas used to store
> data (EG: /home, /var, /tmp),
On 1/30/2014 12:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Lists wrote:
>>> > >
>> >And for clarity's sake, I'm not suggesting a literal partition /os and
>> >/data, simply that there are areas of the filesystem used to store
>> >operating system stuff (EG: /bin, /boot, /usr), a
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/30/2014 12:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Lists wrote:
> >
>>> >And for clarity's sake, I'm not suggesting a literal partition /os and
>>> >/data, simply that there are areas of the filesystem used t
From: Rob Townley
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] idea: "hybrid" iso images?
i definitely had the same experience back then. Anybody had luck with
simply dd a current CentOS iso. I wonder if RedHat supports
ISOHybrid?
On Mon, Apr 15,
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'm getting more and more inclined to make the whole systems
disposable/replaceable and using VMs for the smaller things instead
of micro-managing volume slices.
+1
Resource scarcity has changed dramatically over the past couple
decades. HD space, fo
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> I'm getting more and more inclined to make the whole systems
>> disposable/replaceable and using VMs for the smaller things instead
>> of micro-managing volume slices.
>
> +1
>
> Resource scarcity has changed dramatically over the
On 30 January 2014 @16:36 zulu, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> Yes, I think you are right. I don't really need yumex, it's just
> convenient to have when first setting up when starting from a minimal
> system. I can get the yum information elsewhere without yumex running in
> the syste
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Eight years ago, I wrote an article for SysAdmin, suggesting a
straight partition for /boot and root, and lvm for /home and /var,
and /usr. These days, I might say RAID 1 for /boot and /, and RAID
or not for swap, and another raid partition for ever
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Eight years ago, I wrote an article for SysAdmin, suggesting a
>> straight partition for /boot and root, and lvm for /home and /var,
>> and /usr. These days, I might say RAID 1 for /boot and /, and RAID
>> or not for swap, and
i broke down and stopped attempting this by hand and now use
"multisystem" on my Ubuntu box.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
>
> From: Rob Townley
>
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 8:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] idea: "hybrid" iso images?
>
>
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 16:35 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Paul Heinlein wrote:
> > A RAID 1 of (relatively) inexpensive 80GB or 120GB SSDs are my
> > default for swap and the root filesystem. Larger /srv filesystems,
>> and the NAS holding /home, still require spinning platters on our
>> budg
Oh, btw, one big reason I used to use lvm was that, when I wanted to
upgrade to a new release, I'm make or wipe a partition or two, and install
in that partition... and then I could boot to new or old.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
On 01/30/2014 10:27 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Eight years ago, I wrote an article for SysAdmin, suggesting a
>> straight partition for /boot and root, and lvm for /home and /var, and
>> /usr. These days, I might say RAID 1 for /boot and /, and RAID
On 01/30/2014 12:58 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> i definitely had the same experience back then. Anybody had luck with
> simply dd a current CentOS iso. I wonder if RedHat supports
> ISOHybrid?
Nope. I succeeded once by manually installing grub after an install. I
have an external DVD R/W that a
Kernel 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64. Anyone using motion, or in some other
way using the gspca_zc3xx driver? Just in the last week or two, I've
started getting error messages in my log
Jan 30 16:53:20 kernel: gspca: frame overflow 33180 > 32768
The > 32k size varies, all 33xxx.
mark
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:00 AM, wrote:
> dip patel wrote:
> > i had used all the resources as below
> > and when i had all the untar in a directories and then ./configure the
> > netcdf file so it fives x lib developer is missing and some x11 library
> is
> > also missing etc so please help me..
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
A RAID 1 of (relatively) inexpensive 80GB or 120GB SSDs are my default
for swap and the root filesystem. Larger /srv filesystems, and the NAS
holding /home, still require spinning platters on our budget.
What type of network/filesystem connectio
On 01/30/2014 08:12 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 01/30/2014 05:36 PM, Dirk Olmes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm setting up Samba to authenticate against an LDAP Server. I have the
>> basic setup running but authentication fails. I'm 95% sure that the LDAP
>> config is still wrong but the guy I'm se
On 1/30/2014 10:44 PM, Dirk Olmes wrote:
> Thanks for your help. Unfortunately, the LDAP server does not run on the
> same machine - hence no slapd debugging as described in the blog post:-(
>
> Since samba issues LDAP queries itself I was hoping to make samba itself
> log those queries ...
can yo
On 30/01/2014 06:36 PM, Dirk Olmes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm setting up Samba to authenticate against an LDAP Server. I have
> the
> basic setup running but authentication fails. I'm 95% sure that the
> LDAP
> config is still wrong but the guy I'm setting this up for doesn't
> really
> come up with t
71 matches
Mail list logo
