You seem to imply something magic is going happen to performance with
partitioning. There's not really much magic in these boxes. You
either move the disk head farther more frequently or you don't. So if
your test stays mostly constrained to a small slice of disk that
you've partitioned you might think your performance is improved. But,
that's only true if the test exactly matches real-world use - that is,
in normal operation, the same disk heads won't frequently be moving to
other locations to, for example, write logs.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Jeffrey Hass <xacc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How not so...say something important next time. People are worl I no here..
> On Jan 29, 2014 1:11 PM, "Les Mikesell" <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Jeffrey Hass <xacc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > Here's something: I've done before and /after performance testing with
>> > real time data and User requests
>> > with just the 'basic' file partioning and then Partioning the partition
>> > -- really does wonders..
>>
>> How so, unless you are adding disk heads to the mix or localizing
>> activity during your test?
>>
>> --
>> Les Mikesell
>> lesmikes...@gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
