> Am 20.08.2013 06:04, schrieb Riccardo Castellani:
>> I'm preparing my new
Sendmail mail server with pop3s + smtps where user
> SMTPS is obsolete since a
couple of years. Use SMTP/STARTTLS instead
> over the submission port.
I know,
I used both ports (SMTP over SSL port 465, SMTP/STARTTLS port
On 08/20/2013 10:33 PM Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-08-20, ken wrote:
>>
>> Will the many apps which depend upon the existing code-- e.g., grip,
>> k3b, gnome-cd-- still work after installing your software?
>
> You can install Joerg's version to someplace separate, like /usr/local,
> then test th
ken wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 04:57 AM Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > I told him that if his distro does not do it's homework, he needs to compile
> > himself. The URL is in my signature and in contrary to many autoconf based
> > sources, my software compiles out if the box by just calling "make".
>
> J
ken wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 04:57 AM Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > As mentioned before: I deliver something that compiles and runs out of the
> > box
> > on aprox. 30 OS platforms (not counting the CPU and OS-version variants).
> > It is not my duty to deliver binary packages for more than 100 OS/CP
ken wrote:
> Keith,
>
> I was wondering if anyone would notice. Thanks.
what problem do you have? You have been pointed to compile and install recent
original software. Did you do that?
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-b
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/20/2013 1:47 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >>> > >Please do not write false claims!
> >> >
> >> >says the one on his fight against Linux and GNU since years
> > Do you like to prove that you cannot stay with the truth?
>
> Is your code and
ken wrote:
> Then too of course there'd need to be a way to ascertain if there was
> any substantial differences in the outputs. There's some code out there
> since kernel version 2.2 called cdfs which doesn't seem to be on my
> (v.5.9) system. This allows mounting an audio CD or a disk imag
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:25:23 +0200
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
> > The allegation was that some of it is CDDL, which is problematic.
>
> The CDDL was accepted as definitely OSS compliant by bopensource.org
> within 14 days and without to mention problems.
>
> The GPL did take
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> So if you want your software to be used by the majority of Linux
> distros without license-related hiccups, you can always just re-license
> it to GPL and everyone will be happy.
You seem to be missinformed: When cdrtools have been 100% GPL, it was attacked
by Debian _b
Hello Joerg,
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:09:10 +0200 Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> > So if you want your software to be used by the majority of Linux
> > distros without license-related hiccups, you can always just re-license
> > it to GPL and everyone will be happy.
>
> Yo
wwp wrote:
> > You seem to be missinformed: When cdrtools have been 100% GPL, it was
> > attacked
> > by Debian _because_ it was 100% GPL and because the GPL is a frequently
> > missinterpreted license.
> >
> > ...so I decided to choose a less problematic license than the GPL.
> >
> > > sof
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
>> So if you want your software to be used by the majority of Linux
>> distros without license-related hiccups, you can always just re-license
>> it to GPL and everyone will be happy.
>
> You seem to be missinform
Les Mikesell wrote:
> > You seem to be missinformed: When cdrtools have been 100% GPL, it was
> > attacked
> > by Debian _because_ it was 100% GPL and because the GPL is a frequently
> > missinterpreted license.
> >
> > ...so I decided to choose a less problematic license than the GPL.
>
> The G
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>> > You seem to be missinformed: When cdrtools have been 100% GPL, it was
>> > attacked
>> > by Debian _because_ it was 100% GPL and because the GPL is a frequently
>> > missinterpreted license.
>> >
>> > ...so I decided to choose a less p
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.08.2013 18:42, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > The GPL is discouraged by Debian...
> > You should think about why you did not help to defend the GPL in 2005
>
> *bruhaha* half of the debian distribution including the
> kernel *is* GPL as well as all other linux distr
I'm running CentOS 6 on one machine, plus my wife's. She's OK
with it, but every time I use it, I miss the glorious plethora of
browsers that Fedora has gotten me used to.
I have epel and rpmfusion (both free and unfree) enabled;
is there some other repo I can safely add?
--
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:08:31PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>
> I'm running CentOS 6 on one machine, plus my wife's. She's OK
> with it, but every time I use it, I miss the glorious plethora of
> browsers that Fedora has gotten me used to.
You can safely add Johnny's Chrome repo.
http://l
On 8/21/2013 10:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> But Debian attacked cdrtools for using the GPL when it has been 100% GPL.
I find this an extremely odd assertation. I am not nor ever have been a
Debian user, but I know Debian is based on the Linux Kernel, uses GCC,
gnu libc, etc as its core, and
On 8/21/2013 4:15 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Why do you believe this?
> Do you believe that centos delivers inconstsistent libraries?
if you replace the stuff thats under RPM package management with code
you self compile and simply copy, you break the package management
system. an update mig
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:25 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/21/2013 4:15 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Why do you believe this?
>> Do you believe that centos delivers inconstsistent libraries?
>
> if you replace the stuff thats under RPM package management with code
> you self compile and simply
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:09:10 +0200
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> > So if you want your software to be used by the majority of Linux
> > distros without license-related hiccups, you can always just
> > re-license it to GPL and everyone will be happy.
>
> You seem to be miss
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:18:48 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/21/2013 10:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > But Debian attacked cdrtools for using the GPL when it has been
> > 100% GPL.
>
> I find this an extremely odd assertation. I am not nor ever have
> been a Debian user, but I know Debian i
On 2013-08-21, ken wrote:
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. Yes, that would work. But then I'm pretty
> sure that I'd also need to compile (from source) all (or most) of the
> dependent apps (grip, k3b, gnome-cd, etc.) so that they would look to
> /usr/local/* for supporting libraries and utilit
So, can anyone confirm that discards work on ext4 a LVM RAID0 of two
SSDs with CentOS 6.4 or the latest ElRepo kernel for Centos 5.8?
This should be a fairly simple question, either it works or it doesn't...
--
Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal
joa...@terminalmx.com
I had a rather large ext4 partition on an Areca RAID shut down uncleanly
while it was writing. When I mount it again, it recommends fsck, which I
do, and I get the following error:
Failed to optimize directory ... EXT2 directory corrupted
This error shows up every time I run fsck.ext4 on this p
I have a CentOS 6.4 VM that is getting its DHCP information from dnsmasq (a
libvirt instance). However, it is not applying the routing information.
Attached is a tcpdump of the dhcpc output. You'll see:
Default-Gateway Option 3, length 4: 192.168.122.1
However, when I run 'route -n
So, in the ongoing saga of the unusual 1U short-depth
workstation, we have narrowed the field to two choices.
Both entrants are configured with 16GB memory (4x4GB),
two 2.5" drives (1x250GB SSD and 1x1TB HDD),
and an NVIDIA NVS510 graphic card (quad display):
1) SuperMicro 5017R-MF, Xeon E5-2609 p
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> I have a CentOS 6.4 VM that is getting its DHCP information from dnsmasq (a
> libvirt instance). However, it is not applying the routing information.
> Attached is a tcpdump of the dhcpc output. You'll see:
>
> Default-Gateway
Further investigation.
If I create a route-eth0 file and put this in it:
default 192.168.122.1 dev eth0
I get this upon network restart:
Error: either "to" is duplicate, or "192.168.122.1" is a garbage.
Which this page:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.1/Deployment_Guide/s1%2dnetworkscript
Siigh. Discovered that the file
/etc/sysconfig/network
contained this line:
GATEWAY=
That was first placed there when the machine was first installed, using a
static
IP address.
Commented that out, and now the system gets its gateway via dhcp.
j
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 15:39
On 08/21/2013 11:42 PM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> So, can anyone confirm that discards work on ext4 a LVM RAID0 of two
> SSDs with CentOS 6.4 or the latest ElRepo kernel for Centos 5.8?
>
> This should be a fairly simple question, either it works or it doesn't...
>
hi,
First hit: https://www.google
32 matches
Mail list logo
