ken <geb...@mousecar.com> wrote:
> Then too of course there'd need to be a way to ascertain if there was
> any substantial differences in the outputs. There's some code out there
> since kernel version 2.2 called cdfs which doesn't seem to be on my
> (v.5.9) system. This allows mounting an audio CD or a disk image of one
> so that it can be examined and, presumably, manipulated. In fact, maybe
> this is all I need at the moment... that is, after cloning the CD to a
> disk image, it might be possible to edit the track data prior to
> burning. I don't burn CDs that often, so this would be an acceptable
> solution.
This cdfs does not deliver better quality than from using the "read audio"
ioctls from the kernel. Cdda2wav gives much better quylity in case of
non-optiimal media and cdda2wav gives you the meta data you need to make a
decent copy. You don't get that from cdfs.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
