-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: 27 March 2012 21:13
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] shellinabox
Piero wrote:
>
>is there anyone using shellinabox[1] (Web based AJAX terminal
> emulat
On 03/28/12 3:11 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
> We use it to allow users access to the HPC from Windows machines. The
> alternative, cygwin,
> takes quite a bit of installation and configuration so shellinabox is a
> lightweight
> alternative. We're still on CentOS 5, so not a lot of use to the OP
>
On 03/27/2012 11:38 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:58:56PM +0300, Aggelis Aggelis wrote:
>> I want to install centos 6.2 i386 on a pc with the following specs
>>
>>
>> I suspect that due to the low specs of my pc the installer does not enter
>> graphical mode installation whi
Em 27 de março de 2012 14:54, John R Pierce escreveu:
> On 03/27/12 5:49 AM, Rudinei Dias wrote:
> > HI.
> >
> > I have instaled a WEB server with Postgresql on CentOS 6.2.
> > PostgreSQL, versin 9.1.3 x64 from EntrrpriseDB base *.run*.
> > PHP with PDO from YUM using reposity versions.
> >
>
> u
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:24 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/28/12 3:11 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
>> We use it to allow users access to the HPC from Windows machines. The
>> alternative, cygwin,
>> takes quite a bit of installation and configuration so shellinabox is a
>> lightweight
>> alternat
I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
reboot/poweroff system without any admin rights, or without any further
questions, if using commands 'reboot' or 'poweroff'. But 'shutdown' still
requires admin rights.
What is the preferred way to restrict any regular user from reb
On 03/13/2012 07:01 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/13/12 8:19 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
>> Please, any help?
>
> avoid using ANY device names for SCSI class devices, they are near
> useless.mount the volumes via label or uUID.
>
>
>
Sorry to re-open this thread, but how can I obtain this uuid
CentOS-6.2
I am confused. I need to accept messages somewhat larger
than the default 10M allowed by Postfix. However,
changing the message_size_limit in /etc/postfix/main.cf is
having no effect.
Squirrelmail is configured to accept and transmit messages
up to 24M and this identical configuratio
carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:27 AM:
> Then, how can I obtain these uuids??
blkid
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Le 28/03/2012 15:44, James B. Byrne a écrit :
> CentOS-6.2
>
>
> # grep message_size_limit /etc/postfix/*
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:message_size_limit = 2048
>
> # postfix reload
> postfix/postfix-script: refreshing the Postfix mail system
>
> # postconf -n | grep size_limit
> message_size_limit
On 03/28/2012 03:51 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:27 AM:
>> Then, how can I obtain these uuids??
>
> blkid
>
> Phil
Doesn't works neither:
[root@newc6srv init.d]# blkid /dev/sdb1
[root@newc6srv init.d]
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
Timo Neuvonen wrote on 03/28/2012 09:17 AM:
> I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
> reboot/poweroff system without any admin rights, or without any further
> questions, if using commands 'reboot' or 'poweroff'. But 'shutdown' still
> requires admin rights.
>
> What is the
On Wed, March 28, 2012 09:44, James B. Byrne wrote:
> CentOS-6.2
>
> I am confused.
Yes, yes I am. I was looking at the wrong server.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://w
On 3/28/2012 10:03 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Timo Neuvonen wrote on 03/28/2012 09:17 AM:
>> I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
>> reboot/poweroff system without any admin rights, or without any further
>> questions, if using commands 'reboot' or 'poweroff'. But 'shutdo
carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:53 AM:
> On 03/28/2012 03:51 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:27 AM:
>>> Then, how can I obtain these uuids??
>> blkid
>>
>> Phil
> Doesn't works neither:
>
> [root@newc6srv init.d]# blkid /dev/sdb1
> [root@newc6srv init.d]
What does
On 3/28/2012 10:07 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:53 AM:
>> On 03/28/2012 03:51 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>> carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:27 AM:
Then, how can I obtain these uuids??
>>> blkid
>>>
>>> Phil
>> Doesn't works neither:
>>
>> [root@newc6srv init.
On 03/28/2012 04:04 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 3/28/2012 10:03 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> Timo Neuvonen wrote on 03/28/2012 09:17 AM:
>>> I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
>>> reboot/poweroff system without any admin rights, or without any further
>>> questions, if u
On 03/28/2012 09:03 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Timo Neuvonen wrote on 03/28/2012 09:17 AM:
>> I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
>> reboot/poweroff system without any admin rights, or without any further
>> questions, if using commands 'reboot' or 'poweroff'. But 'shutd
Johnny Hughes wrote on 03/28/2012 10:26 AM:
> On 03/28/2012 09:03 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> Timo Neuvonen wrote on 03/28/2012 09:17 AM:
>>> I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
>>> reboot/poweroff system without any admin rights, or without any further
>>> questions, if
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, wrote:
>
> Yeah... but parted is user hostile. A co-worker and I, both of whom don't
> need GUIs, use gparted. However, that doesn't tell me where it's aligning
> things.
I think its trick is the default 1M offset it adds at the start.
--
Les Mikesell
le
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, wrote:
>>
>> Yeah... but parted is user hostile. A co-worker and I, both of whom
>> don't need GUIs, use gparted. However, that doesn't tell me where it's
>> aligning things.
>
> I think its trick is the default 1M offset it adds at the start
On 03/28/2012 04:15 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 3/28/2012 10:07 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:53 AM:
>>> On 03/28/2012 03:51 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:27 AM:
> Then, how can I obtain these uuids??
blkid
Phil
On 03/28/2012 09:47 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote on 03/28/2012 10:26 AM:
>> On 03/28/2012 09:03 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>> Timo Neuvonen wrote on 03/28/2012 09:17 AM:
I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
reboot/poweroff system without any ad
On 3/28/2012 11:10 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>
>> /etc/grub.conf?
>> /boot/?
>> lost of info there with uuid
>> stage1, stage2?
> What has /etc/grub.conf, /boot, stage1 and stage2 to do here? I don't
> understand what info you are asking ...
>
look in the grub.conf file, lists uuids of block devices
On 03/28/2012 05:16 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 3/28/2012 11:10 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>>
>>> /etc/grub.conf?
>>> /boot/?
>>> lost of info there with uuid
>>> stage1, stage2?
>> What has /etc/grub.conf, /boot, stage1 and stage2 to do here? I don't
>> understand what info you are asking ...
>>
>
> lo
On 3/28/2012 11:19 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 05:16 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>> On 3/28/2012 11:10 AM, carlopmart wrote:
/etc/grub.conf?
/boot/?
lost of info there with uuid
stage1, stage2?
>>> What has /etc/grub.conf, /boot, stage1 and stage2 to do here? I don't
>>> un
as root run blkid
-dennis
On 03/28/2012 08:10 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 04:15 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>> On 3/28/2012 10:07 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>> carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:53 AM:
On 03/28/2012 03:51 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:2
On 03/28/2012 05:22 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 3/28/2012 11:19 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>> On 03/28/2012 05:16 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>> On 3/28/2012 11:10 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> /etc/grub.conf?
> /boot/?
> lost of info there with uuid
> stage1, stage2?
What has /etc/grub.conf,
On 03/28/2012 05:23 PM, cl...@west.net wrote:
> as root run blkid
> -dennis
>
Have you read my previous posts??
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
I solved a similar problem by installing gnu parallel on my system.
It did everything that I wanted, and better than I would have coded.
Ali
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Check out the redirection at the end of each command. 1>&2 redirects
> the standard out of your ch
On 3/26/2012 4:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/26/12 2:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Yeah... but parted is user hostile. A co-worker and I, both of whom don't
>> need GUIs, use gparted. However, that doesn't tell me where it's aligning
>> things.
>
> I don't think its any more user hostile
Warren Young wrote:
> On 3/26/2012 4:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 03/26/12 2:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Yeah... but parted is user hostile. A co-worker and I, both of whom
>>> don't need GUIs, use gparted. However, that doesn't tell me where it's
>>> aligning things.
>>
>> I don't thin
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM, wrote:
>>
>> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical
>> UI. It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design.
>
> I disagree. I don't think it's advanced beyond that school
>
Yes, it is so bad that it is surprising
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 12:32 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM, wrote:
> >>
> >> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical
> >> UI. It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design.
> >
> > I disagree. I don't think it's advanced
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:10 PM, John Austin wrote:
>>
> I have been using gdisk for at least a year on Centos and F15/F16
But that doesn't seem happy with MBR type disks. You don't need GPT
unless the disk is bigger then 2 Gigs and 4k-sector drives start at
750G, at least in the laptop sizes.
On 3/28/2012 11:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Warren Young wrote:
>> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical
>> UI. It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design.
>
> I disagree. I don't think it's advanced beyond that school
Now, be fair. ex(1)
On 3/28/2012 11:32 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Yes, it is so bad that it is surprising that there is not a text-mode
> program that performs the functions of gparted - or is there one?
There's cgdisk, from the gdisk package in EPEL.
It solves most of the problems called out in my rant.
> Only console users (local users) are allowed to do that. It's configured
> using pam (I use Centos5.8 so forgive me if this is not the same for
> CentOS6). I tried to change settings in /etc/pam.d/ and that indeed works:
>
> /etc/pam.d/poweroff
> /etc/pam.d/reboot
> /etc/pam.d/halt
>
> I added as
Warren Young wrote:
> On 3/28/2012 11:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Warren Young wrote:
>>> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical
>>> UI. It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design.
>>
>> I disagree. I don't think it's advanced beyond that schoo
On Tuesday, 27. March 2012. 19.45.33 Ned Slider wrote:
> That ndiswrapper issue should hopefully be fixed now with the
> kmod-ndiswrapper-1.57-1.el6 release. It at least gives you that option
> should the native driver prove fruitless.
Indeed, the new ndiswrapper works perfectly! :-) The compat-wi
Hello Group,
The latest rpm in openssh is 5.8, however, the corresponding latest rpm
available in centos 5.7 is only
openssh-4.3p2-72.el5_6.3.x86_64.rpm
and
in 6.0 centos is
openssh-5.3p1-20.el6.x86_64.rpm
I have following questions.
1. I want to start from src.rpm and where can I get the s
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Vinay Nagrik wrote:
> Hello Group,
>
> The latest rpm in openssh is 5.8, however, the corresponding latest rpm
> available in centos 5.7 is only
> openssh-4.3p2-72.el5_6.3.x86_64.rpm
> and in 6.0 centos is
>openssh-5.3p1-20.el6.x86_64.rpm
>
> I have follow
On 03/28/2012 08:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, wrote:
>>> Yeah... but parted is user hostile. A co-worker and I, both of whom
>>> don't need GUIs, use gparted. However, that doesn't tell me where it's
>>> aligning things.
>> I think its t
44 matches
Mail list logo
