Warren Young wrote:
> On 3/28/2012 11:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Warren Young wrote:
>>> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical
>>> UI. It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design.
>>
>> I disagree. I don't think it's advanced beyond that school....
>
> Now, be fair. ex(1) responded to all errors with:
>
> ?
>
> Ya gotta give it to parted(8), it ain't that bad.
But... but... parted responds to all partitioning with a statement that
the partition's not aligned. And that's, well, memory's much cheaper these
days, they can afford 80 chars instead of one.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
