> Are you a dog lover ? I like dogs too. They usually bark at strangers.
> Paul.
PLONK
see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_%28Usenet%29
best regards
---
Michael
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/li
Hello R,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:46:53 -0700 "R - elists" wrote:
>
> we need to filter out various peoples posts on this list
>
> would some kind soul(s) please direct us in locating the best email list
> reading programs w/ the best features to read the centos and other lists.
>
> the CentOS
m.r...@5-cent.us said the following on 25/08/11 18:33:
> Anyone have any idea how soon RHEL and CentOS will be releasing the patch
> package?
Apparently Apache just released a patch:
https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
Source:
http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/08/31/apache-2
Am 31.08.2011 01:58, schrieb Always Learning:
> I also notice our servers successfully contacting official time
> references centres which are not those sites trying to connect to us. I
> notice too the installed time software is listening on every available
> IP. I can not identity any options in
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:43:46AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> That you for the useful enlightenment. I was unaware it was an OpenVZ. I
> thought is was XEN on Ubuntu.
Next time, try posting more usefull information stating that you are indeed
running CentOS on a CentOS support mailing list an
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:-
>
> iptables -A -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP
>
> I got:
>
> iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615
>
> uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got ins
On 08/30/2011 11:33 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
> Someday, perhaps we'll end up back on an authenticated version of NNTP,
> with support for bbcode, images, and the front end reader of your choice...
Thats quite a good idea - and something that we explored at length when
looking for a replacement so
thus Karanbir Singh spake:
> On 08/30/2011 11:33 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
>> Someday, perhaps we'll end up back on an authenticated version of NNTP,
>> with support for bbcode, images, and the front end reader of your choice...
>
> Thats quite a good idea - and something that we explored at length
On one of my xen hosts a virtual machine does not start at boot. I can
see that xendomains gives an error:
service xendomains start
Starting auto Xen domains: fszeleNo handlers could be found for logger
"xend"
Error: Disk isn't accessible
No handlers could be found for logger "xend"
Error: Disk is
Am 31.08.2011 04:24, schrieb Always Learning:
>
> On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:-
> iptables -A -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP
>
> I got:
> iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615
>
> uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed)
> lsmod
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:13 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> ntpd shipping with CentOS 6 has an option "-I iface"; see "man 8 ntpd".
> Edit "/etc/sysconfig/ntpd" accordingly. ntpd shipping with CentOS 5 does
> not have that and thus always binds to all available interfaces.
That explains why I c
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 08:15:28 PM brian wrote:
>...to your rule list will allow the specified net address(es) to contact
> you on port 123. the above, of course, assumes your
> input port is eth0 (change that, if different on your system), and that the
> NTP server uses TCP protocol (
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:24:41 PM Always Learning wrote:
> On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:-
> iptables -A -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP
> iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615
> uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed)
This
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:46:53 AM R - elists wrote:
> we need to filter out various peoples posts on this list
> would some kind soul(s) please direct us in locating the best email list
> reading programs w/ the best features to read the centos and other lists.
While I use Kmail (which ca
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:01 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:24:41 PM Always Learning wrote:
> > uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed)
> This is not a CentOS-provided kernel; as has been said elsewhere
> in the thread, this is likely an OpenVZ ke
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:46:53 AM R - elists wrote:
> While I use Kmail (which can do very powerful filtering based on a number
So how is kmail these days? I jumped ship to t-bird about '03 or '05, when
I got tired of kmail munging my mbox (I tend to have thousands of
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:25 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> So how is kmail these days? I jumped ship to t-bird about '03 or '05, when
> I got tired of kmail munging my mbox (I tend to have thousands of emails
> stored there, before I get around to moving them to a dated folder...).
Why not sto
On 08/31/2011 12:10 PM, Walter Haidinger wrote:
> PS: To install iptables from source is pretty straightforward:
> get the tarball from netfilter.org, unpack and run:
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/iptables&& make&& make install
And at that point you lose. All management capability or the
Hi,
On 08/31/2011 10:56 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> Just released:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
thanks. I guess we should wait on a fix from upstream, make sure its
tested etc. If there is interest in doing a local fix/build for c4/5/6
testing repo's, please submit a
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 09:25:06 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:46:53 AM R - elists wrote:
>
> > While I use Kmail (which can do very powerful filtering based on a number
>
> So how is kmail these days?
Kmail beats the Dickens out of me
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 09:34:48 AM Always Learning wrote:
> Why not store them in a correspondence database ?
Kmail is working towards full Akonadi integration, and the full 'semantic
desktop' paradigm is (or will be) available.
So it's already being done, to a degree, and in a very f
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 09:18:26 AM Always Learning wrote:
> A very helpful and knowledgeable poster, Walter Haidinger, in his email
> dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:10:16 +0200 (12:10 BST), gave what appears to
> be an ideal solution.
> * get a more recent iptables from netfilter.org
It's
Perhaps the most important point here is that the script kiddies and/or
bots usually make sure the target string, 'login' in your example is *not*
contained within a single packet. You can verify this with wireshark. In
any case just be aware that your solution will likely not have the desired
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:54 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> It's less than ideal to install anything from source, as Karanbir
> has so correctly pointed out downthread.
>
> Sometimes it is necessary; but it is never ideal, for the reasons KB
> stated
The service provider has suggested it needs the x
Hi Mike,
> Perhaps the most important point here is that the script kiddies and/or
> bots usually make sure the target string, 'login' in your example is *not*
> contained within a single packet. You can verify this with wireshark. In
> any case just be aware that your solution will likely n
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:46 PM, R - elists wrote:
>
> we need to filter out various peoples posts on this list
>
> would some kind soul(s) please direct us in locating the best email list
> reading programs w/ the best features to read the centos and other lists.
>
> the CentOS list signal/noise
On 08/31/11 7:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> In the current 4,000 to 6,000 daily hits, the lunatic uses
>
> login.php
> contact.php
> forgotten_password.php
your 'lunatic' aka 'hacker' is undoubtably a blind script ('bot')
running on distributed previously hacked hosts, and pro
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:07 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/31/11 7:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> > In the current 4,000 to 6,000 daily hits, the lunatic uses
> >
> > login.php
> > contact.php
> > forgotten_password.php
>
> your 'lunatic' aka 'hacker' is undoubtably a blind scr
Christopher,
>
> It's not an email program but I think it has the best
> filtering capabilities of all - the brain.
>
umm, yeah, exactly, i want to use my brain to program certain peoples posts
from never reaching my eyeballs
arent they called threaded email readers?
i really didnt find m
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/31/11 7:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>> In the current 4,000 to 6,000 daily hits, the lunatic uses
>>
>> login.php
>> contact.php
>> forgotten_password.php
>
> your 'lunatic' aka 'hacker' is undoubtably a blind script ('bot')
> running on distributed pre
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 11:33 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
>> Someday, perhaps we'll end up back on an authenticated version of NNTP,
>> with support for bbcode, images, and the front end reader of your choice...
>
> Thats quite a good idea - and somethin
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:16 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Maybe not, for a small website. However, let me re-suggest fail2ban, with
> three lines from one of our config files:
> failregex = -.*"GET .*(php|pma|PMA|p/m/a|db|sql|admin).*/(config/c
> onfig\.inc|main)\.php.*".*404.*
>
On 8/31/2011 11:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:16 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Maybe not, for a small website. However, let me re-suggest fail2ban, with
>> three lines from one of our config files:
>> failregex = -.*"GET .*(php|pma|PMA|p/m/a|db|sql|admin).*/(config
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:29 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I assume this is an Apache server. Have you looked at mod_security
> (http://www.modsecurity.org/)? It is available from the epel
> repository. There is a bit of a learning curve to get it running, but
> it protects against a ton of hack
Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:16 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Maybe not, for a small website. However, let me re-suggest fail2ban,
>> with
>> three lines from one of our config files:
>> failregex = -.*"GET
>> .*(php|pma|PMA|p/m/a|db|sql|admin).*/(config/c
>> onf
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:15 AM, R - elists wrote:
>
> sometimes people on the list just get beligerant, drunk, and/or stupid and
> need to be filtered.
But filters tend to be stupid as well. And once you are involved in
a conversation you should have a certain responsibility to follow it
to t
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:30:46PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 08/27/2011 09:12 PM, sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Dear Dennis,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the wise reply.. really did boost my knowledge..
> > honestly was unware of the fact that dom0 is just like another VM ...
> > An
On 08/31/11 8:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> Looking at your example seems to suggest Fail2Ban is an 'after the
> event' response. I would like to implement 'before the event' filtering
> which prevents, even on the first detected hacking attempt, anything
> reaching HTTPD.
so you want another pi
>
> But filters tend to be stupid as well. And once you are involved in
> a conversation you should have a certain responsibility to
> follow it to the bitter end. Filters mostly don't understand
> that (but gmail will push a reply to your own message into
> the 'important' view).
>
i h
On 8/31/2011 11:32 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:29 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> I assume this is an Apache server. Have you looked at mod_security
>> (http://www.modsecurity.org/)? It is available from the epel
>> repository. There is a bit of a learning curve to get
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:41 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/31/11 8:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> > Looking at your example seems to suggest Fail2Ban is an 'after the
> > event' response. I would like to implement 'before the event' filtering
> > which prevents, even on the first detected h
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:51 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 11:32 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:29 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >
> >> I assume this is an Apache server. Have you looked at mod_security
> >> (http://www.modsecurity.org/)? It is available from t
On 08/31/11 9:00 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> No I do not want "another piece of software to parse the http protocol
> and analyze the traffic".
>
> IT Tables, in which I have great confidence and trust, can do it.
iptables will filter on packet headers and such at layer 3, it can't and
won't an
I'm running the command "yum -y update" from a script called from the the post
section of my kickstart config file, and I get the following error:
Installing : kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686
185/378
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
After the i
UPDATE:
I started with kernel 2.6.35.4 #2 and lsmod | grep ipt = ipt_LOG 5419 2.
My service provider produced a replacement kernel 2.6.24-28-xen #1.
Now lsmod | grep ipt reveals ..
ipt_LOG 8192 2
iptable_filter 4608 1
ip_tables 24232 1 iptable_f
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:48 AM, R - elists wrote:
>
>> But filters tend to be stupid as well. And once you are involved in
>> a conversation you should have a certain responsibility to
>> follow it to the bitter end. Filters mostly don't understand
>> that (but gmail will push a reply to your
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:11 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> iptables will filter on packet headers and such at layer 3, it can't
> and won't analyze the content of packets, regardless of your emotional
> attachments.
I believe IP Tables '-m string' will. If you think the custodians and
maintainers
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:15:20 AM Always Learning wrote:
> Dangerous to ignore any background noise - far better to
> firmly shut the door and fill-in all known holes.
The unknown holes are the ones that will get you.
You are also setting yourself up for a denial-of-service vector. Refr
On 08/31/11 9:32 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> Wrong. Some can be determined by machine searching for 'known' invalid
> URL strings which are not remotely similar to valid web page names.
there's an infinite number of invalid strings, and only a finite number
of valid ones.
anyways, your webserve
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:17 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> anyways, your webserver already filters these out, its not going to
> respond to an invalid URL with anything other than '404'. thats its
> job.
The 'error' is trapped; a PHP routine examines the URL for known (in a
list) hacker strings
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Wrong. Some can be determined by machine searching for 'known' invalid
>> URL strings which are not remotely similar to valid web page names.
>
> there's an infinite number of invalid strings, and only a finite number
> of valid ones.
>
> a
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:01 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On today's Internet you are simply not going to catch 100% of the
> attacks, full stop.
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
Paul.
__
On 08/31/11 10:33 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
> aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
an attempted access of a non-vunerability won't be any more effective
the millionth time its run than the first time. its the
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:38 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/31/11 10:33 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> > Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
> > aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
>
> an attempted access of a non-vunerability won't be any more e
On Tue, August 30, 2011 18:57, psprojectplann...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On 29/08/2011 15:46, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> I am experimenting with KVM and I wish to create a
>> virtual machine image in a logical volume. I can
>> create the new lv without problem but when I go to
>> format its file system
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
> Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
> aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
Getting the last 10% will cost you 90% of your time.
___
CentOS
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
> > Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
> > aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
> Getting the last 10% will cost you 90% of you
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears
to be frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
"settings-personal.desktop" and "settings-system.desktop".
The DNS response is always:"No such name". Do tell!
These appear especially when I click on things on the KDE
menus. O
On 31/08/11 17:12, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> I'm running the command "yum -y update" from a script called from the the
> post section of my kickstart config file, and I get the following error:
>
> Installing : kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686
> 185/378
> grubby fatal
On 08/31/2011 05:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:30:46PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 08/27/2011 09:12 PM, sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Dear Dennis,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the wise reply.. really did boost my knowledge..
>>> honestly was unware of the
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears
> to be frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
> "settings-personal.desktop" and "settings-system.desktop".
> The DNS response is always:"No such name". Do tell!
> These appea
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
> > > Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
> > > aim to reduce the penetrabilit
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>
>> On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
>> frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
>> "settings-personal.desktop" and "settings-system.desktop".
>> T
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
other than that, is there a good reason why a mailserver would not be
configured t
Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>>
>>> On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
>>> frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
>>> "settings-personal.desktop" and "
On 08/31/2011 01:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
> Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
> spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
> other than that, is there
> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
> Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
> spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
> other than that, is there a good reason why a mailserver would not be
> co
Stephen Harris wrote:
>> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
>> Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
>> spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply,
>> but
>> other than that, is there a good reason why a
Spam filter that'll authorize the sending before receiving? Just a thought
to stop the hundreds of emails...
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:27 PM, wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> >> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
> >> Europe, has harvested my email, and is us
On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
>>> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
>>> Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
>>> spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply,
>>
Josh Miller wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in
its spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mail
On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Josh Miller wrote:
>> On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Stephen Harris wrote:
> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
> Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in
>>
On 08/31/2011 01:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Josh Miller wrote:
>>> On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
>> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
>> Europe, has harveste
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:27:00PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> > Anyway, the SMTP server should send the delivery failure to the envelope
> > address, which may be different to both the From and Reply-To addresses.
> >
> That would be lovely. Unfortunately, a high perce
On 8/31/2011 4:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> You're saying it uses the envelope, not if exists Reply-To, else From? The
>> problem I have with that is that a few of them have returned the email,
>> with full headers, and I see the *only* reference to
http://www.openspf.org/Introduction - SPF FTW
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:27:00PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Stephen Harris wrote:
> > > Anyway, the SMTP server should send the delivery failure to the
> envelope
> > > address, which
On 08/31/2011 01:48 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 4:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
>> On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> You're saying it uses the envelope, not if exists Reply-To, else From? The
>>> problem I have with that is that a few of them have returned the email,
>>> wi
Josh Miller wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 01:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
>> On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
>>> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in
>>> e
On 08/31/2011 01:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Josh Miller wrote:
>> On 08/31/2011 01:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
>>> On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought
On 8/31/2011 4:50 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 01:48 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> On 8/31/2011 4:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
>>> On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You're saying it uses the envelope, not if exists Reply-To, else From? The
problem I have with that is tha
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 22:08 +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
> > > > Rather than being a willing or passive v
On Aug 31, 2011, at 14:58, Ned Slider wrote:
> Yes, it's a known issue:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/2011-January/msg6.html
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625216
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657257
Thanks, the workarounds described in the
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:16 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
> Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
> spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
> other than th
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:33 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> You're saying it uses the envelope, not if exists Reply-To, else From? The
> problem I have with that is that a few of them have returned the email,
> with full headers, and I see the *only* reference to my email address is
> in the Rep
Folks
The system involved is a 32-bit system, installed via the net about a
week ago. The command
yum update
encountered the following diagonstic
Error: Package: yaf-1.3.2-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
Requires: libfixbuf-0.9.0.so.8()(64bit)
Removing: libfixbuf-0.9.0-
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:50 -0700, Josh Miller wrote:
> That is not true as the remote server will present the envelope header
> to your mail server upon connection.
Surely the FROM is <> ?
Paul
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:19:05 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
> Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
>>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>>>
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequ
Hi all;
does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for
CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from?
Thanks in advance...
kmymoney
darktable
digiKam
--
-
Kevin Kempter - Constent State
A PostgreSQL Professional
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:37 PM, david wrote:
> Folks
>
> The system involved is a 32-bit system...
>
> If the system really is 32bit, then I'd question how you installed the
rpmforge repo, as it's looking for 64bit packages.
It's entirely possible that you installed the 64bit rpmforge-release p
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:30 -0600, CS DBA wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for
> CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from?
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
>
> kmymoney
> darktable
> digiKam
>
You might try #yum --enablerepo= search kmymone
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
>Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
>spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
>other than that, is there a good
On Aug 31, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 10
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:11 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> More to the point, he disables SELinux and then spends hours trying to
> improve security.
Tell the world the ENTIRE story.
Disabled it because things would not run. Said publicly in the last 7
days will find time to learn about Selinux an
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:22:42 +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
> frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
>"settings-personal.desktop" and "settings-system.desktop".
> The DNS response is always:"No such name". Do tel
On 8/31/2011 3:30 PM, CS DBA wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for
> CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from?
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
>
> kmymoney
> darktable
> digiKam
>
You could try the search page at:
http://pkgs.org/search/
I di
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:28:01AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Tell the world the ENTIRE story.
That you never listen to anyone but yourself? I'm confident that this
is a known fact.
> I am trying to filter-out some web page access attepts in IP Tables.
> When will you accept that has no
On 31/08/2011, at 11:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 10:56 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>> Just released:
>> https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
>
> thanks. I guess we should wait on a fix from upstream, make sure its
> tested etc. If there is interest in doing a local
On 08/31/11 4:28 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> Disabled it because things would not run.
Always Talking. Never Learning.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
CentOS mailing
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 18:06 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/31/11 4:28 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > Disabled it because things would not run.
>
> Always Talking. Never Learning.
Always Learning despite the taunts !
Paul.
___
CentOS mailing li
Good Evening All,
I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning. Now I know
there are a lot of different ways to partition the system and different
opinions depending on the use of the server. I currently have a quad
core intel system running 8GB of RAM with 1 TB hard drive (single).
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
