On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:38 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 08/31/11 10:33 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I > > aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them. > > an attempted access of a non-vunerability won't be any more effective > the millionth time its run than the first time.
It can be effective especially if the IP address is blocked (indefinitely or temporarily). > its the unknown vunerabilities that get you, and your approach will > do nothing for these. Wrong because the IP address used for the unknown attack may have been blocked previously by the procedures already described. Paul. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
