Hi,
On our cluster with CentOS 5.5, I have a little problem with a script
for infiniband (this problem:
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/NUQmuN84gd3D31Fdl8PU). So the fix
a very easy. But what will yum/RPM do during the next update ? Will it
overwrite the file ? Will it write on display that
Hello,
is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 srpm or good how to
compile it from src with supported db4?
I tried to compile recent source files, but always finding the current
(installed) db4 >4.3 fails.
Than I tried to compile the LTB Project Files:
http://ltb-project.org/wiki/doc
From: hadi motamedi
> I have captured a file in my centos showing logs captured from many
> modules concurrently. Please find attached a sample of the file. As
> you see, there are logs from individual modules that have been
> captured concurrently. For example, there are logs from
> IPTR,SNM
From: Oguz Yilmaz
>I have rebuilt samba3x SRPM in Centos 5.5. The resultings RPM's are nearly in
>triple size of the original RPMs. I have installed and checked the binary
>files
>are stripped. What can result in such difference in RPM sizes?
>I have not changed anything on built and install s
From: bluethundr
> I am attempting to manage my key logins with ssh-agent. However EVERY
> time I try to ssh I have to go through the same exact routing and it's
> getting a little old...
> Does anyone have any suggestions to make ssh-agent hold these values a
> bit more persistently?
I have
> a very easy. But what will yum/RPM do during the next update ? Will it
> overwrite the file ? Will it write on display that the file was modified
> by an user (as under debian) ?
>
As far as I can tell, if the file is marked as a configuration file in
the RPM, it will be left alone and the new
Please unsubscribe the side on my email
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of John Doe
Sent: 29 November 2010 16:50
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] how to separate individual logs?
From: hadi motamedi
> I have ca
On 11/27/2010 09:21 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:23:34PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
The "working system" in that analogy is software, not necessarily nor
even likely to be the kernel itself. But yes, it can trash a
production critical web or software applicatio
Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 09:46 +0100 schrieb Götz Reinicke -
IT-Koordinator:
> Hello,
>
> is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 srpm or good how to
> compile it from src with supported db4?
Well, you would have to rebuild half of the system to do that.
If you try to rebuild db4 y
Le 29/11/2010 12:44, Gabriel Tabares a écrit :
>> a very easy. But what will yum/RPM do during the next update ? Will it
>> overwrite the file ? Will it write on display that the file was modified
>> by an user (as under debian) ?
>>
>
> As far as I can tell, if the file is marked as a configurati
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:38 AM, giggzounet wrote:
> Le 29/11/2010 12:44, Gabriel Tabares a écrit :
>>> a very easy. But what will yum/RPM do during the next update ? Will it
>>> overwrite the file ? Will it write on display that the file was modified
>>> by an user (as under debian) ?
>>>
>>
>> A
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:41 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: bluethundr
>
>> I am attempting to manage my key logins with ssh-agent. However EVERY
>> time I try to ssh I have to go through the same exact routing and it's
>> getting a little old...
>> Does anyone have any suggestions to make ssh-ag
2010/11/29 Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator :
> Hello,
>
> is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 srpm or good how to
> compile it from src with supported db4?
RHEL 6 provides ldap-2.4.19
So maybe you just need to wait for Centos 6 ?
--
Eero
___
On Monday, November 29, 2010 08:11 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> I don't know how it is now - but I tried running in permissive mode a
> few years ago. It would complain about some
> file, I would fix the file and the next thing I knew it was complaining
> about the same file again, and the file was pa
Le 29/11/2010 13:41, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:38 AM, giggzounet wrote:
>> Le 29/11/2010 12:44, Gabriel Tabares a écrit :
a very easy. But what will yum/RPM do during the next update ? Will it
overwrite the file ? Will it write on display that the file was m
Le 29/11/2010 13:44, giggzounet a écrit :
> Le 29/11/2010 13:41, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:38 AM, giggzounet wrote:
>>> Le 29/11/2010 12:44, Gabriel Tabares a écrit :
> a very easy. But what will yum/RPM do during the next update ? Will it
> overwrite the fil
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:52 AM, giggzounet wrote:
> %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ofed/openib.conf
This is what a config file looks like in a spec file. See how it has
%config at the beginning of the line, with the option of noreplace.
This file is a config and will not be replaced as far a
On Monday, November 29, 2010 08:50 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Well, the kernel I used at the time had a known exploit (exploitable by some
> services I was running), and the intruder got advantage of that. Of course, it
> was partly my fault, because I didn't restart those machines for a long ti
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 09:46 +0100, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator
wrote:
> Hello,
> is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 srpm or good how to
> compile it from src with supported db4?
> I tried to compile recent source files, but always finding the current
> (installed) db4 >4.3 fail
Le 29/11/2010 14:08, Jim Perrin a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:52 AM, giggzounet wrote:
>
>> %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ofed/openib.conf
>
> This is what a config file looks like in a spec file. See how it has
> %config at the beginning of the line, with the option of noreplace.
>
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 23:42 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 28 November 2010 22:40:41 brett mm wrote:
> > > This is where, as a sysadmin, you need to invest just a little time and
> > > effort learning the system. Honestly, the vast majority of issues are
> > > trivial to solve if you ju
Am 29.11.10 13:16, schrieb Stefan Held:
> Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 09:46 +0100 schrieb Götz Reinicke -
> IT-Koordinator:
>> Hello,
>>
>> is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 srpm or good how to
>> compile it from src with supported db4?
>
> Well, you would have to rebuild half of
Am 29.11.10 13:43, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> 2010/11/29 Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator :
>> Hello,
>>
>> is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 srpm or good how to
>> compile it from src with supported db4?
>
> RHEL 6 provides ldap-2.4.19
>
> So maybe you just need to wait for Centos
I thought, I have just recompiled by rpmbuild -ba samba3x.spec. However I
have recognized libcap.so.2 has included instead of libcap.so.1 on my build
system. This is the main difference between ldd outputs of smbd binaries.
I will check further.
Regards,
--
Oguz YILMAZ
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 23:42 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Sunday 28 November 2010 22:40:41 brett mm wrote:
>> > > This is where, as a sysadmin, you need to invest just a little time
>> and effort learning the system. Honestly, the vast majority of issues
>> > In
Has anyone worked with the upstream installation for 5.5, and successfully
told it to ->shut up<- when you pull your smart card out of the reader?
Since you can't add parms in /etc/reader.conf, or in a file in
/etc/reader.conf.d, I tried editing /etc/init.d/pcscd to tell it error
level and above lo
On 11/29/2010 7:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> Even if it is *possible*, the traditional UNIX permissions are a serious
> *PAIN*. If you want two users to have rw- to a file you... create a
> group of two users???
Yes, there is nothing simpler than a group to represent a group of users.
I'd like to get disk I/O down to a minimum for my new Centos
5.5 installation.
The machine will not be used as a web server anymore, as
that's now hosted on a cloud platform. So there are no HTTP
requests coming down the line.
If I move the SWAP partition and /var/log/ to a small spare
drive,
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 7:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>
>> Even if it is *possible*, the traditional UNIX permissions are a serious
>> *PAIN*. If you want two users to have rw- to a file you... create a
>> group of two users???
>
> Yes, there is nothing si
On Nov 29, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 7:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>
>> Even if it is *possible*, the traditional UNIX permissions are a
>> serious
>> *PAIN*. If you want two users to have rw- to a file you... create a
>> group of two users???
>
> Yes, there
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:39:22 am Bob McConnell wrote:
> Maybe not, but the risks should be evaluated on a case by case basis. I
> don't believe it can be considered a panacea either. Even with SE in
> full protected mode, a simple SQL injection flaw can still expose much
> of the sensiti
This is perhaps a more general security question. For those of you with a
directory services installation, do you install a generic local user with
sudo access in case directory services is not available? Or do you just
beef up your directory services to the point that you are confident it will
a
On 11/28/2010 05:13 PM William Hooper wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:00 PM, ken wrote:
>>> You need to take a closer look at what yum is trying to install. This
>>> message is telling you yum won't update the package because it will
>>> break a dependency on another installed package.
>> yum'
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:37:29 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> But that means you were running software with vulnerabilities or a user would
> not be able to become root anyway. Is that due to not being up to date (i.e.
> would normal, non-SELinux measures have been enough), or was this before a
I have successfully created a packaged version of openssh that has
the LPK patch. LPK allows you to store your public keys in LDAP.
However when I go to install the package I created it complains about
dependencies:
[r...@virtcent13:/home/bluethundr/rpm]#rpm -Uvh openssh-5.6p1-1.i386.rpm
error:
On 11/29/2010 10:17 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:37:29 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
>> But that means you were running software with vulnerabilities or a user would
>> not be able to become root anyway. Is that due to not being up to date (i.e.
>> would normal, non-SELinux mea
On 11/28/2010 05:16 PM William Hooper wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, William Hooper
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:00 PM, ken wrote:
You need to take a closer look at what yum is trying to
install. This message is telling you yum won't update the
package because
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 05:40:41 pm brett mm wrote:
> In reality, I am not at all sure that a quantum leap in complexity
> adds to security at all. Any proper use of old-school group
> permissions can give as finely-grained a security policy as you would
> like.
No, it won't.
Suppose I'm run
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 10:17 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:37:29 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> How much 3rd party software do you run where someone else has not
> already spent the time to work out the policies needed to let it work?
And how much in-house develo
When you built openssh, didn't it also build the openssh-clients and
openssh-server RPMs? You should install them at the same in the same
transaction with your version of openssh:
rpm -Uvh openssh*-5.6p1-1.i386.rpm
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, bluethundr wrote:
> I have successfully crea
On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:29:31 am Les Mikesell wrote:
> Agreed, but not everyone has time to do both - or to learn lots of
> distribution-specific details in mixed environments. My opinion is that
> doing the simple stuff first is a win. And that works the same on
> systems that don't i
At Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:23:03 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I have successfully created a packaged version of openssh that has
> the LPK patch. LPK allows you to store your public keys in LDAP.
> However when I go to install the package I created it complains about
> dependencies:
>
>
Good day,
Gparted is not available on my installation.
Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5 please.
Thanks
Johan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Sounds great guys!! on it!!! :)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:23:03 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have successfully created a packaged version of openssh that has
>> the LPK patch. LPK allows you to store your public keys in LDA
I would suggest looking at articles that focus on laptop power
consumption, they typically have a section dedicated to disk accesses
and how to spin the disk down as much as possible since this has
traditionally been one of the better ways to minimize power consumption
on a laptop.
This article ha
At Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:49 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Good day,
>
> Gparted is not available on my installation.
>
> Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5 please.
fdisk, sfdisk, parted, kpartx, and pyparted.
fdisk is not recomended for really large disks since it only h
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> To: centos
> From: Johan Scheepers
> Subject: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - which partition manager installed
>
> Good day,
>
> Gparted is not available on my installation.
>
> Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5 please.
Hi Johan.
It's availabl
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Gparted is not available on my installation.
>
> Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5 please.
>
> Thanks
> Johan
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://li
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Blake Hudson wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Blake Hudson
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Minimising disk I/O
>
> I would suggest looking at articles that focus on laptop power
> consumption, they typically have a section dedicated to disk accesses
> and how to spin the di
> fdisk, sfdisk, parted, kpartx, and pyparted.
>
> fdisk is not recomended for really large disks since it only handles
> DOS partition tables -- use parted to create GPT partition tables.
I prefer GPT fdisk for that and rolled my own rpm ...
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:49 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> Good day,
>>
>> Gparted is not available on my installation.
>>
>> Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5 please.
>
> fdisk, sfdisk, parted, kpartx, and pyparted.
>
> fdisk is not recomended for
Lars Hecking wrote:
>> fdisk, sfdisk, parted, kpartx, and pyparted.
>>
>> fdisk is not recomended for really large disks since it only handles
>> DOS partition tables -- use parted to create GPT partition tables.
>
> I prefer GPT fdisk for that and rolled my own rpm ...
>
>
>
> --
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Johan Scheepers
> wrote:
>> Good day,
>>
>> Gparted is not available on my installation.
>>
>> Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5 please.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Johan
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing li
Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Johan Scheepers wrote:
>
>> To: centos
>> From: Johan Scheepers
>> Subject: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - which partition manager installed
>>
>> Good day,
>>
>> Gparted is not available on my installation.
>>
>> Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5
On 11/29/2010 10:52 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:29:31 am Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Agreed, but not everyone has time to do both - or to learn lots of
>> distribution-specific details in mixed environments. My opinion is that
>> doing the simple stuff first is a win. And t
On 11/29/2010 07:38 AM giggzounet wrote:
> Le 29/11/2010 12:44, Gabriel Tabares a écrit :
>>> ...
>
> where in the rpm package can I find if the file is a configuration file
> or not ?
This will list configuration files for an installed $package:
rpm -Vv $package 2>&1|grep -e ^" c"
___
On 11/29/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> How much 3rd party software do you run where someone else has not
>> already spent the time to work out the policies needed to let it work?
>
> And how much in-house developed software do you run? Or, about those 3rd
> party software, do you run
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 08:13 -0800, Iain Morris wrote:
> This is perhaps a more general security question. For those of you
> with a directory services installation, do you install a generic local
> user with sudo access in case directory services is not available?
Yes, always.
> Or do you just b
On 11/29/2010 10:40 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Sunday, November 28, 2010 05:40:41 pm brett mm wrote:
>> In reality, I am not at all sure that a quantum leap in complexity
>> adds to security at all. Any proper use of old-school group
>> permissions can give as finely-grained a security policy as yo
I've added a second IDE card to my system on the PCI bus,
and added a small HDD on the Primary Master port for that
IDE card.
This drive shows up using the Gparted live CD as /dev/hde
Which sounds about right.
The other drives show up as /dev/hda (Primary Master) and
/dev/hdc (Secondary Master
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have what appears to be a truly puzzling problem. I've got this P4
> 32-bit machine running CentOS 5.5 with XEN that has two NICs: one
> onboard, an Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit and one on an expansion
> card, Realtek Semi
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:13 AM, ken wrote:
> The key to the puzzle for me was that, to install gmime20, it was
> necessary to remove gmime. I never would have guessed that... seems
> counter-intuitive to me... and the only way to find that out is to look
> in the spec file!! Or is there an
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:33 AM, ken wrote:
> Where was a message telling me that? (In my original post I included
> the relevant output.) There wasn't anything there which said the
> install of gmime20 necessitated removing another, different package.
I'll try to explain, but part of it just
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:29:31 am Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Agreed, but not everyone has time to do both - or to learn lots of
>> distribution-specific details in mixed environments. My opinion is that
>> doing the simple stuff first is a win. And that works the same on
>>
Anyone got this working over a LAN under CentOS?
The instructions claim it is easy to connect
after pressing the WPS button on printer and router.
Sadly, I don't see a WPS button on my Linksys WRT54GL router.
When I press the WPS button on the printer
the WiFi icon flashes,
but I don't see any att
2010/11/29 Timothy Murphy :
> Anyone got this working over a LAN under CentOS?
> The instructions claim it is easy to connect
> after pressing the WPS button on printer and router.
>
> Sadly, I don't see a WPS button on my Linksys WRT54GL router.
> When I press the WPS button on the printer
> the W
On 11/29/10 11:50 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Anyone got this working over a LAN under CentOS?
> The instructions claim it is easy to connect
> after pressing the WPS button on printer and router.
>
> Sadly, I don't see a WPS button on my Linksys WRT54GL router.
thats not going to do anything if y
Hey list,
I actually got the spec for openssh-lpk to build... however for some
reason at this point it is ONLY building SRPMs... no idea why yet but
i am plugging away at this.. I could use a spare set of eyes on this
if you can spare them...
spec file is enclosed...
thanks!!
On Mon, Nov 29
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:50:45PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Anyone got this working over a LAN under CentOS?
> The instructions claim it is easy to connect
> after pressing the WPS button on printer and router.
>
> Sadly, I don't see a WPS button on my Linksys WRT54GL router.
I'm not at hom
using this command, sorry I forgot to include that..
[make...@virtcent15 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba openssh-lpk.spec
and here's the tail end of the output:
PAM is enabled. You may need to install a PAM control file
for sshd, otherwise password authentication may fail.
Example PAM control files can be
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:39 PM, ken wrote:
> rpm -Vv $package 2>&1|grep -e ^" c"
Or the slightly easier (and per the rpm documentation)
rpm -qc packagename
HTH
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=ASC&topic_id=19571&forum=40#forumpost73378
>
> Looks like there is a whole special repo for this sort of drivers. Has
> anybody used it? How is it?
Elrepo is trustworthy.
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 11/22/2010 02:21 PM:
> Anyone working with/using it? One thing that's driving me nuts is that it
> keeps spitting garbage into the logs (card absent or mute!!!). I just
> tried editing /etc/init.d/pcscd - there's *no* way to pass parms from the
> config file - and set the
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:38 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> All of the third-party software I run seems to run just fine, as long as the
>> right contexts are applied.
>
> Well, obviously it will work after someone takes the time to make it
> work. Now it is your turn to quantify: How much w
On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:58 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> You end up with a zillion groups - which is
>>> pointless and unmaintainable. Thank goodness for ACL support and
>>> setfacl/getfacl.
>>
>> So what do you do when you have user-specific ACLs splattered randomly
>> through the f
On 30 November 2010 09:03, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:58 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
You end up with a zillion groups - which is
pointless and unmaintainable. Thank goodness for ACL support and
setfacl/getfacl.
>>>
>>> So what do you do when you
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 02:35 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 10:40 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Sunday, November 28, 2010 05:40:41 pm brett mm wrote:
>>> In reality, I am not at all sure that a quantum leap in complexity
>>> adds to security at all. Any proper use of old-school group
On 11/29/2010 04:29 PM Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:39 PM, ken wrote:
>
>> rpm -Vv $package 2>&1|grep -e ^" c"
>
> Or the slightly easier (and per the rpm documentation)
>
> rpm -qc packagename
>
> HTH
"rpm -qvc $package" gives more info-- the files' permissions and
On 11/29/2010 4:09 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
In reality, I am not at all sure that a quantum leap in complexity
adds to security at all. Any proper use of old-school group
permissions can give as finely-grained a security policy as you would
like.
>>>
>>> No, it won't.
>>>
>
Todd Denniston wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 11/22/2010 02:21 PM:
>> Anyone working with/using it? One thing that's driving me nuts is that
>> it keeps spitting garbage into the logs (card absent or mute!!!). I just
>> tried editing /etc/init.d/pcscd - there's *no* way to pass parms from
>> t
On 11/29/2010 05:09 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Hurrah! That's it! Just move the problem elsewhere. Oh, you snipped out
> a bit too much. Write access is not just the problem. Being able to
> upload and execute is also a problem. Can you say 'bot'?
What we've done at my place of employment for
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 11/29/2010 05:20 PM:
> Todd Denniston wrote:
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 11/22/2010 02:21 PM:
>>> Anyone working with/using it? One thing that's driving me nuts is that
>>> it keeps spitting garbage into the logs (card absent or mute!!!). I just
>>> tried editing /etc/i
- Original Message -
From: "Max Hetrick"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:51 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
> On 11/29/2010 05:09 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>> Hurrah! That's it! Just move the problem elsewhere.
- Original Message -
From: "Les Mikesell"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
> On 11/29/2010 4:09 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> If you don't trust your software, run it under a uid that doesn't have
>>
On 11/29/10 8:10 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>> Yes, if you are concerned about security of certain files it is indeed a
>> good idea to run software you don't trust elsewhere. And if the problem
>> is not trusting software, why are you putting blind faith in the SELinux
>> code?
>
> Oh certainl
Lamar Owen wrote:
> With SELinux I can set files and whole hierachies to not allow Acrobat
> Reader access of various types, while still alllowing access to those
> areas it needs. Voila! Acrobat Reader vulnerabilities and the PDF's
> that exploit them no longer have any power to exploit my syst
Christopher Chan wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> >> All of the third-party software I run seems to run just fine, as long as
> >> the right contexts are applied.
> >
> > Well, obviously it will work after someone takes the time to make it
> > work. Now it is your turn to quantify: How much wou
- Original Message -
From:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> >> All of the third-party software I run seems to run just fine, as long
>> >> as the right contexts are applied.
>> >
>> > Well, obviously it will work after someone takes the time to make it
>> > work.
On 11/29/10, John Doe wrote:
> Here is "The Power of CentOS"!!! (in approximately 3 minutes...)
>
> cat edit.txt | while read LINE; do
> echo "$LINE" | grep -q '>\.\.'
> if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
> LOGFILE=`echo $LINE | cut -d' ' -f1`.log
> else
> echo "$LINE" >> $LOGFILE
> fi
> done
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> Even if it is *possible*, the traditional UNIX permissions are a serious
> *PAIN*. If you want two users to have rw- to a file you... create a
> group of two users??? You end up with a zillion groups - which is
> pointless and unmai
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Johan Scheepers
wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Gparted is not available on my installation.
>
> Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5 please.
>
> Thanks
> Johan
gparted is just the "Gnome" GUI for parted. "parted" works very well
at the command line, and has opt
91 matches
Mail list logo
